The undisputed authority in the Shāfiʿī school, Ibn Ḥajar (d. 974), mentions some phrases that, when uttered, may lead to fearing that a person is renouncing their faith. One of them that echos across time is: “I just want money, regardless of it being ḥalāl or ḥarām!”

Modern mozlems when an action is stigmatised and considered very negatively in popular western culture:

"According to Shari'ah he should be executed (even when it's not true) in the most painful way, and he will definitely go to hell forever!!".

Modern mozlems when a crime is played down or not even considered as such in popular western culture:

"Actschuallyyy there is no prescribed punishment for it (even if there is), you don't know what's in his heart, only Allah can judge!".


Once upon a time there were discussion with the mu'tazilah about the issue of tahsin and taqbih aqli, nowadays we should address the tahsin and taqbih gharbi.

Similar to the differences between Maturidis and Mutazilis regarding tahsin and taqbih aqli; modernists also divide themselves on their tahsin and taqbih gharbi:
-for pure modernists, something is good or bad purely because the west says so, and Shari'ah has to adapt to it.
-for cope apologetic mozlems, what is good or bad according to the west always "miraculously" coincide with (their twisting of) Shari'ah, and "that's why Islam is true!".

It is a dangerous illusion to think that one is doing daʿwah by furthering the Dajjalic “western Muslim” assimilation project; self-proclaimed “Muslims” in the west hold more hostility towards Orthodox Islām than even the kuffār that they are desperately trying to appease.

If we could have the Ṣaḥābah back in this world, in this current era, to assist the Muslims and correct our faults and errors, most people who claim Islām today would call them corruptors and extremists.

A question to those who believe that the message and understanding of Islām was corrupted right after the passing of the Prophet ﷺ, and that the ʿUlūm al-Dīn are merely a product of their time, influenced by “backward cultures” and “outdated sentiments”:

‎Why do you claim Islām?

When that one friend finally learns some basic Uṣūl and stops being a Lā-Maḏhhabī:

Imam Ibn Hajar al-Haytami Rahimahullah states in his Hashiyyah on Fath al-Jawaad Bi Sharh Matn al-Irshad, in the chapters of Nikah under his own statement : “It is sunnah for him [the wali] to present the woman in his custody to the pious men [with the objective of marriage]”. [Ibn Hajar states]: “From amongst the requisites of their piety is that they possess such ghayrah which compels them to utmost protection of their wives, and to protect them from places of doubt, even if the doubts are very far fetched. As for one who is not like this [does not possess that level of ghayrah], then it is not appropriate to present the woman to him, rather it is not even appropriate to marry her to him even though he may request it, and although he may have reached the pinnacle of piety and knowledge, as the wali who is happy with this, is pleased with the woman in his guardianship to be in eternal disgrace. This is because most women, when they do not see the utmost ghayrah from their husbands, and protection over them, and they do not see them preventing them from those things which cause doubt, even though they may be far fetched and weak reasons of doubt, this laxity from his side will cause her to fall into such a disgrace, the ugliness of which is endless. Understand this as it is the most important of important matters.”

But your modern "Imams" and "Shuyookh" will tell you that if you show ghayrah, then you are being controlling and toxic. Look at the statement of an Alim living in Darul Islam under a legitimate Khilafah, and compare it with the statements of the "compassionate" imams, and you will have no choice but to realize the necessity of hijrah and of establishing Khilafah. The only solution to societal problems is in Islam, and Islam can only be practiced completely under a Khilafah.
فافهم فإنه مهم

A clip from AlMaghrib Institute, publicizing Fanāʾ al-Nār, referring to it as “a legitimate opinion”.

This position is kufr and contradicts what is maʿlūm min al-Dīn bil-Ḍarūrah. Anyone who holds this view, or considers it valid to hold, is a kāfir.

“Why isn’t Palestine free yet, guys?” 😑

Here we have Yasir Qadhi discussing the topic of Fanāʾ al-Nār, where he:

- Defends the position and insists that it is not heretical.
- Refers to it as “a very legitimate opinion”.
- Advocates for it to be promoted amongst the masses.

Just a reminder that if you are taking your Dīn from Instagram Reels and/or TikTok, it is highly unlikely that you meet the bare minimum requirements of being Muslim.

Too many of you are easily impressed by modernist zandaqah under the garb of (pseudo-)intellectualism.

The irony is that those spewing this filth claim some “higher metaphysics”. In reality, they’ve been so ideologically r@ped that they don’t even understand the fundamentals.