Forwarded from LiveLeak
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Belgium. The international demonstration against restrictions on freedoms turns into chaos in Brussels. Big clashes between demonstrators and the police. A plain clothes policeman is gassed by his colleagues.
More video -> LiveLeak
More video -> LiveLeak
Forwarded from LiveLeak
New footage from the international demonstration against the restriction of freedoms (+ drone footage)
Street furniture serves as barricades against water cannons. Police are forced to take refuge in the subway. The situation turns into a riot in Brussels.
Follow us -> LiveLeak
Street furniture serves as barricades against water cannons. Police are forced to take refuge in the subway. The situation turns into a riot in Brussels.
Follow us -> LiveLeak
Forwarded from Mudflood Research, Tartaria, True Aryan History (Bogatyr)
Smoking gun; A CIA document acknowledging that the Soviet Union had issued a full on decree to "revision" (delete) the history of Tartaria.
The document clearly uses the name Tartaria as if it is a nation full of history, not just an empty territory of pastoralists in Asia like claimed by the Wikipedia.
The decree was issued on August 9th 1944. This was not long ago, only 77 summers. You must remember - history was not simply rewritten in one event 200 years ago, like some believe. It's something that has been chipped away bit by bit. What people knew about Tartaria just 80 years ago was far more than what we know today. Unfortunately as the years pass, there are fewer people from that time period, and even fewer people who are knowledgable about this subject.
This document also seems to make it clear that it was in conflict with Russia, so it was definitely a political body of some sort. You can read the rest of it here:
https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp78-02771r000200090002-6
The document clearly uses the name Tartaria as if it is a nation full of history, not just an empty territory of pastoralists in Asia like claimed by the Wikipedia.
The decree was issued on August 9th 1944. This was not long ago, only 77 summers. You must remember - history was not simply rewritten in one event 200 years ago, like some believe. It's something that has been chipped away bit by bit. What people knew about Tartaria just 80 years ago was far more than what we know today. Unfortunately as the years pass, there are fewer people from that time period, and even fewer people who are knowledgable about this subject.
This document also seems to make it clear that it was in conflict with Russia, so it was definitely a political body of some sort. You can read the rest of it here:
https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp78-02771r000200090002-6
Forwarded from White Dragon Truther News — We The People
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🎶 Struggle Jennings & Caitlynne Curtis - God We Need You Now 👊👍🙏
Forwarded from White Dragon Truther News — We The People
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
1 of 2 Father Alexis Bugnolo - Beware as Skull & Bones Pivots - The Controlled Opposition
Forwarded from White Dragon Truther News — We The People
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
2 of 2 Father Alexis Bugnolo - How Skull & Bones Plans to Co-Opt Worldwide Resistance to The Plandemic
Forwarded from Vault of Secrets - Unpopular History (M Himself)
Deus Vult?
A French-Jewish nobleman, Hugues de Payens, together with eight other crusaders of Jewish origin, including Andre de Montbard, Geoffroi Bisol and Geoffroi de Saint-Omer officially founded the Order of the Knights Templar in 1118. There is, however, certain information that the order was actually founded four years earlier... In 1114, the bishop of Chartres mentioned "la Milice du Christ" in a letter, the name by which the order was originally known... died the following year. They called themselves the Poor Knights of Solomon's Temple... Jerusalem was liberated from Muslim rule 19 years earlier (1099)... the Church was grateful for the services of De Payens... A secret Jewish order was behind these men, the Order of Zion (l'Ordre de Sion), founded in the monastery of Notre-Dame du Mont de Sion, on mount Zion.. in June 1099 by the 39 year-old Godfroi de Bouillon, duke of Lorraine - a descendant of Guillem de Gellone who was of the seed and tribe of David.
Lina, J. (2004). Architects of Deception
A French-Jewish nobleman, Hugues de Payens, together with eight other crusaders of Jewish origin, including Andre de Montbard, Geoffroi Bisol and Geoffroi de Saint-Omer officially founded the Order of the Knights Templar in 1118. There is, however, certain information that the order was actually founded four years earlier... In 1114, the bishop of Chartres mentioned "la Milice du Christ" in a letter, the name by which the order was originally known... died the following year. They called themselves the Poor Knights of Solomon's Temple... Jerusalem was liberated from Muslim rule 19 years earlier (1099)... the Church was grateful for the services of De Payens... A secret Jewish order was behind these men, the Order of Zion (l'Ordre de Sion), founded in the monastery of Notre-Dame du Mont de Sion, on mount Zion.. in June 1099 by the 39 year-old Godfroi de Bouillon, duke of Lorraine - a descendant of Guillem de Gellone who was of the seed and tribe of David.
Lina, J. (2004). Architects of Deception
Forwarded from Vault of Secrets - Unpopular History (سیندخت)
Pasargadae: the tomb of Solomon's mother or Cyrus the Great?
Until the nineteenth century, it was thought that this tomb belonged to the mother of the prophet Solomon, but where did this belief come from?
Ibn Balkhi, a historian of the sixth century AH, is the first person to mention Pasargadae in post-Islamic texts and considers this tomb to belong to the mother of Suleiman the Prophet:
"The meadow of Callan is near the tomb of Solomon's mother. It is four miles long, but it is not wide except a little, and the tomb of Solomon's mother is made of stone." "No one in that house can look at who says they made a spell, whoever looks at that house goes blind, but I have not seen anyone try it." (Farsnameh, Ibn Balkhi, p. 155)
As mentioned, this idea about Pasargadae continued until the nineteenth century AD, and other historians, following Ibn Balkhi, referred to this tomb as the tomb of Suleiman's mother.
But is the idea of Suleiman's mother's grave in a plain in central Iran rational?
As you can see in the map below, Solomon's kingdom did not cross the Euphrates River in its widest form, on its eastern borders.
https://b2n.ir/j98065
This means that Suleiman's kingdom is thousands of kilometers away from the center of Iran, and carrying a dead body in this long distance has been impossible due to the existing dangers and the absence of Iran in Suleiman's territory. And also there was no rational reason for this !!
According to the texts we have, it seems that the local people gave supernatural power to this tomb! And it was referred to as a shrine. As Ibn Balkhi states in Farsnameh, whoever looks at the tomb becomes blind!
Therefore, the locals considered this tomb to belong to the mother of Suleiman the Prophet
But to prove that this tomb belongs to Cyrus the Great.
The famous Greek philosopher and historian Lucius Flavius Arian, in his book Anabasis Alexander, which describes the life and campaigns of Alexander the Great, gives a detailed account of the appearance of the tomb of Cyrus:
"The base of the tomb was rectangular, made of square cut stone, and on top of it was a room that was also made of stone and had a narrow passage through the door that only one person could hardly enter the room at a time," he said. Inside the room was a golden coffin containing the body of Cyrus and a large courtyard with hammered gold bases with covers of thick and colorful materials and a Babylonian rug on top (Anabasis Iskander, Arian, Book 6, p. 29, paragraph 5)
As you can see, the description of the tomb that Arian gave of the tomb of Cyrus is most similar to today's Pasargadae. In addition, other famous archaeologists, historians, historians and orientalists have argued that Pasargadae belonged to Cyrus.
The famous English historian and orientalist Amelie Kurt, in addition to confirming Arian's statements, considers Pasargadae to be the main tomb of Cyrus. (Achaemenids, Ameli Kurt, pp. 96-97, Phoenix Publications)
General Sykes, who wrote a travelogue about his trip to Iran, in addition to seeing Pasargadae closely, considers it to belong to Cyrus (Ten Thousand Miles in Iran, Sykes, p. 344).
Dandamayev, the famous Russian orientalist, in addition to confirming that the tomb of Pasargadae belonged to Cyrus, considers its appearance to be related to the Persian culture and ideology of Cyrus (Achaemenid Political History, Dandamayev, p. 93).
Shahpour Shahbazi, a famous Iranian archaeologist, knows the tomb of Cyrus in detail in Pasargadae (Life and work of Cyrus the Great, Shahpour Shahbazi, p. 126)
Historian and Iranologist Parviz Rajabi also considers Pasargadae to belong to Cyrus (The Lost Millennia, Parviz Rajabi, vol. 2, p. 156)
Until the nineteenth century, it was thought that this tomb belonged to the mother of the prophet Solomon, but where did this belief come from?
Ibn Balkhi, a historian of the sixth century AH, is the first person to mention Pasargadae in post-Islamic texts and considers this tomb to belong to the mother of Suleiman the Prophet:
"The meadow of Callan is near the tomb of Solomon's mother. It is four miles long, but it is not wide except a little, and the tomb of Solomon's mother is made of stone." "No one in that house can look at who says they made a spell, whoever looks at that house goes blind, but I have not seen anyone try it." (Farsnameh, Ibn Balkhi, p. 155)
As mentioned, this idea about Pasargadae continued until the nineteenth century AD, and other historians, following Ibn Balkhi, referred to this tomb as the tomb of Suleiman's mother.
But is the idea of Suleiman's mother's grave in a plain in central Iran rational?
As you can see in the map below, Solomon's kingdom did not cross the Euphrates River in its widest form, on its eastern borders.
https://b2n.ir/j98065
This means that Suleiman's kingdom is thousands of kilometers away from the center of Iran, and carrying a dead body in this long distance has been impossible due to the existing dangers and the absence of Iran in Suleiman's territory. And also there was no rational reason for this !!
According to the texts we have, it seems that the local people gave supernatural power to this tomb! And it was referred to as a shrine. As Ibn Balkhi states in Farsnameh, whoever looks at the tomb becomes blind!
Therefore, the locals considered this tomb to belong to the mother of Suleiman the Prophet
But to prove that this tomb belongs to Cyrus the Great.
The famous Greek philosopher and historian Lucius Flavius Arian, in his book Anabasis Alexander, which describes the life and campaigns of Alexander the Great, gives a detailed account of the appearance of the tomb of Cyrus:
"The base of the tomb was rectangular, made of square cut stone, and on top of it was a room that was also made of stone and had a narrow passage through the door that only one person could hardly enter the room at a time," he said. Inside the room was a golden coffin containing the body of Cyrus and a large courtyard with hammered gold bases with covers of thick and colorful materials and a Babylonian rug on top (Anabasis Iskander, Arian, Book 6, p. 29, paragraph 5)
As you can see, the description of the tomb that Arian gave of the tomb of Cyrus is most similar to today's Pasargadae. In addition, other famous archaeologists, historians, historians and orientalists have argued that Pasargadae belonged to Cyrus.
The famous English historian and orientalist Amelie Kurt, in addition to confirming Arian's statements, considers Pasargadae to be the main tomb of Cyrus. (Achaemenids, Ameli Kurt, pp. 96-97, Phoenix Publications)
General Sykes, who wrote a travelogue about his trip to Iran, in addition to seeing Pasargadae closely, considers it to belong to Cyrus (Ten Thousand Miles in Iran, Sykes, p. 344).
Dandamayev, the famous Russian orientalist, in addition to confirming that the tomb of Pasargadae belonged to Cyrus, considers its appearance to be related to the Persian culture and ideology of Cyrus (Achaemenid Political History, Dandamayev, p. 93).
Shahpour Shahbazi, a famous Iranian archaeologist, knows the tomb of Cyrus in detail in Pasargadae (Life and work of Cyrus the Great, Shahpour Shahbazi, p. 126)
Historian and Iranologist Parviz Rajabi also considers Pasargadae to belong to Cyrus (The Lost Millennia, Parviz Rajabi, vol. 2, p. 156)