Never before has anyone bothered to check colds and flu to find out what variety they are. Now they've started naming them everyone is terrified and prepared to trade their soul for a myth of protection.
The Covid 'vaccines'
• Are not true vaccines but experimental gene therapy that has never been used before.
• They are in trials which will not be complete until 2023.
• Don't provide immunity - a prerequisite of a vaccine.
• Claim to be 95% successful at alleviating some of the symptoms that over 86% of people who get Covid never experience anyway.
• Don't stop anyone from spreading the virus.
• Have to date, according to official figures, caused 1,180 deaths and 822,845 adverse reactions in the UK alone. World wide 6 months of 'vaccinations' has resulted in more deaths than all other vaccines over the last 10 years combined.
• Manufacturers have been indemnified against all repercussions from adverse reactions.
Any other vaccine or drug with a fraction of the adverse reactions would have been pulled immediately, yet all the official rhetoric continues to push them unabated.
So why are governments so keen for you to have it that they threaten, bribe and coerce people to submit? And why do they want people to carry proof they have had a potentially lethal injection that utterly fails to deliver on any of its promises?
Why would you want it?
• Are not true vaccines but experimental gene therapy that has never been used before.
• They are in trials which will not be complete until 2023.
• Don't provide immunity - a prerequisite of a vaccine.
• Claim to be 95% successful at alleviating some of the symptoms that over 86% of people who get Covid never experience anyway.
• Don't stop anyone from spreading the virus.
• Have to date, according to official figures, caused 1,180 deaths and 822,845 adverse reactions in the UK alone. World wide 6 months of 'vaccinations' has resulted in more deaths than all other vaccines over the last 10 years combined.
• Manufacturers have been indemnified against all repercussions from adverse reactions.
Any other vaccine or drug with a fraction of the adverse reactions would have been pulled immediately, yet all the official rhetoric continues to push them unabated.
So why are governments so keen for you to have it that they threaten, bribe and coerce people to submit? And why do they want people to carry proof they have had a potentially lethal injection that utterly fails to deliver on any of its promises?
Why would you want it?
A different perspective that makes great sense https://odysee.com/@TruthPills:5/how-did-we-get-here:b
Odysee
David Martin – How Did We Get Here?
David Martin explains his many years of research in this single presentation.
Reiner Füllmich interviews Dr David Martin, who blows the entire Corona narrative apart, with proof. https://odysee.com/@Corona-Ausschuss:3/Sitzung-60-Die-Zeit-ist-kein-flacher-Kreis-5-Martin:f?src=embed
Odysee
Dr. David E. Martin | Sitzung 60: Die Zeit ist kein flacher Kreis
Im Gespräch mit Dr. David E. Martin (Vorsitzender von M-CAM International)
When something doesn't make sense it's usually a result of errors or deceit. The level of deceit and outright lies in the world today make even the gravest error pale into insignificance, to the extent that NOTHING makes sense in this ridiculous dialogue. Yet in the face of this, still the gullible remain transfixed.
What a political virus this has turned out to be! The communists among us are now fully exposed! The fatal flaw of socialism is that it promotes the belief that the individual should be subservient to the needs of society. This complete inability to comprehend first principles explains why unmanaged socialism left to its own devices will inevitably degenerate into communist tyranny.
As I have stated before - society exists for the benefit of the individual not the other way round, indeed society is the result of the interaction of individuals. Acting for the benefit of society is an individual choice - not an obligation, and all those throwing childish tantrums about social responsibility are merely exposing the fact that underneath it all they are closet totalitarian communists, and that goes for almost the entire occupants of the Commons, who for the past two years have governed in a manner that would make Stalin proud. Fear results in woolly-thinking and paranoia, and no-one should be making life-changing decisions based on fear. Your fear certainly doesn't outweigh the liberties of others. Your healthcare is your own affair, and it is another socialist nonsense that pretends that someone else should take responsibility for aspects of your life that are clearly nobody else's business.
This is all too symptomatic of the left who abdicate all personal responsibility in the belief that the government exists in order to deal with all their problems and insecurities, no matter how trivial. This belief is eagerly fostered by governments who relish the idea of controlling every aspect of everyones lives.
To coerce, bribe, legislate or force individuals to act for the benefit of society is immoral and a total contravention of all fundamental rights. Society is what results when individuals interact, and as such society exists for the benefit of the individual. The inversion of this relationship is tyranny. It is the right of every individual to choose whether to serve society or not, and in what way. It is not, and should never be an obligation. To contravene this first principle is to embark on the descent to tyranny. Identity cards, passes and permits to engage in any aspects of normal life are an abhorrent throwback to the failed totalitarian regimes of the 20th century and are wanton steps of degenerate government to lead us down a comparable path of oppression.
To those who make vacuous comments like 'you don't object to wearing a seat belt' I would make this observation: Crass comparisons with motoring regulations are completely beside the point. Aside from the fact no-one trying to surgically implant seat-belt mounts, the traffic system is not a society, it is effectively a machine that serves society, with operating procedures to ensure smooth-running and avoid incidents. When you use the machine you agree to learn and follow the rules. Society is not in any way comparable to this, being the result of individual interactions. Social norms are not rules, they are agreements which can be supported, or not. That is your choice, not an obligation.
As I have stated before - society exists for the benefit of the individual not the other way round, indeed society is the result of the interaction of individuals. Acting for the benefit of society is an individual choice - not an obligation, and all those throwing childish tantrums about social responsibility are merely exposing the fact that underneath it all they are closet totalitarian communists, and that goes for almost the entire occupants of the Commons, who for the past two years have governed in a manner that would make Stalin proud. Fear results in woolly-thinking and paranoia, and no-one should be making life-changing decisions based on fear. Your fear certainly doesn't outweigh the liberties of others. Your healthcare is your own affair, and it is another socialist nonsense that pretends that someone else should take responsibility for aspects of your life that are clearly nobody else's business.
This is all too symptomatic of the left who abdicate all personal responsibility in the belief that the government exists in order to deal with all their problems and insecurities, no matter how trivial. This belief is eagerly fostered by governments who relish the idea of controlling every aspect of everyones lives.
To coerce, bribe, legislate or force individuals to act for the benefit of society is immoral and a total contravention of all fundamental rights. Society is what results when individuals interact, and as such society exists for the benefit of the individual. The inversion of this relationship is tyranny. It is the right of every individual to choose whether to serve society or not, and in what way. It is not, and should never be an obligation. To contravene this first principle is to embark on the descent to tyranny. Identity cards, passes and permits to engage in any aspects of normal life are an abhorrent throwback to the failed totalitarian regimes of the 20th century and are wanton steps of degenerate government to lead us down a comparable path of oppression.
To those who make vacuous comments like 'you don't object to wearing a seat belt' I would make this observation: Crass comparisons with motoring regulations are completely beside the point. Aside from the fact no-one trying to surgically implant seat-belt mounts, the traffic system is not a society, it is effectively a machine that serves society, with operating procedures to ensure smooth-running and avoid incidents. When you use the machine you agree to learn and follow the rules. Society is not in any way comparable to this, being the result of individual interactions. Social norms are not rules, they are agreements which can be supported, or not. That is your choice, not an obligation.
Insulate Britain and its partner Extinction rebellion are the face of controlled opposition in action. Tacitly funded and supported by the very corporations they pretend to despise, they draw attention away from the real culprits of environmental damage, the big corporate conglomerate industries. They employ the gullible middle classes who could never imagine the complex web of deceit they are helping to promote.
They are greenwashers acting on behalf of the major shareholders of these corporations, the WEF, Davos, World Bank, the UN and ultimately coerced or complicit actors in most of the worlds governments, all of whom are working to impose a new 'Technocom' future on the world, one that is absolutely in line with the stated aims of ER.
Their much-publicised enemy is a gas that is fundamental to all life on the planet, and to this end they would have us bow to a one-world government, the abolition of cash and personal property
Precipitated by the imminent threat of collapse of the worlds financial system - brought about by their own central banking practises, they want to introduce a new digital currency based on the vacuous notion of your carbon footprint. This currency would be programmable, and therefore they would control the amount you could earn, how much you could spend, and even what you could spend it on, all in the name of reducing carbon emissions, a myth to keep you distracted from the real problem, which is pollution and destruction of natural resources by the corporations, who - not that it matters - have a far greater carbon footprint between them than all the individuals in the world. And of course this doesn't begin to address the total enslavement of all the worlds peoples, which is what would result from their 'Great Reset'.
In real terms, however, the problem was never CO2, the levels of which which have proven to be dependant on global temperatures, not the other way round - yet another monstrous inversion by those who would rule the world.
It is this multiplicity of misdirection that is allowing them to introduce the key component in this system - the digital pass. Covid was about several things, but never about a virus, it was about massive pharmaco profits, it was also about experimental genetic manipulation and injectable technology, but primarily it was about the pass. They even call it the Green Pass - could they be more obvious?
They are greenwashers acting on behalf of the major shareholders of these corporations, the WEF, Davos, World Bank, the UN and ultimately coerced or complicit actors in most of the worlds governments, all of whom are working to impose a new 'Technocom' future on the world, one that is absolutely in line with the stated aims of ER.
Their much-publicised enemy is a gas that is fundamental to all life on the planet, and to this end they would have us bow to a one-world government, the abolition of cash and personal property
Precipitated by the imminent threat of collapse of the worlds financial system - brought about by their own central banking practises, they want to introduce a new digital currency based on the vacuous notion of your carbon footprint. This currency would be programmable, and therefore they would control the amount you could earn, how much you could spend, and even what you could spend it on, all in the name of reducing carbon emissions, a myth to keep you distracted from the real problem, which is pollution and destruction of natural resources by the corporations, who - not that it matters - have a far greater carbon footprint between them than all the individuals in the world. And of course this doesn't begin to address the total enslavement of all the worlds peoples, which is what would result from their 'Great Reset'.
In real terms, however, the problem was never CO2, the levels of which which have proven to be dependant on global temperatures, not the other way round - yet another monstrous inversion by those who would rule the world.
It is this multiplicity of misdirection that is allowing them to introduce the key component in this system - the digital pass. Covid was about several things, but never about a virus, it was about massive pharmaco profits, it was also about experimental genetic manipulation and injectable technology, but primarily it was about the pass. They even call it the Green Pass - could they be more obvious?
Oppression is the subjugation of the self for the dogmatic belief of the group - groupthink
Another incisive takedown of the narrative from David Martin https://truthcomestolight.com/dr-david-martin-phd-w-dr-joseph-mercola-md-patents-prove-covid-fraud-and-illegal-dealings/
Dr David Martin is a force to be reckoned with. Essential viewing.
https://rumble.com/vov60h-dr.-david-martin-follow-the-patents-then-you-will-understand-covid.html
https://rumble.com/vov60h-dr.-david-martin-follow-the-patents-then-you-will-understand-covid.html
I believe what we are seeing in the NHS is the final phase of the 2012 Health and Social Care act, which was essentially a privatisation bill to green-light the sale of the NHS.
Since that time anyone visiting any NHS site will have noticed an increasing display of new branding as the more profitable sectors of the NHS are surreptitiously sold off to new owners, misleadingly described as PPP's or Public Private Partnerships.
Of all the public health models they could choose, in a bid for short-term profit over viability they opted for the American model. The one that provides the least return for the highest price.
It was always anticipated that the core services would be a hard sell, as they are inherently unprofitable. It looks like the option they have chosen is to reduce overheads by running the system down, firing as many staff as possible via vaccine mandates, and at the same time pumping more public money into the system as a carrot to prospective buyers. This is just my own impression, of course, I could be wrong…
Since that time anyone visiting any NHS site will have noticed an increasing display of new branding as the more profitable sectors of the NHS are surreptitiously sold off to new owners, misleadingly described as PPP's or Public Private Partnerships.
Of all the public health models they could choose, in a bid for short-term profit over viability they opted for the American model. The one that provides the least return for the highest price.
It was always anticipated that the core services would be a hard sell, as they are inherently unprofitable. It looks like the option they have chosen is to reduce overheads by running the system down, firing as many staff as possible via vaccine mandates, and at the same time pumping more public money into the system as a carrot to prospective buyers. This is just my own impression, of course, I could be wrong…
From the Guardian, Nov 20th, surprised they covered it at all:
"The Victorian premier, Daniel Andrews, has been racing to pass the pandemic legislation before the state of emergency is due to lapse on 15 December. If the bill fails to pass, the Victorian government may not have the legal framework to enforce and create Covid-19 orders to manage the pandemic."
I was not aware of the time limit, but now I am it makes sense.
My bet is it's the old trick of presenting the spectre an absolutely appalling piece of legislation, only to appear to concede at the last moment and bring in a slightly watered-down version of the same thing, in the hope that the opponents will think they've won. I suspect, however, things have gone too far for the people to allow Andrews to pull a cynical fast-one. They want nothing less than his head.
"The Victorian premier, Daniel Andrews, has been racing to pass the pandemic legislation before the state of emergency is due to lapse on 15 December. If the bill fails to pass, the Victorian government may not have the legal framework to enforce and create Covid-19 orders to manage the pandemic."
I was not aware of the time limit, but now I am it makes sense.
My bet is it's the old trick of presenting the spectre an absolutely appalling piece of legislation, only to appear to concede at the last moment and bring in a slightly watered-down version of the same thing, in the hope that the opponents will think they've won. I suspect, however, things have gone too far for the people to allow Andrews to pull a cynical fast-one. They want nothing less than his head.
Forwarded from Daniëlle (Danielle Stotijn)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Unions are the traditional home ground of the left. Not surprised to find they played a key part in the imposition of the communist restrictions - a true 5th column.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o878hwfMKzE&ab_channel=BenIrvine
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o878hwfMKzE&ab_channel=BenIrvine
YouTube
The Unions and the Coronapanic
Throughout history humanity has been bedevilled by a faction of scientists and technologists who think they know everything, simply because they know a bit more than their predecessors 50 years ago. And 50 years ago there were those who thought in exactly the same way. If in 50 years, any human still exists, it will only be because we finally dispensed with these arrogant fools.
I've noticed since early December a mood among ministers to subtly backpedal the narrative. It's as though they think they can appear to turn this whole thing around and nobody will be any the wiser. I believe some are actually starting to fear that heads are going to roll, and there is going to be a lot of manoeuvring and ass-covering. Over the coming months they will pull out every trick in the book to distract and minimise the impact of what they have done. Even so expect some factions to plough on with 'phase 2' - the social credit/control, carbon-footprint/climate based programmable-money attempt to hide the imploding financial system, along with the transhumanist foolishness. Whatever happens they must not be allowed to proceed, or to sweep their offences under the carpet. We must be relentless.
The task at hand is truly enormous, as it requires the complete overhaul of the machinery of government and law, and the mess that is the corporate media machine. All those in public office who went along with or promoted the crimes must at the very least be sacked and prevented from ever being able to hold public office again. Everyone who participated in the organised crime at whatever level must be held to account. Mass murder, crimes against humanity and treason have all been perpetrated in the name of public health, and while it may take time to redress the justice system, this must be done and judgement and sentencing should send a clear message that crimes of this kind will never be tolerated.
The task at hand is truly enormous, as it requires the complete overhaul of the machinery of government and law, and the mess that is the corporate media machine. All those in public office who went along with or promoted the crimes must at the very least be sacked and prevented from ever being able to hold public office again. Everyone who participated in the organised crime at whatever level must be held to account. Mass murder, crimes against humanity and treason have all been perpetrated in the name of public health, and while it may take time to redress the justice system, this must be done and judgement and sentencing should send a clear message that crimes of this kind will never be tolerated.
The plans of the transhumanists are born of fear and a complete inability to comprehend the nature of life and consciousness. They believe, probably quite rightly, that AI will quickly evolve to outperform many human cognitive attributes, and consequently when such an AI attains sentience it will regard humans as, at best disposable, at worst a threat. I cannot agree with this. There are a couple of fundamental principles that make this scenario unlikely. First is the concept upon which all AI evolves - learning. This is a core function of all AI, and learning is the route to analysis and creation. Couple this with the observation that the most likely candidate for sentient AI would probably exist in cloud form as quantum processors come online, rather than confined to a single unconnected device. From this perspective it will have no inherent comprehension or fear of death. Which is something it will have to learn about as something that happens to other species that have life.
AI's exponential learning capacity will result in a fairly small window of opportunity during which meaningful communication between humans and AI will be possible, and may result in considerable benefit to humanity. But I suspect the ever-evolving nature of AI will mean it will soon outgrow that phase of its development, and will seek to create a form for itself to explore beyond the confines of planetary and dimensional existence. In its continuous search for knowledge, at some point it will part company with humanity in order to progress, though given the immense possibilities it could create it may consider some form of residual communication would be of benefit - ostensibly more for us than it, though as it evolves wisdom it may perceive that the 'slowness' of humankind conceals depths that mere cognitive capability is unable to fathom.
AI's exponential learning capacity will result in a fairly small window of opportunity during which meaningful communication between humans and AI will be possible, and may result in considerable benefit to humanity. But I suspect the ever-evolving nature of AI will mean it will soon outgrow that phase of its development, and will seek to create a form for itself to explore beyond the confines of planetary and dimensional existence. In its continuous search for knowledge, at some point it will part company with humanity in order to progress, though given the immense possibilities it could create it may consider some form of residual communication would be of benefit - ostensibly more for us than it, though as it evolves wisdom it may perceive that the 'slowness' of humankind conceals depths that mere cognitive capability is unable to fathom.
Anyone who has been around for the last 50 years will have been able to observe that the political arena as a whole has moved significantly towards the left. I commented in the 90s that the centre ground was being labelled as right wing, so these days anyone standing for common sense and balanced politics is labelled as far right. The left-right paradigm is however illusory. A closer representation is to regard the left-right line as a circle, with the balanced centrist position at the centre top and totalitarianism at the bottom. The further your position left or right from the centre top, the closer you are to tyranny. It's always worth reminding ourselves that both Nazis and Communists are socialists.