Forwarded from ↟ Modernists Go To Hell ↟
Another great take on why Catholics should be opposed to miscegenation:
“On the sinfulness of racemixing: As I conceded, the act in and of itself is not necessarily sinful. However, and the Church has spoken against these types of actions many times even if they haven’t been elevated to the level of sinfulness, it is in and of itself an act against reason. There are no true “sins” against reason, as sins are offenses against God and God supersedes reason itself, but these actions are to be avoided. On top of itself being an act against natural reason, the actions that lead to miscegenation can also be actually sinful. The most common would be selfishness, imprudence, lust, overindulgence, pride, etc.
Selfishness: thinking of your own love for the woman and not thinking of the problems it may cause your children. (Since you had to ask the question in the first place I’m assuming you don’t already know about the issues racemixed children face but you can research that later, specifically identity issues and mental health issues rates)
Imprudence: not stopping and thinking if this is what God truly wants, rather rushing into the situation motivated by what you want, also related to selfishness obviously
Lust: Being attracted to the woman because of her appearance, not because she would make the best mother for your future children. Obviously the more similar the parents are the more they will be able to raise the children as one unified family. Coming from separate cultures and language backgrounds can also cause issues if you need a parallel example
Pride: knowing that your family has for all previous generations stuck within its tribe, but assuming that you know better and are more enlightened because you have the internet and technology etc. as if humans have evolved that much to be inter-tribal over the last century. When Rome occupies Britain for 300 years, the Britons still stuck within their tribes and avoided marrying the Romans. There is perennial wisdom behind that...
My logic on it follows from a more right wing view of identity so you might not even agree on the fundamental principles, but if you do look at the issue from a perennialist or traditional right wing perspective, it follows that racial identity is is natural and worthy of being protected in and of itself without exterior justification.”
“On the sinfulness of racemixing: As I conceded, the act in and of itself is not necessarily sinful. However, and the Church has spoken against these types of actions many times even if they haven’t been elevated to the level of sinfulness, it is in and of itself an act against reason. There are no true “sins” against reason, as sins are offenses against God and God supersedes reason itself, but these actions are to be avoided. On top of itself being an act against natural reason, the actions that lead to miscegenation can also be actually sinful. The most common would be selfishness, imprudence, lust, overindulgence, pride, etc.
Selfishness: thinking of your own love for the woman and not thinking of the problems it may cause your children. (Since you had to ask the question in the first place I’m assuming you don’t already know about the issues racemixed children face but you can research that later, specifically identity issues and mental health issues rates)
Imprudence: not stopping and thinking if this is what God truly wants, rather rushing into the situation motivated by what you want, also related to selfishness obviously
Lust: Being attracted to the woman because of her appearance, not because she would make the best mother for your future children. Obviously the more similar the parents are the more they will be able to raise the children as one unified family. Coming from separate cultures and language backgrounds can also cause issues if you need a parallel example
Pride: knowing that your family has for all previous generations stuck within its tribe, but assuming that you know better and are more enlightened because you have the internet and technology etc. as if humans have evolved that much to be inter-tribal over the last century. When Rome occupies Britain for 300 years, the Britons still stuck within their tribes and avoided marrying the Romans. There is perennial wisdom behind that...
My logic on it follows from a more right wing view of identity so you might not even agree on the fundamental principles, but if you do look at the issue from a perennialist or traditional right wing perspective, it follows that racial identity is is natural and worthy of being protected in and of itself without exterior justification.”
Forwarded from 𝘊𝘢𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘤 𝘈𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘤
“Oh, if only you could know how harsh the pains of Purgatory are, you would much sooner choose to have all the wars, famines, and plagues of this life come down on you than to remain in those torments of Purgatory.”
- Girolamo Savonarola
- Girolamo Savonarola
Show this to C I heretics
Apocalypse 7:9 After this I saw a great multitude which no man could number, of all nations, and tribes, and peoples, and tongues, standing before the throne, and in sight of the Lamb, clothed with white robes, and palms in their hands: [10] And they cried with a loud voice, saying: Salvation to our God, who sitteth upon the throne, and to the Lamb.
[11] And all the angels stood round about the throne, and the ancients, and the four living creatures; and they fell down before the throne upon their faces, and adored God, [12] Saying: Amen. Benediction, and glory, and wisdom, and thanksgiving, honour, and power, and strength to our God for ever and ever. Amen. [13] And one of the ancients answered, and said to me: These that are clothed in white robes, who are they? and whence came they? [14] And I said to him: My Lord, thou knowest. And he said to me: These are they who are come out of great tribulation, and have washed their robes, and have made them white in the blood of the Lamb.
Apocalypse 7:9 After this I saw a great multitude which no man could number, of all nations, and tribes, and peoples, and tongues, standing before the throne, and in sight of the Lamb, clothed with white robes, and palms in their hands: [10] And they cried with a loud voice, saying: Salvation to our God, who sitteth upon the throne, and to the Lamb.
[11] And all the angels stood round about the throne, and the ancients, and the four living creatures; and they fell down before the throne upon their faces, and adored God, [12] Saying: Amen. Benediction, and glory, and wisdom, and thanksgiving, honour, and power, and strength to our God for ever and ever. Amen. [13] And one of the ancients answered, and said to me: These that are clothed in white robes, who are they? and whence came they? [14] And I said to him: My Lord, thou knowest. And he said to me: These are they who are come out of great tribulation, and have washed their robes, and have made them white in the blood of the Lamb.
Every morning I wake up and cross myself with holy water “In Nomine Patris et Fili et Spiritu Sanctu”. A brief Pater Noster in Thanksgiving for a new day and to plead for strength and guidance then I reach for my brown scapular and my gun, I carry these wherever I go, because this world is a place of conflict and struggle which we cannot endure alone and which ends only in death.
Saint Alphonsus Liguori “remember that now more than ever you must prepare yourself for conflict because your enemies; the world ,the devil ,and the flesh will arm themselves now more than ever to fight against you to deprive you of all you have aquired
Pope Leo Xlll “Christians are born for combat”
Saint Alphonsus Liguori “remember that now more than ever you must prepare yourself for conflict because your enemies; the world ,the devil ,and the flesh will arm themselves now more than ever to fight against you to deprive you of all you have aquired
Pope Leo Xlll “Christians are born for combat”
In this portion of acts everything you need to disprove CI is present. At the very beginning you have it said that men of all nations can be pleasing to God. The only way to argue your way out of this is.
A) to pretend “nations” is used distinctly for a singular race, a case which cannot be made in good faith
B) that “being pleasing to God” does not equate being saved. The idea that God would find someone pleasing and then condemn them to hell or in the CI theology to non-existence
At the very end it also shows that they were astonished because the Holy Spirit poured out onto the gentiles also. Clearly delineating that there were two distinct peoples, unlike each other not from separate tribes of Israel but inherently different from each other and the Holy Ghost poured out on them both.
“And Peter opening his mouth, said: In very deed I perceive, that God is not a respecter of persons. [35] But in every nation, he that feareth him, and worketh justice, is acceptable to him.
[36] God sent the word to the children of Israel, preaching peace by Jesus Christ: (he is Lord of all.) [37] You know the word which hath been published through all Judea: for it began from Galilee, after the baptism which John preached, [38] Jesus of Nazareth: how God anointed him with the Holy Ghost, and with power, who went about doing good, and healing all that were oppressed by the devil, for God was with him. [39] And we are witnesses of all things that he did in the land of the Jews and in Jerusalem, whom they killed, hanging him upon a tree. [40] Him God raised up the third day, and gave him to be made manifest,
[41] Not to all the people, but to witnesses preordained by God, even to us, who did eat and drink with him after he arose again from the dead; [42] And he commanded us to preach to the people, and to testify that it is he who was appointed by God, to be judge of the living and of the dead. [43] To him all the prophets give testimony, that by his name all receive remission of sins, who believe in him. [44] While Peter was yet speaking these words, the Holy Ghost fell on all them that heard the word. [45] And the faithful of the circumcision, who came with Peter, were astonished, for that the grace of the Holy Ghost was poured out upon the Gentiles also.”
A) to pretend “nations” is used distinctly for a singular race, a case which cannot be made in good faith
B) that “being pleasing to God” does not equate being saved. The idea that God would find someone pleasing and then condemn them to hell or in the CI theology to non-existence
At the very end it also shows that they were astonished because the Holy Spirit poured out onto the gentiles also. Clearly delineating that there were two distinct peoples, unlike each other not from separate tribes of Israel but inherently different from each other and the Holy Ghost poured out on them both.
“And Peter opening his mouth, said: In very deed I perceive, that God is not a respecter of persons. [35] But in every nation, he that feareth him, and worketh justice, is acceptable to him.
[36] God sent the word to the children of Israel, preaching peace by Jesus Christ: (he is Lord of all.) [37] You know the word which hath been published through all Judea: for it began from Galilee, after the baptism which John preached, [38] Jesus of Nazareth: how God anointed him with the Holy Ghost, and with power, who went about doing good, and healing all that were oppressed by the devil, for God was with him. [39] And we are witnesses of all things that he did in the land of the Jews and in Jerusalem, whom they killed, hanging him upon a tree. [40] Him God raised up the third day, and gave him to be made manifest,
[41] Not to all the people, but to witnesses preordained by God, even to us, who did eat and drink with him after he arose again from the dead; [42] And he commanded us to preach to the people, and to testify that it is he who was appointed by God, to be judge of the living and of the dead. [43] To him all the prophets give testimony, that by his name all receive remission of sins, who believe in him. [44] While Peter was yet speaking these words, the Holy Ghost fell on all them that heard the word. [45] And the faithful of the circumcision, who came with Peter, were astonished, for that the grace of the Holy Ghost was poured out upon the Gentiles also.”
Forwarded from Based Book Excerpts
What Happens When Rabbis Are Forced To Defend The Talmud In Open Debate, excerpt from “The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and its impacts on world history” by E Michael Jones
"Just before I came out here I went into the church and knelt before the altar. That was not done to pay superficial homage to the religion of the State; it was the expression of an intimate conviction, for I believe that a people cannot become great and powerful, conscious of its destinies, without religion; unless it looks on religion and feels the need of it as an essential element of its public and private life. With this thought as motive for your actions you will see how the Fatherland is served above all in silence, humility, discipline, without many or great phrases but with unfailing daily works."
— Il DVX, Speech in Vicenza, September 23, 1924
— Il DVX, Speech in Vicenza, September 23, 1924
Forwarded from Based Book Excerpts
The Revolution Arrives in Europe: Excerpt from E Michael Jones the Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and its impact on world history.
Parallels between Bar Kokhba, Trotsky, and CI
Parallels between Bar Kokhba, Trotsky, and CI
A man who is aware of “certain happenings and knows that a certain danger threatens, and at the same time sees a certain remedy which can be employed against it, is in duty bound not to work in silence but to come into the open and publicly fight for the destruction of the evil and the acceptance of his own remedy. If he does not do so, then he is neglecting his duty and shows that he is weak in character- Adolf Hitler
Both as a Catholic and as a Nationalist you are duty bound to raise your voice in opposition. Not to hint at who is doing it and not deal merely with symptoms or the newest innovations while passively accepting the culture and laws that have already been passed by the enemy but to oppose the enemy of Judaism itself and every single one of its attendant policies from no-fault divorce to racial displacement and trans-kids.
We do not need to passively accept the filth they have wrought on us for some 200 years but bring down the entire structure of Judaism and Jews both religious and atheist.
Both as a Catholic and as a Nationalist you are duty bound to raise your voice in opposition. Not to hint at who is doing it and not deal merely with symptoms or the newest innovations while passively accepting the culture and laws that have already been passed by the enemy but to oppose the enemy of Judaism itself and every single one of its attendant policies from no-fault divorce to racial displacement and trans-kids.
We do not need to passively accept the filth they have wrought on us for some 200 years but bring down the entire structure of Judaism and Jews both religious and atheist.
Forwarded from Based Book Excerpts
The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit: The Hussites Burn Down the Monasteries and Persecute German Monks but Leave the Jews Unmolested
The synagogue of satan is not material, it’s not a like a person who hates another person. It hates essential qualities, it hates everything that God represents. As such It wages wars not only on nations and people but on beauty and truth itself. If satan is the father of lies then also he is the father of what is ugly, if he is the destroyer of truth then also he is the destroyer of beauty and his synagogue never fails to carry out this unholy crusade in architecture and art.
Forwarded from Based Book Excerpts
The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit: Jews Give Money to the First Revolutionaries and Join in the First Brother’s War Between Czechs and Germans. Jews Recognize Revolutionaries As “on their way to becoming Jews”.
Forwarded from parthenikó taxídi
"You carry your snare everywhere and spread your nets in all places. You allege that you never invited others to sin. You did not, indeed, by your words, but you have done so by your dress and your deportment, and much more effectively than you could by your voice. When you have made another sin in his heart, how can you be innocent? Tell me, whom does this world condemn? Whom do judges in court punish? Those who drink poison or those who prepare it and administer the fatal potion?
You have prepared the abominable cup, you have given the death-dealing drink, and you are more criminal than are those who poison the body; you murder not the body, but the soul. And it is not to enemies that you do this, nor are you urged on by any imaginary necessity, nor provoked by injury, but out of foolish vanity and pride."
--St. John Chrysostom on Immodesty (d. 407A.D.)
You have prepared the abominable cup, you have given the death-dealing drink, and you are more criminal than are those who poison the body; you murder not the body, but the soul. And it is not to enemies that you do this, nor are you urged on by any imaginary necessity, nor provoked by injury, but out of foolish vanity and pride."
--St. John Chrysostom on Immodesty (d. 407A.D.)