Starship and Falcon 1 at Boca Chica - Mod-Team in Position
https://ift.tt/2o7FL9h
Submitted September 29, 2019 at 02:59AM by ElongatedMuskrat
via reddit https://ift.tt/2m3Xmys
https://ift.tt/2o7FL9h
Submitted September 29, 2019 at 02:59AM by ElongatedMuskrat
via reddit https://ift.tt/2m3Xmys
Starship will be the most powerful rocket in history, capable of carrying humans to the Moon, Mars, and beyond.
https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1178129849057038337
Submitted September 29, 2019 at 11:54AM by FoxhoundBat
via reddit https://ift.tt/2nA9ibw
https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1178129849057038337
Submitted September 29, 2019 at 11:54AM by FoxhoundBat
via reddit https://ift.tt/2nA9ibw
Twitter
SpaceX
Starship will be the most powerful rocket in history, capable of carrying humans to the Moon, Mars, and beyond https://t.co/LloN8AQdei
[CNN Interview] Elon Musk: Starship could take people to orbit within a year
https://ift.tt/2m35NtG
Submitted September 29, 2019 at 04:27PM by LeJules
via reddit https://ift.tt/2m0Rcim
https://ift.tt/2m35NtG
Submitted September 29, 2019 at 04:27PM by LeJules
via reddit https://ift.tt/2m0Rcim
reddit
[CNN Interview] Elon Musk: Starship could take people to orbit...
Posted in r/spacex by u/LeJules • 39 points and 11 comments
Elon’s Starship Presentation In 8 minutes
https://youtu.be/cTPYUox41bU
Submitted September 29, 2019 at 05:22PM by tjcooney
via reddit https://ift.tt/2nCS3GG
https://youtu.be/cTPYUox41bU
Submitted September 29, 2019 at 05:22PM by tjcooney
via reddit https://ift.tt/2nCS3GG
YouTube
Elon Musk's Starship Announcement in 8 Minutes | SpaceX
Please help support my channel and get a sweet new space shirt 🚀 http://ineedmore.space/store
SpaceX has been building the first Starship prototype in Boca Chica, Texas for the last several months. On the 11th Anniversary of the first Falcon 1 rocket getting…
SpaceX has been building the first Starship prototype in Boca Chica, Texas for the last several months. On the 11th Anniversary of the first Falcon 1 rocket getting…
SpaceX testing the Raptors rocket engine powered by cryogenic methane and liquid oxygen
https://ift.tt/2mHUhEE
Submitted September 29, 2019 at 08:03PM by KingImran708431
via reddit https://ift.tt/2mRq4CY
https://ift.tt/2mHUhEE
Submitted September 29, 2019 at 08:03PM by KingImran708431
via reddit https://ift.tt/2mRq4CY
reddit
SpaceX testing the Raptors rocket engine powered by cryogenic...
Posted in r/spacex by u/KingImran708431 • 20 points and 3 comments
SpaceX Superstars: Gwynne Shotwell, President and COO
https://ift.tt/2oniJLK
Submitted September 29, 2019 at 10:44PM by scr00chy
via reddit https://ift.tt/2nG48ee
https://ift.tt/2oniJLK
Submitted September 29, 2019 at 10:44PM by scr00chy
via reddit https://ift.tt/2nG48ee
ElonX.net
SpaceX Superstars: Gwynne Shotwell, President and COO – ElonX.net
SpaceX is so much more than just Elon Musk, the company employs many other interesting people. Among the most recognizable are engineers who sometimes host the launch broadcasts. However, one of the truly key figures at SpaceX is Gwynne Shotwell, Chief Operating…
Falcon 9 booster eastbound from AL/FL line, maybe for DM-2. Pic by J Murrah
https://ift.tt/2nTXWiG
Submitted September 30, 2019 at 05:17PM by SuPrBuGmAn
via reddit https://ift.tt/2mjYIFg
https://ift.tt/2nTXWiG
Submitted September 30, 2019 at 05:17PM by SuPrBuGmAn
via reddit https://ift.tt/2mjYIFg
Starship: SERVICE TO EARTH ORBIT, THE MOON, MARS AND BEYOND
https://ift.tt/2mp3Jwo
Submitted September 30, 2019 at 05:59PM by LeJules
via reddit https://ift.tt/2nXDzRC
https://ift.tt/2mp3Jwo
Submitted September 30, 2019 at 05:59PM by LeJules
via reddit https://ift.tt/2nXDzRC
SpaceX
Starship
Starship Launch Animation | Boca Chica, TX
https://youtu.be/wzFQJUzoUvM
Submitted September 30, 2019 at 06:01PM by LeJules
via reddit https://ift.tt/2ml7Auf
https://youtu.be/wzFQJUzoUvM
Submitted September 30, 2019 at 06:01PM by LeJules
via reddit https://ift.tt/2ml7Auf
YouTube
Starship Launch Animation | South Texas
This animation depicts the Starship spacecraft and Super Heavy rocket lifting off from SpaceX's South Texas launch site on its way to orbit. After Super Heavy boosts Starship to orbit, it returns to the launch site for reuse. For missions beyond Earth orbit…
Elon Musk on Twitter: Inside Starship cargo bay. Header tanks mounted in tip of nosecone to offset engine weight at rear.
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1178931253229187072
Submitted October 01, 2019 at 09:15AM by OccupyMarsNow
via reddit https://ift.tt/2o55kYN
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1178931253229187072
Submitted October 01, 2019 at 09:15AM by OccupyMarsNow
via reddit https://ift.tt/2o55kYN
Twitter
Elon Musk
Inside Starship cargo bay. Header tanks mounted in tip of nosecone to offset engine weight at rear.
The Space Review: Starships are meant to fly
https://ift.tt/2o4iIvX
Submitted October 01, 2019 at 04:19AM by kitmatthews
via reddit https://ift.tt/2nbu2qp
https://ift.tt/2o4iIvX
Submitted October 01, 2019 at 04:19AM by kitmatthews
via reddit https://ift.tt/2nbu2qp
Reddit
From the spacex community on Reddit: The Space Review: Starships are meant to fly
Posted by [Deleted Account] - 123 votes and 50 comments
IFA booster moving from Hawthorne to Cape Canaveral, pic from Perry FL
https://ift.tt/2off7v6
Submitted October 01, 2019 at 12:57PM by SuPrBuGmAn
via reddit https://ift.tt/2oYZ4Ch
https://ift.tt/2off7v6
Submitted October 01, 2019 at 12:57PM by SuPrBuGmAn
via reddit https://ift.tt/2oYZ4Ch
Everyday Astronaut: A conversation with Elon Musk about Starship
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIQ36Kt7UVg
Submitted October 01, 2019 at 04:04PM by Dragon029
via reddit https://ift.tt/2o8tX6N
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIQ36Kt7UVg
Submitted October 01, 2019 at 04:04PM by Dragon029
via reddit https://ift.tt/2o8tX6N
YouTube
A conversation with Elon Musk about Starship
After Elon Musk gave his presentation about the progress of SpaceX's Starship program, I had the opportunity to pick his brain just a little. In general I wanted to let him talk a lot and see where his mind went, but luckily for us aerospace enthusiasts,…
Benji Reed interview about Crew Dragon on "Houston we have a Podcast"
https://ift.tt/2oZOXNr
Submitted October 01, 2019 at 04:58PM by Bananas_on_Mars
via reddit https://ift.tt/2p1Tcbp
https://ift.tt/2oZOXNr
Submitted October 01, 2019 at 04:58PM by Bananas_on_Mars
via reddit https://ift.tt/2p1Tcbp
NASA
The SpaceX Crew Dragon - NASA
Benji Reed, director of Crew Mission Management for SpaceX, talks about the SpaceX Crew Dragon, the testing and training thus far including an uncrewed mission to the station, and the exciting future for the commercial crew vehicle. HWHAP Episode 111.
Musk: Raptor cost is tracking to well under $1M for V1.0. Goal is <$250k for V2.0 is a 250 ton thrust-optimized engine, ie <$1000/ton
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1179107539352313856
Submitted October 01, 2019 at 09:04PM by izybit
via reddit https://ift.tt/2noNDn7
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1179107539352313856
Submitted October 01, 2019 at 09:04PM by izybit
via reddit https://ift.tt/2noNDn7
Twitter
Elon Musk
Raptor cost is tracking to well under $1M for V1.0. Goal is <$250k for V2.0 is a 250 ton thrust-optimized engine, ie <$1000/ton
Interview with Bridenstine: How NASA Works With Elon Musk
https://ift.tt/2ofb02s
Submitted October 01, 2019 at 09:42PM by Kang_54
via reddit https://ift.tt/2oqOkvW
https://ift.tt/2ofb02s
Submitted October 01, 2019 at 09:42PM by Kang_54
via reddit https://ift.tt/2oqOkvW
The Atlantic
NASA Hands Elon Musk a Reality Check
A shared effort to deliver NASA astronauts to space recently got a little awkward.
<b>[OC]: The potential advantages of a detachable passenger module for Earth to Mars transportation</b>
Hi all! I was thinking through the Starship architecture and it seems inefficient to me to have the majority of the mass and expense that is being transported between Earth and Mars tied up in hardware that is only needed at the ends of the trip, namely the huge Raptor engines, fuel tanks and heat shield equipment. It seems to me that the weight of those structures is conservatively about 90% of the total mass of Starship, and probably about the same proportion of the total expense, and it's completely unnecessary and potentially even harmful for the interplanetary journey. If instead, you had a dockable passenger module which attaches inside the Starship aeroshell for takeoff and landing, but is free during the trip to and from Mars, you can keep your expensive specialized rocket around a gravity well while sending only the cargo you actually care about on the months long journey. Basically, the architecture I propose can be summarized in 3 points:1. Keep the specialized hardware for entering and exiting an atmosphere as close to an atmosphere as possible.As Elon said in his presentation, they expect Super Heavy to be able to launch essentially at will, as much as 24 times a day. Starship should be able to launch 4 times a day. That means that while these ships are close to Earth (or Mars) you have enormous payload to orbit capabilities, at essentially the cost of fuel. If you send Starship to Mars, you're losing that capability for months, at an enormous opportunity cost and for really no benefit.2. Use one starship for multiple lauches <em>and landings</em> at each planetNot only is your expensive hardware located where it's useful, but it costs absolutely negligible DV to stagger the arrival time of a crew pod to Mars, so you could in theory launch and land at a defined interval, say two pods every day, using just ion engines on the crew modules (which would be far more effective with the far lower dry mass of the pods - more on this in the next point). That means that with lets say 4 starships on Mars, you could handle conservatively 4 passenger landings per day for the duration of the window, instead of needing a single starship per window. This would be <em>huge</em> for passenger throughput to Mars, and the same is true on launch. Throw passengers on their way, bring the ship back, repeat. The whole system could be 8 cargo starships <em>total</em> and a supporting fleet of tankers on the Earth side, for an essentially uncapped throughput of passengers, and the only hardware lost to deep space would be the relatively cheap and light passenger module itself.3. Have as much propulsion hardware as possible on the passenger module, rather than coming from the very heavy, EDL specialized starship.This is a little tricky because it gets into how much you actually want to engineer into the passenger stage, and therefore its dry mass (for example, adding a chemical rocket versus ion engines would make it more capable and have huge DV advantages for the entire system, but you have to figure out if you can fit that all in the Starship cargo bay, can it aerobrake, etc.) However, the more propulsion that is done on the low mass passenger vehicle, versus the very high dry mass Starship, the more efficient the overall architecture is, just like how GEO satellites that have their own fuel and propulsion much more efficiently use F9s capabilities than a direct second stage insertion to GEO, and that's the direction that the satellite industry has explored.Basically, as low dry mass as possible cycling between Earth and Mars means less propellant usage, higher utilization of the expensive parts of the system itself (namely Starship). The passenger module could also be more specialized for deep space, including ideally an inflatable component instead of the punitive space constraints of Starship itself. Finally, first and foremost this…
Hi all! I was thinking through the Starship architecture and it seems inefficient to me to have the majority of the mass and expense that is being transported between Earth and Mars tied up in hardware that is only needed at the ends of the trip, namely the huge Raptor engines, fuel tanks and heat shield equipment. It seems to me that the weight of those structures is conservatively about 90% of the total mass of Starship, and probably about the same proportion of the total expense, and it's completely unnecessary and potentially even harmful for the interplanetary journey. If instead, you had a dockable passenger module which attaches inside the Starship aeroshell for takeoff and landing, but is free during the trip to and from Mars, you can keep your expensive specialized rocket around a gravity well while sending only the cargo you actually care about on the months long journey. Basically, the architecture I propose can be summarized in 3 points:1. Keep the specialized hardware for entering and exiting an atmosphere as close to an atmosphere as possible.As Elon said in his presentation, they expect Super Heavy to be able to launch essentially at will, as much as 24 times a day. Starship should be able to launch 4 times a day. That means that while these ships are close to Earth (or Mars) you have enormous payload to orbit capabilities, at essentially the cost of fuel. If you send Starship to Mars, you're losing that capability for months, at an enormous opportunity cost and for really no benefit.2. Use one starship for multiple lauches <em>and landings</em> at each planetNot only is your expensive hardware located where it's useful, but it costs absolutely negligible DV to stagger the arrival time of a crew pod to Mars, so you could in theory launch and land at a defined interval, say two pods every day, using just ion engines on the crew modules (which would be far more effective with the far lower dry mass of the pods - more on this in the next point). That means that with lets say 4 starships on Mars, you could handle conservatively 4 passenger landings per day for the duration of the window, instead of needing a single starship per window. This would be <em>huge</em> for passenger throughput to Mars, and the same is true on launch. Throw passengers on their way, bring the ship back, repeat. The whole system could be 8 cargo starships <em>total</em> and a supporting fleet of tankers on the Earth side, for an essentially uncapped throughput of passengers, and the only hardware lost to deep space would be the relatively cheap and light passenger module itself.3. Have as much propulsion hardware as possible on the passenger module, rather than coming from the very heavy, EDL specialized starship.This is a little tricky because it gets into how much you actually want to engineer into the passenger stage, and therefore its dry mass (for example, adding a chemical rocket versus ion engines would make it more capable and have huge DV advantages for the entire system, but you have to figure out if you can fit that all in the Starship cargo bay, can it aerobrake, etc.) However, the more propulsion that is done on the low mass passenger vehicle, versus the very high dry mass Starship, the more efficient the overall architecture is, just like how GEO satellites that have their own fuel and propulsion much more efficiently use F9s capabilities than a direct second stage insertion to GEO, and that's the direction that the satellite industry has explored.Basically, as low dry mass as possible cycling between Earth and Mars means less propellant usage, higher utilization of the expensive parts of the system itself (namely Starship). The passenger module could also be more specialized for deep space, including ideally an inflatable component instead of the punitive space constraints of Starship itself. Finally, first and foremost this…
❤1
Cameron County weighs in on SpaceX plans
https://ift.tt/2pc15uR
Submitted October 01, 2019 at 09:29PM by shaldag_x
via reddit https://ift.tt/2mNOrBs
https://ift.tt/2pc15uR
Submitted October 01, 2019 at 09:29PM by shaldag_x
via reddit https://ift.tt/2mNOrBs
r/SpaceX Discusses [October 2019, #61]
If you have a short question or spaceflight news...You may ask short, spaceflight-related questions and post news here, even if it is not about SpaceX. Be sure to check the FAQ and Wiki first to ensure you aren't submitting duplicate questions.If you have a long question...If your question is in-depth or an open-ended discussion, you can submit it to the subreddit as a post.If you'd like to discuss slightly relevant SpaceX content in greater detail...Please post to r/SpaceXLounge and create a thread there!This thread is not for...Questions answered in the FAQ. Browse there or use the search functionality first.Non-spaceflight related questions or news.You can read and browse past Discussion threads in the Wiki.
Submitted October 02, 2019 at 02:16PM by ElongatedMuskrat
via reddit https://ift.tt/2mYbslo
If you have a short question or spaceflight news...You may ask short, spaceflight-related questions and post news here, even if it is not about SpaceX. Be sure to check the FAQ and Wiki first to ensure you aren't submitting duplicate questions.If you have a long question...If your question is in-depth or an open-ended discussion, you can submit it to the subreddit as a post.If you'd like to discuss slightly relevant SpaceX content in greater detail...Please post to r/SpaceXLounge and create a thread there!This thread is not for...Questions answered in the FAQ. Browse there or use the search functionality first.Non-spaceflight related questions or news.You can read and browse past Discussion threads in the Wiki.
Submitted October 02, 2019 at 02:16PM by ElongatedMuskrat
via reddit https://ift.tt/2mYbslo
reddit
faq - spacex
r/spacex: Welcome to r/SpaceX, the premier SpaceX discussion community and the largest fan-run board on the American aerospace company SpaceX. We …
Intuitive Machines selects SpaceX to launch Nova-C to the Moon in 2021 on a Falcon 9 rocket.
https://ift.tt/2oDWAsA
Submitted October 02, 2019 at 08:50PM by ethan829
via reddit https://ift.tt/2mZyhoG
https://ift.tt/2oDWAsA
Submitted October 02, 2019 at 08:50PM by ethan829
via reddit https://ift.tt/2mZyhoG
Intuitive Machines
Intuitive Machines selects SpaceX to launch Nova-C to the Moon in 2021 on a Falcon 9 rocket.
Houston-based Intuitive Machines selected SpaceX to launch its lunar lander, Nova-C, to the Moon in 2021 on a Falcon 9 rocket. “Intuitive Machines is thrilled to sign with SpaceX to take Nova-C on its first mission to the moon,” said Intuitive Machines President…
NASA Commercial Crew on Twitter: "The @SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket and #CrewDragon spacecraft that will be used for the In-Flight Abort test have arrived at SpaceX facilities in Cape Canaveral, Fla. for preparation ahead of the test!"
https://twitter.com/Commercial_Crew/status/1179748212963528705
Submitted October 03, 2019 at 03:26PM by ethan829
via reddit https://ift.tt/2pHpN6H
https://twitter.com/Commercial_Crew/status/1179748212963528705
Submitted October 03, 2019 at 03:26PM by ethan829
via reddit https://ift.tt/2pHpN6H
Twitter
NASA Commercial Crew
The @SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket and #CrewDragon spacecraft that will be used for the In-Flight Abort test have arrived at SpaceX facilities in Cape Canaveral, Fla. for preparation ahead of the test!