Even many of those who claim to represent the tradition have basically joined the ʿAbduhist camp of modernist reform, both ideologically and in practice. They just hide behind the maḏhabī label, which is either a tactic of infiltration, or just ignorance.
There are some that don’t outright say it, but many of them will in fact say that what is written in the books of fiqh is inapplicable in our times. And they don’t mean “hard to implement at the moment but something we NEED to work towards”. That would at least be an acknowledgement of falling short of our obligations. But no. They genuinely believe that the books of fiqh are not authoritative to begin with.
Many of them will deliberately and totally misuse recognized terms and hermeneutics within the tradition to push for this bāṭil. Yasir Qadhi, who is a so-called “wāsiṭī” in manhaj, has used this exact phraseology in past conversations with co-reformists and zanādiqa. And these tactics and phraseologies have picked up traction in so-called “traditionalist” circles as well.
These clowns are pushing secularism, feminism, modernism, and every other -ism you can think of, all under the guise of “hikmah”, “adab”, and being “kind”. Undermining our entire tradition and the authority of classical scholars. They do this for a variety of reasons.
Easy access to the women (let’s not even get into all the cases of perversion and incidents that these masjid boards cover up). Funding from the lonely and “independent” feminist sistaz and other deviant Muslims who have more money than they know what to do with and who want to pay the masājid to hear what they want. And then of course the funding from RAND and other corporations and think-tanks whose sole objective is the total secularization and destruction of Islām.
The logical conclusion of all these narratives and tactics is that none of the scholars of the past understood Islām correctly, and that many of them deliberately lied about the Dīn and distorted the real understanding of Islām for some type of personal gain. If one takes these idiotic ideas to their logical conclusions, one would have to doubt the preservation of the religion altogether.
It is really no different from a so-called “Qurʾānist” who rejects aḥādīth but accepts the Qurʾān, despite the fact that the means of preservation for both of them were the classical scholars. Those classical scholars are the ones who codified all of our sciences. We are undoubtedly dependent on them, in one way or another, for any and all knowledge of the Dīn. Even just for understanding the Arabic language. So if the classical scholars are not reliable to you, then on what basis do you believe in Islām?
Compounded ignorance on an unprecedented level. And this blatant disrespect and rejection of the authority of the classical scholars is what has opened the doors to total reinterpretation of the Dīn. Even the aspects of the Dīn that are Maʿlūm min al-Dīn bil-Ḍarūra have become “open to interpretation” to many of these zanādiqa.
There are some that don’t outright say it, but many of them will in fact say that what is written in the books of fiqh is inapplicable in our times. And they don’t mean “hard to implement at the moment but something we NEED to work towards”. That would at least be an acknowledgement of falling short of our obligations. But no. They genuinely believe that the books of fiqh are not authoritative to begin with.
Many of them will deliberately and totally misuse recognized terms and hermeneutics within the tradition to push for this bāṭil. Yasir Qadhi, who is a so-called “wāsiṭī” in manhaj, has used this exact phraseology in past conversations with co-reformists and zanādiqa. And these tactics and phraseologies have picked up traction in so-called “traditionalist” circles as well.
These clowns are pushing secularism, feminism, modernism, and every other -ism you can think of, all under the guise of “hikmah”, “adab”, and being “kind”. Undermining our entire tradition and the authority of classical scholars. They do this for a variety of reasons.
Easy access to the women (let’s not even get into all the cases of perversion and incidents that these masjid boards cover up). Funding from the lonely and “independent” feminist sistaz and other deviant Muslims who have more money than they know what to do with and who want to pay the masājid to hear what they want. And then of course the funding from RAND and other corporations and think-tanks whose sole objective is the total secularization and destruction of Islām.
The logical conclusion of all these narratives and tactics is that none of the scholars of the past understood Islām correctly, and that many of them deliberately lied about the Dīn and distorted the real understanding of Islām for some type of personal gain. If one takes these idiotic ideas to their logical conclusions, one would have to doubt the preservation of the religion altogether.
It is really no different from a so-called “Qurʾānist” who rejects aḥādīth but accepts the Qurʾān, despite the fact that the means of preservation for both of them were the classical scholars. Those classical scholars are the ones who codified all of our sciences. We are undoubtedly dependent on them, in one way or another, for any and all knowledge of the Dīn. Even just for understanding the Arabic language. So if the classical scholars are not reliable to you, then on what basis do you believe in Islām?
Compounded ignorance on an unprecedented level. And this blatant disrespect and rejection of the authority of the classical scholars is what has opened the doors to total reinterpretation of the Dīn. Even the aspects of the Dīn that are Maʿlūm min al-Dīn bil-Ḍarūra have become “open to interpretation” to many of these zanādiqa.
💯12⚡1❤1
“You MUST be a zionist agent because you don’t talk about Palestine!”
First off, I am Palestinian myself.
Secondly, I don’t believe protesting with the rainbow alphabet gang and other degenerates, who hate Islām and everything it stands for, is the way that Allāh will give us victory.
This aversion to riqq, a perfectly moral, wise, and in fact NECESSARY institution for the strength and spread of Islām, which the Greatest of Creation HIMSELF ﷺ and his blessed companions رضي الله عنهم all took part in, is just a symptom of a much larger issue within our Ummah.
You people need to correct your worldview. Our worldview is exclusively based in Islām. Not liberalism. Not feminism. Not humanism. We take our morals from the Kitāb and the Sunnah and the tradition that they were preserved through. Not the UN Charter of “Human Rights”.
You think it is a coincidence that we’re hearing about karamāt en masse for the first time in Allāhu aʿlam how long and they all seem to be occurring at the hands of the Mujāhidīn? Wake up.
First off, I am Palestinian myself.
Secondly, I don’t believe protesting with the rainbow alphabet gang and other degenerates, who hate Islām and everything it stands for, is the way that Allāh will give us victory.
This aversion to riqq, a perfectly moral, wise, and in fact NECESSARY institution for the strength and spread of Islām, which the Greatest of Creation HIMSELF ﷺ and his blessed companions رضي الله عنهم all took part in, is just a symptom of a much larger issue within our Ummah.
You people need to correct your worldview. Our worldview is exclusively based in Islām. Not liberalism. Not feminism. Not humanism. We take our morals from the Kitāb and the Sunnah and the tradition that they were preserved through. Not the UN Charter of “Human Rights”.
You think it is a coincidence that we’re hearing about karamāt en masse for the first time in Allāhu aʿlam how long and they all seem to be occurring at the hands of the Mujāhidīn? Wake up.
❤9🔥1
I’ll be posting some more batches of PDFs shortly, InshāʾAllāh :)
❤3👍3
Don’t ever take someone seriously if they unironically use the phrase: “Don’t generalize!”.
Without generalities, one can neither identify exceptions for what they are, nor can they ever have any proper grasp of reality itself. It just leads to delusion and the rejection of objective truth.
Go look up the phrase on Google. Disturbing results.
Without generalities, one can neither identify exceptions for what they are, nor can they ever have any proper grasp of reality itself. It just leads to delusion and the rejection of objective truth.
Go look up the phrase on Google. Disturbing results.
👍10💯1
Forwarded from دار الإمام مصطفى صبري
The shipment is on its way very soon إن شاء الله ! And the website will be opening shortly as well!
❤3
دار الإمام مصطفى صبري
The shipment is on its way very soon إن شاء الله ! And the website will be opening shortly as well!
Follow, support, and share InshāʾAllāh.
💯3
قناة السمسمية الكبرى
“You don’t need a Fiqh textbook to tell you something shouldn’t be done”. “You don’t need a Fiqh textbook to tell you something should be done”. “It’s rooted in guru worship and a reliance on clergy”. Where does one even begin with addressing this stupidity???
It is extremely evident that you struggle with grasping rationality. Instead of challenging basic, agreed-upon fiqh, humble yourself and take a fiqh class.
🤡5
❤3