SpaceX standing down for today’s IFA test launch due to sustained winds and rough seas in recovery area. Window reopens tomorrow 1/19/2020 for a six-hour window starting at 8am.
https://twitter.com/spacex/status/1218473546772430848?s=21
Submitted January 18, 2020 at 11:13AM by tbcheese
via reddit https://ift.tt/2RpDZvg
https://twitter.com/spacex/status/1218473546772430848?s=21
Submitted January 18, 2020 at 11:13AM by tbcheese
via reddit https://ift.tt/2RpDZvg
Twitter
SpaceX
Standing down from today’s in-flight Crew Dragon launch escape test attempt due to sustained winds and rough seas in the recovery area. Now targeting Sunday, January 19, with a six-hour test window opening at 8:00 a.m. EST, 13:00 UTC
NASA says early March dm2 possible
https://ift.tt/374ndIR
Submitted January 18, 2020 at 12:21PM by deadman1204
via reddit https://ift.tt/30FshRy
https://ift.tt/374ndIR
Submitted January 18, 2020 at 12:21PM by deadman1204
via reddit https://ift.tt/30FshRy
Spaceflightnow
Pending test outcomes, NASA says SpaceX could launch astronauts in early March
EDITOR’S NOTE: Updated at 6 a.m. EST (1100 GMT) Saturday with abort test launch delay.
Here's why Falcon 9/Heavy 2nd stage is an engineering marvel.
First where did this rant comes from? The trigger is this tweet from someone who has no idea how rocket equation works: https://twitter.com/LCS_Big_Mike/status/1217990754771095561This was also briefly discussed on SpaceXMasterrace here It looks to me that there's a misconception that Falcon 2nd stage is "bad", but is it? A straight forward comparison would tell you otherwise:F9/H 2nd Stage (S2)Centuar III (used on Atlas V)Stage Empty Mass (t)~52Stage Propellant Mass (t)~11120.8Stage Total Mass (t)~11622.8Isp (s)348450Delta-V without payload (m/s)1072210732Delta-V with 1t payload (m/s)101309133Delta-V with 5t payload (m/s)85026081Delta-V with 10t payload (m/s)72584434(Disclaimer: SpaceX doesn't disclose the exact 2nd stage empty or propellant mass, so the numbers here is an estimate, but I think it's a conservative estimate. Source is spacelaunchreport.com: Falcon 9, Atlas V) As you can see, while empty the F9 S2 has basically the same delta-v as the Centuar upper stage on Atlas V, once you start to add payload, the delta-v provided by F9 S2 quickly surpassed Centuar.This is very remarkable since Centuar is using RL10, a hydrolox engine which has much higher Isp than F9 S2's Merlin Vacuum engine, and Centuar uses a pressure stabilized propellant tank which is very mass efficient (but couldn't support itself without pressurization).So how did SpaceX do this? The general answer is that F9 S2 is simply more mass efficient, as measured by Propellant mass fraction (PMF), which is the ratio between the propellant mass and the initial mass of the vehicle. In rocket equation, PMF has the same importance as Isp, but rookies usually focused on Isp and ignores PMF, which is a big mistake.F9 S2's PMF is 95.7% while Centuar's PMF is 91.2%, this is a huge difference when it comes to rocket equation. This means given the same metric ton of vehicle structure, F9 S2 can take a lot more propellant, and thus provide more delta-v. A simple division would show for each metric ton of vehicle structure, F9 S2 can take 22 metric tons of propellant, while Centuar can only take 10.4 metric tons of propellant.The exact method SpaceX used to achieve this remarkable PMF is not spelled out, it's their secret sauce after all, but my guess is it's a combination of:Merlin's superior Thrust-to-weight ratio (TWR)Semi pressure stabilized propellant tank (can support its own weight when unpressurized but need pressure to handle flight load)Sub-cooled propellantCooled Helium storage using COPV inside LOX tank This mass efficient 2nd stage is what's allowing SpaceX to put 5 to 6 metric tons to Geostationary transfer orbit (GTO) using a two stage all kerolox launch vehicle, no other launch vehicle in human history can do this. So next time someone mentions F9 S2 is trash or bad, explain PMF to them and see them squirm.
Submitted January 18, 2020 at 06:17PM by spacerfirstclass
via reddit https://ift.tt/37iY256
First where did this rant comes from? The trigger is this tweet from someone who has no idea how rocket equation works: https://twitter.com/LCS_Big_Mike/status/1217990754771095561This was also briefly discussed on SpaceXMasterrace here It looks to me that there's a misconception that Falcon 2nd stage is "bad", but is it? A straight forward comparison would tell you otherwise:F9/H 2nd Stage (S2)Centuar III (used on Atlas V)Stage Empty Mass (t)~52Stage Propellant Mass (t)~11120.8Stage Total Mass (t)~11622.8Isp (s)348450Delta-V without payload (m/s)1072210732Delta-V with 1t payload (m/s)101309133Delta-V with 5t payload (m/s)85026081Delta-V with 10t payload (m/s)72584434(Disclaimer: SpaceX doesn't disclose the exact 2nd stage empty or propellant mass, so the numbers here is an estimate, but I think it's a conservative estimate. Source is spacelaunchreport.com: Falcon 9, Atlas V) As you can see, while empty the F9 S2 has basically the same delta-v as the Centuar upper stage on Atlas V, once you start to add payload, the delta-v provided by F9 S2 quickly surpassed Centuar.This is very remarkable since Centuar is using RL10, a hydrolox engine which has much higher Isp than F9 S2's Merlin Vacuum engine, and Centuar uses a pressure stabilized propellant tank which is very mass efficient (but couldn't support itself without pressurization).So how did SpaceX do this? The general answer is that F9 S2 is simply more mass efficient, as measured by Propellant mass fraction (PMF), which is the ratio between the propellant mass and the initial mass of the vehicle. In rocket equation, PMF has the same importance as Isp, but rookies usually focused on Isp and ignores PMF, which is a big mistake.F9 S2's PMF is 95.7% while Centuar's PMF is 91.2%, this is a huge difference when it comes to rocket equation. This means given the same metric ton of vehicle structure, F9 S2 can take a lot more propellant, and thus provide more delta-v. A simple division would show for each metric ton of vehicle structure, F9 S2 can take 22 metric tons of propellant, while Centuar can only take 10.4 metric tons of propellant.The exact method SpaceX used to achieve this remarkable PMF is not spelled out, it's their secret sauce after all, but my guess is it's a combination of:Merlin's superior Thrust-to-weight ratio (TWR)Semi pressure stabilized propellant tank (can support its own weight when unpressurized but need pressure to handle flight load)Sub-cooled propellantCooled Helium storage using COPV inside LOX tank This mass efficient 2nd stage is what's allowing SpaceX to put 5 to 6 metric tons to Geostationary transfer orbit (GTO) using a two stage all kerolox launch vehicle, no other launch vehicle in human history can do this. So next time someone mentions F9 S2 is trash or bad, explain PMF to them and see them squirm.
Submitted January 18, 2020 at 06:17PM by spacerfirstclass
via reddit https://ift.tt/37iY256
Twitter
Big Mike
@fael097 @elonmusk @SciGuySpace Well the fact hasn’t changed- FH can’t throw Orion or any Lunar rated capsule into LOI. It’s second stage is trash. SLS however can. Also let’s not forget which one is actually man rated too.
Starman is at its farthest point from Earth in its orbit.
Today is the farthest that a Tesla has ever been from the earth, till 2022 at least. It's current location is 217,118,543 miles (349,418,532 km, 2.336 AU, 19.43 light minutes) away, on an orbit around the sun that extends beyond the orbit of Mars. https://www.whereisroadster.com/
Submitted January 17, 2020 at 07:59PM by Zero_Waist
via reddit https://ift.tt/37dwoqw
Today is the farthest that a Tesla has ever been from the earth, till 2022 at least. It's current location is 217,118,543 miles (349,418,532 km, 2.336 AU, 19.43 light minutes) away, on an orbit around the sun that extends beyond the orbit of Mars. https://www.whereisroadster.com/
Submitted January 17, 2020 at 07:59PM by Zero_Waist
via reddit https://ift.tt/37dwoqw
Where is Starman?
Where is Starman? Track Elon Musk's Tesla Roadster in Space! · Where is Starman?
Current location of Elon Musk's cherry red Tesla Roadster and Starman launched by SpaceX on the Falcon Heavy maiden flight
The new trajectory to Mars. The Low-Energy-Transfer. This is exactly the right terrain for SpaceX ...isn't it?
Is SpaceX also discussing the possibility of a new shorter route to Mars?In 2014 Francesco Toputto and Edward Belbruno construct a new type of transfer from the Earth to Mars, which ends in ballistic capture. (https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.8856) It is called the Low-Energy-Transfer (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low-energy_transfer)Their work caused quite a stir. It would be the alternative to the Hohmann transfer. The short time window, the extreme deceleration manoeuvre, the high propellant velocities... all this would be obsolete after the route Toputto and Belbruno have calculated.The flight duration would be only slightly longer and above all a regular shuttle service to Mars could be established.It would be interesting if flight tests would be started at least once. So far I could not find any further public reports about this. Neither from NASA, ESA nor from SpaceX. The new trajectory was already described in 2014. This is exactly the right terrain for SpaceX ...isn't it?
Submitted January 18, 2020 at 09:57PM by nochnDing
via reddit https://ift.tt/2G5qdZy
Is SpaceX also discussing the possibility of a new shorter route to Mars?In 2014 Francesco Toputto and Edward Belbruno construct a new type of transfer from the Earth to Mars, which ends in ballistic capture. (https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.8856) It is called the Low-Energy-Transfer (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low-energy_transfer)Their work caused quite a stir. It would be the alternative to the Hohmann transfer. The short time window, the extreme deceleration manoeuvre, the high propellant velocities... all this would be obsolete after the route Toputto and Belbruno have calculated.The flight duration would be only slightly longer and above all a regular shuttle service to Mars could be established.It would be interesting if flight tests would be started at least once. So far I could not find any further public reports about this. Neither from NASA, ESA nor from SpaceX. The new trajectory was already described in 2014. This is exactly the right terrain for SpaceX ...isn't it?
Submitted January 18, 2020 at 09:57PM by nochnDing
via reddit https://ift.tt/2G5qdZy
New T-0 of 10:00 a.m. EST to optimize for decreasing winds in the recovery area
https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1218865768428974081?s=19
Submitted January 19, 2020 at 01:09PM by UrbanArcologist
via reddit https://ift.tt/38nFQaC
https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1218865768428974081?s=19
Submitted January 19, 2020 at 01:09PM by UrbanArcologist
via reddit https://ift.tt/38nFQaC
Twitter
SpaceX
New T-0 of 10:00 a.m. EST to optimize for decreasing winds in the recovery area
SpaceX on Twitter: "Now targeting 10:30 a.m. EST; teams are continuing to track weather in the recovery area"
https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1218898186162466818?s=19
Submitted January 19, 2020 at 03:09PM by OhBuggery
via reddit https://ift.tt/38fyUMO
https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1218898186162466818?s=19
Submitted January 19, 2020 at 03:09PM by OhBuggery
via reddit https://ift.tt/38fyUMO
Twitter
SpaceX
Now targeting 10:30 a.m. EST; teams are continuing to track weather in the recovery area
Forwarded from Maciek
Falcon 9 - Crew Dragon In Flight Abort Test
Launch date:
Launch site: KSC LC 39A
Payloads
Name: Crew Dragon In Flight Abort Test
Customers: NASA (CCtCap)
Type: Crew Dragon
Orbit: SO
Rocket
Name: Falcon 9
Version: FT
Cores
Serial: B1046
Block: 5
Flight-proven: Yes
Flying expendable
Details
SpaceX will launch a Crew Dragon capsule from LC-39A, KSC on a fully fueled Falcon 9 rocket and then trigger the launch escape system during the period of maximum dynamic pressure. As part of NASA'a Commercial Crew Integrated Capability program (CCiCap) this test will contribute valuable data to help validate Crew Dragon and its launch abort system. The Crew Dragon will be recovered by GO Searcher after splashdown in the Atlantic Ocean. This flight does not go to orbit. The booster and upper stage are expected to break up following capsule separation and there will be no landing attempt.
Webcast
Reddit Thread
@Chat_SpaceX
#Launch
Launch date:
2020-01-19 15:30:00 UTC
Flight number: 88Launch site: KSC LC 39A
Payloads
Name: Crew Dragon In Flight Abort Test
Customers: NASA (CCtCap)
Type: Crew Dragon
Orbit: SO
Rocket
Name: Falcon 9
Version: FT
Cores
Serial: B1046
Block: 5
Flight-proven: Yes
Flying expendable
Details
SpaceX will launch a Crew Dragon capsule from LC-39A, KSC on a fully fueled Falcon 9 rocket and then trigger the launch escape system during the period of maximum dynamic pressure. As part of NASA'a Commercial Crew Integrated Capability program (CCiCap) this test will contribute valuable data to help validate Crew Dragon and its launch abort system. The Crew Dragon will be recovered by GO Searcher after splashdown in the Atlantic Ocean. This flight does not go to orbit. The booster and upper stage are expected to break up following capsule separation and there will be no landing attempt.
Webcast
Reddit Thread
@Chat_SpaceX
#Launch
YouTube
Crew Dragon | Launch Escape Demonstration
SpaceX is targeting Sunday, January 19 for an in-flight test of Crew Dragon’s launch escape capabilities from Launch Complex 39A (LC-39A) at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida. This test, which does not have NASA astronauts onboard the spacecraft, is…
Forwarded from Feed Reader Bot - Premium
Dragon has separated from Falcon 9 and its SuperDraco engines have completed their burn https://t.co/tDhogz1qQ9
https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1218919149079908353
https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1218919149079908353
Forwarded from Feed Reader Bot - Premium
Dragon’s trunk has deployed https://t.co/bxRPYGpJTx
https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1218919423215464448
https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1218919423215464448
Forwarded from Feed Reader Bot - Premium
Dragon's drogue chutes deployed nominally https://t.co/vdzIjDmTO7
https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1218919969628360705
https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1218919969628360705
Forwarded from Feed Reader Bot - Premium
Dragon's main parachutes have been deployed https://t.co/SMLK62YXPP
https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1218920244468539397
https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1218920244468539397
Forwarded from Maciek
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Replay of explosion
ABORT! Through a tiny hole in the clouds, I managed to catch the abort and subsequent explosion! RIP B1046.
https://ift.tt/38dQIYO
Submitted January 19, 2020 at 05:09PM by Space_Coast_Steve
via reddit https://ift.tt/2ND1gIT
https://ift.tt/38dQIYO
Submitted January 19, 2020 at 05:09PM by Space_Coast_Steve
via reddit https://ift.tt/2ND1gIT
Forwarded from EverythingScience
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
SpaceX In-Flight Abort test Highlights
SpaceX has successfully carried out a test of the Crew Dragon Launch Escape system and is now one step closer to launching astronauts to the International Space Station this year
@EverythingScience
SpaceX has successfully carried out a test of the Crew Dragon Launch Escape system and is now one step closer to launching astronauts to the International Space Station this year
@EverythingScience
Forwarded from EverythingScience
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Crew Dragon separating from Falcon 9 during today’s test, which verified the spacecraft’s ability to carry astronauts to safety in the unlikely event of an emergency on ascent
Tweet
@EverythingScience
Tweet
@EverythingScience