Reddit Moments
4.62K subscribers
25.8K photos
100 videos
1 file
2.06K links
A compilation of cringy, funny, degenerate, "high IQ" and weird posts from reddit (that can also be called "The Sodom and Gomorrah of the internet" or "The Weimar of the internet").
Download Telegram
๐Ÿ˜ข9
Redditors boyfriends ass stinks.
๐Ÿคฎ20
๐ŸŒš4๐Ÿ˜ญ4๐Ÿคจ1
๐Ÿณ14
Redditors husband wants to try again after cleaning himself.
๐Ÿคฎ11๐Ÿคฃ3
What an odd thing to say.
๐Ÿคก23๐Ÿค”4
๐Ÿ’ฉ13๐Ÿ’…6๐Ÿคฃ3
๐Ÿคฃ27๐Ÿ˜6๐Ÿ’‹1
๐Ÿ’…7
He literally described her as blonde.
๐Ÿ‘19
๐Ÿ˜22๐Ÿซก4
Redditors girlfriend told him about her FWB
๐Ÿ’…16๐Ÿคฌ5
"Yeah I totally remember being on St. James's with my dad Elon Musk after never telling anyone about this until just now."
๐Ÿ˜19
๐Ÿ˜ข16โค2
"Pointing out the House Nigger slur is astroturfing"
๐Ÿคฃ19
Do you have a source on that?

Source?

A source. I need a source.

Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.

No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.

You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.

Do you have a degree in that field?

A college degree? In that field?

Then your arguments are invalid.

No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.

Correlation does not equal causation.

CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.

You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.

Nope, still haven't.

I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
๐Ÿ˜17โค1
Atheist doesn't read the Bible and uses it to prove his point (imagine my shock)
๐Ÿ˜2