Michael Sheetz on Twitter: Thread about Axiom-1 mission
https://twitter.com/thesheetztweetz/status/1391770849003417603
Submitted May 10, 2021 at 08:24PM by hitura-nobad
via reddit https://ift.tt/3uBHh0U
https://twitter.com/thesheetztweetz/status/1391770849003417603
Submitted May 10, 2021 at 08:24PM by hitura-nobad
via reddit https://ift.tt/3uBHh0U
Twitter
Michael Sheetz
NASA and Axiom Space are talking to reporters about the AX-1 mission. AX-1 is scheduled to fly four private astronauts to the ISS for eight days in January 2022, launching with SpaceX's Falcon 9 and Crew Dragon vehicles. Thread:
👍1
Starbase & Starship SN15 Flyover May 07, 2021
https://youtu.be/l2r8bGFOYYc
Submitted May 10, 2021 at 06:21PM by RGVaerial
via reddit https://ift.tt/3fckSkj
https://youtu.be/l2r8bGFOYYc
Submitted May 10, 2021 at 06:21PM by RGVaerial
via reddit https://ift.tt/3fckSkj
YouTube
SpaceX Starship SN15 & Starbase Tx Flyover (May 07, 2021)
For usage inquiries please contact us at RGVaerialPhotography@gmail.com
Support us on Patreon at: https://www.patreon.com/RGVaerial or https://www.paypal.me/RGVAerialPhotography
We are now doing weekly aerial flyovers depending on the support that we get.…
Support us on Patreon at: https://www.patreon.com/RGVaerial or https://www.paypal.me/RGVAerialPhotography
We are now doing weekly aerial flyovers depending on the support that we get.…
👍1
Forwarded from SpaceX Feed
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
First Falcon 9 first stage to complete 10 launches and landings
Source: @SpaceX
Source: @SpaceX
👍1
Effects of image stacking on Starlink satellite trails for amateur astrophotography
https://ift.tt/3o1Q7Cu
Submitted May 11, 2021 at 02:13PM by azzkicker7283
via reddit https://ift.tt/2RHBOab
https://ift.tt/3o1Q7Cu
Submitted May 11, 2021 at 02:13PM by azzkicker7283
via reddit https://ift.tt/2RHBOab
reddit
r/spacex - Effects of image stacking on Starlink satellite trails for amateur astrophotography
3,601 votes and 322 comments so far on Reddit
👍1
Forwarded from SpaceX Feed
Starship SN15 is being transported to Pad B at SpaceX Boca Chica launch site. 🤩🚀
Source: @BocaChicaGal
Source: @BocaChicaGal
👍1
Forwarded from SpaceX Feed
Starship SN15 is waiting for a lift onto the launch stand. 🤩🚀🏗
Source: @BocaChicaGal
Source: @BocaChicaGal
👍1
Building a space-based ISP - Stack Overflow Blog
https://ift.tt/2RN7vyL
Submitted May 11, 2021 at 05:06PM by condorman1024
via reddit https://ift.tt/3bBQYVN
https://ift.tt/2RN7vyL
Submitted May 11, 2021 at 05:06PM by condorman1024
via reddit https://ift.tt/3bBQYVN
Stack Overflow Blog
Network protocols in orbit: Building a space-based ISP
There are requirements that make software engineers sweat. Massive distribution to thousands of nodes. High reliability and availability. Multiple distinct platforms. Rapid network growth. This is the world SpaceX’s Starlink program, which has set a goal…
👍1
Forwarded from SpaceX Feed
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Jailbreak!
While we're all distracted by Starship SN15 waiting to be lifted back onto the launch mount, the test article in nosecone jail is making a run for it! 😅
Source: @NASASpaceflight
While we're all distracted by Starship SN15 waiting to be lifted back onto the launch mount, the test article in nosecone jail is making a run for it! 😅
Source: @NASASpaceflight
👍1
Forwarded from SpaceX Feed
SpaceX Boca Chica Build Site
~2 yr difference:
Left: March 2019, Right: May 2021
Source: @RGVaerialphotos
~2 yr difference:
Left: March 2019, Right: May 2021
Source: @RGVaerialphotos
👍1
Forwarded from SpaceX Feed
Starship’s first orbital flight is NET June 20 per FCC report!
Source: https://fcc.report/ELS/Space-Exploration-Technologies-Corp-SpaceX/0748-EX-ST-2021
Source: @spacex360
Source: https://fcc.report/ELS/Space-Exploration-Technologies-Corp-SpaceX/0748-EX-ST-2021
Source: @spacex360
👍1
Forwarded from SpaceX Feed
Starship Orbital Launch Attempt details per FCC exhibit:
- Staging 170 seconds into flight
- Booster will splashdown in the Gulf 20 miles downrange
- Starship will perform a soft landing 62 miles northwest of Kauai
https://apps.fcc.gov/els/GetAtt.html?id=273481&x=
Source: @nextspaceflight
- Staging 170 seconds into flight
- Booster will splashdown in the Gulf 20 miles downrange
- Starship will perform a soft landing 62 miles northwest of Kauai
https://apps.fcc.gov/els/GetAtt.html?id=273481&x=
Source: @nextspaceflight
👍1
Forwarded from SpaceX Feed
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
SpaceX’s fifth high-altitude flight test of Starship from Starbase in Texas
Source: @SpaceX
Source: @SpaceX
👍1
Starship Conveyor Flight System
Recently I've been trying to gain some insight into all we've heard about SpaceX plans for orbital refueling including NASA's endorsement of them for HLS Starship. Many pundits claim SpaceX will require enormous numbers of tanker flights to pull this off - but it's possible they don't have all the information...SpaceX are currently building three orbital launch sites for Starship, one on dry land at Boca Chica, Texas and another two on floating platforms, i.e. Phobos and Deimos. If the Super Heavy booster can land downrange on these platforms, that should save a significant amount of propellant (compared to returning booster to original launch site), which would allow them to haul the maximum payload possible to space, without expending the booster.If we do an ocean landing, the performance hit is actually quite small at maybe in the order of 15%. If we do a return to launch site landing, it's probably double that, it's more like a 30% hit (i.e., 30% of payload lost). ~ Elon MuskHence it’s possible SpaceX will launch from Boca Chica then land the booster downrange on Deimos, which is currently docked at Brownsville, Texas. This should allow them to launch a full stack again from Deimos and land the booster downrange on Phobos (which has already been towed from Port of Galveston, Texas to Pascagoula, Mississippi). Then the long journeyed booster could fly retrograde back to Boca Chica, ready to commence this conveyor launch process again.Elon suggests they will need to launch four tankers to refuel each Mars Starship in orbit, and this ratio will likely increase for lunar excursions, where more propellant is needed for propulsive landing. Hence a tanker could depart with a full load of propellant from Boca Chica, offload at an orbital fuel depot then land at the first link in the chain i.e. Deimos. After launching again with a full propellant load from Deimos, the tanker could visit the same fuel depot then return to Boca Chica. Overall this procedure should reduce the number of tanker flights required to fill the depot because significantly more propellant could be delivered to orbit with each tanker flight, due to a more ergonomic use of infrastructure (compared to operating from a single launch site).(How will Starships be transported to the floating platform?) They will fly there from our launch site. ~ Elon Musk ~ Elon MuskFortunately SpaceX intend to manufacture methalox propellant onboard these floating platforms, so essentially they will produce the payload required for these tanker flights in-situ. That should allow the comparatively small number of cargo and crew Starships to depart from Boca Chica, thus retaining the floating platforms for more numerous tanker flights.This improved launch efficiency might explain the rather conservative estimate for the number of tanker flights required for each Mars mission, and the feasibility of sustainable moon operations. Elon suggests it should only take 5 or 6 tankers to fully refuel Starship, which implies each tanker could deliver ~220mt to orbit, given Starship’s maximum propellant capacity of 1,200mt.Eventually this chain of launch sites might stretch all the way to the Cape to further increase launch efficiency. No doubt the FAA would want to see plenty of precision landings before they allow Starship or Super Heavy to descend over Florida - although if anyone can do it it’s SpaceX.Gotta love a joined up space effort!
Submitted May 13, 2021 at 04:20PM by CProphet
via reddit https://ift.tt/3uLXsJd
Recently I've been trying to gain some insight into all we've heard about SpaceX plans for orbital refueling including NASA's endorsement of them for HLS Starship. Many pundits claim SpaceX will require enormous numbers of tanker flights to pull this off - but it's possible they don't have all the information...SpaceX are currently building three orbital launch sites for Starship, one on dry land at Boca Chica, Texas and another two on floating platforms, i.e. Phobos and Deimos. If the Super Heavy booster can land downrange on these platforms, that should save a significant amount of propellant (compared to returning booster to original launch site), which would allow them to haul the maximum payload possible to space, without expending the booster.If we do an ocean landing, the performance hit is actually quite small at maybe in the order of 15%. If we do a return to launch site landing, it's probably double that, it's more like a 30% hit (i.e., 30% of payload lost). ~ Elon MuskHence it’s possible SpaceX will launch from Boca Chica then land the booster downrange on Deimos, which is currently docked at Brownsville, Texas. This should allow them to launch a full stack again from Deimos and land the booster downrange on Phobos (which has already been towed from Port of Galveston, Texas to Pascagoula, Mississippi). Then the long journeyed booster could fly retrograde back to Boca Chica, ready to commence this conveyor launch process again.Elon suggests they will need to launch four tankers to refuel each Mars Starship in orbit, and this ratio will likely increase for lunar excursions, where more propellant is needed for propulsive landing. Hence a tanker could depart with a full load of propellant from Boca Chica, offload at an orbital fuel depot then land at the first link in the chain i.e. Deimos. After launching again with a full propellant load from Deimos, the tanker could visit the same fuel depot then return to Boca Chica. Overall this procedure should reduce the number of tanker flights required to fill the depot because significantly more propellant could be delivered to orbit with each tanker flight, due to a more ergonomic use of infrastructure (compared to operating from a single launch site).(How will Starships be transported to the floating platform?) They will fly there from our launch site. ~ Elon Musk ~ Elon MuskFortunately SpaceX intend to manufacture methalox propellant onboard these floating platforms, so essentially they will produce the payload required for these tanker flights in-situ. That should allow the comparatively small number of cargo and crew Starships to depart from Boca Chica, thus retaining the floating platforms for more numerous tanker flights.This improved launch efficiency might explain the rather conservative estimate for the number of tanker flights required for each Mars mission, and the feasibility of sustainable moon operations. Elon suggests it should only take 5 or 6 tankers to fully refuel Starship, which implies each tanker could deliver ~220mt to orbit, given Starship’s maximum propellant capacity of 1,200mt.Eventually this chain of launch sites might stretch all the way to the Cape to further increase launch efficiency. No doubt the FAA would want to see plenty of precision landings before they allow Starship or Super Heavy to descend over Florida - although if anyone can do it it’s SpaceX.Gotta love a joined up space effort!
Submitted May 13, 2021 at 04:20PM by CProphet
via reddit https://ift.tt/3uLXsJd
NASASpaceFlight.com
SpaceX acquires former oil rigs to serve as floating Starship spaceports
SpaceX has acquired two former oil drilling rigs to serve as these floating spaceports. Named Phobos…
👍1