ViewPdf (14).pdf
5.6 MB
विज्ञापन संख्या-08-परीक्षा/2026, आबकारी सिपाही मुख्य परीक्षा (प्रा0अ0प0-2025)/09 का विज्ञापन ।
Total Post-722
UPSSSC New Vacancy 💐✅
Total Post-722
UPSSSC New Vacancy 💐✅
🤯7❤1
The StudyWin1: Ragini Ma'am UPPcs Ro/Aro UPsssc
Ye issues to dekhne ko mila hai UPPcs 2024 result mei
ये समझ आया या समझाया जाए?
🙏12👏3
Things are really shocking that we received regarding the UPPCS 2024 result and mains copy evaluation.
All this is from those who actually evaluated copies and told exact things. Though we have verified it once through “word of mouth” by trusting them. If it looks reliable, we will share it here too deeper details. It is very unfortunate to see what the commission has done in the mains copy evaluation of 2024.
People, even from rural inter colleges who don’t even know what is meant by the topic “Emotional Intelligence,” have checked copies. AI model answers were given to evaluators. It took a lot of time due to digitally scanned copies. Copies were around 14,000 × 8 = 1,12,000 (1 lakh 12 thousand).
They gave very good marks in the initial copies and took 6 months to evaluate the first 40% of copies. When pressure increased, they evaluated the remaining 60% copies in just 40 days to publish results. Don’t ask about the quality of evaluators.Many could not even properly see even after using spectacles. Did like UP board answer evaluation. Some insiders have confirmed same.
Overall, it is debated, and the same is reflected in the results. It is like this: There are 6 series of roll numbers: 00 to 05.
00, 01 series – 4,927 wrote mains and 440 people were finally selected. And surprisingly, 26 out of 37 SDMs and 12 out of 17 DSPs are from these 2 series, with such a high success rate.(looks all got good marks)
02, 03, 04, 05 series – 10,149 people wrote mains, and 492 were finally selected. Most of them are in lower category posts. Only 11 SDMs and 5 DSPs from 10,149.
Is this coincidence or carelessness in evaluation? However, in prelims results (machine-based), pure proportionality is there in all series—why not in mains?
We understood many things with proof when we talked to a few who actually evaluated copies. It won’t be good to type everything here.
Students expect better when they write every single line with effort, and then we see such evaluation (as alleged).
In one line . Even your roll number decided if u will pass your exam , whether u will become SDM or lower post or u will be out of list, as alleged. 😊
Wish Copy Gayab na Ho Mains ki. Like UPPCS -J . 2022. 😄 A Mass RTI for ans copy review (as commission gives this window) is a step to be taken . Else 2025 will see same.
All this is from those who actually evaluated copies and told exact things. Though we have verified it once through “word of mouth” by trusting them. If it looks reliable, we will share it here too deeper details. It is very unfortunate to see what the commission has done in the mains copy evaluation of 2024.
People, even from rural inter colleges who don’t even know what is meant by the topic “Emotional Intelligence,” have checked copies. AI model answers were given to evaluators. It took a lot of time due to digitally scanned copies. Copies were around 14,000 × 8 = 1,12,000 (1 lakh 12 thousand).
They gave very good marks in the initial copies and took 6 months to evaluate the first 40% of copies. When pressure increased, they evaluated the remaining 60% copies in just 40 days to publish results. Don’t ask about the quality of evaluators.Many could not even properly see even after using spectacles. Did like UP board answer evaluation. Some insiders have confirmed same.
Overall, it is debated, and the same is reflected in the results. It is like this: There are 6 series of roll numbers: 00 to 05.
00, 01 series – 4,927 wrote mains and 440 people were finally selected. And surprisingly, 26 out of 37 SDMs and 12 out of 17 DSPs are from these 2 series, with such a high success rate.(looks all got good marks)
02, 03, 04, 05 series – 10,149 people wrote mains, and 492 were finally selected. Most of them are in lower category posts. Only 11 SDMs and 5 DSPs from 10,149.
Is this coincidence or carelessness in evaluation? However, in prelims results (machine-based), pure proportionality is there in all series—why not in mains?
We understood many things with proof when we talked to a few who actually evaluated copies. It won’t be good to type everything here.
Students expect better when they write every single line with effort, and then we see such evaluation (as alleged).
In one line . Even your roll number decided if u will pass your exam , whether u will become SDM or lower post or u will be out of list, as alleged. 😊
Wish Copy Gayab na Ho Mains ki. Like UPPCS -J . 2022. 😄 A Mass RTI for ans copy review (as commission gives this window) is a step to be taken . Else 2025 will see same.
💯26❤8
🥰7🤔1
❤15🤔1