Wordsmith Workshop
Photo
The table compares how much money ( in million dollars) was invested to second world countries by the USA, EU and other states between 2006 and 2010. Overall, the USA gave significantly higher monetary aid compared to EU and other countries. However, they all constantly increased financial support year by year, with an only exception of 2009 when all the given investors slightly reduced their funding.
In initial two years, total 15.7 and 17.6 million dollars were given to developing countries, with the USA constituting more than half of these sums ( 9.8 in 2006 and 11million dollars in 2007). The rest of these investments was covered by EU and other counties, sharing almost equal 3.1 / 2.8 and 3.4/ 3.2 million dollars respectively. In 2008, the amount of donation was significant, with 24.4 million dollars in a year. While 3.9 and 3.5 million dollars were given by EU and other countries, 17 million dollars investment was from the USA.
2009, however, was an exceptional year during the entire period as all countries declined financial support. Altogether 23.5 million dollars were given to developing counties. 16,7 millions of this amount was given by the USA and almost 3,5 millions equally from the rest given investors. At the end of the given period, 20.3 , 4.1, and 3.7 million dollars were given respectively by the USA, EU and other countries.
In initial two years, total 15.7 and 17.6 million dollars were given to developing countries, with the USA constituting more than half of these sums ( 9.8 in 2006 and 11million dollars in 2007). The rest of these investments was covered by EU and other counties, sharing almost equal 3.1 / 2.8 and 3.4/ 3.2 million dollars respectively. In 2008, the amount of donation was significant, with 24.4 million dollars in a year. While 3.9 and 3.5 million dollars were given by EU and other countries, 17 million dollars investment was from the USA.
2009, however, was an exceptional year during the entire period as all countries declined financial support. Altogether 23.5 million dollars were given to developing counties. 16,7 millions of this amount was given by the USA and almost 3,5 millions equally from the rest given investors. At the end of the given period, 20.3 , 4.1, and 3.7 million dollars were given respectively by the USA, EU and other countries.
🔥1🕊1
Forwarded from CDI REPORT
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
2❤1🕊1
CDI REPORT
The two pictures compare two tunnels in different Australian cities. The comparison involves length, depth, design of the tunnel together with its construction date and cost. Overall, except the design of the tunnels, tunnel B dominated regarding all categories given as its construction cost is higher and have been built recently.
When it comes to Tunnel A, it is and underwater link of two sides of a lake. It was constructed between 1987 and 1992, requiring total 556 million dollars during this process. It is 25 meters below ground level and lengthens 2.2 kilometers. Twin tube design was used in this tunnel making the traffic flow more easier as the result.
Tunnel B, on the other hand, is not under water - just links one part of the city with another, yet twin tube design was used here as well. Its construction required 1.1 billion dollars with three year infrastructure procedure from 2004. It is rather deeper with 35 meters and cover more area (3.6 kilometres).
When it comes to Tunnel A, it is and underwater link of two sides of a lake. It was constructed between 1987 and 1992, requiring total 556 million dollars during this process. It is 25 meters below ground level and lengthens 2.2 kilometers. Twin tube design was used in this tunnel making the traffic flow more easier as the result.
Tunnel B, on the other hand, is not under water - just links one part of the city with another, yet twin tube design was used here as well. Its construction required 1.1 billion dollars with three year infrastructure procedure from 2004. It is rather deeper with 35 meters and cover more area (3.6 kilometres).
1🔥2🕊2
The golden rule of the passanger!
Whenever the driver is sleepy you must talk to live😂😂
This is fight for life
Whenever the driver is sleepy you must talk to live😂😂
This is fight for life
1🤣7😁5👍1
Wordsmith Workshop
The golden rule of the passanger! Whenever the driver is sleepy you must talk to live😂😂 This is fight for life
As a secondary option 🤦♂️
1🤣5👏3
Forwarded from CDI REPORT
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
CDI REPORT
The table compares seven most visited destinations by Australians in 1999 and after a decade. Overall, the number of Australians travelling to the given countries increased significantly in each destination case. Despite this figures, the consecutiveness of which the most popular to the least popular remained unchanged, with New Zealand and Chine at the beginning and end of the table respectively.
As for the three most common tourist destinations for Australians, in 1999, 500700 people planned their tour to New Zealand and this figure increased to over a million (1.064.000) in the next given year. To the UK and the USA, 400 and 300 thousand Australians respectively organized their trip which are 60% and 30% lower compared to the number of people visited there in 2009.
The growth of tourism with Australian- origin people was, also, noticeable in Indonesia, Fiji and Japan where figures showed 127%, 114% and 150% increase to 340, 257, and 250 thousands. China, particularly, experienced the highest growth in this category of tourism as the figure ascended from 86,000 to 300,000 (249 % jump)
As for the three most common tourist destinations for Australians, in 1999, 500700 people planned their tour to New Zealand and this figure increased to over a million (1.064.000) in the next given year. To the UK and the USA, 400 and 300 thousand Australians respectively organized their trip which are 60% and 30% lower compared to the number of people visited there in 2009.
The growth of tourism with Australian- origin people was, also, noticeable in Indonesia, Fiji and Japan where figures showed 127%, 114% and 150% increase to 340, 257, and 250 thousands. China, particularly, experienced the highest growth in this category of tourism as the figure ascended from 86,000 to 300,000 (249 % jump)
1🔥2❤1
Wordsmith Workshop
The table compares seven most visited destinations by Australians in 1999 and after a decade. Overall, the number of Australians travelling to the given countries increased significantly in each destination case. Despite this figures, the consecutiveness of…
Seems a bit technical for me
1
Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods. Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Environmental problems are attracting both governmental and international organizations more than ever before, such as in the case of packaging which has become a topic of discussion recently. While some people consider certain people like producers and business owners are exclusively responsible regarding this issue because of the power and finance they posses, others think public opinion can make a turning point here. Personally, they had better work on collaboration to reach effective measures.
From one perspective, manufacturers and markets,indeed, seems need to shoulder more responsibility regarding environmental pollution coming with excessive use of packaging. Initially, they have power to change public opinion about using plastic bags dramatically using various ways of marketing. Discounting strategy can be one of ultimate solution they could offer. Whenever they promote unpackaged goods or eco-friendly bags with discounts, consumers commence to utilize these sort of products to save their budget simultaneously preventing environmental pollution unconsciously.
Another effective, yet less economic way for companies, is complete removal of plastic packaging from their goods. Plastic packaging is the cheapest option for companies as at most the plastic they use comes from recycling and does not require much effort and investment to design them for their product. If they do not use this methods they have number of innovative ways to package their product in an eco-friendly ways. Single-use paper packaging - common packaging type in Germany and Japan- is an example in point where environmental pollution significantly reduced after transformation to this method.
Notwithstanding these arguments, general public is always the consumers to make final decisions regarding packaging. They always have the power to alter the situation unless government or companies want eco-friendly packaging. They could boycott companies or demand less environmentally damaging products for their daily use. In this case producers have no option but to adjust consumer needs in order not to loose consumers and reputation in the market consequently. Famous bakery company in Uzbekistan - Safia - is what begun introducing paper packaging after public request.
Above mentioned arguments mean both companies and public can make a change regarding packaging of goods. Yet without the positive reaction of one side to the shift, there could not be any solutions. For example, unless consumers stop using convenient and multiple use plastic packaging, there is no point in introducing eco-friendly bags. The same scenario is true for companies because there are always someone to buy the product either with packages or not.
In conclusion, consumer-company collaboration is the best way tackle issues related to packaging because they hold equal weights in the scale to solve the issue.
4🔥4⚡3👍1
✅ Writing Time
✍️ Below is a handy list of words that are both useful and appropriate to academic language😊
🔷️ Describing similarities
-Likewise
-Correspondingly
-Equally
-Not only… but also
-In the same way
-Similarly
🔷️ Showing cause and effect
-Consequently
-As a result
-Thus
-Hence (never ‘hence why’)
-Since (try to avoid ‘as’ when showing cause and effect)
-Because
-Therefore
-Accordingly
-This suggests that
-It follows that
-For this reason
🔷️ Comparing and contrasting
-Alternatively
-However
-Conversely
-On the other hand
-Instead
-Yet
-On the contrary
🔷️ Showing limitation or contradiction
-Despite/in spite of
-While (not whilst!)
-Even so
-On the contrary
-Nevertheless
-Nonetheless
-Although
-Admittedly
✍️ Below is a handy list of words that are both useful and appropriate to academic language😊
🔷️ Describing similarities
-Likewise
-Correspondingly
-Equally
-Not only… but also
-In the same way
-Similarly
🔷️ Showing cause and effect
-Consequently
-As a result
-Thus
-Hence (never ‘hence why’)
-Since (try to avoid ‘as’ when showing cause and effect)
-Because
-Therefore
-Accordingly
-This suggests that
-It follows that
-For this reason
🔷️ Comparing and contrasting
-Alternatively
-However
-Conversely
-On the other hand
-Instead
-Yet
-On the contrary
🔷️ Showing limitation or contradiction
-Despite/in spite of
-While (not whilst!)
-Even so
-On the contrary
-Nevertheless
-Nonetheless
-Although
-Admittedly
2👍1🔥1