later that year in the congress of Berlin, the great powers gave back some of that conquered land back to the turks to avoid Russia having too much influence in the region

Brief, simplified history of Marxist ideology from Marx to present:

In 1848, the Communist Manifesto laid out a handful of primary objectives, including:
- Abolition of property
- Destruction of family
- Destruction of nations
- Destruction of traditional culture
- Founding of a monopolistic, centralized banking system
- Centralization of all production, communication, and transport in the hands of "the state" (the ruling elite)

These objectives are shared by 99.99% of modern Leftists and they haven't diverged from these goals in almost 2 centuries.

(Btw the Communist Manifesto is like 20 pages long, I recommend reading it).

Marxism before 1923 aimed to achieve these objectives via a "colorblind" proletarian revolution against the "capitalist overlords" that they called the World Revolution. This strategy had failed miserably because the workers overwhelmingly sided with various nationalist movements (mostly Fascism) because they didn't like the idea of abolishing their families, property, nations, and traditions.

This led to two developmental pathways in Marxism, in the East and the West, both of which converge at the same endpoint.

In the East, Marxism from Lenin onwards shifted focus to the global struggle of the "oppressed races" against the "capitalist imperialists" (White people), while still paying lip service to "proletarian revolution." You'll see Marxists describing some ethnic groups as "proletarian nations of the world" and so on, which is just their obfuscatory way of saying "brown people."

Stalin implemented "socialism in one country", which was not nationalism — the USSR was a multi-racial empire — but the idea that the USSR must serve as a stable base of operations from which Communism could be spread throughout the world. Stalin had Leninist ideals.

Mao developed Marxist "anti-imperialist" ideology further with his Third Worldism, and both the USSR and PRC funded brown Communist insurgencies against White colonial states, e.g. Rhodesia and South Africa.

When people claim that "Marxists were based/trad/patriotic in the past," this is basically only true for the Third World Marxists, who were already serving the globalist agenda simply by revolting against White global hegemony.

Plus, they weren't really based at all. They still preached feminism, sometimes sexual depravity, and so on. But, most importantly, they only preached nationalism from the perspective of:
"brown nationalism = oppressed = good"
"white nationalism = oppressors = evil"

Meanwhile, Marxism in the West developed various strategies of cultural subversion (see: Frankfurt School, New School) that aimed to destroy the nationalistic spirit and traditional cultures of the Western proletariat. This was designed to soften up the masses for full globalist conquest and basically boiled down to:
"freaks = oppressed = good"
"normal people = oppressors = evil"

However, Western Marxists were also inspired by the "anti-imperialist" ideologies of Lenin & friends, which eventually led to the creation of things like Critical Race Theory and "intersectionality," which is the idea that all "oppressed" groups must unite against the "oppressors" (straight White men and, increasingly, White women).

Although much of the Left today does not vocally identify as Marxist, they still advance the primary objectives laid out in the Communist Manifesto.

Furthermore, the Left ideologically dominates the West to such a degree that many Leftists don't identify with any specific ideology at all. They simply declare that their insane political beliefs are "being a good person." Some of the most stringent Leftists around today have never read a single word of Marx, or Lenin, or Mao, or Gramsci, Lukacs, Marcuse, Adorno, but espouse their ideologies almost verbatim.

I've made all of these points before but I can't emphasize this enough. It's vital information for understanding our enemies.

Noticed this film on Fatima came out this year, however its directed by Marco Pontecorvo. His surname is "redsea pedestrian" so be wary

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatima_(2020_film)

Yet another thing i found interesting regarding the Ottoman-Russian wars was that Charles XII, king of Sweden (famous Carolus rex), after he lost the great northern wars against Russia. He later exiled in the Ottoman empire where he persuaded the Ottoman sultan to wage war against the Russians.

Prots 🤝 muslims

Very based

https://twitter.com/LordVesconte/status/1462539904223563778

I do not understand the obsession of some people with eugenics in right wing spheres.

There were many of gay activists, feminists and major globalists who were supportive of eugenics. The eugenics movement in the early 20th centuries was basically spearheaded by spooks.

Winston Churchill was a massive supporter of Eugenics.
Havelock Ellis was a Fabian socialist and sexologist, who did extensive research on troons and homosexuality. He served as vice-president to the Eugenics Education Society. He was greatly influenced by the jewish sexologist Magnus Hirschfeld.
Margaret Sanger. Birth control, feminist, abortion rights and eugenics supporter.
John Maynard Keynes. super spook. Director of Bank of England. Creator of Keynesian economics, which is all economic policy in Western industrialized countries post WW2. Also a Fabian socialist and panel member of UN speech

I could go on and on...

Least I forget Julian Huxley, the first Director of UNESCO and coined the term agnosticism. He was president of the British Eugenics Society (also brother of Aldous Huxley, author of the dystopic novel "Brave new world")

Proofs of the Sufferings of God - Medical and Bodily Conditions.

Joseph Darnard:

On your knees!

I swear on the Honor to serve France and the Marshall Pétain, leader of the Legion,
To engage all my strengths, to make triumph the National Revolution and its Ideal,
Following our leader's commands and the discipline freely accepted of the SOL

SOL! STAND UP! 🇫🇷

Lol

Have you ever noticed how the most anti-Christian Roman emperors, like Diocleatian and Julian, were pro-Jewish?

Diocletian, the pagan Roman emperor who made one of the biggest persecution of Christians in history:
"Diocletian showed a certain tolerance toward the Jews, one of the reasons probably being that Judaism – unlike Christianity – had been declared a religio licita by the Romans. Thus, when he imposed a tax to provide sacrifices to the gods – a fact explicitly mentioned in the Talmud (TJ, Av. Zar. 5:4, 44a) – he excluded the Jews, but not the Samaritans, from this impost."
-Jewish virtual library.
So not only did he persecute Christians, he also gave tax benefits to Jews

Julian the Apostate, the last pagan emperor, allied with the Jews and promised them the construction of the third temple in Jerusalem in order to combat Christians.
He allowed them to return to "Holy Jerusalem which you have for many years longed to see rebuilt" after they were expelled and banned from in 325.
In his major works "Against the Galileans", Julian claimed that Jews were closer to Paganism than Christians.