I think one must remember that Anarchists and Communists both seek to strive the same goal, which is a Socialist society ruled by the left, clamping firmly on the rightist Bourgeoisie. Just that they have different ideas on how it should be ruled and both sides have fair criticisms over the other.

A fully single party dictatorship may not be a perfect representation of the proletariat nor a perfect bastion of socialism. Furthermore having that much power concentrated into a single dictator is susceptible to abuse of power for selfish needs. Having heavy intrusion into privacy for surveillance is also understandably terrifying, even for leftist obeying citizens.

A self-ruled individualist society is susceptible to an easy counterattack by the bourgeoisie because there's barely any proper authority enforcing Socialism. A nation with no government is a more chaotic one with zero structure.

Some cool poster I found regarding the unexpected Russia x India friendship tie

Warren and corporate democrats don't give a rat's arse about women's rights. Remember the OGs that started the idea of worldwide recognition to feminism.

No nazbol has ever called me a radlib.

capitalism can fuck off smh expecting me to try when my surplus labour gets yeeted? nah fuck that