Who cares about side-channel attacks?
Ray Dillinger bear at sonic.net
Fri Oct 31 17:33:09 EDT 2008
https://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2008-October/014811.html
Ray Dillinger bear at sonic.net
Fri Oct 31 17:33:09 EDT 2008
https://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2008-October/014811.html
There are three categories of identity that are useful to
think about.
Category one: public. Real-world identities
are a matter of record and attached to every transaction.
Category two: Pseudonymous. There are persistent "identities" within the system and people can see if something was done by the same nym that did something else, but there's not necessarily any way of linking the nyms with real-world identities.
Category three: unlinkably anonymous. There is no concept of identity,persistent or otherwise. No one can say or prove whether the agents involved in any transaction are the same agents as involved in any other transaction.
Are you claiming category 3 as you seem to be, or category 2?
Lots of people don't distinguish between anonymous and pseudonymous protocols, so it's worth asking exactly what you mean here.
Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ray Dillinger)
Mon Nov 17 12:05:08 2008
From: Ray Dillinger <bear@sonic.net>
To: satoshi@vistomail.com
http://diswww.mit.edu/bloom-picayune/crypto/137798
think about.
Category one: public. Real-world identities
are a matter of record and attached to every transaction.
Category two: Pseudonymous. There are persistent "identities" within the system and people can see if something was done by the same nym that did something else, but there's not necessarily any way of linking the nyms with real-world identities.
Category three: unlinkably anonymous. There is no concept of identity,persistent or otherwise. No one can say or prove whether the agents involved in any transaction are the same agents as involved in any other transaction.
Are you claiming category 3 as you seem to be, or category 2?
Lots of people don't distinguish between anonymous and pseudonymous protocols, so it's worth asking exactly what you mean here.
Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ray Dillinger)
Mon Nov 17 12:05:08 2008
From: Ray Dillinger <bear@sonic.net>
To: satoshi@vistomail.com
http://diswww.mit.edu/bloom-picayune/crypto/137798
Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Satoshi Nakamoto)
Mon Nov 17 12:05:47 2008
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 02:02:00 +0800
From: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@vistomail.com>
Reply-To: satoshi@vistomail.com
To: bear@sonic.net
Right, it's ECC digital signatures. A new key pair is used for every transaction.
Satoshi Nakamoto
The Cryptography Mailing List
http://diswww.mit.edu/bloom-picayune/crypto/137799
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Satoshi Nakamoto)
Mon Nov 17 12:05:47 2008
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 02:02:00 +0800
From: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@vistomail.com>
Reply-To: satoshi@vistomail.com
To: bear@sonic.net
Right, it's ECC digital signatures. A new key pair is used for every transaction.
Satoshi Nakamoto
The Cryptography Mailing List
http://diswww.mit.edu/bloom-picayune/crypto/137799
Cryddit
Re: Why 1BTC should equal 10^8 satoshi ?
October 12, 2014
Uhh, I don't remember ever agreeing to keep it secret, but we didn't talk about it on the list either. At that time Hal was elbows-deep in the transaction scripting code, and I was checking Satoshi's work on the crypto on the blockchain architecture.
Finney had a lot to worry about with the transaction scripting and wound up blocking out about a dozen more opcodes than Satoshi had wanted to, but I found essentially nothing wrong with the block structure. I am still freakin' amazed how tight he got that blockchain design.
And, yeah, I'm Ray Dillinger
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=819656.msg9171089#msg9171089
Re: Why 1BTC should equal 10^8 satoshi ?
October 12, 2014
Uhh, I don't remember ever agreeing to keep it secret, but we didn't talk about it on the list either. At that time Hal was elbows-deep in the transaction scripting code, and I was checking Satoshi's work on the crypto on the blockchain architecture.
Finney had a lot to worry about with the transaction scripting and wound up blocking out about a dozen more opcodes than Satoshi had wanted to, but I found essentially nothing wrong with the block structure. I am still freakin' amazed how tight he got that blockchain design.
And, yeah, I'm Ray Dillinger
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=819656.msg9171089#msg9171089
Forwarded from @RamonQuesada †🌷🙏
Q4:
"Honestly I’m very surprised Tethercoin isn’t dead yet. What they propose, economically speaking, simply will not work. They got themselves somehow declared to be the only way to get money OUT of a major wallet, which props up their transaction volume, but if the people haven’t already walked away with most of the money they’re supposedly holding but won’t say where, then I’m very surprised".
Interview with Ray Dillinger
Posted on October 1, 2018
https://ramonquesada.com/english/interview-with-ray-dillinger/
"Honestly I’m very surprised Tethercoin isn’t dead yet. What they propose, economically speaking, simply will not work. They got themselves somehow declared to be the only way to get money OUT of a major wallet, which props up their transaction volume, but if the people haven’t already walked away with most of the money they’re supposedly holding but won’t say where, then I’m very surprised".
Interview with Ray Dillinger
Posted on October 1, 2018
https://ramonquesada.com/english/interview-with-ray-dillinger/
Ramon Quesada
Interview with Ray Dillinger | Ramon Quesada
"For what it's worth:
I'm the guy who went over the blockchain stuff in Satoshi's first cut of the bitcoin code. Satoshi didn't have a 1MB limit in it. The limit was originally Hal Finney's idea. Both Satoshi and I objected that it wouldn't scale at 1MB. Hal was concerned about a potential DoS attack though, and after discussion, Satoshi agreed. The 1MB limit was there by the time Bitcoin launched. But all 3 of us agreed that 1MB had to be temporary because it would never scale.
Several attempted "abuses" of the blockchain under the 1MB limit have proved Hal right about needing the limit at least for launching purposes. A lot of people wanted to piggyback extraneous information onto the blockchain, and before miners (and the community generally) realized that blockchain space was a valuable resource they would have allowed it. The blockchain would probably be several times as big a download now if that limit hadn't been in place, because it would have a lot of random 1-satoshi transactions that exist only to encode information for altcoins etc.
At this point I don't think random schmoes who would allow just any transaction are getting a lot of blocks. The people who have made a major investment in hashing power are doing the math to figure out which tx are worthwhile to include because block propagation time (and therefore the risk of orphan blocks) is proportional to block size. So at this point I think blockchain bloat as such is no longer likely to a problem, and the 1MB limit is no longer necessary. It has been more-or-less replaced by a profitability limit that motivates people to not waste blockchain bandwidth, and miners are now reliably dropping transactions that don't pay fees."
Re: Permanently keeping the 1MB (anti-spam) restriction is a great idea ...
February 07, 2015
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=946236.msg10388435#msg10388435
I'm the guy who went over the blockchain stuff in Satoshi's first cut of the bitcoin code. Satoshi didn't have a 1MB limit in it. The limit was originally Hal Finney's idea. Both Satoshi and I objected that it wouldn't scale at 1MB. Hal was concerned about a potential DoS attack though, and after discussion, Satoshi agreed. The 1MB limit was there by the time Bitcoin launched. But all 3 of us agreed that 1MB had to be temporary because it would never scale.
Several attempted "abuses" of the blockchain under the 1MB limit have proved Hal right about needing the limit at least for launching purposes. A lot of people wanted to piggyback extraneous information onto the blockchain, and before miners (and the community generally) realized that blockchain space was a valuable resource they would have allowed it. The blockchain would probably be several times as big a download now if that limit hadn't been in place, because it would have a lot of random 1-satoshi transactions that exist only to encode information for altcoins etc.
At this point I don't think random schmoes who would allow just any transaction are getting a lot of blocks. The people who have made a major investment in hashing power are doing the math to figure out which tx are worthwhile to include because block propagation time (and therefore the risk of orphan blocks) is proportional to block size. So at this point I think blockchain bloat as such is no longer likely to a problem, and the 1MB limit is no longer necessary. It has been more-or-less replaced by a profitability limit that motivates people to not waste blockchain bandwidth, and miners are now reliably dropping transactions that don't pay fees."
Re: Permanently keeping the 1MB (anti-spam) restriction is a great idea ...
February 07, 2015
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=946236.msg10388435#msg10388435
Are you saying that the original plan was to have no limit at all? What would happen if we were just to remove the limit now, instead of making it bigger?
"The limit wasn't part of Satoshi's original plan, but keep in mind that the original plan was at that time very much a work in progress. I was only involved for about a month back then. When Hal and Satoshi started talking about involving more people, I dropped it."
Ryan Dillinger
neuronics
Re: Permanently keeping the 1MB (anti-spam) restriction is a great idea ...
February 07, 2015
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=946236.msg10388435#msg10388435
"The limit wasn't part of Satoshi's original plan, but keep in mind that the original plan was at that time very much a work in progress. I was only involved for about a month back then. When Hal and Satoshi started talking about involving more people, I dropped it."
Ryan Dillinger
neuronics
Re: Permanently keeping the 1MB (anti-spam) restriction is a great idea ...
February 07, 2015
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=946236.msg10388435#msg10388435
Craig Wright talk at Future of Bitcoin on 30 June 2017 · GitHub
https://gist.github.com/Time02/4b507a444709b3334ee001d1e8c3e812
https://gist.github.com/Time02/4b507a444709b3334ee001d1e8c3e812
Gist
Craig Wright talk at Future of Bitcoin on 30 June 2017
Craig Wright talk at Future of Bitcoin on 30 June 2017 - craig-wright-2017-06-30.md
"The 1MB limit was there by the time Bitcoin launched. But all 3 of us agreed that 1MB had to be temporary because it would never scale."
Ray Dillinger
https://ramonquesada.com/english/who-is-ray-dillinger/
Ray Dillinger
https://ramonquesada.com/english/who-is-ray-dillinger/
Ramon Quesada
Who is Ray Dillinger? | Ramon Quesada
"My background is mostly software QA and Natural-language processing. I got a couple of patents for a way to disambiguate pronouns in free text and autogeneration of queryable content from parsing free text.
2008 361 Ray Dillinger - Bear 400 pinned «"The 1MB limit was there by the time Bitcoin launched. But all 3 of us agreed that 1MB had to be temporary because it would never scale." Ray Dillinger https://ramonquesada.com/english/who-is-ray-dillinger/»
Min: 16:42
"Anyone knows who bear is?"...
"Craig Wright - Future of Bitcoin talk, Arnhem Netherlands 2017" en YouTube
https://youtu.be/JdJexAYjrDw
"Anyone knows who bear is?"...
"Craig Wright - Future of Bitcoin talk, Arnhem Netherlands 2017" en YouTube
https://youtu.be/JdJexAYjrDw
YouTube
Craig Wright - Future of Bitcoin talk, Arnhem Netherlands 2017
Craig Wright's talk at the Future of Bitcoin Conference in Arnhem, Netherlands.
I had a hard time finding this video so I figured I'd post it. I have no proof, but I'd bet good money that this is not Satoshi Nakamoto.
I had a hard time finding this video so I figured I'd post it. I have no proof, but I'd bet good money that this is not Satoshi Nakamoto.
"There are three categories of identity that are useful to
think about.
Category one: public. Real-world identities
are a matter of record and attached to every transaction.
Category two: Pseudonymous. There are persistent "identities" within the system and people can see if something was done by the same nym that did something else, but there's not necessarily any way of linking the nyms with real-world identities.
Category three: unlinkably anonymous. There is no concept of identity, persistent or otherwise. No one can say or prove whether the agents involved in any transaction are the same agents as involved in any other transaction."
Bear
Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper
Ray Dillinger bear at sonic.net
Sat Nov 15 2008
The Cryptography Mailing List
https://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2008-November/014859.html
think about.
Category one: public. Real-world identities
are a matter of record and attached to every transaction.
Category two: Pseudonymous. There are persistent "identities" within the system and people can see if something was done by the same nym that did something else, but there's not necessarily any way of linking the nyms with real-world identities.
Category three: unlinkably anonymous. There is no concept of identity, persistent or otherwise. No one can say or prove whether the agents involved in any transaction are the same agents as involved in any other transaction."
Bear
Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper
Ray Dillinger bear at sonic.net
Sat Nov 15 2008
The Cryptography Mailing List
https://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2008-November/014859.html
Forwarded from 2008 - 2010 361 BitCoin History (@RamonQuesada 🌷)
Cryptography Mailing List
November 2008 Archives by author
Starting: Nov 2 2008
Ending: Nov 29 2008
https://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2008-November/author.html#14858
November 2008 Archives by author
Starting: Nov 2 2008
Ending: Nov 29 2008
https://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2008-November/author.html#14858
Forwarded from 2008 361 303 Satoshi N's Quotes SN (@RamonQuesada 🌷)
Ray Dillinger (Bear) wrote:
> When a coin is spent, the buyer and seller digitally sign a (blinded) transaction record.
Only the buyer signs, and there's no blinding.=20"
Satoshi Nakamoto
Re: Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper
Mon Nov 17 12:04:31 2008
From: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@vistomail.com>
http://diswww.mit.edu/bloom-picayune/crypto/137797
> When a coin is spent, the buyer and seller digitally sign a (blinded) transaction record.
Only the buyer signs, and there's no blinding.=20"
Satoshi Nakamoto
Re: Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper
Mon Nov 17 12:04:31 2008
From: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@vistomail.com>
http://diswww.mit.edu/bloom-picayune/crypto/137797
Maybe you would like to have a full list of Craig Wright public videos in chronological order, here you are!!!!
Any idea or suggestions are welcome!!!
https://ramonquesada.com/english/craig-wright-videos/
Compilation of +440 Craig Wright´s Post, Papers & Books in chronological order https://ramonquesada.com/english/compilation-craig-wright/
Craig S. Wright academic (1992-2012)
https://ramonquesada.com/english/craig-s-wright-academic/
TELEGRAMS CHANNELS: Names in alphabetical order.
https://ramonquesada.com/english/telegrams-channels/
Who was Dave Kleiman?
https://t.co/9YSY2zUIiu
Is he Satoshi or is he my Brother? By Danni-D
https://ramonquesada.com/english/is-he-satoshi-or-is-he-my-brother-by-danni-d/
DEPOSITION OF DONALD JOSEPH LYNAM
https://ramonquesada.com/english/deposition-of-donald-joseph-lynam/
SATOSHI IS DEAD – LONG LIVE SATOSHI. By Ian Grigg
https://ramonquesada.com/english/satoshi-is-dead-long-live-satoshi/
Who is Ian Grigg?
https://t.co/NeFALMT1Au
Who is Joseph Vaughn-Perling?
https://ramonquesada.com/english/who-is-joseph-vaughn-perling/
2005 First Known Satoshi Nakamoto Sighting. Joseph Vaughn-Perling
https://t.co/LRDoiodZdX
I believe Craig Steven Wright is the person who invented Bitcoin. By Gavin Andresen
https://ramonquesada.com/english/i-believe-craig-is-satoshi/
Who is Gavin Andresen?
https://t.co/NHAHqjH20P
I don’t think Craig is a scammer. I think he is Satoshi. Roger Ver
https://ramonquesada.com/english/i-dont-think-craig-is-a-scammer-roger-ver/
How I Met Satoshi. By Jon Matonis
https://ramonquesada.com/english/how-i-met-satoshi-by-jon-matonis/
WHY WE THINK CRAIG WRIGHT IS SATOSHI. By Jack Laskey and Dave Mullen-Muhr
https://ramonquesada.com/english/why-we-think-craig-wright-is-satoshi/
Who was Prof. David Rees?
https://ramonquesada.com/english/who-was-prof-david-rees/
Interview with Laszlo Hanyecz. Zoë Bernard May 30, 2018,
https://ramonquesada.com/english/interview-with-laszlo-hanyecz/
Bitcoin and me (Hal Finney) March 19, 2013
https://ramonquesada.com/english/hal-finney/
Who is Ray Dillinger?
https://t.co/thgACBfLLo
Interview with Ray Dillinger. Posted on October 1, 2018
https://ramonquesada.com/english/interview-with-ray-dillinger/
If I’d Known What We Were Starting. September 20th 2017 Ray Dillinger
https://ramonquesada.com/english/if-id-known-what-we-were-starting/
The Satoshi Affair
Andrew O’Hagan 30 June 2016
https://ramonquesada.com/english/the-satoshi-afaire/
Who is Mike Hearn?
https://t.co/5BqoWpYwNZ
The resolution of the Bitcoin experiment. By Mike Hearn Jan 14, 2016
https://ramonquesada.com/english/the-resolution-of-the-bitcoin-experiment-by-mike-hearn/
Any idea or suggestions are welcome!!!
https://ramonquesada.com/english/craig-wright-videos/
Compilation of +440 Craig Wright´s Post, Papers & Books in chronological order https://ramonquesada.com/english/compilation-craig-wright/
Craig S. Wright academic (1992-2012)
https://ramonquesada.com/english/craig-s-wright-academic/
TELEGRAMS CHANNELS: Names in alphabetical order.
https://ramonquesada.com/english/telegrams-channels/
Who was Dave Kleiman?
https://t.co/9YSY2zUIiu
Is he Satoshi or is he my Brother? By Danni-D
https://ramonquesada.com/english/is-he-satoshi-or-is-he-my-brother-by-danni-d/
DEPOSITION OF DONALD JOSEPH LYNAM
https://ramonquesada.com/english/deposition-of-donald-joseph-lynam/
SATOSHI IS DEAD – LONG LIVE SATOSHI. By Ian Grigg
https://ramonquesada.com/english/satoshi-is-dead-long-live-satoshi/
Who is Ian Grigg?
https://t.co/NeFALMT1Au
Who is Joseph Vaughn-Perling?
https://ramonquesada.com/english/who-is-joseph-vaughn-perling/
2005 First Known Satoshi Nakamoto Sighting. Joseph Vaughn-Perling
https://t.co/LRDoiodZdX
I believe Craig Steven Wright is the person who invented Bitcoin. By Gavin Andresen
https://ramonquesada.com/english/i-believe-craig-is-satoshi/
Who is Gavin Andresen?
https://t.co/NHAHqjH20P
I don’t think Craig is a scammer. I think he is Satoshi. Roger Ver
https://ramonquesada.com/english/i-dont-think-craig-is-a-scammer-roger-ver/
How I Met Satoshi. By Jon Matonis
https://ramonquesada.com/english/how-i-met-satoshi-by-jon-matonis/
WHY WE THINK CRAIG WRIGHT IS SATOSHI. By Jack Laskey and Dave Mullen-Muhr
https://ramonquesada.com/english/why-we-think-craig-wright-is-satoshi/
Who was Prof. David Rees?
https://ramonquesada.com/english/who-was-prof-david-rees/
Interview with Laszlo Hanyecz. Zoë Bernard May 30, 2018,
https://ramonquesada.com/english/interview-with-laszlo-hanyecz/
Bitcoin and me (Hal Finney) March 19, 2013
https://ramonquesada.com/english/hal-finney/
Who is Ray Dillinger?
https://t.co/thgACBfLLo
Interview with Ray Dillinger. Posted on October 1, 2018
https://ramonquesada.com/english/interview-with-ray-dillinger/
If I’d Known What We Were Starting. September 20th 2017 Ray Dillinger
https://ramonquesada.com/english/if-id-known-what-we-were-starting/
The Satoshi Affair
Andrew O’Hagan 30 June 2016
https://ramonquesada.com/english/the-satoshi-afaire/
Who is Mike Hearn?
https://t.co/5BqoWpYwNZ
The resolution of the Bitcoin experiment. By Mike Hearn Jan 14, 2016
https://ramonquesada.com/english/the-resolution-of-the-bitcoin-experiment-by-mike-hearn/
Ramon Quesada
Craig Wright Videos | Ramon Quesada
Maybe you would like to have a full list of Craig Wright public videos in chronological order, here you are!!!!Any idea or suggestion is welcome!!!
Forwarded from CSW 150 Anonymity Vs Privacy vs personal possesion (@RamonQuesada 🌷)
"There are three categories of identity that are useful to
think about.
Category one: public. Real-world identities
are a matter of record and attached to every transaction.
Category two: Pseudonymous. There are persistent "identities" within the system and people can see if something was done by the same nym that did something else, but there's not necessarily any way of linking the nyms with real-world identities.
Category three: unlinkably anonymous. There is no concept of identity, persistent or otherwise. No one can say or prove whether the agents involved in any transaction are the same agents as involved in any other transaction."
Bear
Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper
Ray Dillinger bear at sonic.net
Sat Nov 15 2008
The Cryptography Mailing List
https://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2008-November/014859.html
think about.
Category one: public. Real-world identities
are a matter of record and attached to every transaction.
Category two: Pseudonymous. There are persistent "identities" within the system and people can see if something was done by the same nym that did something else, but there's not necessarily any way of linking the nyms with real-world identities.
Category three: unlinkably anonymous. There is no concept of identity, persistent or otherwise. No one can say or prove whether the agents involved in any transaction are the same agents as involved in any other transaction."
Bear
Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper
Ray Dillinger bear at sonic.net
Sat Nov 15 2008
The Cryptography Mailing List
https://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2008-November/014859.html
Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper
Ray Dillinger bear at sonic.net
Fri Nov 14 18:20:23 PST 2008
"Okay.... I'm going to summarize this protocol as I understand it..."
https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks-legacy/2008-November/155400.html
Ray Dillinger bear at sonic.net
Fri Nov 14 18:20:23 PST 2008
"Okay.... I'm going to summarize this protocol as I understand it..."
https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks-legacy/2008-November/155400.html