Maybe you would like to have a full list of Craig Wright public videos in chronological order, here you are!!!!
Any idea or suggestions are welcome!!!
https://ramonquesada.com/english/craig-wright-videos/

Compilation of +440 Craig Wright´s Post, Papers & Books in chronological order https://ramonquesada.com/english/compilation-craig-wright/


Craig S. Wright academic (1992-2012)
https://ramonquesada.com/english/craig-s-wright-academic/


TELEGRAMS CHANNELS: Names in alphabetical order.
https://ramonquesada.com/english/telegrams-channels/


Who was Dave Kleiman?
https://t.co/9YSY2zUIiu


Is he Satoshi or is he my Brother? By Danni-D
https://ramonquesada.com/english/is-he-satoshi-or-is-he-my-brother-by-danni-d/


DEPOSITION OF DONALD JOSEPH LYNAM
https://ramonquesada.com/english/deposition-of-donald-joseph-lynam/


SATOSHI IS DEAD – LONG LIVE SATOSHI. By Ian Grigg
https://ramonquesada.com/english/satoshi-is-dead-long-live-satoshi/


Who is Ian Grigg?
https://t.co/NeFALMT1Au


Who is Joseph Vaughn-Perling?
https://ramonquesada.com/english/who-is-joseph-vaughn-perling/


2005 First Known Satoshi Nakamoto Sighting. Joseph Vaughn-Perling
https://t.co/LRDoiodZdX


I believe Craig Steven Wright is the person who invented Bitcoin. By Gavin Andresen
https://ramonquesada.com/english/i-believe-craig-is-satoshi/


Who is Gavin Andresen?
https://t.co/NHAHqjH20P


I don’t think Craig is a scammer. I think he is Satoshi. Roger Ver
https://ramonquesada.com/english/i-dont-think-craig-is-a-scammer-roger-ver/


How I Met Satoshi. By Jon Matonis
https://ramonquesada.com/english/how-i-met-satoshi-by-jon-matonis/


WHY WE THINK CRAIG WRIGHT IS SATOSHI. By Jack Laskey and Dave Mullen-Muhr
https://ramonquesada.com/english/why-we-think-craig-wright-is-satoshi/


Who was Prof. David Rees?
https://ramonquesada.com/english/who-was-prof-david-rees/


Interview with Laszlo Hanyecz. Zoë Bernard May 30, 2018,
https://ramonquesada.com/english/interview-with-laszlo-hanyecz/


Bitcoin and me (Hal Finney) March 19, 2013
https://ramonquesada.com/english/hal-finney/


Who is Ray Dillinger?
https://t.co/thgACBfLLo


Interview with Ray Dillinger. Posted on October 1, 2018
https://ramonquesada.com/english/interview-with-ray-dillinger/


If I’d Known What We Were Starting. September 20th 2017 Ray Dillinger
https://ramonquesada.com/english/if-id-known-what-we-were-starting/


The Satoshi Affair
Andrew O’Hagan 30 June 2016
https://ramonquesada.com/english/the-satoshi-afaire/


Who is Mike Hearn?
https://t.co/5BqoWpYwNZ


The resolution of the Bitcoin experiment. By Mike Hearn Jan 14, 2016
https://ramonquesada.com/english/the-resolution-of-the-bitcoin-experiment-by-mike-hearn/

"There are three categories of identity that are useful to
think about.

Category one: public. Real-world identities
are a matter of record and attached to every transaction.

Category two: Pseudonymous. There are persistent "identities" within the system and people can see if something was done by the same nym that did something else, but there's not necessarily any way of linking the nyms with real-world identities.

Category three: unlinkably anonymous. There is no concept of identity, persistent or otherwise. No one can say or prove whether the agents involved in any transaction are the same agents as involved in any other transaction."

Bear

Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper
Ray Dillinger bear at sonic.net
Sat Nov 15 2008
The Cryptography Mailing List

https://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2008-November/014859.html

Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper
Ray Dillinger bear at sonic.net
Fri Nov 14 18:20:23 PST 2008

"Okay.... I'm going to summarize this protocol as I understand it..."

https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks-legacy/2008-November/155400.html

Copyright (c) 2008 Satoshi Nakamoto

Bitcoin source from November 2008.
December 23, 2013, 07:30:00 PM
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=382374.0

Copyright (c) 2008 Satoshi Nakamoto

Bitcoin source from November 2008.
December 23, 2013, 07:30:00 PM
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=382374.0

"Satoshi didn't have a 1MB limit in it. The limit was originally Hal Finney's idea. Both Satoshi and I objected that it wouldn't scale at 1MB. Hal was concerned about a potential DoS attack though, and after discussion, Satoshi agreed. The 1MB limit was there by the time Bitcoin launched. But all 3 of us agreed that 1MB had to be temporary because it would never scale."
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/5dtny2/the_origin_of_the_1mb_block_limit_cryddit_ray/

Re: Scalability and transaction rate
July 29, 2010, 02:00:38 AM

The current system where every user is a network node is not the intended configuration for large scale.  That would be like every Usenet user runs their own NNTP server.  The design supports letting users just be users.  The more burden it is to run a node, the fewer nodes there will be.  Those few nodes will be big server farms.  The rest will be client nodes that only do transactions and don't generate".


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=532.msg6306#msg6306

"Quote from: satoshi

Hi Mike,

I'm glad to answer any questions you have.  If I get time, I ought to write a FAQ to supplement the paper.

There is only one global chain.

The existing Visa credit card network processes about 15 million Internet purchases per day worldwide.  Bitcoin can already scale much larger than that with existing hardware for a fraction of the cost.  It never really hits a scale ceiling.  If you're interested, I can go over the ways it would cope with extreme size.

By Moore's Law, we can expect hardware speed to be 10 times faster in 5 years and 100 times faster in 10.  Even if Bitcoin grows at crazy adoption rates, I think computer speeds will stay ahead of the number of transactions.

I don't anticipate that fees will be needed anytime soon, but if it becomes too burdensome to run a node, it is possible to run a node that only processes transactions that include a transaction fee.  The owner of the node would decide the minimum fee they'll accept.  Right now, such a node would get nothing, because nobody includes a fee, but if enough nodes did that, then users would get faster acceptance if they include a fee, or slower if they don't.  The fee the market would settle on should be minimal.  If a node requires a higher fee, that node would be passing up all transactions with lower fees.  It could do more volume and probably make more money by processing as many paying transactions as it can.  The transition is not controlled by some human in charge of the system though, just individuals reacting on their own to market forces.

Eventually, most nodes may be run by specialists with multiple GPU cards.  For now, it's nice that anyone with a PC can play without worrying about what video card they have, and hopefully it'll stay that way for a while.  More computers are shipping with fairly decent GPUs these days, so maybe later we'll transition to that."

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=149668.msg1596879#msg1596879