Plot twist, the liberal and secularist "mozlems" who call orthodox normative Muslims as "khawarij", they themselves follow a distinctive khariji belief in their denial of khilafah.

شرح تعديل العلوم - صدر الشریعة

In the commentary of Qur’ān 11:71, which mentions that the “wife of (Ibrāhīm عليه السلام) was standing” during the incident when the angels (appearing as men) visited Ibrāhīm (عليه السلام), Imām Abū Manṣūr al-Māturīdī (ca. 235–333 AH) states:

“Some have said that she was standing in front of the guests (to serve them) because she was an elderly woman. There is no issue with an elderly woman doing so. Do you not see the statement of Allāh (تعالى): ‘The sitting (elderly) women’ (24:60) to the end of the verse? Others have said she was standing behind the door. We do not know which of them transpired.” (Ta’wīlāt al-Qur’ān (Dār al-Mīzān), 7:204)

Abū Ḥafṣ al-Nasafī quotes the same from Imām al-Māturīdī in his tafsīr. (al-Taysīr fi ‘l-Tafsīr, 8:237)

(Note how the principle of avoiding ikhtilāṭ, rooted in basic values of ghayrah and ḥayā’, is applied here. See also Ibn ʿĀbidīn's comment above: “A messenger needs to mix with males in teaching and establishing proofs against them and so on, which can only occur from males.” The shar'ī laws of ḥijāb later formalised this principle as a legal necessity, though it was observed before this as well but in a less rigorous manner.)

Read More Here: https://ahlussunnah.boards.net/thread/975/prohibition-ikhtilat-mixing-men-women

__
Join the Ahlus Sunnah Forum Telegram Channel: https://t.me/AhlusSunnahForum

There is no “Human Rights”.
There is no “International Law”.

The kuffār will not protect us.
The kuffār cannot be trusted.

Things will not change until we get this through our heads.

A lot of 1st generation immigrants to the west, who have suffered from inferiority complexes, and have fallen victim to the liberal distortions of our Dīn, are now slowly waking up.

Views that were considered “extreme” just a few years ago are starting to appeal to them :)

No wonder he’s dead now lol.

Yasir Qadhi and Omar Suleiman being on here is laughable.

Yasir Qadhi is an open secularist at this point, and Omar Suleiman is an “activist” whose support for the cause is entirely based on some “human rights” nonsense.

Neither of them are scholars or political analysts.

Not a single statement on Syria from this guy. Just more “tasawwuf”.

OP is implying that the cat does not exist because the scale is not reading a weight for the cat. I am going to critique this post through a Manṭiqī lens.

If we were to put this into a syllogism, it would look like this:

Everything that exists has a mass.
This kitten does not have a mass.
Therefore, this kitten does not exist.

The syllogism above is correct in structure, meaning the logic flows correctly. There is a major premise, a minor premise, and then a conclusion. However, the premises themselves are either outright incorrect and untrue, or they are not verifiable in this particular case.

This post displays a horrible attempt at logical deduction for the following reasons:

1 - Even if we were to put aside metaphysics, not everything that exists has a mass (light is a good example of this). So the major premise is not correct or accurate. That alone invalidates the syllogism.

2 - The scale could be defective, broken, or out of batteries, and therefore, the reading (or lack thereof) is not an accurate representation of the kitten’s mass. This throws doubt on the minor premise as well, further disproving the conclusion.

3 - We cannot verify that this photo is real. It could be AI or edited through a photo-editing software.

4 - If this photo is in fact real, we still do not know where it was taken. Different planets and moons have different gravitational pulls. Weight ≠ Mass. Weight = Mass x Gravity. So the (lack of a) reading could also be due to the cat being somewhere that has such a weak gravitational pull that the weight is too small for the scale to detect it.

Huh?

A significant percentage of “Sufism” is just straight up Tashayyuʿ & Rafidism. If you do some research on the history of a lot of these Ṣūfī ṭuruq, you’ll quickly see the parallels. Fabricated chains, baseless and ridiculous stories, ghulū, and outright heretical statements and doctrines.

A lot of people today try to white-wash the history of “Ṣūfīs”. It’s plainly obvious to most that the overwhelming majority of contemporary Ṣūfīs are charlatans and zanādiqah, but a lot of these guys will pretend like this is ONLY a modern phenomenon.

In reality, “Sufism” has always been a mixed bag, and zandaqah has always been extremely common in these circles. Classical scholars have also always acknowledged this.

Do some go overboard in their criticisms of tasawwuf? Yes. But let’s stop pretending like a lot of it isn’t warranted.

Imagine (rightly) warning Muslims not to celebrate kafir-western-christian holidays in Muslim lands, ...while not batting an eyelid about being ruled by kafir-western-christian laws and systems.

Too many Muslims make the worst decisions these days because they are selfish. Individualism has poisoned their minds.

They can pretend like they feel empathy for the Muslims around the world who are suffering, but none of their choices reflect that.

They can pretend like they care, and that they want to fix our state, but they constantly do the opposite of what is required of us.

Their worldview has been so tainted. And those who speak out about this get mocked, ridiculed, and labelled by them.

They aren’t fulfilling their roles anymore. Men aren’t being men and women aren’t being women. Their children aren’t being raised properly. They aren’t learning our Dīn correctly. They prioritize comfort, luxury, and ease over our principles as Muslims.

They look for fringe opinions or try to do mental gymnastics to justify ideological inclinations or the way that they’ve been living. They do whatever satisfies their nafs first, and then try to come up with a moral justification or excuse afterwards.

The funniest part is that those who are most guilty of all of the above are the ones who complain the most about the state of the Ummah and the Muslims.

And the worst part is that when you ask these same people for their diagnosis of the issue, they’ll blame those who are identifying the problem and suggesting the obvious solutions.

I’m tired.

Minutes 17:00 - 19:30

Imam Maturidiyyah al-'Asr, ash-Shaykh Hamzah al-Bakri حفظه الله on the Shar'i obligation of Khilafah and Islamic government, and blasting contemporary modernist scholars reducing government to "muh justice".

I’ve been patient and optimistic, but this is not a good sign.

الله يعينا…

WALLĀHI feminism is more destructive to Islām and Muslims than any guns, rockets, or missiles.

You want Muslims to get stronger?
FULFILL YOUR ROLES.
MARRY YOUNG.
PRODUCE MORE KIDS.
TEACH THEM THE DĪN PROPERLY FROM DAY 1.

THE KUFFĀR FEAR MUSLIMS WHO KNOW THEIR PURPOSE.

Muslim women nowadays, ESPECIALLY Shāmīs, will be late into their 20s and still be uninterested in marriage or children. This is becoming increasingly more common with every passing generation.

“Women’s empowerment” is a cancer.

Men and women are not the same. We do not function the same. We should not be treated the same. We each have our roles, and we should adhere to them.

The way people today speak about the differences between men and women, you would think we are the same in everything except a couple physical characteristics. This includes modern Muslims.

Women’s education is a psy-op. The movement was started with a very specific agenda, and no matter what you say or try to do, you cannot detach them. They are inextricably linked. The concept, purpose, and intention of it is all based in philosophical presuppositions and ideologies that are antithetical to Islām.

I don’t wanna hear these misrepresentations and distortions about “women in the past working”, and “women used to learn this”, and “this woman who did this one thing one time”, and every other non-contextualized revisionist take of pre-modern history.

I’m sick of the fiqh loopholes. When it comes to topics that don’t align with modern sensibilities, they pick and choose when they want to go into the technicalities of rulings, and when they suddenly want to argue for Maqāsid al-Sharīʿah. And they do both of these totally incorrectly. They’ll switch from “classical rulings akhiiii” to “these authoritative classical scholars were actually mistaken” within seconds.

If the last 100 years weren’t enough for you to grasp this, then I cannot help you. Brainwashing. Retarded slogans. Selfishness. Individualism. Emasculation of men and masculinization of women. Broken families. Insane divorce rates. Complete neglect of marriage.

All the arguments for women’s education are built on lies, hypotheticals, fear-mongering, consequences of not having Islamic systems of governance, and living under systems that are entirely antithetical to Islām to begin with. Their arguments are all circular. “We have to do ‘X’ because ‘Y’ akhiii”, but the whole reason ‘Y’ happened was because of the last 100 years of ‘X’.

We as a community need to start differentiating between the symptoms and the disease. These people cry about the symptoms, do ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about those, and then get mad when someone identifies the disease.