Forwarded from KFA UK
Sangwon Cement Complex Vows to Produce Hundreds of Thousands of More Tons of Cement This Year
Pyongyang, January 12 (KCNA) -- In order to successfully complete this year's huge construction projects as monumental entities of Juche architecture to be handed down to the younger generation for the honor of our times and generation, the Central Committee of the Workers' Party of Korea called upon the workers at the Sangwon Cement Complex standing on the arsenal of grand construction to perform miracles again.
enthusiasm of all the employees that they
Pyongyang, January 12 (KCNA) -- In order to successfully complete this year's huge construction projects as monumental entities of Juche architecture to be handed down to the younger generation for the honor of our times and generation, the Central Committee of the Workers' Party of Korea called upon the workers at the Sangwon Cement Complex standing on the arsenal of grand construction to perform miracles again.
enthusiasm of all the employees that they
Forwarded from Beorn and The Shieldmaiden
Out with the Pans from Ukraine!
A poster from the Ukrainian Socialist Soviet Republic proclaiming that Pans — the mainly Polish landlords — should be evicted from Ukraine.
@BeornAndTheShieldmaiden
🚀 Boost🚀
A poster from the Ukrainian Socialist Soviet Republic proclaiming that Pans — the mainly Polish landlords — should be evicted from Ukraine.
@BeornAndTheShieldmaiden
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from Beorn and The Shieldmaiden
On December 24, 1943, the Dnieper-Carpathian operation of the Red Army began
The operation began on December 24, 1943 and ended with the defeat of Army Group South, the destruction of 1 million 100 thousand Nazis, the liberation of Right-Bank Ukraine and the entry into the territory of Romania, Southern Poland and Czechoslovakia.
The length of the front was about 1300-1400 km, the depth - 250-450 km.
Troops from the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th Ukrainian and 2nd Belorussian Fronts took part in the operation.
The strategic operation included the following stages: Zhitomir-Berdichev, Kirovograd, Korsun-Shevchenkivska, Rivne-Lutsk, Nikopol-Krivoy Rog, Proskurov-Chernivtsi, Uman-Botosha, Bereznegovato-Snigirevskaya, Polesie and Odessa operations.
The Red Army learned to master the art of encircling and defeating the enemy.
Source
@BeornAndTheShieldmaiden
🚀 Boost🚀
The operation began on December 24, 1943 and ended with the defeat of Army Group South, the destruction of 1 million 100 thousand Nazis, the liberation of Right-Bank Ukraine and the entry into the territory of Romania, Southern Poland and Czechoslovakia.
The length of the front was about 1300-1400 km, the depth - 250-450 km.
Troops from the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th Ukrainian and 2nd Belorussian Fronts took part in the operation.
The strategic operation included the following stages: Zhitomir-Berdichev, Kirovograd, Korsun-Shevchenkivska, Rivne-Lutsk, Nikopol-Krivoy Rog, Proskurov-Chernivtsi, Uman-Botosha, Bereznegovato-Snigirevskaya, Polesie and Odessa operations.
The Red Army learned to master the art of encircling and defeating the enemy.
Source
@BeornAndTheShieldmaiden
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from Communism
These people evidently think that socialism calls for equalisation, for levelling the requirements and personal, everyday life of the members of society. Needless to say, such an assumption has nothing in common with Marxism, with Leninism. By equality Marxism means, not equalisation of personal requirements and everyday life, but the abolition of classes, i.e., a) the equal emancipation of all working people from exploitation after the capitalists have been overthrown and expropriated; b) the equal abolition for all of private property in the means of production after they have been converted into the property of the whole of society; c) the equal duty of all to work according to their ability, and the equal right of all working people to receive in return for this according to the work performed (socialist society); d) the equal duty of all to work according to their ability, and the equal right of all working people to receive in return for this according to their needs (communist society). Moreover, Marxism proceeds from the assumption that people's tastes and requirements are not, and cannot be, identical and equal in regard to quality or quantity, whether in the period of socialism or in the period of communism.
There you have the Marxist conception of equality.
Marxism has never recognised, and does not recognise, any other equality.
To draw from this the conclusion that socialism calls for equalisation, for the levelling of the requirements of the members of society, for the levelling of their tastes and of their personal, everyday life—that according to the Marxist plan all should wear the same clothes and eat the same dishes in the same quantity—is to utter vulgarities and to slander Marxism.
It is time it was understood that Marxism is an enemy of equalisation. Already in the Manifesto of the Communist Party Marx and Engels scourged primitive utopian socialism and termed it reactionary because it preached "universal asceticism and social levelling in its crudest form." 11 In his Anti-Duhring Engels devoted a whole chapter to a withering criticism of the "radical equalitarian socialism" put forward by Duhring in opposition to Marxist socialism.
". . . The real content of the proletarian demand for equality," said Engels, "is the demand for the abolition of classes. Any demand for equality which goes beyond that, of necessity passes into absurdity." 12
Lenin said the same thing:
"Engels was a thousand times right when he wrote that to conceive equality as meaning anything beyond the abolition of classes is a very stupid and absurd prejudice. Bourgeois professors have tried to make use of the concept of equality to accuse us of wanting to make all men equal to one another. They have tried to accuse the Socialists of this absurdity, which they themselves invented. But in their ignorance they did not know that the Socialists—and precisely the founders of modern scientific socialism, Marx and Engels—said: Equality is an empty phrase unless equality is understood to mean the abolition of classes. We want to abolish classes, and in this respect we stand for equality. But the claim that we want to make all men equal to one another is an empty phrase and a stupid invention of intellectuals" (Lenin's speech "On Deceiving the People with Slogans About Liberty and Equality," Works, Vol. XXIV, pp. 2 9 3 - 9 4 13).
Clear, one would think.
Bourgeois writers are fond of depicting Marxist socialism in the shape of the old tsarist barracks, where everything is subordinated to the "principle" of equalisation. But Marxists cannot be held responsible for the ignorance and stupidity of bourgeois writers.
J. V. Stalin
Report to the Seventeenth Party Congress on the Work of the Central Committee of the C.P.S.U.(B.)
January 26, 1934
@Communism
There you have the Marxist conception of equality.
Marxism has never recognised, and does not recognise, any other equality.
To draw from this the conclusion that socialism calls for equalisation, for the levelling of the requirements of the members of society, for the levelling of their tastes and of their personal, everyday life—that according to the Marxist plan all should wear the same clothes and eat the same dishes in the same quantity—is to utter vulgarities and to slander Marxism.
It is time it was understood that Marxism is an enemy of equalisation. Already in the Manifesto of the Communist Party Marx and Engels scourged primitive utopian socialism and termed it reactionary because it preached "universal asceticism and social levelling in its crudest form." 11 In his Anti-Duhring Engels devoted a whole chapter to a withering criticism of the "radical equalitarian socialism" put forward by Duhring in opposition to Marxist socialism.
". . . The real content of the proletarian demand for equality," said Engels, "is the demand for the abolition of classes. Any demand for equality which goes beyond that, of necessity passes into absurdity." 12
Lenin said the same thing:
"Engels was a thousand times right when he wrote that to conceive equality as meaning anything beyond the abolition of classes is a very stupid and absurd prejudice. Bourgeois professors have tried to make use of the concept of equality to accuse us of wanting to make all men equal to one another. They have tried to accuse the Socialists of this absurdity, which they themselves invented. But in their ignorance they did not know that the Socialists—and precisely the founders of modern scientific socialism, Marx and Engels—said: Equality is an empty phrase unless equality is understood to mean the abolition of classes. We want to abolish classes, and in this respect we stand for equality. But the claim that we want to make all men equal to one another is an empty phrase and a stupid invention of intellectuals" (Lenin's speech "On Deceiving the People with Slogans About Liberty and Equality," Works, Vol. XXIV, pp. 2 9 3 - 9 4 13).
Clear, one would think.
Bourgeois writers are fond of depicting Marxist socialism in the shape of the old tsarist barracks, where everything is subordinated to the "principle" of equalisation. But Marxists cannot be held responsible for the ignorance and stupidity of bourgeois writers.
J. V. Stalin
Report to the Seventeenth Party Congress on the Work of the Central Committee of the C.P.S.U.(B.)
January 26, 1934
#Stalin #Lenin #Marx #Engels #Equality
@Communism
Lay down your weapons, you soldiers at the front. Lay down your tools, you workers at home. Do not let yourselves be deceived any longer by your rulers, the lip patriots, and the munitions profiteers. Rise with power and seize the reins of government. Yours is the force. To you belongs the right to rule. Answer the call for freedom and win your own war for liberty.
- Karl Liebknecht, Call for Revolution (1918)
❤1
Forwarded from Class Consciousness Project
Class Consciousness Project
Sharon Graham: The Illusion of Change at Unite the Union
Picture from leftfootforward.org We have been observing Sharon Graham’s stewardship of Unite the Union with some amusement. She ascended to the position of General Secretary amidst a plethora…
Forwarded from Russian Diplomat 🅉
Sinwar Jr. is about 50 years old. Like Yahya, he joined Hamas in his youth. The publication writes that, unlike his brother, Mohammed Sinwar did not spend “significant time” in an Israeli prison, so the Israeli intelligence services do not understand him as well.
He received the nickname “Shadow” because he preferred to act “behind the scenes” and managed to hide from the Israeli intelligence services for a long time.
Младший брат убитого Яхьи Синвара Мухаммед возглавил ХАМАС – WSJ
Синвару-младшему около 50 лет. Так же, как и Яхья, он присоединился к ХАМАС в молодости. Издание пишет, что в отличие от брата, Мухаммед Синвар не провел «значительное время» в израильской тюрьме, поэтому спецслужбы Израиля его не так хорошо понимают.
Прозвище «Тень» он получил за то, что тот предпочитал действовать «за кулисами» и ему долгое время удавалось скрываться от израильских спецслужб.
Boost | Support |
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from MT News
8 mansions owned by Ukrainian generals burnt in LA wildfires – reports
The properties were reportedly purchased with Western funds provided to Kiev as military aid
@MTodayNews
The properties were reportedly purchased with Western funds provided to Kiev as military aid
@MTodayNews
😁1
Nazism is being allowed to arise once more in Europe. Ukraine, Latvia and Finland all have a strong Nazi ideology still prevalent. It seems Moldova does too.