Charlie Says he supports the Raise Act - but this is a new view of his - three weeks ago he called the idea of limiting legal immigration a "wonky idea" - WE HAVE THE CLIP
Tomorrow someone must read and ask about some of the Charlie Kirk anti-Trump tweets.... ALSO ask him about his pivot on Immigration from calling limiting legal immigration a
"wonky idea" to suddenly supporting the RAISE ACT. Ask him if his new position is authentic based on the quick pivot.
"wonky idea" to suddenly supporting the RAISE ACT. Ask him if his new position is authentic based on the quick pivot.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Based STEM Student BLASTS Charlie Kirk on Immigration
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Charlie Kirk GRILLED on his Legal Immigration Stance
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Charlie Kirk APOLOGIZES for His Stance on "Stapling Green Cards to Diplomas" After Tucker Carlson and Michelle Malkin Called Him Out
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Charlie Kirk CALLED OUT for Taking People Out of Line in Order to Get Softball Questions
Forwarded from Franssen
Thank you, Simon, for filming the event tonight. Major kudos!
A daily wire editor just tweeted that "Jew Hatred is inherent in European DNA” - Could this be why major Jewish organziations push for mass immigration into western countries? https://web.archive.org/save/https://twitter.com/josh_hammer/status/1194442549672468481?s=20
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Daily Wire Editor DELETED HIS TWEET After He Said "Jew Hatred is Inherent in European DNA" - Here is the screen recording. He also works for YAF
CHARLIE KIRK QUESTION:
Leading up to and after the primary election, you tweeted things like “The fact that Iowa Could Elect Trump, Who Openly Brags About His Affairs is Astonishing to Me,” as well as “Anyone Down for a Cruz Rubio Ticket to Save America.”
A few weeks ago you called the position of limiting current legal immigration levels a “wonky idea,” but after pressure from American nationalists you changed you position and started to vocally support the RAISE ACT.
Finally, yesterday at UF you apologized for your recent statements on F-1 Visas after Tucker Carlson and Michelle Malkin criticized it.
Since your current support for Trump is likely a sham based on your countless tweets slamming him in 2016, why should we actually believe you authentically believe and support the things you say now?
(Don’t let him lie about the tweets - we have archive links to the tweets)
Leading up to and after the primary election, you tweeted things like “The fact that Iowa Could Elect Trump, Who Openly Brags About His Affairs is Astonishing to Me,” as well as “Anyone Down for a Cruz Rubio Ticket to Save America.”
A few weeks ago you called the position of limiting current legal immigration levels a “wonky idea,” but after pressure from American nationalists you changed you position and started to vocally support the RAISE ACT.
Finally, yesterday at UF you apologized for your recent statements on F-1 Visas after Tucker Carlson and Michelle Malkin criticized it.
Since your current support for Trump is likely a sham based on your countless tweets slamming him in 2016, why should we actually believe you authentically believe and support the things you say now?
(Don’t let him lie about the tweets - we have archive links to the tweets)
Hit Charlie Kirk on his Anti-Trump tweets in front of Lara Trump. See post above ^^
Forwarded from Franssen
All chance at resolving these go out the window if mass LEGAL migration is not stopped:
-race relations
-environmental pollution
-drug epidemics
-healthcare
-infrastructure
-housing/homelessness crisis
-human trafficking
-etc.
We can ALL unite to stop mass legal migration.
-race relations
-environmental pollution
-drug epidemics
-healthcare
-infrastructure
-housing/homelessness crisis
-human trafficking
-etc.
We can ALL unite to stop mass legal migration.
QUESTION FOR BEN SHAPIRO:
You’ve said recently that voting is malleable, and mentioned the Cuban vote in Florida - When in fact only 54% of Cubans in Florida backed Trump and over 60% of all Hispanics in Florida voted for the Democratic Party.
The truth is that Hispanics nationwide have voted 70% for the Democratic Party consistently every single election since 1968, and Cubans make up less than 1% of the Hispanics in America.
Why are you denying that demographic change will eventually lead to republicans no longer being able to win Texas or a presidential election ever again?
( Shapiro admitted this was true years ago in a sit down with Anne Coulter and a video where he quoted CIS data)
You’ve said recently that voting is malleable, and mentioned the Cuban vote in Florida - When in fact only 54% of Cubans in Florida backed Trump and over 60% of all Hispanics in Florida voted for the Democratic Party.
The truth is that Hispanics nationwide have voted 70% for the Democratic Party consistently every single election since 1968, and Cubans make up less than 1% of the Hispanics in America.
Why are you denying that demographic change will eventually lead to republicans no longer being able to win Texas or a presidential election ever again?
( Shapiro admitted this was true years ago in a sit down with Anne Coulter and a video where he quoted CIS data)
BEN SHAPIRO QUESTION
You once tweets that you “don’t care about the browning of America.”
But it is precisely because of this demographic change that Republicans will eventually never be able to win Texas or a general election ever again.
In Texas for instance, county after county is going blue and never going back red again.
In 2018 Beto O’rourke received about 80% of the latino vote in the top 5 counties that make up 36% of all Texans. Latinos will be a super majority in Texas come 2024 and the hispanic vote has always been around 70% in for democrats in every election and has never surpassed 35% for republicans in history.
How could you declare you don’t care about this shift yet clamor you care about the future of conservatism, gun rights, or the 1st amendment.
You once tweets that you “don’t care about the browning of America.”
But it is precisely because of this demographic change that Republicans will eventually never be able to win Texas or a general election ever again.
In Texas for instance, county after county is going blue and never going back red again.
In 2018 Beto O’rourke received about 80% of the latino vote in the top 5 counties that make up 36% of all Texans. Latinos will be a super majority in Texas come 2024 and the hispanic vote has always been around 70% in for democrats in every election and has never surpassed 35% for republicans in history.
How could you declare you don’t care about this shift yet clamor you care about the future of conservatism, gun rights, or the 1st amendment.
👎1
Forwarded from Columbia Bugle
Question for Ben Shapiro:
Thank you Mr. Shapiro for being here. You said in 2003 that the Conservative movement had “progressed beyond the ideology of Pat Buchanan.” You called out his America First stance on immigration, his opposition to the Iraq War, and his America First trade policies. You went on to say and I quote, “[Conservatives]must jettison the Buchananites.” But with the election of President Trump, the popularity of America First pundits like Tucker Carlson, and a Republican Party more in line with Buchanan’s positions, is it perhaps your brand of Libertarian Conservatism that we have progressed beyond?
Thank you Mr. Shapiro for being here. You said in 2003 that the Conservative movement had “progressed beyond the ideology of Pat Buchanan.” You called out his America First stance on immigration, his opposition to the Iraq War, and his America First trade policies. You went on to say and I quote, “[Conservatives]must jettison the Buchananites.” But with the election of President Trump, the popularity of America First pundits like Tucker Carlson, and a Republican Party more in line with Buchanan’s positions, is it perhaps your brand of Libertarian Conservatism that we have progressed beyond?
👎1
Forwarded from Columbia Bugle
Question 1: “Hi Charlie, I voted for Trump in 2016 and I think his most effective argument was highlighting that American corporations and plutocrats loved illegal immigration for cheap labor while the American people, like the Angel Moms, suffered crimes at the hands of aliens who shouldn’t have been here in the first place. Hasn’t the Republican Party stepped into a similarly awful situation with the First Step Act, where felons are freed early to provide cheap labor while law-abiding Americans are left to pay the cost in blood?”
👎1
Forwarded from Columbia Bugle
Question 2:
Charlie you wrote an Op-Ed in December of last year supporting the First Step Act where you begin by saying “Imprisoning convicted criminals for longer and longer periods sounds like an appealing and commonsense proposal to many people. After all, when lawbreakers are locked up they can’t commit more crimes and law-abiding citizens are safer. Right? Actually, wrong.” Unfortunately, it appears as though you are the one who is wrong as Joel Francisco, notorious leader of the ‘Almighty Latin Kings’ gang has been arrested for murdering a man less than a year after being freed by your “First Step Act.” Additionally, Tucker Carlson highlighted recently that the First Step Act has released about 240 sex offenders, nearly 60 convicted murders and assailants, as well as almost 1,000 inmates convicted for drug crimes onto our streets. Were you lying, misinformed, or just reckless with the American people’s safety?
Charlie you wrote an Op-Ed in December of last year supporting the First Step Act where you begin by saying “Imprisoning convicted criminals for longer and longer periods sounds like an appealing and commonsense proposal to many people. After all, when lawbreakers are locked up they can’t commit more crimes and law-abiding citizens are safer. Right? Actually, wrong.” Unfortunately, it appears as though you are the one who is wrong as Joel Francisco, notorious leader of the ‘Almighty Latin Kings’ gang has been arrested for murdering a man less than a year after being freed by your “First Step Act.” Additionally, Tucker Carlson highlighted recently that the First Step Act has released about 240 sex offenders, nearly 60 convicted murders and assailants, as well as almost 1,000 inmates convicted for drug crimes onto our streets. Were you lying, misinformed, or just reckless with the American people’s safety?
BEN SHAPIRO QUESTION
Josh Hammer, one of your editors tweeted that “Jew hatred is inherent in European DNA” not once but twice over the past weeks.
You’ve stated on Dave Rubin that we should “hunt down racists and destroy their careers.”
If this statement from your editor was in the reverse, this man’s life would be destroyed and you would fire him immediately. Are you going to fire him?
Josh Hammer, one of your editors tweeted that “Jew hatred is inherent in European DNA” not once but twice over the past weeks.
You’ve stated on Dave Rubin that we should “hunt down racists and destroy their careers.”
If this statement from your editor was in the reverse, this man’s life would be destroyed and you would fire him immediately. Are you going to fire him?
QUESTION IDEA # 16 - FOR KIRK, Shapiro, or Others
Professor Robert Putnam, who conducted the largest study ever done on civic engagement in America, found that racial diversity is in fact our weakness and not the ‘strength’ the elites have tried to sell us.
The study determined that the greater the diversity in a community, the less people trust each other and the less they are engaged in their communities.
We also know that the least diverse states and cities are typically the safest. According to polls, a record 67 million people don’t speak English at home today, which tells us that we don’t even share a language, let alone a culture any longer.
Increased Diversity has also resulted in SAT score changes, elimination of standardized testing in Ivy League schools, diversity departments in schools and businesses, whole districts saying math is racist, and all of the rest of the crazy social justice ethnic conflict that your organization likes to make viral anti-sjw videos about.
Why do you and your organization deny that demographic change is not only going to be detrimental for the future of republicans, but also be detrimental to the future of the entire country?
Professor Robert Putnam, who conducted the largest study ever done on civic engagement in America, found that racial diversity is in fact our weakness and not the ‘strength’ the elites have tried to sell us.
The study determined that the greater the diversity in a community, the less people trust each other and the less they are engaged in their communities.
We also know that the least diverse states and cities are typically the safest. According to polls, a record 67 million people don’t speak English at home today, which tells us that we don’t even share a language, let alone a culture any longer.
Increased Diversity has also resulted in SAT score changes, elimination of standardized testing in Ivy League schools, diversity departments in schools and businesses, whole districts saying math is racist, and all of the rest of the crazy social justice ethnic conflict that your organization likes to make viral anti-sjw videos about.
Why do you and your organization deny that demographic change is not only going to be detrimental for the future of republicans, but also be detrimental to the future of the entire country?