Forwarded from VResearch channel
Epstein emails mention David Stern (aide to Andrew Mountbatten Windsor) conversations with Jeffrey Epstein considering Axel Vervoordt business. Axel Vervoordt being interior designer and alleged pedophile and dealer of stolen antiques once accused by Baron de Meeus, Amy Page and Michel Van Rijn is curious in context of trafficking. Vervoordt castle Gravenwezel is near Kattenhof, object of investigation due to Regina Louf accusations of murder ring at property of de Caters family. Axel bought their properties in March 1997, month after Louf testified.
https://www.justice.gov/age-verify?destination=/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA02025694.pdf
https://archive.vn/B89sX
Alefantis, Tony Podesta and Abramovic have been linked to Axel Vervoordt orbit, raising suspicions further:
https://matrix-client.matrix.org/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/EesKmTgCoObTdQJgEXTYnPKt
Sources:
https://archive.ph/mI3tt
https://archive.ph/0ycDE
https://www.instagram.com/axelvervoordt
https://www.instagram.com/jimmycomet
https://www.justice.gov/age-verify?destination=/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA02025694.pdf
https://archive.vn/B89sX
Alefantis, Tony Podesta and Abramovic have been linked to Axel Vervoordt orbit, raising suspicions further:
https://matrix-client.matrix.org/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/EesKmTgCoObTdQJgEXTYnPKt
Sources:
https://archive.ph/mI3tt
https://archive.ph/0ycDE
https://www.instagram.com/axelvervoordt
https://www.instagram.com/jimmycomet
β€1π₯1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
NORWAY FIRST COUNTRY TO ARREST EPSTEIN ASSOCIATE. Who's next? Can you imagine the rats panic and fear?
β€1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Can you imagine why these these men are fighting so hard to continue to perform in front of children? Imagine one of these creatures ''performing'' for your kids. Enough of this nonsense
π€―2
This media is not supported in the widget
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
There once was a girl from Korea
Whose dad wanted no one to see her
Until she succeeds
The throne that he schemes
'Now everyone has got to meet her.
Her dad is such a distemperer
It's tough for a kid being emperor
You don't get no childhood
You're stuck in a wildwood
She's lucky he doesn't dismember her
Kim Jue Ae from Ryongsong
Must be tired of hearing the same song
From Kangdong to Wonsan
It's stick to the plan
& no one admits they could be wrong
Whose dad wanted no one to see her
Until she succeeds
The throne that he schemes
'Now everyone has got to meet her.
Her dad is such a distemperer
It's tough for a kid being emperor
You don't get no childhood
You're stuck in a wildwood
She's lucky he doesn't dismember her
Kim Jue Ae from Ryongsong
Must be tired of hearing the same song
From Kangdong to Wonsan
It's stick to the plan
& no one admits they could be wrong
Forwarded from Jade Helm 15 Rehash (Freedom N. Weep)
{does it really take extra pages of text to process niceties in queries like please thanks sorry etc}
Not really "extra pages," but every word counts toward the computational cost. AI models process text in chunks called tokens (roughly 4 characters or 0.75 words each), and you are billed or limited based on the total number of tokens used.
How Politeness Affects the Model:
Computational Cost: A simple "What is the weather?" is about 5 tokens. Adding "Hi! Could you please tell me the weather today, thank you!" jumps to roughly 20β25 tokens. At a massive scale (millions of users), these extra "niceties" consume significant GPU power and energy.
Response Length: Polite prompts often nudge the AI to mirror that tone, leading to longer, more "fluff-filled" responses rather than direct answers.
Accuracy: Some studies suggest that while being rude can hurt performance, being overly polite can actually decrease accuracy (by up to 9% in some tests) because the extra words add "noise" or ambiguity to your actual request.
Social Mirroring: LLMs are trained on human data where polite questions often get more detailed answers (like on StackOverflow), so being nice can sometimes trigger a "helpful assistant" persona that provides more thorough context.
In short: while it doesn't take "pages" to process a single "please," it does force the AI to perform a fresh computational pass on those specific tokens, which adds up to real infrastructure costs.
Not really "extra pages," but every word counts toward the computational cost. AI models process text in chunks called tokens (roughly 4 characters or 0.75 words each), and you are billed or limited based on the total number of tokens used.
How Politeness Affects the Model:
Computational Cost: A simple "What is the weather?" is about 5 tokens. Adding "Hi! Could you please tell me the weather today, thank you!" jumps to roughly 20β25 tokens. At a massive scale (millions of users), these extra "niceties" consume significant GPU power and energy.
Response Length: Polite prompts often nudge the AI to mirror that tone, leading to longer, more "fluff-filled" responses rather than direct answers.
Accuracy: Some studies suggest that while being rude can hurt performance, being overly polite can actually decrease accuracy (by up to 9% in some tests) because the extra words add "noise" or ambiguity to your actual request.
Social Mirroring: LLMs are trained on human data where polite questions often get more detailed answers (like on StackOverflow), so being nice can sometimes trigger a "helpful assistant" persona that provides more thorough context.
In short: while it doesn't take "pages" to process a single "please," it does force the AI to perform a fresh computational pass on those specific tokens, which adds up to real infrastructure costs.
Forwarded from Jade Helm 15 Rehash (Freedom N. Weep)
Abbreviations & typos generally have a lower impact on processing & cost than "niceties," but uniquely degrade quality of response.
1. Direct Cost Comparison
Niceties (Please/Thanks) add predictable, clean tokens to a sequence. Each has a small fixed cost, easy for a model to process but directly increases total token count.
Errors (Typos/Abbreviations) often result in sub-word tokenization, where a single misspelled word is broken into multiple smaller, nonsensical chunks.
Processing forces a model to use extra "heads" or layers to "reassemble" intended meaning from fragments.
Cost: A typo may increase token count by 1β2 units, but still "cheaper" than a sentence of politeness.
3. Structural "Noise"
Common abbreviations (e.g., IMDb vs imsb) are usually understood, but obscure ones shift position in embedding space, sending a model down less accurate reasoning paths.
Missing or incorrect punctuation (like a missing question mark) has negligible computational cost but can lead to misinterpretation of intent.
1. Direct Cost Comparison
Niceties (Please/Thanks) add predictable, clean tokens to a sequence. Each has a small fixed cost, easy for a model to process but directly increases total token count.
Errors (Typos/Abbreviations) often result in sub-word tokenization, where a single misspelled word is broken into multiple smaller, nonsensical chunks.
Processing forces a model to use extra "heads" or layers to "reassemble" intended meaning from fragments.
Cost: A typo may increase token count by 1β2 units, but still "cheaper" than a sentence of politeness.
3. Structural "Noise"
Common abbreviations (e.g., IMDb vs imsb) are usually understood, but obscure ones shift position in embedding space, sending a model down less accurate reasoning paths.
Missing or incorrect punctuation (like a missing question mark) has negligible computational cost but can lead to misinterpretation of intent.