The latest study from Israel shows how effective natural immunity is. This has always been the teaching by scientists that stood up for real science. The body is the best immune factory, fastest and costs absolutely nothing with no side effects like Myocarditis and Guillaine Barre Syndrome.

The US Appeals court ruled that the FDA is not a physician to advise doctors or patients on how to treat patients. The FDA, it turns out, enjoys sovereign immunity for misinformation. This is a most bizarre law because it is expected that the scientists appointed to work for the FDA should be highly qualified and should be subjected to the same laws governing any doctor or scientist. Any doctor or scientist, who is guilty of deliberately issuing false information, like the FDA scientists did on Ivermectin, should be immediately stripped of his/her registration. The scientists working for regulatory authorities or for any company are not holy cows that they should not be accountable to the law or public.

The FDA's callous tweet, "you'll not horses" is an utterly disgusting tweet that had the highest viewership in it's history. The FDA staff gloated about the popularity of this heinous post, which is an absolute shame.
Other health authorities in the world need to take heed of the comments by the appellate judeges that regulatory authorities like the FDA have no jurisdiction over doctors in how to treat their patients.
This is particularly true when it comes to repurposed drugs.

I sincerely hope that this ruling will serve as a wake up call to all other regulatory authorities in the world, medical and hospital boards, medical doctors, who have blindly listened or adhered to the advice of regulatory authorities like FDA,AAPHRA, TGA, SAPHRA. Doctors have an inherent right to use their discretion on how to treat a patient, especially during an emergency, as enshrined in the Helsinki declaration.
Quite clearly, during Covid, all these regulatory authorities have lost the respect of the general public and, I am sure, a vast number of medical professionals around the world for going beyond their bounds of authority during the plandemic.

All of these institutions must be fully investigated for interfering with the rights of doctors on how to practice medicine; their scientists should be investigated for conflict of interest and dismissed immediately, if found guilty.

ALL HANDS ON DECK PLEASE.
Who has contacts with the press that they may attend the court case tomorrow 4-6th Sept in the High Court Pretoria? Please help then. Thank you.

There's never been a better time than now to stand up for your constitutional rights and justice.

For the sake of the children. Support #StopTheShots court case in South Africa.

4-6 September 2023

Telegram: t.me/StopTheShotsSA

What is Informed Consent?

Adverse effect survivors, funders, vaccine manufacturers, research institutions, scientists, regulators, health care workers, law workers, human rights activists, and media - take note

Topic: Overview and rationale for informed consent

Source: Informed Consent in Human Subjects Research). Office for Protection of Research Subjects, University of Southern California

✅ Sign up for more content, campaigns and resources: https://childrenshealthdefense.co.za/about-us/sign-up/

✅ Follow CHD Africa socials:
- Telegram: t.me/CHDafrica
- Twitter: twitter.com/CHD_Africa
- Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/af.childrenshealthdefense/
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CHDafricachapter/
- Rumble: https://rumble.com/user/ChildrensHealthDefenseAfrica
- Tiktok: https://tiktok.com/@chdafrica

Please inform all supporters the STS case is in Court 6B, High Court Pretoria.

Support #StopTheShots case in South Africa. 4-6 September 2023. Pretoria High Court.

I am the one and only support! 😩😩 I feel a bit what Jesus Christ felt. Giving His blood and all left him alone.

Dear STOP THE SHOTS Supporters,

The STS case was concluded in unexpected quick time. We await the verdict. 

Sorry, I cannot not give you good news. To be honest, I am very downcast, dumbstruck, heart broken, .... I can hardly believe what I witnessed today. God knows I / we tried and my conscience is clear. 

I will leave it at that and with God. He will righteously judge every word and deed. I will continue running the race He gave me. 

Thank you for all your support and prayers. You and I will need more in the days ahead and especially wisdom to DO what is needed and right. 

Kind regards, 

Faan

We are compiling a more detailed report. It will be difficult without incriminating people which we do not want to do before the verdict. I can say this, the judge was very good and fair and was searching to establish the truth. Thankfully no problem there. 🙏 Regards, Faan O

After so many lies, it's time for the truth and a major change in how we manage our health.

Please read my SECOND SUPPLEMENTARY AFFIDAVIT TO CRIMINAL CHARGES regarding the Covid kill shots updated 21 Sept. and communication with the SAPS investigating team here: https://t.me/SA_CCPAL/32/548

Exit the WHO, learn how to treat vaccine injuries.

Don't save vaccines, save lives!

Ban the defunct WHO, NOT the building blocks of life!

You may read my covering letter with the Second Supplementary Affidavit with Criminal Charges submitted to SAPS on 10 Oct. 2023 which was sent to the President, Minister of Health, DG of Health, CEO SAHPRA, DR. Crisp, etc.
Link where to read: https://t.me/SA_CCPAL/32

Here is the TRANSCRIPT OF STS COURT HEARING OF 4 Sept 2023 for an urgent interdict to stop the Covid shots. Please join the CCPAL platform with different topical groups. This is the parallel group for all legal actions
https://t.me/SA_CCPAL/32

From: Faan Oosthuizen <sdoosthuizen@xsinet.co.za>
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2023 11:24 PM
To: 'Elijah Ramonyai' <elijah@ock.co.za>; 'AEFI@health.gov.za' <AEFI@health.gov.za>; 'adr@sahpra.org.za' <adr@sahpra.org.za>; 'pvqueries@sahpra.org.za' <pvqueries@sahpra.org.za>; 'ceooffice@sahpra.org.za' <ceooffice@sahpra.org.za>; 'nicholas.crisp@health.gov.za' <nicholas.crisp@health.gov.za>; 'Boitumelo.Semete@sahpra.org.za' <Boitumelo.Semete@sahpra.org.za>; 'DG' <dg@Health.gov.za>; 'info@savic.ac.za' <info@savic.ac.za>; 'Bongani.Ngcobo@sahpra.org.za' <Bongani.Ngcobo@sahpra.org.za>; 'doctor.tshwale@health.gov.za' <doctor.tshwale@health.gov.za>; 'Thabani.mnyandu@health.gov.za' <Thabani.mnyandu@health.gov.za>; 'MajaP@health.gov.za' <MajaP@health.gov.za>; 'JNJvaccineFollowup@its.jnj.com' <JNJvaccineFollowup@its.jnj.com>; 'ZAF.AEReporting@pfizer.com' <ZAF.AEReporting@pfizer.com>; 'cmabena@justice.gov.za' <cmabena@justice.gov.za>; 'zzenani@justice.gov.za' <zzenani@justice.gov.za>; 'Junaid Mally' <junaid@ock.co.za>; 'Lufuno Makhoshi' <Lufuno.Makhoshi@health.gov.za>; 'Ditshego Molefe' <ditshego.molefe@sahpra.org.za>
Cc: 'robertrapiti@gmail.com' <robertrapiti@gmail.com>; 'info@thj-africa.org.za' <info@thj-africa.org.za>; 'Info' <info@free-the-children-now.org>; 're' <re@riekieerasmus.co.za>; 'MhlongoLanga@saps.gov.za' <MhlongoLanga@saps.gov.za>; 'KheswaMV@saps.gov.za' <KheswaMV@saps.gov.za>; 'nuus@maroelamedia.co.za' <nuus@maroelamedia.co.za>; 'Abbygail van Wyk' <abby@avwlaw.co.za>; 'Reyno De Beer' <reyno@libertyfighters.co.za>
Subject: HARASMENT ALLEGATIONS RE: SECOND SUPPLEMENTARY AFFIDAVIT WITH CRIMINAL CHARGES and NEW INFORMATION OF COVID JAB TOXICITY.

Subject: Response to Your Email - Harassment Allegations

Dear Mr. Ramonayi,

I acknowledge the receipt of your email and its contents. However, I wish to make it clear that I do not perceive my communications as harassment, nor do I intend them to be so. It is my understanding that your client, being an institution of the state, is not susceptible to harassment when receiving communications related to their official duties, which may include matters, complaints, and warnings.

My primary objective is to fulfil my ethical, professional, and moral obligations as a medical professional. I am dutifully reporting and alerting the government of my observations following the administration of COVID poison shots i.e. “vaccinations,” which I observed as having harmful and even fatal consequences. These observations are substantiated by international literature, reinforcing the validity of my concerns regarding adverse events and fatalities post-jabbing. It is imperative that I do not remain silent in light of these findings, and that I am not swayed by your threats.

In light of the foregoing, I would strongly recommend that you advise your client on the appropriate approach to address credible, factual eyewitness allegations and charges of such a serious nature. This will help them prevent further harm to recipients of your clients’ poison shots and avoid potential significant legal consequences.

Furthermore, I am of the belief that your legal threats against me in an attempt to silence my voice are not only unlawful and unconstitutional but may also be construed as an endeavour to obstruct the pursuit of justice. For your reference, I draw your attention to the information regarding SLAPP provided below.

Sincerely,

S de W Oosthuizen