“Brothers and sisters in Islam, we live in a time where slogans such as "You do you" and "My body, my choice" dominate the cultural landscape. These phrases reflect a worldview that elevates the self above all else, urging people to craft their own morality and truth. The modern world teaches us that autonomy is the ultimate virtue and that religion is merely a personal choice rather than a divine truth. As Muslims, we must recognise this as a deception that seeks to weaken our connection to Allah and transform Islam into a set of negotiable values.
Today, we will examine the origins of the secular self, its impact on the Muslim psyche, and the necessity of reclaiming our Islamic sensibilities to navigate the world as true servants of Allah.”

https://www.openmadrasa.org/reclaiming-the-islamic-self-in-an-age-of-secular-hegemony

Those who deny actual fiqh and abuse Islam by picking single episodes from the sirah and or ayat/ahadith without context and true understanding will just quote when the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم refused to have the people of Ta'if punished and extend this as a general rule.

Or when he صلى الله عليه وسلم didn't punish some of the blasphemous mushrikin after the fath of Makkah.

This is the sort of abuse of religion with extrapolated twisted references and a paint of Islamic-sounding slogans that is in reality a denial of the correct understanding of the texts as held by 14 centuries of Muslims from one corner to another of the Islamic world.

This deformist "salafi" methodology is the backbone of all modernists and all istikhbarati-academia twisting: they all adopt the classical-fiqh-bypassing "going back directly to the Qur'an and Sunnah" and "authentic original pristine actual Izlaam over culture and man-made fiqh" deception slogans to twist nusus through a modern liberal filter.

All modernism passes through the destruction of classical traditional fiqh.

The destructive perpetual cycle:

1 - Neglect aḥkām.
2 - Become weaker due to 1.
3 - Compromise on more rulings due to 2.
4 - Become complacent with 3.
5 - Try to defend and justify 4 with 2-3.
6 - More of 1 and the cycle repeats itself.

You people lack self-awareness.

And when someone tries to address 1 in an attempt to break the cycle:

“Ummm there’s like a literal like genocide going on right now! Are you seriously talking about [insert major issue that got us here in the first place] right now???”.

Question (71): In university girls and boys want to take a group photo together, keeping some distance between them. Is this permissible?

Answer (71): It is not permissible for men and women to engage in ikhtilat (mixing, interacting, or socializing). It is also not permissible for a woman to uncover her face in front of non-mahram men.

Allama Sheikh Nidal al-Hanafi

The author of al-Mawāqif, Imām ʿAḍud al-Dīn al-Ījī (d.756 AH), on al-husn wal-qubḥ:

Imām al-Kāsānī (d. 587 AH) states:

وأما المرأة فلأنها مشغولة بخدمة الزوج ممنوعة عن الخروج إلى محافل الرجال لكون الخروج سببا للفتنة

“As for the woman…she is preoccupied with serving her husband and is prohibited from emerging to gatherings of men, as emerging (to them) is a cause of fitnah.” (Badā’i‘ al-Ṣanā’i‘, 2:186)

Read More Here: https://ahlussunnah.boards.net/thread/975/prohibition-ikhtilat-mixing-men-women

__
Join the Ahlus Sunnah Forum Telegram Channel: https://t.me/AhlusSunnahForum

Join the Ahlus Sunnah Forum WhatsApp Channel: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb7aLtv4Spk89JPYvj16

We've been warning you about all this, but you kept repeating the zio-Abduhist "muh all those bans on female education and career are from Pashtun tribal culture not from Izlaam" slogans.

ʿAbdūh, the zindīq, the khabīth, is a “legend”? A “legend” at what exactly? Taḥrīf? Kufr? Freemasonry?