*Salafi Research Institute* & *Dar us-Sunnah Li-Takhassus wat-Tahqiq* (دار السنہ للتخصص والتحقیق لاہور)

Present

Gatherings of Hadith Reading and Ijazah

*Shaykh Ibn Bashir al-Hussainwy of Pakistan*

*Nukhbatul Fikr*
Thursday 25th February 2021
8:00pm Pakistan/3:00pm UK

Join Zoom Meeting
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/85336497008?pwd=UUYvWnM2d3Z1VTVLZW5xTDF3OTQ2UT09

Muhammad b. Abdul Wahhab was a......

This is a hot topic in recent years, where a group of people have made it a habit of cursing Shaykh Muhammad b. Abdul Wahhab, May Allah have mercy on him, Amin. Generally Muslims were unconcerned when this came from Barelwi Quarters but in our times with the advent of social media and monetary gains, people, who you could only but describe as "disturbed" from the likes of the Dr. Yasir Qadhi, Bro Hajji and a whole host of other unsavoury characters, all attack the Shaykh and his Dawah. The last mentioned individual and others have emerged as the new hybrid generation, giving another sect courage, which they desired quite badly for many years.

In other words, some Deobandis have been vociferous in their relentless attacks on Shaykh Muhammad b. Abdul Wahhab and thereby followed the fashionable trend of attacking the Shaykh. What these hybrid Muqallidin anti Salafi Deobandis forgot was that their elders used Shaykh Muhammad b. Abdul Wahhab as an authority in refuting other Deobandis!

Everyone has been quick in accusing Salafis of arguing and the same people have been quick to point out Shaykh so and so Salafi scholar said this and he refuted him etc and infact, social media thinks Salafis are always fighting.

The reality is that Deobandis have been at it for decades and have gone to the extreme of making takfir of each other, remember for decades. Furthermore, the same Deobandis had extreme asabiyyah and they were not shy about it.

This book, was published by the Deobandis of Pakistan and it is a refutation of the Deobandis. The Hayati Deobandis refuted the Mamatis Deobandis and the former described it as a Pakistani Fitnah. So, not only did they refute each other but they also described it on the basis of nationalistic differences. The Salafis have never acted in this way.

You can see the name of 4 highly respected Deobandi scholars and you can see the last name of Shaykh Muhammad b Abdul Wahhab. So, why are these Deobandis using the Shaykh when the new hybrid Deobandi on social media attacks the Shaykh? <This shows you how extreme these modern deobandis have become.

The book is not dated but from the contents  dates contained in it, as well as the script style and type of paper we can roughly guess it is from the mid 80's. So, for the best part of 35 years the Deobandis have had extreme inter Deobandis differences yet the world only has eyes for Salafis.

In the book the Hayati Deobandis refute the well known Deobandi scholar of the Mamatis, Mawlana Ghulamullah Khan and the book has a heading, showing his view as "Whoever calls those who believe the dead can hear a KAFIR, is someone who has a lot of La'na (curse) and he is without Iman" they go on to say, we have Mawlana Ghulamullah Khan on cassette saying this and therefore it is recorded.

So, we learn the Deobandis have been fighting for decades, much earlier. 2. They took it to the level of countries and called it a Pakistani Fitnah and 3. The Hayati Deobandis showed so much respect to Shaykh Muhammad b. Abdul Wahhab that they used him and put his name along with 4 of their eminent scholars trying to prove their belief. While the new hybrid Deobandis openly attack Shaykh Muhammad on social media. Deobandis should at least have respect for their elders. NOTE, the pass we from Shaykh Muhammad is very general to even use to prove their interpretation of this belief.

[SRI Lessons] - Islamic Beliefs - Omar Muhaimen
http://www.salafiri.com/sri-lessons-islamic-beliefs-omar-muhaimen/

Join Zoom Meeting

https://us02web.zoom.us/j/86819272378?pwd=MzB4VDFJeUVNcTFtV0VZYlJ5NkwrUT09

*Shaykh Nawab Siddiq Hasan Khan (1307H) on Containing those Who Hide behind Jihah (Direction) for Allah*

Ash'ari and Maturidis deny the Uluww of Allah and claim this gives Allah a direction which is within creation, so Shaykh Siddiq Hasan Khan explains and restricts the Ash'aris and explains even Salafis don't restrict Allah to the creation. He said,

"If the one who negates Jihah, and if by this he means negating the Creator who is above the Heavens and Earth, he negates the ascension of Muhammad ﷺ on the night journey, he negates rasing his hands towards him when he supplicate and he also negates Allah's Uluww and that the hearts turn towards him, then indeed such a person is a *FIRAWNI*, a mu'attil, denies the attributes of Allah and rejects Allah the Rabb of the Universe. If he rejects these things, then he is a Jahil and contradicts his own speech. The people of Ittihad (who believe the creation and Allah are one) and Hulul (that Allah is incarnate in the creation) adopted this approach like Ibn Arabi and others who say Allah is everywhere and with every individual in his essence and His Self. They also said the existence of the creation is in reality the existence of the creator. If he says by negating Jihah he means Allah is not confined by the creation, then his statement is correct."

(Hidayatus Sa'il Ila Adillatil Masa'il, question no.13 from Fatawa Nawab Sayyid Muhammad Siddiq Hasan Khan 1:67-68)

Coming soon Inshallah

You Don't Even Reach the Dirt on Al-Albani's Feet, and YES TODAY WE ARE AL-ALBANIYUN

Mohammad Hijab says, can I suck your wife's... because this was Al-Albanis view..

Shaykh Muhammad Nasir ud-Din al-Albani said, "My advice to the student of knowledge is not to proceed to preach to people something that may lead then to great misguidance (Dalal). He should check with the people of knowledge before he jumps to conclusions. It is one of the disasters of the Muslim youth today that they quickly adopt opinions without looking into the opinions of the Salaf and Khalaf regarding these issues".

(Taken from "A Clarification of the Requirements of Jihad" from the tape, Munazarah Ma'a Tanzim al-Jihad al-Islami)

Shaykh Al-Albani and Just One Book

One of the most read, used and referenced books on prayer is the book of Shaykh al-Albani Rahimahullah, Sifah Salatun Nabi. The original is a staggering 3 large volumes, which Shaykh al-Albani summarised himself and is widely available. Its publication editions have reached near 20. The Shaykh even summarised this further into a Muktasar and the Ummah of Muhammad Sallalahu Alayhi Wasallam benefitted immensely from this work.

The Muqaddimah alone of this book served for decades, breaking the evil shackles of blind following and very beneficial for the seeker of truth.

It was translated in English as early as the mid 90's and it has since had another translation by Dar us-Sunnah and another modification of the early 90s translation by Granada Publications. It has had countless translations in Urdu and no doubt into many other languages.

The author of Salafism in Lebanon mentioned Shaykh al-Albani's book led many youth to leave their deviants ways to become Salafists.

This is just ONE book!!

What have you done? You had a debate with Christians and even for that you sought help from Salafis, then you talked about them in the most disgusting way!

Misguidance and deviation is knocking on the doorstep of these brothers yet they are still adamant in defending and promoting these individuals.

All praise be to Allah, The Magnificent, who had mercy on Muslims and attached us with the noble scholars of Ahl us-Sunnah, while others praise and take from those who lick and eat the spit of their pirs.

This is the legacy of our Shaykh al-Albani, what's yours?

We learnt not to make Taqlid of Shaykh al-Albani from Shaykh al-Albani himself and we also learnt the Ettiquettes of Differing from him. This is an article of the Shaykh from the Mid 90's, i.e. 25 years ago. Our Ulama taught and nurtured us, what did yours do?