WALLĀHI feminism is more destructive to Islām and Muslims than any guns, rockets, or missiles.
You want Muslims to get stronger?
FULFILL YOUR ROLES.
MARRY YOUNG.
PRODUCE MORE KIDS.
TEACH THEM THE DĪN PROPERLY FROM DAY 1.
THE KUFFĀR FEAR MUSLIMS WHO KNOW THEIR PURPOSE.
Muslim women nowadays, ESPECIALLY Shāmīs, will be late into their 20s and still be uninterested in marriage or children. This is becoming increasingly more common with every passing generation.
“Women’s empowerment” is a cancer.
You want Muslims to get stronger?
FULFILL YOUR ROLES.
MARRY YOUNG.
PRODUCE MORE KIDS.
TEACH THEM THE DĪN PROPERLY FROM DAY 1.
THE KUFFĀR FEAR MUSLIMS WHO KNOW THEIR PURPOSE.
Muslim women nowadays, ESPECIALLY Shāmīs, will be late into their 20s and still be uninterested in marriage or children. This is becoming increasingly more common with every passing generation.
“Women’s empowerment” is a cancer.
❤10💯3🤣2👍1
Men and women are not the same. We do not function the same. We should not be treated the same. We each have our roles, and we should adhere to them.
The way people today speak about the differences between men and women, you would think we are the same in everything except a couple physical characteristics. This includes modern Muslims.
Women’s education is a psy-op. The movement was started with a very specific agenda, and no matter what you say or try to do, you cannot detach them. They are inextricably linked. The concept, purpose, and intention of it is all based in philosophical presuppositions and ideologies that are antithetical to Islām.
I don’t wanna hear these misrepresentations and distortions about “women in the past working”, and “women used to learn this”, and “this woman who did this one thing one time”, and every other non-contextualized revisionist take of pre-modern history.
I’m sick of the fiqh loopholes. When it comes to topics that don’t align with modern sensibilities, they pick and choose when they want to go into the technicalities of rulings, and when they suddenly want to argue for Maqāsid al-Sharīʿah. And they do both of these totally incorrectly. They’ll switch from “classical rulings akhiiii” to “these authoritative classical scholars were actually mistaken” within seconds.
If the last 100 years weren’t enough for you to grasp this, then I cannot help you. Brainwashing. Retarded slogans. Selfishness. Individualism. Emasculation of men and masculinization of women. Broken families. Insane divorce rates. Complete neglect of marriage.
All the arguments for women’s education are built on lies, hypotheticals, fear-mongering, consequences of not having Islamic systems of governance, and living under systems that are entirely antithetical to Islām to begin with. Their arguments are all circular. “We have to do ‘X’ because ‘Y’ akhiii”, but the whole reason ‘Y’ happened was because of the last 100 years of ‘X’.
We as a community need to start differentiating between the symptoms and the disease. These people cry about the symptoms, do ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about those, and then get mad when someone identifies the disease.
The way people today speak about the differences between men and women, you would think we are the same in everything except a couple physical characteristics. This includes modern Muslims.
Women’s education is a psy-op. The movement was started with a very specific agenda, and no matter what you say or try to do, you cannot detach them. They are inextricably linked. The concept, purpose, and intention of it is all based in philosophical presuppositions and ideologies that are antithetical to Islām.
I don’t wanna hear these misrepresentations and distortions about “women in the past working”, and “women used to learn this”, and “this woman who did this one thing one time”, and every other non-contextualized revisionist take of pre-modern history.
I’m sick of the fiqh loopholes. When it comes to topics that don’t align with modern sensibilities, they pick and choose when they want to go into the technicalities of rulings, and when they suddenly want to argue for Maqāsid al-Sharīʿah. And they do both of these totally incorrectly. They’ll switch from “classical rulings akhiiii” to “these authoritative classical scholars were actually mistaken” within seconds.
If the last 100 years weren’t enough for you to grasp this, then I cannot help you. Brainwashing. Retarded slogans. Selfishness. Individualism. Emasculation of men and masculinization of women. Broken families. Insane divorce rates. Complete neglect of marriage.
All the arguments for women’s education are built on lies, hypotheticals, fear-mongering, consequences of not having Islamic systems of governance, and living under systems that are entirely antithetical to Islām to begin with. Their arguments are all circular. “We have to do ‘X’ because ‘Y’ akhiii”, but the whole reason ‘Y’ happened was because of the last 100 years of ‘X’.
We as a community need to start differentiating between the symptoms and the disease. These people cry about the symptoms, do ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about those, and then get mad when someone identifies the disease.
❤15👍2💯1
Forwarded from Islam Against Modernism - الماتريدية الجها.دية
Allah informed us through His Revelation that he will not forgive someone dying on kufr and shirk.
When we mention this, we're accused of "judging", "playing God" and "interfering in the affairs between the servant and his Lord".
Dude, Allah Himself informed us in revelation about His decision and the criteria for salvation.
And you still insist, object and argue "but but but he was a good person, how can he be punished in the eternal hellfire??2?".
So, now who is the one "judging the hearts of people", "playing God" and "interfering in the affairs between the servant and his Lord"?...
When we mention this, we're accused of "judging", "playing God" and "interfering in the affairs between the servant and his Lord".
Dude, Allah Himself informed us in revelation about His decision and the criteria for salvation.
And you still insist, object and argue "but but but he was a good person, how can he be punished in the eternal hellfire??2?".
So, now who is the one "judging the hearts of people", "playing God" and "interfering in the affairs between the servant and his Lord"?...
❤5💯2🔥1😁1
A kāfir is doing nahī ʿan al-munkar and the Muslims are getting offended. You can’t make this up.
The reactions to this guy’s post are such a perfect example of the state of Muslims today. Let’s break this down:
1) The post is not an attack on Islām.
2) The post is criticizing the behavior of Muslim women today (rightfully so).
3) He doesn’t even MENTION the words “Muslim” or “Islam” in the post. Just “females”.
4) He is pointing out the obvious and inherent contradiction in them wearing ḥijāb and then deliberately showing themselves off to millions.
5) He is 100% correct in this post.
6) A bunch of Muslims got offended and threw a tantrum because they don’t understand their own Dīn or the post.
Trying to frame this as “kāfir attacks Islām” is ridiculous. I don’t know if this individual has posted content against Islām in the past, and if he did then obviously he is a scumbag, but even then, this post is a separate thing.
Just because someone is a kāfir doesn’t mean EVERYTHING he says is wrong. Just like not EVERYTHING a random Muslim says is right, EVEN if it’s against the kuffār. As Muslims, we must be objective. Our priority is the truth.
The outrage from the post is a result of low IQ, horrible comprehension skills, total ignorance of fiqh, and this victim-complex that Muslims have developed after decades of self-victimization and compromising their principles.
The reactions to this guy’s post are such a perfect example of the state of Muslims today. Let’s break this down:
1) The post is not an attack on Islām.
2) The post is criticizing the behavior of Muslim women today (rightfully so).
3) He doesn’t even MENTION the words “Muslim” or “Islam” in the post. Just “females”.
4) He is pointing out the obvious and inherent contradiction in them wearing ḥijāb and then deliberately showing themselves off to millions.
5) He is 100% correct in this post.
6) A bunch of Muslims got offended and threw a tantrum because they don’t understand their own Dīn or the post.
Trying to frame this as “kāfir attacks Islām” is ridiculous. I don’t know if this individual has posted content against Islām in the past, and if he did then obviously he is a scumbag, but even then, this post is a separate thing.
Just because someone is a kāfir doesn’t mean EVERYTHING he says is wrong. Just like not EVERYTHING a random Muslim says is right, EVEN if it’s against the kuffār. As Muslims, we must be objective. Our priority is the truth.
The outrage from the post is a result of low IQ, horrible comprehension skills, total ignorance of fiqh, and this victim-complex that Muslims have developed after decades of self-victimization and compromising their principles.
👍15❤5💯2🤣1
Forwarded from Strangers In The Dunyā
Feminism was necessary for the development of the modern state.
In the past, women had extended families they could rely on in times of need. This meant that if they weren’t working and lost their husbands, they could still be provided for by family members.
The development of the modern state required breaking up extended families and centralising power in the hands of the state. This necessitated waging war on religion and traditional moral values as well, since they stressed the importance of upholding the ties of kinship. As a result, the family unit was severely weakened and society became extremely individualistic.
Hence, women lost their support networks and could no longer afford to just rely on their husbands at the risk of their marriage breaking down. This pressured them to seek financial independence by entering the formal workforce.
Entering the formal workforce, however, is not a guarantee that women will always be safe as they could lose their jobs and not be able to find employment for a long time (as is the case during economic contractions and recessions). This allowed the state to further expand its power and influence through the provision of welfare benefits.
In the past, women had extended families they could rely on in times of need. This meant that if they weren’t working and lost their husbands, they could still be provided for by family members.
The development of the modern state required breaking up extended families and centralising power in the hands of the state. This necessitated waging war on religion and traditional moral values as well, since they stressed the importance of upholding the ties of kinship. As a result, the family unit was severely weakened and society became extremely individualistic.
Hence, women lost their support networks and could no longer afford to just rely on their husbands at the risk of their marriage breaking down. This pressured them to seek financial independence by entering the formal workforce.
Entering the formal workforce, however, is not a guarantee that women will always be safe as they could lose their jobs and not be able to find employment for a long time (as is the case during economic contractions and recessions). This allowed the state to further expand its power and influence through the provision of welfare benefits.
💯9👍2❤1
Digital Sisterhood? The podcast where Muslim women publicly discussed their sexual pasts? Including but not limited to sucking men off? And then proceeded to misapply and distort concepts from Islamic theology, such as Qadr, and use very modern liberal conceptions of consent to essentially justify what they did?
“Local Shafii masjid”.
The west is Dār al-Shayṭān. Leave these cursed lands immediately.
“Local Shafii masjid”.
The west is Dār al-Shayṭān. Leave these cursed lands immediately.
💯9🤣4😭3👍1
There are many things in our religion that will be deemed as barbaric, backwards, and disgusting by not just kuffār, but even by many Muslims who are ignorant and unaware of our tradition. And this is because of scholars spending the last 100 years lying about the Dīn and hiding things, trying to present Islām as compatible with modern western liberal “ethics”.
These discussions are a waste of time. We don’t agree with these people on their worldview or their underlying philosophical presumptions on morality. You’re only confusing Muslims, feeding into their inferiority complex, and making us all collectively weaker.
These discussions are a waste of time. We don’t agree with these people on their worldview or their underlying philosophical presumptions on morality. You’re only confusing Muslims, feeding into their inferiority complex, and making us all collectively weaker.
💯13👍3👏1
Forwarded from Islam Against Modernism - الماتريدية الجها.دية
4_6037271988517475851.pdf
3.5 MB
Some important letters from Imam Rabbani Mujaddid Alf-i Thani Shaykh Ahmad as-Sirhindi al-Hanafi al-Maturidi an-Naqshbandi ق س on the evil of corrupt scholars.
A point always hidden by those abusing the qUaLiFiCaTiOnS card to silence opponents with the excuse that "muh you're disrespecting ulama".
A point always hidden by those abusing the qUaLiFiCaTiOnS card to silence opponents with the excuse that "muh you're disrespecting ulama".
❤2💯2👍1
Forwarded from Islam Against Modernism - الماتريدية الجها.دية
No we aren't "DiSrEsPeCtInG tHe ScHoLaRz", we're disrespecting the corrupt ones who adorn themselves with scholarly grabs to abuse the scholarly tradition they falsely claim to represent, but that in reality they are the first to disrespect.
Yes, we proudly disrespect everyone who (with their lies, corruption, deformism and distortions) disrespect authentic classical scholarship.
Yes, we proudly disrespect everyone who (with their lies, corruption, deformism and distortions) disrespect authentic classical scholarship.
💯5❤3👍1
Forwarded from Islam Against Modernism - الماتريدية الجها.دية
A partial translation of the above
💯2❤1👍1
Forwarded from Islam Against Modernism - الماتريدية الجها.دية
IMG_20250109_160239_907.jpg
84.2 KB
Shaykh Muhammad Awwamah blasting those using his name and supposed actions as a proof to claim the permissibility of ikhtilat.
This is going to burn the UK-USA neobandis' mafia which has been trying to legitimize free-mixing between males and females by using the Shaykh's name.
This is going to burn the UK-USA neobandis' mafia which has been trying to legitimize free-mixing between males and females by using the Shaykh's name.
❤7💯3👍1