🎙 President of Russia Vladimir Putin's statement on the terrorist attack by the Kiev regime on the Starobelsk Pedagogical College (May 22, 2026)

The statement was made during President of Russia Vladimir Putin’s meeting with graduates of the first cohort of the Time of Heroes educational programme.

💬 On May 22, the neo-Nazi regime that seized power in Kiev carried out a terrorist attack on the student dormitory of the Starobelsk Pedagogical College. At night, while the students were asleep.

According to the reports I have been receiving throughout this time, as of now, six people have been killed, 39 injured, and 15 are listed as missing, as debris removal continues. We will, of course, do everything to help the victims and the families of those killed.

I want to stress – this is important – that there are no military facilities, no intelligence or related service facilities near the dormitory. Therefore, there are no grounds whatsoever to claim that the projectiles hit the building as a result of our air defence or electronic warfare systems. No one can say that they were trying to strike some other facility, while the UAVs were allegedly intercepted by our own systems and accidentally hit this building.

☝️ The strike was not accidental: it came in three waves, with 16 UAVs hitting the same site.

Of course, we will investigate the details. The appropriate conclusions will be drawn. But it is clear to us – and once again becomes obvious – who we are dealing with, who we are fighting, and what we are fighting for. This is a manifestation of neo-Nazism. It once again confirms the terrorist nature of the Kiev regime.

The reasons behind the Kiev regime’s criminal conduct are clear. Constant failures at the front, surrendering positions, populated areas and territories.

For the AFU, the situation at the front is gradually turning from difficult and critical into catastrophic. Neither Western aid – which is regularly stolen, they simply cannot resist stealing it – nor forced mobilisation helps, when people are rounded up in the streets like stray dogs and then thrown to the front. Against this backdrop, desertion is also growing catastrophically for the enemy. It is becoming large-scale.

The situation for the ruling clique is further aggravated by all-consuming corruption that is corroding society and is covered up by the regime’s ringleaders. In fact, they themselves are part of these corruption schemes, which is why they later help one another flee the country and escape to Israel and other countries abroad.

Everyone knows perfectly well – both in Ukraine and around the world – that the Ukrainian authorities steal from absolutely everything. It has even reached military property and personal protective equipment intended for those very people who are driven to the front like cattle – driven to die for those who are plundering Ukraine and foreign aid.

The Kiev regime undoubtedly needs such crimes in order to divert attention from what is happening at the front and inside the country, to provoke a response from Russia, and then – as we know, and have seen many times before – to blame everything on us, on Russia, on our country: all escalations and all consequences of such crimes.

👉 Russia's Foreign Ministry has been instructed to inform international organisations and the international community about this crime.

But, of course, you and I understand that in such cases, MFA statements alone cannot suffice. Therefore, Russia's Defence Ministry has been ordered to submit its proposals.

◾️ I would now ask everyone to rise and honour the memory of those who were killed (a minute of silence).

Read in full

🎙 Statement by Permanent Representative Vassily Nebenzia at a UNSC Briefing on the situation in the Middle East, including the Palestinian issue (May 21, 2026)

💬 Mr. President,

We wish to thank Mr. Ramiz Alakbarov, Deputy Special Coordinator for the #MiddleEast Peace Process, for his briefing on the situation in the Middle East.

We have closely listened to Mr. Nikolay Mladenov, High Representative for Gaza of the Board of Peace, as well as to Mr. Rami Hijjo. Frankly speaking, we were somewhat surprised to hear various members of the Council extolling what is happening now.

Today’s meeting is more than a routine briefing. Recently, the Council was presented with the first semi-annual report of the Board of Peace, pursuant to Security Council Resolution 2803.

Let me remind you that Russia abstained during that vote as the resolution failed to mention Israel’s obligations, the role of UNRWA, the situation in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, or the universally recognized two-State solution. We chose not to block the document then only in response to numerous requests, primarily from regional States, to allow the US blueprint for Gaza a chance to succeed.

❗️ Regrettably, our fears were borne out. The Board of Peace’s report echoes the language of paragraph 33 about “the difference between a framework that exists on paper and one that delivers on the ground for the people of Gaza.” Six months after the vote on Security Council Resolution 2803, the so-called “Trump Plan” remains largely a dead letter, with declarative successes only serving as a smokescreen to conceal the grim reality in the #GazaStrip. <...>

In fact, since the ceasefire was announced on October 10, 2025, Israeli strikes have been killing Palestinian civilians literally each and every day – more than 880 people have died and over 2,600 have been wounded. According to the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), most of them died as a result of sniper fire or explosions of tripwire bombs which were positioned at access points to water sources. There is a genuine manhunt underway targeting Palestinian law enforcement officers. <...>

Those who survived in Gaza continue to suffer from acute shortages of food and basic necessities, communicable diseases, and they are being forced to relocate en masse due to the bans and restrictions, which were imposed and are being tightened by the Israelis. As was mentioned at a recent OHCHR briefing, sanitary conditions in the enclave are catastrophic, which is compounded by acute shortages of clean drinking water. According to the available information, the UN emergency humanitarian appeal for $4 billion is financed to the tune of a meager 12%.

Those who read the report by the Board of Peace might come to the impression that Hamas alone is to blame for all the misfortunes plaguing Gaza. Essentially, it is being proposed that we accept the premise whereby blocking humanitarian aid, investment, and development assistance can be made contingent on political demands.

We are explicitly being told that until Palestinian groups disarm, we better forget about the provisions of the Trump plan stipulating that “Israel will not occupy or annex the Gaza Strip” and that the people of the enclave will be given “the opportunity to build a better Gaza.” At the same time, it is being proposed that the Security Council members exert pressure on Hamas and Palestinian factions for them to accept a “road map” and a framework document on disarmament, which have not even been shown to the Security Council. However, such “pigs in a poke” no longer surprise us.

👉 The US plan for Gaza contains no specific political commitments vis-à-vis the Palestinians themselves. The Palestinians, who have been tormented by a decades-long brutal war, are cynically being lured with idyllic depictions of beach resorts, skyscrapers, and promises of jobs. But this will be in exchange for their own State, which was pledged to them by the international community more than 70 years ago.

Read in full

❗️ Statement by Permanent Representative Vassily Nebenzia at a UNSC Briefing Following the Attack on Starobelsk (May 22, 2026)

💬 Today we have convened an emergency UNSC meeting in connection to yet another horrific terrorist attack perpetrated by the neo-Nazi Kiev regime against Russian civilians.

In the early hours of May 22, the Ukrainian army used four fixed-wing drones to launch a targeted strike on the administrative buildings and dormitory of the Starobelsk College of the Lugansk State Pedagogical University.

According to existing reports, at the time of the incident, there were 86 students aged 14 to 18 and one staff member in the dormitory building. As a result, the five-story building collapsed down to the second floor. As of 3 p.m., it has been confirmed that six people have died, and more than 40 children have been wounded to varying degrees.

Unfortunately, that number is likely to rise. A number of children are in critical condition and remain in hospital, with the search for missing people going on: there are still children buried under the rubble. <...>

Thus, this was a deliberate strike targeting a civilian facility where children live and study; this strike was carried out at nighttime when the dormitory was full, and it was clearly perpetrated with the aim of incurring the highest possible number of casualties. Under international humanitarian law, this constitutes a war crime.

By no means could this have been an accidental strike: there were three waves of drones that hit the same location. Neither could the UAV strike on the college have been the result of air defense or radio electronic warfare, as was immediately claimed by Kiev. None of those inside the building were or could have been taking part in hostilities, and there are no military facilities in the vicinity of the college. This was an attack targeting sleeping children, and this is yet another testament to the craven, terrorist, and anti-human nature of the Kiev regime: it is sustaining losses on the battlefield and hitting in agony what is the most sacred, with the West turning a blind eye to these crimes and covering them up.

Furthermore, this clearly attests to the bad faith and unwillingness to negotiate on the part of Kiev, which –  acting with the connivance of its Western sponsors – not only fails to embrace a peaceful resolution but is openly sabotaging it.

Such strikes using long-range weapons supplied to the Kiev regime by NATO countries – including UAVs – are being carried out with technical assistance from foreign specialists from well-known NATO States. We have verifiable information that Western capitals are providing the Ukrainian armed forces with intelligence and assisting them with targeting. <...>

The Kiev neo-Nazi regime has never ceased its attacks against civilians and civilian infrastructure of our country, using cruise missiles and long-range rocket artillery supplied by Western countries. Officials on Bankovaya Street openly express joy when women, children, and the elderly die, and when residential buildings and social facilities are hit.

In April alone, at least 100 civilians (including 8 children) were killed as a result of criminal acts by Ukrainian militants, and 667 people, including 34 minors, were injured. Over the past week, 234 Russian citizens have been affected by constant shelling and drone strikes by Ukrainian nationalists. Of them, 203 people were wounded, including 18 children, and 31 people were killed, including 2 children. <...>

We call on international organizations, national governments, and the global community to give a frank assessment of the criminal actions by the Zelensky regime and to strongly condemn the bloody terrorist attack in Starobelsk. Silence would be tantamount to complicity in the brutal acts by the Kiev terrorists and indifference to the plight of all innocent children who were murdered and injured.

📄 Read in full

🎙 Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s remarks at the 34th Assembly of the Council on Foreign and Defence Policy (Moscow, May 23, 2026)

💬 There are so many familiar faces here. This serves as a reminder that we have been working together for several decades now. The interactions between the community of political scientists and the official diplomacy have consisted in searching for and adopting ideas coming from the Council on Foreign and Defence Policy since its creation. They have never gone unnoticed and would either serve as a foundation for major initiatives or advised against certain actions. This is not very common, if we are talking about the way our political research and academic institutions and entities operate.

The Council on Foreign and Defence Policy’s Chair, Fyodor Lukyanov, mentioned a report. I can confirm that it is a very useful document. It offers a lot of food for thought, including an idea that has been becoming increasingly prominent in the public space and boils down to the question whether what we are experiencing today amounts to a new world war.

Some are putting forward arguments proving that this is the case. There are also qualitative indicators demonstrating that the nature of military action has changed to an extent that it can be argued that military action has evolved so much that we must describe the ongoing developments as a war of a radically new kind. This is what we learned from the report by the President of the Association for the Export of Technological Sovereignty, MGIMO Professor Andrey Bezrukov.

As for whether this war unfolds on a global scale, I am certain that we will discuss this today. It is already in full swing in Eurasia. The West staged an aggression in Ukraine against Russia in what amounted to yet another attempt to weaken our country and to ensure that it does not have a place among the key global actors. They followed up by launching the operation in the Persian Gulf, the Strait of Hormuz. There were border clashes in the southern and eastern parts of the Asian continent, and I am not even mentioning Latin America, where there are so many outstanding issues, as we all know.

This goes to say that we are dealing with a global and universal scale. It will be up to future historians to conclude whether any of these elements and conflicts in terms of their intensity, once we combine them, can be described as a world war. <...>

Here is one conclusion I wanted to highlight. There has been much talk lately, even if not everyone agrees on this point, that we must make sure not to lose our positions on one continent or another, across one ocean or elsewhere overseas since the West is trying to steal our allies. This primarily deals with our neighbours, which was the case with Georgia, Moldova, and this is currently happening with Ukraine. They are trying to place Armenia on the same erroneous path. Their single goal consists of hurting Russia as much as possible, or, if I may say so, make it harder for Russia to retain and reinforce its standing as a truly great power and civilisation.

We have been working a lot in Africa, of course, and restoring our embassies there. This is an imperative for us. But when we talk about the need to strengthen Russia’s influence around the world and to make it more attractive as a civilisation, a partner and a comrade who always delivers on its commitments, our only goal capable of strengthening our influence is to achieve the objectives of the special military operation. Our friends, neighbours and our adversaries and enemies are all keeping a close eye on the way it unfolds.

Therefore, the primary task for our diplomacy consists in doing everything we can to create the necessary conditions for ensuring that the actions by our troops as part of the special military operation are effective, victorious and yield tangible results. <...>

📄 Read in full

📆 24 мая в России и многих других странах торжественно отмечается День славянской письменности и культуры — праздник, посвящённый памяти святых равноапостольных братьев Кирилла и Мефодия, выдающихся просветителей славянских народов. Их считают создателями первой славянской азбуки, а их деятельность положила начало развитию славянской, в том числе русской, письменной традиции, литературы и образования.

В России праздник впервые широко отметили в 1863 году — в год тысячелетия славянской письменности. Тогда же Святейший Синод постановил ежегодно чтить память Кирилла и Мефодия. В Советском Союзе идея возрождения праздника возникла в 1986 году, а в 1991 году он обрёл статус государственного.

🌍 Славянские языки обладают богатой историей и обширной географией распространения. Сегодня на языках славянской группы говорят более 400 миллионов человек. В зависимости от классификации к ней относят от 10 до 18 языков, крупнейшим и наиболее распространённым среди которых является русский язык.

💬 М.В.Захарова:

Уникальность праздника заключается в том, что он играет огромную роль как в единении российского общества, так и в укреплении его связей со славянскими народами на основе общих исторических и культурных традиций.

(из брифинга официального представителя МИД России от 21 мая 2026 года)

В этом году в Москве празднование Дня славянской письменности и культуры пройдёт 24 мая в Храме Христа Спасителя, где состоится праздничный концерт с участием ведущих деятелей академического искусства. Традиционно с приветственным словом выступит Святейший Патриарх Московский и всея Руси Кирилл.

#ДеньCлавянскойПисьменностииКультуры

📆 24 мая в России и за ее пределами традиционно отмечается День славянской письменности и культуры.

Этот праздник посвящен памяти святых равноапостольных братьев Мефодия и Кирилла, почитающихся как создатели славянской азбуки, чья подвижническая деятельность заложила фундамент для развития славянской, в том числе русской, письменности и литературы.

🇷🇺🇳🇴 Норвежский язык принадлежит к германской группе и не является родственным славянским языкам. Тем не менее история соседствующих народов России и Норвегии знает пример того, как в результате многовекового активного взаимодействия на Севере русский и норвежский языки породили самобытное общее наречие — контактный язык-пиджин руссенорск (норв. Russenorsk), известный также под народным обозначением «моя-по-твоя», использовавшийся приблизительно с середины XVIII по начало XX века в общении между русскими поморами и норвежскими рыбаками.

Словарный состав руссенорска насчитывал около 400–500 единиц: примерно половина лексики восходит к норвежскому языку, около 40% — к русскому, прочие заимствования — из английского, нидерландского, немецкого, финского и саамского языков.

Исследователи указывают, что, в отличие от большинства известных аналогов, руссенорск не имел доминирующего языка-основы, что принято расценивать как свидетельство равноправного характера отношений между его носителями. Примечательно и то, что норвежская сторона в общении, как правило, прибегала к русской лексике, тогда как поморы — к норвежской: каждая из сторон шла навстречу партнеру.

💬 Примеры фраз на руссенорске:
— «Пят вога мука по сто фиска» — «Пять возов муки за сто рыб»;
— «Драсви, гаммель гу вен по моя. Твоя фиск купум?» — «Здравствуй, мой старый добрый друг. Ты купишь рыбу?»;
— «Как твоя ниет копом — са просяй» — «Если не покупаешь — тогда прощай»;
— «Как спрек? Мое ниет форсто» — «Что ты говоришь? Я тебя не понимаю».

С прекращением поморской торговли в начале XX века руссенорск вышел из употребления. Тем не менее он сохранил свое значение как памятник российско-норвежской истории — свидетельство того, что стремление к диалогу и сотрудничеству способно преодолевать языковые и культурные границы.

🔗 Источники: 1, 2.
* Изображение создано с помощью искусственного интеллекта.