Kanekoa is running an entire Twitter thread highlighting how bad our election systems actually are: https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1648462770936115202

⬆️⬆️⬆️. Make sure to take a good look at who is saying what. They might just be "election deniers"!!!

To paraphrase that great RI company Dial-Media (creators of the late night info-mericial marketing technique and selling Ginsu Knives, etc.) "But wait! There's more!!!" If our elections are so secure, then why is RI's Senior US Stateman Jack Reed along with others politicians ensuring we have a cyber-security "range" to train cyber-security specialists? Funny, they are trusting NEIT to deliver, but when an NEIT professor and alumni (whose own MSIT Thesis advisor was Dr. Tim Henry) raises genuine questions about cybersecurity of Rhode Island's voter registration system, he is maligned. See this article at the Warwick Beacon: http://warwick.staging.communityq.com/stories/neit-simulation-range-targets-cyber-bad-guys,206135

How do 20 states sychronize their mail ballot election outcomes? ⬇️⬇️⬇️

Here is the file of the report

Looks like AG Paxton of TX has something to say about Election fraud.

Things are really heating up in Russian and Ukraine.

Mail ballots are exceptionally problematic!!!

Sooooo many opportunities for fraud when you vote by mail!

(If this looks familiar, it's because it was one of the first ones we shared, but we just updated it!)

⬆️⬆️⬆️ Is your voting franchise being treated like “junk mail”???

What's the possibility that given the number of gaps available in Rhode Island's voter rolls (over 39 million unaccounted for voterID numbers!), that what Andrew found is also happening here? 👇👇👇https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2023/05/information_warfare_in_new_york.html

Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.
Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.
But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate—we can not consecrate—we can not hallow—this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us—that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion—that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain—that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom—and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth. - Abraham Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address.

Zuckerberg finally admits Facebook got a lot wrong when it comes to the Covid pandemic.
https://beckernews.com/zuckerberg-admits-facebooks-fact-checkers-censored-information-that-turned-out-to-be-true-damaging-trust-50631/

⬆️⬆️⬆️ Quite interesting that as I am watching the Rasmussen video and Zuckerberg's spending of hundreds of millions of dollars to influence the outcome of elections (70% of the public consider that influence a "bad thing"), the Lex Fridman video (via Becker) has Zuckerberg admitting that he censored information that was true. How much of that "private censorship" of American's free-speech impact or change the election outcome? Like the Twitter-Files how much was done at the request of government officials? It appears that Hillary Clinton's technique of installing a server in her bathroom to avoid oversight has not only been embraced by all levels of government, but has been adopted whole heartedly by the private sector executives to ensure outcomes that favor themselves.

So here is the complete Halderman Report in Georgia's Curling vs. Raffensberger case: Security Analysis of Georgia’s ImageCast X Ballot Marking Devices.