The Perceptions and Attitudes of Palestinian Diaspora Towards the Palestinian Cause and How this Impacts their Politics:
In light of recent events, I would like to discuss something that has been overlooked and not discussed as much as it should have been. Some of what I say will not come as a shock to most, and other things may trigger people. So we’ll see how that goes I guess. I am not exactly new to controversy or backlash on here, lol.
We have all seen grifters like Jackass Hinkle, Syrian Bint, etc. change their tune as soon as their agenda called for it. We also know how the liberals try to project their “Human-Rights” crap onto the cause whenever it’s convenient for them. However, the worldview problem has become deeply engrained into our communities on an internal level, and it isn’t only the fraud outsiders.
Any real Muslim can easily acknowledge that before anything else, the Palestinian cause is an Islamic one. But what we often see today is that a lot of self-proclaimed Muslims have internalized a prideful and aggressive nationalism that supersedes their Imān and loyalty to Islām. Sometimes it’s hidden, and other times they make it extremely clear. As a Palestinian living in the west, I have seen just how many Palestinians think this way, regardless of whether or not they are aware of it.
A lot of Palestinian diaspora do view many things through the “UN / Human Rights / Secular Liberal” lens, and although it disgusts me, that isn’t the topic of discussion today.
Many Palestinians are outright nationalists. A lot of them are extremely secular in their worldview, despite claiming to be Muslim. They may not outright verbalize it, and may not even be consciously aware of it, but many do in fact believe that they are more important than other Muslims and that their blood is of more value. This does not only apply to other ethnicities, but even to other Arabs. Even the ones who are culturally, ethnically, and geographically closest to them, other Shāmīs included.
Does the description above apply to all Palestinians? Of course not. I myself find the above sentiments disgusting and I don’t agree one bit and there are many Palestinians with clean ʿaqīdah who will agree with me on that. Not everyone is affected to the same extent. There is a spectrum. But I have found that there are significantly more Palestinians affected by those nationalistic sentiments than there are Palestinians who are not.
Some of the worst people I have ever met in my life personally are Palestinian diaspora. They tend to be the least religious and they are the most impacted by foreign ideologies. I have touched on this many times before.
Now this should be obvious, but the worldview of an individual is going to directly impact their political views. When such a significant portion of Palestinians are nationalist or have strong nationalistic sentiments, their politics will inevitably reflect that. Especially when they have an extremely weak grasp of their own theology.
The following are just SOME examples of the types of statements I’ve heard from Palestinians on recent political events:
• “[The Palestinian Resistance] is to blame for causing tensions in their country’s political scene. I am Palestinian first before I am Muslim”.
• *After being questioned on why they believe media propaganda about Afghans but not about the Palestinian Resistance* “Because these are our people and we know they wouldn’t do such things”.
• “The Syrian Rebels did not help Gaza. They are munāfiqūn working with Israel and the US. They should have done nothing”.
• “The Shīʿa are superior to the Sunnīs. The Sunnīs did nothing for Palestine”.
• “I want Bashar to stay in power because it is better for the Palestinians”.
• “I was on the side of Bashar and Hezbollah during the war in Syria and what they did was necessary for Palestine”.
• “The Syrians celebrating the death of Hasan Nasrallah are munāfiqūn”.
In light of recent events, I would like to discuss something that has been overlooked and not discussed as much as it should have been. Some of what I say will not come as a shock to most, and other things may trigger people. So we’ll see how that goes I guess. I am not exactly new to controversy or backlash on here, lol.
We have all seen grifters like Jackass Hinkle, Syrian Bint, etc. change their tune as soon as their agenda called for it. We also know how the liberals try to project their “Human-Rights” crap onto the cause whenever it’s convenient for them. However, the worldview problem has become deeply engrained into our communities on an internal level, and it isn’t only the fraud outsiders.
Any real Muslim can easily acknowledge that before anything else, the Palestinian cause is an Islamic one. But what we often see today is that a lot of self-proclaimed Muslims have internalized a prideful and aggressive nationalism that supersedes their Imān and loyalty to Islām. Sometimes it’s hidden, and other times they make it extremely clear. As a Palestinian living in the west, I have seen just how many Palestinians think this way, regardless of whether or not they are aware of it.
A lot of Palestinian diaspora do view many things through the “UN / Human Rights / Secular Liberal” lens, and although it disgusts me, that isn’t the topic of discussion today.
Many Palestinians are outright nationalists. A lot of them are extremely secular in their worldview, despite claiming to be Muslim. They may not outright verbalize it, and may not even be consciously aware of it, but many do in fact believe that they are more important than other Muslims and that their blood is of more value. This does not only apply to other ethnicities, but even to other Arabs. Even the ones who are culturally, ethnically, and geographically closest to them, other Shāmīs included.
Does the description above apply to all Palestinians? Of course not. I myself find the above sentiments disgusting and I don’t agree one bit and there are many Palestinians with clean ʿaqīdah who will agree with me on that. Not everyone is affected to the same extent. There is a spectrum. But I have found that there are significantly more Palestinians affected by those nationalistic sentiments than there are Palestinians who are not.
Some of the worst people I have ever met in my life personally are Palestinian diaspora. They tend to be the least religious and they are the most impacted by foreign ideologies. I have touched on this many times before.
Now this should be obvious, but the worldview of an individual is going to directly impact their political views. When such a significant portion of Palestinians are nationalist or have strong nationalistic sentiments, their politics will inevitably reflect that. Especially when they have an extremely weak grasp of their own theology.
The following are just SOME examples of the types of statements I’ve heard from Palestinians on recent political events:
• “[The Palestinian Resistance] is to blame for causing tensions in their country’s political scene. I am Palestinian first before I am Muslim”.
• *After being questioned on why they believe media propaganda about Afghans but not about the Palestinian Resistance* “Because these are our people and we know they wouldn’t do such things”.
• “The Syrian Rebels did not help Gaza. They are munāfiqūn working with Israel and the US. They should have done nothing”.
• “The Shīʿa are superior to the Sunnīs. The Sunnīs did nothing for Palestine”.
• “I want Bashar to stay in power because it is better for the Palestinians”.
• “I was on the side of Bashar and Hezbollah during the war in Syria and what they did was necessary for Palestine”.
• “The Syrians celebrating the death of Hasan Nasrallah are munāfiqūn”.
💯7❤1👍1😢1
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
لعنة الله على بشار الأسد
❤26🔥3💯2👍1👌1
Forwarded from Islam Against Modernism - الماتريدية الجها.دية
A repost from a few years ago
Contemporary Shiah are the least practicing, the most secularist, the furthest from religion virtually in every single Muslim country:
-In Iran the youth are apostatizing en masse or just don't care about religion.
-In Syria they were the backbone of the secularist kafir ba'athist nusayri government
-In Afghanistan Hazara were known for being agents of secularism, westernization and fahsha'.
-In Turkey Alevis are either kemalists or communists, in any case heavily secularists and harshly opposed to Islam.
-In Albania Bektashis are total jokers.
-In Azerbaijan Shiahs are completely secular.
-In Tajikistan and Pakistan Ismailis are basically mountain pagans hiding behind a batini İsmaili mask.
In all those cases, their first enemies are always Sunnis, Shari`ah, Islam.
What does this tell you about the nature of shaism?
Contemporary Shiah are the least practicing, the most secularist, the furthest from religion virtually in every single Muslim country:
-In Iran the youth are apostatizing en masse or just don't care about religion.
-In Syria they were the backbone of the secularist kafir ba'athist nusayri government
.
-In Pakistan behind any secularist/liberal there are always either Shiah or Qadyanis.-In Afghanistan Hazara were known for being agents of secularism, westernization and fahsha'.
-In Turkey Alevis are either kemalists or communists, in any case heavily secularists and harshly opposed to Islam.
-In Albania Bektashis are total jokers.
-In Azerbaijan Shiahs are completely secular.
-In Tajikistan and Pakistan Ismailis are basically mountain pagans hiding behind a batini İsmaili mask.
In all those cases, their first enemies are always Sunnis, Shari`ah, Islam.
What does this tell you about the nature of shaism?
💯11⚡2❤2👍1
Forwarded from Islam Against Modernism - الماتريدية الجها.دية
Plot twist, the liberal and secularist "mozlems" who call orthodox normative Muslims as "khawarij", they themselves follow a distinctive khariji belief in their denial of khilafah.
شرح تعديل العلوم - صدر الشریعة
شرح تعديل العلوم - صدر الشریعة
🔥9❤2
Forwarded from Ahlus Sunnah Forum
In the commentary of Qur’ān 11:71, which mentions that the “wife of (Ibrāhīm عليه السلام) was standing” during the incident when the angels (appearing as men) visited Ibrāhīm (عليه السلام), Imām Abū Manṣūr al-Māturīdī (ca. 235–333 AH) states:
“Some have said that she was standing in front of the guests (to serve them) because she was an elderly woman. There is no issue with an elderly woman doing so. Do you not see the statement of Allāh (تعالى): ‘The sitting (elderly) women’ (24:60) to the end of the verse? Others have said she was standing behind the door. We do not know which of them transpired.” (Ta’wīlāt al-Qur’ān (Dār al-Mīzān), 7:204)
Abū Ḥafṣ al-Nasafī quotes the same from Imām al-Māturīdī in his tafsīr. (al-Taysīr fi ‘l-Tafsīr, 8:237)
(Note how the principle of avoiding ikhtilāṭ, rooted in basic values of ghayrah and ḥayā’, is applied here. See also Ibn ʿĀbidīn's comment above: “A messenger needs to mix with males in teaching and establishing proofs against them and so on, which can only occur from males.” The shar'ī laws of ḥijāb later formalised this principle as a legal necessity, though it was observed before this as well but in a less rigorous manner.)
Read More Here: https://ahlussunnah.boards.net/thread/975/prohibition-ikhtilat-mixing-men-women
__
Join the Ahlus Sunnah Forum Telegram Channel: https://t.me/AhlusSunnahForum
“Some have said that she was standing in front of the guests (to serve them) because she was an elderly woman. There is no issue with an elderly woman doing so. Do you not see the statement of Allāh (تعالى): ‘The sitting (elderly) women’ (24:60) to the end of the verse? Others have said she was standing behind the door. We do not know which of them transpired.” (Ta’wīlāt al-Qur’ān (Dār al-Mīzān), 7:204)
Abū Ḥafṣ al-Nasafī quotes the same from Imām al-Māturīdī in his tafsīr. (al-Taysīr fi ‘l-Tafsīr, 8:237)
(Note how the principle of avoiding ikhtilāṭ, rooted in basic values of ghayrah and ḥayā’, is applied here. See also Ibn ʿĀbidīn's comment above: “A messenger needs to mix with males in teaching and establishing proofs against them and so on, which can only occur from males.” The shar'ī laws of ḥijāb later formalised this principle as a legal necessity, though it was observed before this as well but in a less rigorous manner.)
Read More Here: https://ahlussunnah.boards.net/thread/975/prohibition-ikhtilat-mixing-men-women
__
Join the Ahlus Sunnah Forum Telegram Channel: https://t.me/AhlusSunnahForum
ahlussunnah.boards.net
Prohibition of Ikhtilat (Mixing Between Men & Women) | Ahlus Sunnah Forum
The Prohibition of Ikhtilāṭ(Unnecessary Mixing of Non-Elderly Men and Women)
❤2👍1👏1💯1
There is no “Human Rights”.
There is no “International Law”.
The kuffār will not protect us.
The kuffār cannot be trusted.
Things will not change until we get this through our heads.
There is no “International Law”.
The kuffār will not protect us.
The kuffār cannot be trusted.
Things will not change until we get this through our heads.
💯13❤3👍3
A lot of 1st generation immigrants to the west, who have suffered from inferiority complexes, and have fallen victim to the liberal distortions of our Dīn, are now slowly waking up.
Views that were considered “extreme” just a few years ago are starting to appeal to them :)
Views that were considered “extreme” just a few years ago are starting to appeal to them :)
❤6❤🔥4👍1😁1