Them: It’s not “forced” compliance.

Us: What would call it, then?

Them: We’ll continue to allow you to live your life normally as long as you continue to let us experiment on you.

If you get 3-4 shots of the same thing in 1 year, and you still get infected and transmit the pathogen, then please don’t call it a vaccine. Call it whatever you like, but don’t call it a vaccine.

This recent paper in Nature demonstrates that the RBD domain of Spike for Omicron exhibits strikingly less affinity for the ACE2 receptor than the Delta variant. So, increased transmission/infectivity is probably not due to tighter ACE2 binding. Effect on virulence is unknown.

I use the phrase “probably not due” because this is ELISA data, and the full length Spike protein in multimeric (trimer) form may function differently in vivo. Lots of other interesting findings in this paper, so check it out.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41392-021-00863-2.pdf

* List of 1000+ Papers on COVID Vaccine Reactions/Dangers *

This is a great resource of info.

https://www.saveusnow.org.uk/covid-vaccine-scientific-proof-lethal/

Check hassling off the list, that’s not working. You don’t have to be in a secret group or subscribe to conspiracy theories to know what their plans are. They shout their plans from the roof tops.

https://www.wsj.com/amp/articles/europes-omicron-battle-plan-hassle-the-unvaccinated-11641737453

“Being exposed to the SARS-CoV-2 virus doesn’t always result in infection, and we’ve been keen to understand why. We found that high levels of pre-existing T cells, created by the body when infected with other human coronaviruses like the common cold, can protect.”

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-01-10/t-cells-triggered-by-common-cold-also-fend-off-covid-in-study

Reducing deaths due to COVID means nothing if you have to increase deaths from other causes by equal or greater number.

Illegal drug dealers initially give you some free product because they know your body will require repeated future doses and a you’ll be back for more.

Oh wait, I’m sorry, I misspelled Legal.

We’re two years into this, we’ve had three big waves, a present tsunami of infections which are uncontrollably spreading like wildfire in the jabbed & unjabbed, AND 3 doses of a vaccine — and now, NOW, the government is going to ship us all some masks that “really” work. 😂😂😂

I can’t help but think that if many brave people like you weren’t constantly speaking out about the vaccine and sharing the other side of the story, the Supreme Court may have ruled the opposite way today. So I just want to congratulate you all on a job well done. Thank you. :-)

According to a CDC/Kaiser Permanente study of 69,000 patients:

Compared to delta, an omicron infection has a:

1) 91% reduced risk of death.
2) 74% reduced risk of ICU admission.
3) 53% reduced risk of hospitalization.
4) 70% reduction in duration of hospital stay.

Unlike Delta, none of the 52,297 cases of Omicron in the study required mechanical ventilation.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.01.11.22269045v1.full.pdf

It’s a psychological wonder to realize there’s a growing number of people who believe you should be force injected with something that doesn’t protect them and that may cause you fatal harm. If that wasn’t crazy enough, these people also think their position is the virtuous one.

Imagine that. Giving a person a booster every 4 months might actually harm their immune system.

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/320443

Question: If we need to receive continued boosters to counteract rapidly waning vaccine efficacy, but repeated boosters ultimately impairs the immune system, where does that leave us? Catch 22? Stuck between a rock and a hard place? We can’t boost our way out of this.

Viral attenuation in action. And this is pre-omicron.

Are recently vaccinated people more prone to COVID infection? Data would suggest that this is the case. This lymphocyte count data for the Pfizer mRNA vaccine provides the basis as to the mechanism. Pronounced vaccine induced immunosuppression.

93% experienced a side effect. The majority were mild/moderate. However, 22% had 1 or more symptoms to significantly disturb daily activities, and lasting for several days and/or causing absence from work. The severity of side effects correlated with antibody levels.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanepe/article/PIIS2666-77622100185-X/fulltext#sec0019