Science With Dr. Doug
863 subscribers
105 photos
2 videos
122 links
Ph.D. Biochemist & Molecular Biologist, Physicist, Award Winning Global Super Solver, Materials Scientist, Innovator.
Download Telegram
We’re two years into this, we’ve had three big waves, a present tsunami of infections which are uncontrollably spreading like wildfire in the jabbed & unjabbed, AND 3 doses of a vaccine — and now, NOW, the government is going to ship us all some masks that “really” work. 😂😂😂
I can’t help but think that if many brave people like you weren’t constantly speaking out about the vaccine and sharing the other side of the story, the Supreme Court may have ruled the opposite way today. So I just want to congratulate you all on a job well done. Thank you. :-)
According to a CDC/Kaiser Permanente study of 69,000 patients:

Compared to delta, an omicron infection has a:

1) 91% reduced risk of death.
2) 74% reduced risk of ICU admission.
3) 53% reduced risk of hospitalization.
4) 70% reduction in duration of hospital stay.

Unlike Delta, none of the 52,297 cases of Omicron in the study required mechanical ventilation.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.01.11.22269045v1.full.pdf
It’s a psychological wonder to realize there’s a growing number of people who believe you should be force injected with something that doesn’t protect them and that may cause you fatal harm. If that wasn’t crazy enough, these people also think their position is the virtuous one.
Imagine that. Giving a person a booster every 4 months might actually harm their immune system.

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/320443
Question: If we need to receive continued boosters to counteract rapidly waning vaccine efficacy, but repeated boosters ultimately impairs the immune system, where does that leave us? Catch 22? Stuck between a rock and a hard place? We can’t boost our way out of this.
Viral attenuation in action. And this is pre-omicron.
Are recently vaccinated people more prone to COVID infection? Data would suggest that this is the case. This lymphocyte count data for the Pfizer mRNA vaccine provides the basis as to the mechanism. Pronounced vaccine induced immunosuppression.
93% experienced a side effect. The majority were mild/moderate. However, 22% had 1 or more symptoms to significantly disturb daily activities, and lasting for several days and/or causing absence from work. The severity of side effects correlated with antibody levels.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanepe/article/PIIS2666-77622100185-X/fulltext#sec0019
It’s imperative that we know why cumulative “excess” mortality since the start of the pandemic is significantly greater than confirmed COVID deaths. In the U.S., the difference now stands at 400K. Globally, the difference is 5-15 million. When will we have answers?

https://ourworldindata.org/excess-mortality-covid
Among all of the effective ways to handle a pandemic, I’m pretty sure that waiting to the end of the pandemic to send out 1 billion test kits and n95 masks is not one of them.
Someone who is vaccinated is twice as likely to develop long COVID according to this study.
.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.01.04.21268536v1
👍1
Definitely take some time to read this article in Science. It discusses why vaccine side effects aren’t being exposed or dealt with properly. We’re starting to get “little hints” of transparency, but it’s still not close to enough.

https://www.science.org/content/article/rare-cases-coronavirus-vaccines-may-cause-long-covid-symptoms
If an observation starts to show that your position may not be correct, put the word “rare” in front of the observation. “Rare” has a sort of magic power to make anyone who reads it to completely discount what proceeds it, and to abandon any desire to evaluate the actual numbers.
Immune Mediated Hepatitis.

They also discuss the mechanism by which the jab can produce autoimmune reactions via antibodies that are cross-reactive between Spike and self-antigens.

https://www.journal-of-hepatology.eu/article/S0168-8278(21)02093-6/fulltext#relatedArticles
Brazilian study of 159,761 subjects who were using, or not using, IVM prophylactically.

-44% reduction in COVID-19 infection rate.
-67% reduction in hospitalization rate
-70% reduction in COVID-19 mortality

“Conclusion: In this large PSM study, regular use of ivermectin as a prophylactic agent was associated with significantly reduced COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and mortality rates.”

https://www.cureus.com/articles/82162-ivermectin-prophylaxis-used-for-covid-19-a-citywide-prospective-observational-study-of-223128-subjects-using-propensity-score-matching
It’s a terrible shame to think that we are at a time in history where we have resorted to piecing together volumes of anecdotal data, issuing FOIA requests, and analyzing appendices and supplemental data, in order to get to the truth, rather than just relying on our institutions.
👍1