Forwarded from Disclose.tv
NEW - U.S. Navy names ship after gay rights leader Harvey Milk and it's christened by a transgender veteran.
@disclosetv
@disclosetv
Australian Christian Fascists
Photo
One thing i found interesting while researching the Russian-Ottoman wars was that if Anglos didnt mingle with Russian affairs, then the Turks would've have been kicked out of European lands by the end of the 19th century.
in 1877 the Russians almost conquered Constantinople before Ottomans surrendered. Anglos however decided to give some land back to the Turks because otherwise it would've given Russia too much power.
"Under pressure from the British, Russia accepted the truce offered by the Ottoman Empire on 31 January 1878, but continued to move towards Constantinople.
"The British sent a fleet of battleships to intimidate Russia from entering the city, and Russian forces stopped at San Stefano [see pic above]. Eventually Russia entered into a settlement under the Treaty of San Stefano on 3 March, by which the Ottoman Empire would recognize the independence of Romania, Serbia, and Montenegro, and the autonomy of Bulgaria."
in 1877 the Russians almost conquered Constantinople before Ottomans surrendered. Anglos however decided to give some land back to the Turks because otherwise it would've given Russia too much power.
"Under pressure from the British, Russia accepted the truce offered by the Ottoman Empire on 31 January 1878, but continued to move towards Constantinople.
"The British sent a fleet of battleships to intimidate Russia from entering the city, and Russian forces stopped at San Stefano [see pic above]. Eventually Russia entered into a settlement under the Treaty of San Stefano on 3 March, by which the Ottoman Empire would recognize the independence of Romania, Serbia, and Montenegro, and the autonomy of Bulgaria."
SSPX posting squad
One thing i found interesting while researching the Russian-Ottoman wars was that if Anglos didnt mingle with Russian affairs, then the Turks would've have been kicked out of European lands by the end of the 19th century. in 1877 the Russians almost conquered…
later that year in the congress of Berlin, the great powers gave back some of that conquered land back to the turks to avoid Russia having too much influence in the region
Forwarded from Thuletide
Brief, simplified history of Marxist ideology from Marx to present:
In 1848, the Communist Manifesto laid out a handful of primary objectives, including:
- Abolition of property
- Destruction of family
- Destruction of nations
- Destruction of traditional culture
- Founding of a monopolistic, centralized banking system
- Centralization of all production, communication, and transport in the hands of "the state" (the ruling elite)
These objectives are shared by 99.99% of modern Leftists and they haven't diverged from these goals in almost 2 centuries.
(Btw the Communist Manifesto is like 20 pages long, I recommend reading it).
Marxism before 1923 aimed to achieve these objectives via a "colorblind" proletarian revolution against the "capitalist overlords" that they called the World Revolution. This strategy had failed miserably because the workers overwhelmingly sided with various nationalist movements (mostly Fascism) because they didn't like the idea of abolishing their families, property, nations, and traditions.
This led to two developmental pathways in Marxism, in the East and the West, both of which converge at the same endpoint.
In the East, Marxism from Lenin onwards shifted focus to the global struggle of the "oppressed races" against the "capitalist imperialists" (White people), while still paying lip service to "proletarian revolution." You'll see Marxists describing some ethnic groups as "proletarian nations of the world" and so on, which is just their obfuscatory way of saying "brown people."
Stalin implemented "socialism in one country", which was not nationalism — the USSR was a multi-racial empire — but the idea that the USSR must serve as a stable base of operations from which Communism could be spread throughout the world. Stalin had Leninist ideals.
Mao developed Marxist "anti-imperialist" ideology further with his Third Worldism, and both the USSR and PRC funded brown Communist insurgencies against White colonial states, e.g. Rhodesia and South Africa.
When people claim that "Marxists were based/trad/patriotic in the past," this is basically only true for the Third World Marxists, who were already serving the globalist agenda simply by revolting against White global hegemony.
Plus, they weren't really based at all. They still preached feminism, sometimes sexual depravity, and so on. But, most importantly, they only preached nationalism from the perspective of:
"brown nationalism = oppressed = good"
"white nationalism = oppressors = evil"
Meanwhile, Marxism in the West developed various strategies of cultural subversion (see: Frankfurt School, New School) that aimed to destroy the nationalistic spirit and traditional cultures of the Western proletariat. This was designed to soften up the masses for full globalist conquest and basically boiled down to:
"freaks = oppressed = good"
"normal people = oppressors = evil"
However, Western Marxists were also inspired by the "anti-imperialist" ideologies of Lenin & friends, which eventually led to the creation of things like Critical Race Theory and "intersectionality," which is the idea that all "oppressed" groups must unite against the "oppressors" (straight White men and, increasingly, White women).
Although much of the Left today does not vocally identify as Marxist, they still advance the primary objectives laid out in the Communist Manifesto.
Furthermore, the Left ideologically dominates the West to such a degree that many Leftists don't identify with any specific ideology at all. They simply declare that their insane political beliefs are "being a good person." Some of the most stringent Leftists around today have never read a single word of Marx, or Lenin, or Mao, or Gramsci, Lukacs, Marcuse, Adorno, but espouse their ideologies almost verbatim.
I've made all of these points before but I can't emphasize this enough. It's vital information for understanding our enemies.
In 1848, the Communist Manifesto laid out a handful of primary objectives, including:
- Abolition of property
- Destruction of family
- Destruction of nations
- Destruction of traditional culture
- Founding of a monopolistic, centralized banking system
- Centralization of all production, communication, and transport in the hands of "the state" (the ruling elite)
These objectives are shared by 99.99% of modern Leftists and they haven't diverged from these goals in almost 2 centuries.
(Btw the Communist Manifesto is like 20 pages long, I recommend reading it).
Marxism before 1923 aimed to achieve these objectives via a "colorblind" proletarian revolution against the "capitalist overlords" that they called the World Revolution. This strategy had failed miserably because the workers overwhelmingly sided with various nationalist movements (mostly Fascism) because they didn't like the idea of abolishing their families, property, nations, and traditions.
This led to two developmental pathways in Marxism, in the East and the West, both of which converge at the same endpoint.
In the East, Marxism from Lenin onwards shifted focus to the global struggle of the "oppressed races" against the "capitalist imperialists" (White people), while still paying lip service to "proletarian revolution." You'll see Marxists describing some ethnic groups as "proletarian nations of the world" and so on, which is just their obfuscatory way of saying "brown people."
Stalin implemented "socialism in one country", which was not nationalism — the USSR was a multi-racial empire — but the idea that the USSR must serve as a stable base of operations from which Communism could be spread throughout the world. Stalin had Leninist ideals.
Mao developed Marxist "anti-imperialist" ideology further with his Third Worldism, and both the USSR and PRC funded brown Communist insurgencies against White colonial states, e.g. Rhodesia and South Africa.
When people claim that "Marxists were based/trad/patriotic in the past," this is basically only true for the Third World Marxists, who were already serving the globalist agenda simply by revolting against White global hegemony.
Plus, they weren't really based at all. They still preached feminism, sometimes sexual depravity, and so on. But, most importantly, they only preached nationalism from the perspective of:
"brown nationalism = oppressed = good"
"white nationalism = oppressors = evil"
Meanwhile, Marxism in the West developed various strategies of cultural subversion (see: Frankfurt School, New School) that aimed to destroy the nationalistic spirit and traditional cultures of the Western proletariat. This was designed to soften up the masses for full globalist conquest and basically boiled down to:
"freaks = oppressed = good"
"normal people = oppressors = evil"
However, Western Marxists were also inspired by the "anti-imperialist" ideologies of Lenin & friends, which eventually led to the creation of things like Critical Race Theory and "intersectionality," which is the idea that all "oppressed" groups must unite against the "oppressors" (straight White men and, increasingly, White women).
Although much of the Left today does not vocally identify as Marxist, they still advance the primary objectives laid out in the Communist Manifesto.
Furthermore, the Left ideologically dominates the West to such a degree that many Leftists don't identify with any specific ideology at all. They simply declare that their insane political beliefs are "being a good person." Some of the most stringent Leftists around today have never read a single word of Marx, or Lenin, or Mao, or Gramsci, Lukacs, Marcuse, Adorno, but espouse their ideologies almost verbatim.
I've made all of these points before but I can't emphasize this enough. It's vital information for understanding our enemies.
Noticed this film on Fatima came out this year, however its directed by Marco Pontecorvo. His surname is "redsea pedestrian" so be wary
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatima_(2020_film)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatima_(2020_film)
Wikipedia
Fatima (2020 film)
2020 film by Marco Pontecorvo
I do not understand the obsession of some people with eugenics in right wing spheres.
There were many of gay activists, feminists and major globalists who were supportive of eugenics. The eugenics movement in the early 20th centuries was basically spearheaded by spooks.
Winston Churchill was a massive supporter of Eugenics.
Havelock Ellis was a Fabian socialist and sexologist, who did extensive research on troons and homosexuality. He served as vice-president to the Eugenics Education Society. He was greatly influenced by the jewish sexologist Magnus Hirschfeld.
Margaret Sanger. Birth control, feminist, abortion rights and eugenics supporter.
John Maynard Keynes. super spook. Director of Bank of England. Creator of Keynesian economics, which is all economic policy in Western industrialized countries post WW2. Also a Fabian socialist and panel member of UN speech
I could go on and on...
There were many of gay activists, feminists and major globalists who were supportive of eugenics. The eugenics movement in the early 20th centuries was basically spearheaded by spooks.
Winston Churchill was a massive supporter of Eugenics.
Havelock Ellis was a Fabian socialist and sexologist, who did extensive research on troons and homosexuality. He served as vice-president to the Eugenics Education Society. He was greatly influenced by the jewish sexologist Magnus Hirschfeld.
Margaret Sanger. Birth control, feminist, abortion rights and eugenics supporter.
John Maynard Keynes. super spook. Director of Bank of England. Creator of Keynesian economics, which is all economic policy in Western industrialized countries post WW2. Also a Fabian socialist and panel member of UN speech
I could go on and on...
SSPX posting squad
I do not understand the obsession of some people with eugenics in right wing spheres. There were many of gay activists, feminists and major globalists who were supportive of eugenics. The eugenics movement in the early 20th centuries was basically spearheaded…
Least I forget Julian Huxley, the first Director of UNESCO and coined the term agnosticism. He was president of the British Eugenics Society (also brother of Aldous Huxley, author of the dystopic novel "Brave new world")
Forwarded from Alítheia's Archive
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Proofs of the Sufferings of God - Medical and Bodily Conditions.