Wordsmith Workshop
Photo
The picture illustrates the process through which olive oil is produced. Overall, this process is sophisticated consisting of three stages and seven steps requiring both manual labor and and special equipment in certain steps.
In the first stage, ripe olive are picked out by hand in order not to damage the beans. This is followed by rinsing them with cold water before they are sent to the smashing pot by conveyor belt.
In the next stage, olive stones and olive paste is separated from smashed olive. While olive stones are ready for consumption, olive paste can be processed again. Bottled olive pastes is brought to pressing step with the use of bags with holes.
Having been pressed, olive is ready for the next step which involves separating oil and water. After this ready Olive oil is either sent to storage or immediately to the storage.
In the first stage, ripe olive are picked out by hand in order not to damage the beans. This is followed by rinsing them with cold water before they are sent to the smashing pot by conveyor belt.
In the next stage, olive stones and olive paste is separated from smashed olive. While olive stones are ready for consumption, olive paste can be processed again. Bottled olive pastes is brought to pressing step with the use of bags with holes.
Having been pressed, olive is ready for the next step which involves separating oil and water. After this ready Olive oil is either sent to storage or immediately to the storage.
1🕊1
Some ex-prisoners commit crimes after being released from prison. What do you think is the cause? How can it be solved?
Imprisonment is not always an ultimate rehabilitation process as it is an often case ex-prisoners commit crimes again after their release. In my opinion, social isolation and environmental gap are the main drivers urging them to reoffend, yet there are certain actions to be taken both during and after incarceration to prevent recidivism.
There are myriad of reasons why ex-criminals reoffend after their release, with social isolation being the primary of them. In most societies, whether a person committed a crime or not critically matters in his social life and career since people’s belief towards a person with criminal record erodes regardless that individual understand his mistake or not. Consequently, this ex-offender is socially isolated as people hesitate to build relations with him. The same scenario happens regarding ex-prisoners’ employment status as both governmental organizations and private entities prioritize individuals with no criminal history as ex-prisoners are believed to hinder social and market status of the company. In this case, ex-offenders have no other choice than committing crime again.
Environmental gap is another significant factor why ex-prisoners cannot adjust to ordinary lifestyle and go back to their prison cell again. The reason is that social norms noticeably varies before and after the imprisonment which worsens rehabilitation process of ex-criminals. The more sentence duration the harder it becomes for ex- offenders to reintegrate into society. In most countries, however, rehabilitation process continues exclusively during imprisonment which is why re-offence occurs because of maladjustment.
When it comes to the solutions of these problems, from my perspective, both during the imprisonment and upon release, the rehabilitation should be long- term drawn process and never be seen as an event. Rather than approaching this process as a punishment, during sentence period, mental treatments should be applied in the ways of psychological lesson of how toxic committing crime is. After release, community members and family should accept ex-offender as a reformed individual nor a criminal again and local authority has utmost importance on attitude shift of general public towards ex-offender.
In conclusion, social gap and isolation are main to blame on re-offence of ex-criminal, yet this could be solved by collective actions by the government and the public.
1🔥1👏1🕊1
Wordsmith Workshop
Photo
The table compares how much money ( in million dollars) was invested to second world countries by the USA, EU and other states between 2006 and 2010. Overall, the USA gave significantly higher monetary aid compared to EU and other countries. However, they all constantly increased financial support year by year, with an only exception of 2009 when all the given investors slightly reduced their funding.
In initial two years, total 15.7 and 17.6 million dollars were given to developing countries, with the USA constituting more than half of these sums ( 9.8 in 2006 and 11million dollars in 2007). The rest of these investments was covered by EU and other counties, sharing almost equal 3.1 / 2.8 and 3.4/ 3.2 million dollars respectively. In 2008, the amount of donation was significant, with 24.4 million dollars in a year. While 3.9 and 3.5 million dollars were given by EU and other countries, 17 million dollars investment was from the USA.
2009, however, was an exceptional year during the entire period as all countries declined financial support. Altogether 23.5 million dollars were given to developing counties. 16,7 millions of this amount was given by the USA and almost 3,5 millions equally from the rest given investors. At the end of the given period, 20.3 , 4.1, and 3.7 million dollars were given respectively by the USA, EU and other countries.
In initial two years, total 15.7 and 17.6 million dollars were given to developing countries, with the USA constituting more than half of these sums ( 9.8 in 2006 and 11million dollars in 2007). The rest of these investments was covered by EU and other counties, sharing almost equal 3.1 / 2.8 and 3.4/ 3.2 million dollars respectively. In 2008, the amount of donation was significant, with 24.4 million dollars in a year. While 3.9 and 3.5 million dollars were given by EU and other countries, 17 million dollars investment was from the USA.
2009, however, was an exceptional year during the entire period as all countries declined financial support. Altogether 23.5 million dollars were given to developing counties. 16,7 millions of this amount was given by the USA and almost 3,5 millions equally from the rest given investors. At the end of the given period, 20.3 , 4.1, and 3.7 million dollars were given respectively by the USA, EU and other countries.
🔥1🕊1
Forwarded from CDI REPORT
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
2❤1🕊1
CDI REPORT
The two pictures compare two tunnels in different Australian cities. The comparison involves length, depth, design of the tunnel together with its construction date and cost. Overall, except the design of the tunnels, tunnel B dominated regarding all categories given as its construction cost is higher and have been built recently.
When it comes to Tunnel A, it is and underwater link of two sides of a lake. It was constructed between 1987 and 1992, requiring total 556 million dollars during this process. It is 25 meters below ground level and lengthens 2.2 kilometers. Twin tube design was used in this tunnel making the traffic flow more easier as the result.
Tunnel B, on the other hand, is not under water - just links one part of the city with another, yet twin tube design was used here as well. Its construction required 1.1 billion dollars with three year infrastructure procedure from 2004. It is rather deeper with 35 meters and cover more area (3.6 kilometres).
When it comes to Tunnel A, it is and underwater link of two sides of a lake. It was constructed between 1987 and 1992, requiring total 556 million dollars during this process. It is 25 meters below ground level and lengthens 2.2 kilometers. Twin tube design was used in this tunnel making the traffic flow more easier as the result.
Tunnel B, on the other hand, is not under water - just links one part of the city with another, yet twin tube design was used here as well. Its construction required 1.1 billion dollars with three year infrastructure procedure from 2004. It is rather deeper with 35 meters and cover more area (3.6 kilometres).
1🔥2🕊2
The golden rule of the passanger!
Whenever the driver is sleepy you must talk to live😂😂
This is fight for life
Whenever the driver is sleepy you must talk to live😂😂
This is fight for life
1🤣7😁5👍1
Wordsmith Workshop
The golden rule of the passanger! Whenever the driver is sleepy you must talk to live😂😂 This is fight for life
As a secondary option 🤦♂️
1🤣5👏3
Forwarded from CDI REPORT
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
CDI REPORT
The table compares seven most visited destinations by Australians in 1999 and after a decade. Overall, the number of Australians travelling to the given countries increased significantly in each destination case. Despite this figures, the consecutiveness of which the most popular to the least popular remained unchanged, with New Zealand and Chine at the beginning and end of the table respectively.
As for the three most common tourist destinations for Australians, in 1999, 500700 people planned their tour to New Zealand and this figure increased to over a million (1.064.000) in the next given year. To the UK and the USA, 400 and 300 thousand Australians respectively organized their trip which are 60% and 30% lower compared to the number of people visited there in 2009.
The growth of tourism with Australian- origin people was, also, noticeable in Indonesia, Fiji and Japan where figures showed 127%, 114% and 150% increase to 340, 257, and 250 thousands. China, particularly, experienced the highest growth in this category of tourism as the figure ascended from 86,000 to 300,000 (249 % jump)
As for the three most common tourist destinations for Australians, in 1999, 500700 people planned their tour to New Zealand and this figure increased to over a million (1.064.000) in the next given year. To the UK and the USA, 400 and 300 thousand Australians respectively organized their trip which are 60% and 30% lower compared to the number of people visited there in 2009.
The growth of tourism with Australian- origin people was, also, noticeable in Indonesia, Fiji and Japan where figures showed 127%, 114% and 150% increase to 340, 257, and 250 thousands. China, particularly, experienced the highest growth in this category of tourism as the figure ascended from 86,000 to 300,000 (249 % jump)
1🔥2❤1
Wordsmith Workshop
The table compares seven most visited destinations by Australians in 1999 and after a decade. Overall, the number of Australians travelling to the given countries increased significantly in each destination case. Despite this figures, the consecutiveness of…
Seems a bit technical for me
1
Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods. Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Environmental problems are attracting both governmental and international organizations more than ever before, such as in the case of packaging which has become a topic of discussion recently. While some people consider certain people like producers and business owners are exclusively responsible regarding this issue because of the power and finance they posses, others think public opinion can make a turning point here. Personally, they had better work on collaboration to reach effective measures.
From one perspective, manufacturers and markets,indeed, seems need to shoulder more responsibility regarding environmental pollution coming with excessive use of packaging. Initially, they have power to change public opinion about using plastic bags dramatically using various ways of marketing. Discounting strategy can be one of ultimate solution they could offer. Whenever they promote unpackaged goods or eco-friendly bags with discounts, consumers commence to utilize these sort of products to save their budget simultaneously preventing environmental pollution unconsciously.
Another effective, yet less economic way for companies, is complete removal of plastic packaging from their goods. Plastic packaging is the cheapest option for companies as at most the plastic they use comes from recycling and does not require much effort and investment to design them for their product. If they do not use this methods they have number of innovative ways to package their product in an eco-friendly ways. Single-use paper packaging - common packaging type in Germany and Japan- is an example in point where environmental pollution significantly reduced after transformation to this method.
Notwithstanding these arguments, general public is always the consumers to make final decisions regarding packaging. They always have the power to alter the situation unless government or companies want eco-friendly packaging. They could boycott companies or demand less environmentally damaging products for their daily use. In this case producers have no option but to adjust consumer needs in order not to loose consumers and reputation in the market consequently. Famous bakery company in Uzbekistan - Safia - is what begun introducing paper packaging after public request.
Above mentioned arguments mean both companies and public can make a change regarding packaging of goods. Yet without the positive reaction of one side to the shift, there could not be any solutions. For example, unless consumers stop using convenient and multiple use plastic packaging, there is no point in introducing eco-friendly bags. The same scenario is true for companies because there are always someone to buy the product either with packages or not.
In conclusion, consumer-company collaboration is the best way tackle issues related to packaging because they hold equal weights in the scale to solve the issue.
4🔥4⚡3👍1