The brother has been actively posting excellent content, including translations and excerpts from the works of Shaykh al-Islām Mustafa Sabrī and Imām Zāhid al-Kawtharī.

Also follow the Ḥanafī School Telegram Channel. Me and a few other brothers are running it. A lot of excellent content on there as well, particularly ʿaqīdah.

https://t.me/hanafi_school

So many layers of stupidity, ignorance, and irony in one screenshot. I don’t even know where to begin. I get a headache every time I open this app.

:P

Blimey, now he says we have to overlook the theological differences between Sunnis and Shia Dogs when there is a “common political objective”.

This same reasoning could be applied to the Assad regime, should we be all kumbaya with Nusayris because they are (supposedly) “resisting the Zionistsssssss !!!” ?

Something that Sheikh Asrar does not seem to understand is that these groups (whether it’s Houthis or HezboShit or anyone else) do not actually oppose the Jews, it’s all theatre and drama.

I’ve had quite a few brothers message me over the last few months, letting out their frustrations and asking me for advice regarding marriage.

Some of them have gotten divorced and screwed over by their ex-wives, others have tried to get married multiple times but were unable to due to the inability to find a woman who meets their criteria. The standards are extremely basic, but sadly due to current societal and economic circumstances, the bare minimum has become difficult to find. And many times, the men do not meet the (quite frankly, extremely unrealistic) criteria of the women.

A lot of disgusting behavior and habits have been enabled by our so-called community leaders. The root cause of all this is compounded ignorance of the Dīn.

My advice to all of the brothers who are trying to get married is: Do not get married to a woman that doesn’t have a basic understanding of ACTUAL fiqh. She will make your life a living nightmare. You do NOT want a female citing Nouman Ali Khan and Omar Suleiman when you have marital disputes. A woman who doesn’t understand the rights of the husband and wife in Islām should not be given a second thought. I don’t care how attractive you find her.

Even following the above will not guarantee that everything will go smoothly. I’ve had brothers inform me that so-called ʿālimahs will use their knowledge of the Dīn and respective rights against their husbands in secular courts on the basis of “Human Rights Violations” (which is an act of clear-cut nifāq).

Vet her carefully. Don’t let the fantasy you have of someone, or your idealized image of them, blur your vision of reality. Being overly cautious and potentially missing out on something that could have been good is better than impulsively jumping into something that could potentially ruin the rest of your life. Potential ≠ Outcome.

I urge all of you, women especially, to really think about how much damage this is all going to cause long-term. A lot of people may be “living life”, “enjoying themselves”, “keeping themselves occupied”, but in reality this is all just going to come out in the wrong way over time. What we’re dealing with now is unprecedented.

No stable marriages means no stable families, and that will be disastrous for the future of our Ummah.

For those who asked, the best green flags in a woman would be:

- Strong understanding of Islām as a comprehensive and wholistic worldview.
- Religious and competent father and/or brother(s).
- Feminine and understands her role.
- Actual intelligence (no Uni degree needed).

بإذن الله تعالى وبركاته

Even many of those who claim to represent the tradition have basically joined the ʿAbduhist camp of modernist reform, both ideologically and in practice. They just hide behind the maḏhabī label, which is either a tactic of infiltration, or just ignorance.

There are some that don’t outright say it, but many of them will in fact say that what is written in the books of fiqh is inapplicable in our times. And they don’t mean “hard to implement at the moment but something we NEED to work towards”. That would at least be an acknowledgement of falling short of our obligations. But no. They genuinely believe that the books of fiqh are not authoritative to begin with.

Many of them will deliberately and totally misuse recognized terms and hermeneutics within the tradition to push for this bāṭil. Yasir Qadhi, who is a so-called “wāsiṭī” in manhaj, has used this exact phraseology in past conversations with co-reformists and zanādiqa. And these tactics and phraseologies have picked up traction in so-called “traditionalist” circles as well.

These clowns are pushing secularism, feminism, modernism, and every other -ism you can think of, all under the guise of “hikmah”, “adab”, and being “kind”. Undermining our entire tradition and the authority of classical scholars. They do this for a variety of reasons.

Easy access to the women (let’s not even get into all the cases of perversion and incidents that these masjid boards cover up). Funding from the lonely and “independent” feminist sistaz and other deviant Muslims who have more money than they know what to do with and who want to pay the masājid to hear what they want. And then of course the funding from RAND and other corporations and think-tanks whose sole objective is the total secularization and destruction of Islām.

The logical conclusion of all these narratives and tactics is that none of the scholars of the past understood Islām correctly, and that many of them deliberately lied about the Dīn and distorted the real understanding of Islām for some type of personal gain. If one takes these idiotic ideas to their logical conclusions, one would have to doubt the preservation of the religion altogether.

It is really no different from a so-called “Qurʾānist” who rejects aḥādīth but accepts the Qurʾān, despite the fact that the means of preservation for both of them were the classical scholars. Those classical scholars are the ones who codified all of our sciences. We are undoubtedly dependent on them, in one way or another, for any and all knowledge of the Dīn. Even just for understanding the Arabic language. So if the classical scholars are not reliable to you, then on what basis do you believe in Islām?

Compounded ignorance on an unprecedented level. And this blatant disrespect and rejection of the authority of the classical scholars is what has opened the doors to total reinterpretation of the Dīn. Even the aspects of the Dīn that are Maʿlūm min al-Dīn bil-Ḍarūra have become “open to interpretation” to many of these zanādiqa.

‎“You MUST be a zionist agent because you don’t talk about Palestine!”

‎First off, I am Palestinian myself.

‎Secondly, I don’t believe protesting with the rainbow alphabet gang and other degenerates, who hate Islām and everything it stands for, is the way that Allāh will give us victory.

‎This aversion to riqq, a perfectly moral, wise, and in fact NECESSARY institution for the strength and spread of Islām, which the Greatest of Creation HIMSELF ﷺ and his blessed companions رضي الله عنهم all took part in, is just a symptom of a much larger issue within our Ummah.

‎You people need to correct your worldview. Our worldview is exclusively based in Islām. Not liberalism. Not feminism. Not humanism. We take our morals from the Kitāb and the Sunnah and the tradition that they were preserved through. Not the UN Charter of “Human Rights”.

‎You think it is a coincidence that we’re hearing about karamāt en masse for the first time in Allāhu aʿlam how long and they all seem to be occurring at the hands of the Mujāhidīn? Wake up.

I’ll be posting some more batches of PDFs shortly, InshāʾAllāh :)

Don’t ever take someone seriously if they unironically use the phrase: “Don’t generalize!”.

Without generalities, one can neither identify exceptions for what they are, nor can they ever have any proper grasp of reality itself. It just leads to delusion and the rejection of objective truth.

Go look up the phrase on Google. Disturbing results.

The shipment is on its way very soon إن شاء الله ! And the website will be opening shortly as well!

Follow, support, and share InshāʾAllāh.