Good Monday ladies and gents! Weโre excited to drop our crispy new report: The Science Behind Tokenomics and Launch Performance.
It builds on our earlier analysis of 2025โs token launches, and this time, we went deeper.
Our analysts tested how different tokenomics structures correlate with short- and mid-term returns.
We explored four key questions:
- Does insider allocation hurt performance?
- Does high community allocation help?
- Does a tokenโs listing price shape investor perception?
- And does post-launch circulating supply even matter?
Here are the main takeaways:
1. Maximize community allocation
2. Set a lower launch price
3. Donโt stress over insider shares
4. Circulating-supply unlocks have little impact
5. Prioritize clear tokenomics
๐ Read the full report: https://docsend.com/view/47i874vknexnw5hm
It builds on our earlier analysis of 2025โs token launches, and this time, we went deeper.
Our analysts tested how different tokenomics structures correlate with short- and mid-term returns.
We explored four key questions:
- Does insider allocation hurt performance?
- Does high community allocation help?
- Does a tokenโs listing price shape investor perception?
- And does post-launch circulating supply even matter?
Here are the main takeaways:
1. Maximize community allocation
2. Set a lower launch price
3. Donโt stress over insider shares
4. Circulating-supply unlocks have little impact
5. Prioritize clear tokenomics
๐ Read the full report: https://docsend.com/view/47i874vknexnw5hm
18๐ฅ5โค4๐4๐2
In 2025, projects that gave a large share of their token supply to the community (e.g. via airdrops, public sales, ecosystem incentives) performed much better after launch.
The top third of projects by community allocation (i.e. those that gave 47% or more of total supply to the community) delivered:
~120% return after 1 week
~350% after 1 month
~200% at the time of analysis
Meanwhile, projects that allocated only 30โ47% to the community saw more volatility without consistently better returns.
So basically:
Give the community a lot, or donโt bother.
Read more
The top third of projects by community allocation (i.e. those that gave 47% or more of total supply to the community) delivered:
~120% return after 1 week
~350% after 1 month
~200% at the time of analysis
Meanwhile, projects that allocated only 30โ47% to the community saw more volatility without consistently better returns.
So basically:
Give the community a lot, or donโt bother.
Read more
๐ฅ7โค4๐3
Tokens that launch at a lower unit price (specifically, below $0.075) perform better across all timeframes, both short-term and long-term.
Why?
People tend to think a token priced at $0.01 has โmore room to growโ than one priced at $1, even if the market caps are the same.
Full report:
https://docsend.com/view/47i874vknexnw5hm
Why?
People tend to think a token priced at $0.01 has โmore room to growโ than one priced at $1, even if the market caps are the same.
Full report:
https://docsend.com/view/47i874vknexnw5hm
๐ฅ6๐4โค3โก1๐1
Why higher initial market caps = weaker token performance?
Hereโs the math:
If your token launches with a $1M IMC, itโll perform ~1.37% better than the same token launched at a $2.7M IMC.
So if you go from $1M to $10M IMC, your early performance could drop by ~4โ5% purely because of launch size.
Every extra dollar of IMC adds friction to post-TGE performance.
Read more
Hereโs the math:
If your token launches with a $1M IMC, itโll perform ~1.37% better than the same token launched at a $2.7M IMC.
So if you go from $1M to $10M IMC, your early performance could drop by ~4โ5% purely because of launch size.
Every extra dollar of IMC adds friction to post-TGE performance.
Read more
โค5๐4๐4
Don't over-optimize insider share, other than maybe for optics.
Our report showed that there is no clear correlation between higher or lower insider allocations and token price success.
Learn more
Our report showed that there is no clear correlation between higher or lower insider allocations and token price success.
Learn more
๐ฅ6โค4๐4
Your ad copy needs to clearly say what the user gets, why it matters, and what they should do next.
โ Left example
Whatโs wrong with it?
- Doesnโt tell the user what youโre offering
- No reason to care
- No clear next step
- Could be literally any project
โ Right example
Why it works:
- Tells you what you get: staking rewards + early access
- Tells you why it matters: real yield + governance rights
- Tells you what to do next: stake now, and itโs easy
If you need quality ads for your project, dm @Alex_Simplicity
โ Left example
Whatโs wrong with it?
- Doesnโt tell the user what youโre offering
- No reason to care
- No clear next step
- Could be literally any project
โ Right example
Why it works:
- Tells you what you get: staking rewards + early access
- Tells you why it matters: real yield + governance rights
- Tells you what to do next: stake now, and itโs easy
If you need quality ads for your project, dm @Alex_Simplicity
๐6โค5๐ฅ5
Free Tokenomics Master Template ๐
This is the exact tokenomics template we use at Simplicity Group to design the token economy for our clients.
This covers:
โ Allocations
โ Vesting schedules
โ Valuations
โ Emissions modelling
โ Investor ROI calculator
โ 22 charts and graphs
โ V3 (and V2) Liquidity model
โ TGE Price impact simulations
โ Financials (PnL)
โ Equity valuations (for equity rounds)
Get it for free here: https://forms.gle/x1AcgBAabwhbj5XP8
This is the exact tokenomics template we use at Simplicity Group to design the token economy for our clients.
This covers:
โ Allocations
โ Vesting schedules
โ Valuations
โ Emissions modelling
โ Investor ROI calculator
โ 22 charts and graphs
โ V3 (and V2) Liquidity model
โ TGE Price impact simulations
โ Financials (PnL)
โ Equity valuations (for equity rounds)
Get it for free here: https://forms.gle/x1AcgBAabwhbj5XP8
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
35โค8๐ฅ4๐3โก1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
After building token models for 100+ teams, seeing firsthand what passes for โtokenomicsโ in this space (and the consequences that follow), we figured it was time to do something about it.
So weโre sharing the exact tokenomics template we use at Simplicity.
Itโs the same structure thatโs helped founders close $10M+ rounds, design emissions schedules, and pressure-test liquidity assumptions before launch.
Now weโre making it public. Because this space needs better token design and gatekeeping helps no one.
If you're designing your own token, or just want to understand what actually matters in supply-side mechanics, grab the template and check the walkthrough video.
Hope it helps. And if it saves you from one overpriced advisor call, even better๐
๐Watch the full video now:
https://youtu.be/RgGBxm7XSvY?si=HbJVqzQ3QdaBxrI3
So weโre sharing the exact tokenomics template we use at Simplicity.
Itโs the same structure thatโs helped founders close $10M+ rounds, design emissions schedules, and pressure-test liquidity assumptions before launch.
Now weโre making it public. Because this space needs better token design and gatekeeping helps no one.
If you're designing your own token, or just want to understand what actually matters in supply-side mechanics, grab the template and check the walkthrough video.
Hope it helps. And if it saves you from one overpriced advisor call, even better
๐Watch the full video now:
https://youtu.be/RgGBxm7XSvY?si=HbJVqzQ3QdaBxrI3
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
1โค5๐5๐4
Don't confuse supply side 'tokenomics' with the full token economy, this is what (a fraction of) full economy design looks like.
Our template is purely for the supply side.
Our template is purely for the supply side.
๐6โค5๐ฅ4๐1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Another serious milestone for our client MetaWealth! ๐พ
Invited to speak at NASDAQ Trade Talks in New York, on a panel alongside Coinbase, Circle, and Credit Suisse.
Congrats to Darren and the team!
Invited to speak at NASDAQ Trade Talks in New York, on a panel alongside Coinbase, Circle, and Credit Suisse.
Congrats to Darren and the team!
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
โค6๐6๐4
Your content should match your team's personality
That's what we learned from the best-performing projects in 2025. If the founding team is serious, your Twitter should be serious. If you're degens, lean into it.
Walrus, despite being a heavy infrastructure project with $140M backing, leaned into humour authentically and saw its token jump 357% one month after TGE (still +192% since).
Hyperlane went the other way. Their posts avoided hype and stuck to matter-of-fact updates only, which aligned with their brand the most.
HYPER shot up by 533% in the first week post launch, evidencing that merely posting playful / high energy posts isnโt indicative of community perception of the projectโs token.
That's what we learned from the best-performing projects in 2025. If the founding team is serious, your Twitter should be serious. If you're degens, lean into it.
Walrus, despite being a heavy infrastructure project with $140M backing, leaned into humour authentically and saw its token jump 357% one month after TGE (still +192% since).
Hyperlane went the other way. Their posts avoided hype and stuck to matter-of-fact updates only, which aligned with their brand the most.
HYPER shot up by 533% in the first week post launch, evidencing that merely posting playful / high energy posts isnโt indicative of community perception of the projectโs token.
โค8๐5๐5