Well done, lads! Let's see more of this please...

Bullhorns available here:
https://amzn.eu/d/dXHp58g

Join Not On The Beeb for more stuff the BBC forgot.
Comment on this post in the NOTB chat group.

NOTB main website | Supplements | Celtic salt | articles | petition | newsletter | contact

This lad is right. While he’s at risk of being arrested for some got-up charge like “misinformation” or “hate speech”, he’s presumably decided that this would be the lesser of two evils, the other being to do nothing.
I salute his courage.
All it would take even now is a lot more people to calmly do what he just did.
Citing an official & ignored source (Yellow Card, VAERS) would be the icing on the cake.
If anyone wishes to quote me, please do.

I often say, because it’s absolutely true, that if a person is fearful about what might happen to them if they speak out, they ought to be terrified about what is going to happen if they don’t.

Best wishes
Mike

https://robwillson.substack.com/p/communitarianism-for-the-distracted

Strongly recommended, a good summary of the means to shift our society to one we no longer recognize. And it’s getting much darker, because the ultimate technocratic policy is one in which individuals are deprived of customary rights under the excise of the common good.

This is very well written. The introduction through to reduction to practice includes many quotes from people most of us are well aware of. They’re as sneaky and underhand as we’d heard they were.
An absolutely key distinction is that between the ostensible reason for a policy & the real reason. We’ve seen a dozen such examples during the faked “covid19 fraud”. Yet more is required & we again see examples all around. I’m not sure that at present there are any policies which do not fit this model of plausible v real. The push towards EV cars in place of ICE cars is a clear example. It’s merely asserted that city air quality is unacceptably poor. Therefore anything which reduces it is arguably for “the common good”. In practice, what is being targeted is the little people’s ownership of liquid fuelled vehicles. They don’t care if you drive an EV or not. But if you own & drive an expensive ICE vehicle, they want you out of it.
This piece is as normie friendly as it’s possible to be, while also leading the reader from the abstract and into the pragmatism of the modern day.

Ideally consumed adjacent to any of Jacob Nordengard’s recent interviews and books.

Here’s a conversation he had with Ivor Cummins just a few days ago.

https://youtu.be/Cp8k-0e6UAk

Best wishes
Mike

https://open.substack.com/pub/jamesroguski/p/say-goodbye-to-your-money

As extraordinary post from a Professor Fred Nazar (who I don’t know personally, though I’ve seen his name for years).

Re-posting does not necessarily indicate that I’m up to speed & in agreement with all of the crimes. Most likely, it’ll be because I haven’t looked at them all. At this point, it doesn’t add much to my certainty that we’re facing diabolical & criminal activity all around us.

I’m less concerned about the purloining of billions for “pandemic preparedness” than the clear indication that they intend to produce a fresh crisis based on lies.

Best wishes
Mike

https://controlstudies.substack.com/p/the-positive-control

Well worth reading this. Sasha Latypova also recently interviewed Jamie Andrews about this work.

In brief, it invalidates the basic method used in all of virology to “prove” the existence of a virus in a clinical sample. That method is fraudulent because you get exactly the same results if you don’t add a clinical sample.

You see, at the time the purported virus-containing clinical sample is added to cells in culture, changes in the medium in which the cells are being cultured (grown / supported) are also made.

Those changes to the cell culture medium are all that’s needed to initiate the death of those cells.

When the experimentalist claims, upon seeing cell death, “Here is proof that the clinical sample contains a virus”, it’s total rot. Not adding that clinical sample yields exactly the same results.

These proper negative controls are not included in virology papers. If these are even mentioned, the reader is left to imagine that nothing happened. This is intentionally misleading.

These kinds of study provide no evidence whatsoever for the existence of viruses.

Best wishes
Mike

...
The illusion of regulation of medical products - PART 7 :

The painstakingly detailed legal analyses by Katherine Watt. Foreword: Dr. Yeadon. Summarization: Dr. Yeadon, A. Klarić, and Sasha Latypova.

For more than a century, people around the world have been deliberately and systematically deceived, made sick and killed.

Suavek
Oct 27, 2024

https://suavek1.substack.com/p/the-illusion-of-regulation-of-medical-4fb

...
The Land Grab: Weaponizing Nature

The commoditization of private and public property impacts landowners and communities alike. And when foreign governments, philanthropic organizations and pharmaceutical companies get hold of our physical environment, we may very well be justified in expecting the worst. Learn more about the “land grab” Catherine Austin Fitts, Carolyn Betts and Margaret Byfield have been warning us about, today, on “Financial Rebellion.”

And hear from Polly Tommey for a critical update on the groundbreaking “Vaxxed III: Authorized to Kill” documentary that showed in theaters yesterday. You won’t want to miss it!

https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/the-land-grab-weaponizing-nature/

Prominent UK Cancer Surgeon Raises Urgent Concerns Over Cancer Surge Following mRNA Vaccinations
"since the gene based injectable rollout, there has been observed an alarming and significant increase in cancers"

Aussie17
Oct 29, 2024

" ( ... )
Compounding the urgency of these revelations, Dr. Royle recalls his firsthand experiences, noting, "I've noticed aggressive widespread recurrences in previously successfully treated bowel cancer cases that I'd considered cured. Many metastases in these cases are unusual or atypical." The atypical nature of these recurrences suggests a concerning shift in cancer behavior that he encounters regularly, as he adds, "It is horrific to see on a weekly basis in my MDT (multi disciplinary team)."

In addressing potential causes for this surge, Dr. Royle systematically debunks commonly held theories pushed by government regulators and the fake mainstream media. He clarifies that the widespread theories attributing this increase to Western lifestyles or environmental changes fail to explain the sudden post-2021 rise. "…western ultra processed diet, obesity and sedentary lifestyles, Whilst these things have undoubtedly played a major role in the steady increase in cancer over the past three to four decades, they do not explain the post 2021 sudden increase and change in biology."

( ... )."

Full article :

https://www.aussie17.com/p/news-alert-prominent-uk-cancer-surgeon

McCullough is one of the most disappointing people in this whole mess.

He’s a remarkable person with the most extraordinary powers of recall, for example, for the medical literature (to which he’s a major contributor).

He & his wife, who I believe is also a doctor, has been so successful in every dimension, including financially, that they were able to endow a wing of the main hospital in Texas in which he worked until being dismissed in response to his outspoken criticism of official policies in relation to the “pandemic”.

In the early days, we even shared a platform such as the “Stop The Shots” campaign we ran in 2021.

However, he continued to push that there’d been a pandemic, a major global health emergency, requiring specific, novel treatments for a non-existent illness (91-divoc), long after it became formally untenable. He’s still doing it. That makes him, unfortunately, a central actor in deceiving the public, an evil act.

I used to like him as a person, but he’s revealed his true character and I no longer even respect him.

All that said, it’s important to pay attention to what he’s saying here. 500 new products masquerading as vaccines by 2030. Is that roughly one every 3 or 4 days?

If this is even broadly what’s coming towards us, surely people are going to have increasingly deep misgivings about allowing themselves to be injected with any of then?

Vaccination is inherently unsafe as well as accomplishing nothing beneficial.

They always involve injecting a person, more than once, with foreign proteins, a process known to cause Type I hypersensitivity responses and other responses which can result in chronic activation of biological defence systems likely to cause symptomatic harms. This was always true even of so-called traditional products.

It’s made much worse by constituting these products from genetic materials, encoding non-self proteins, even quite small ones, because this sets in train a series of biological responses that result in auto-attack upon one’s own cells & tissues. Selection of lipid nanoparticle formulations unavoidably (or better said, intentionally) results in accumulation of the product in the ovaries of women and girls, damaging their fertility. Also, LNPs facilitate deposition in any anatomical location, varying presumably by chance events.

Please continue to do all you can to warn people that the WHO is completely out of control by the public, and yet who is completely controlled by the self-appointed wealthy “elites”.

Best wishes
Mike

https://x.com/unusual_whales/status/1850904352136819132

It made me smile, anyway 🙃🤡

This presumably chance event could have been improved only if the dollar sign had been visible when it fell on the floor.

Best wishes
Mike

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-26926-0

This article was pointed out to me just now.

It may actually be a real piece of research. I can’t rule out that most people involved in the technical processes involved think they’re actually making a useful thing. An analytical chemist, or whatever the lead authors are, are most unlikely to realise that, if they succeeded in making what was the purported design, it would probably have been even more injurious than what was actually manufactured.

I’m reminded of remarks made by my colleague, Hedley Rees, who spent longer in this end of pharmaceutical formulation and manufacturing than I did in research, that development of the analytical methods alone, absolutely required in order to track what is being made, step by step and batch to batch, minimally takes longer than the entire claimed elapsed time between target identification and mass roll-out of the “product”.

This research paper concentrates on merely one kind of degradation pathway. I’d be surprised if there weren’t more than a dozen different modes of degradation of the active ingredients. Each one of these not only reduces the amount of the intended active in a given vial, but it is also associated with increasing formation of impurities & degradation products. These too can be either inactive, or toxic & furthermore will add further complexity to the stability of the intended product.

If asked to offer an opinion, I very much doubt that it’s possible to manufacture the product as described on scale and with sufficient stability that final product delivered through the supply chain will be consistent from batch to batch. They’re probably pretty much all degraded and what people received was not under the precise control of the manufacturers.

I do think that, early in 2021, the variation from batch to batch was so extreme (remember the controversy around “hot batches”?) that this must have been intentional. Essentially, the extraordinary degree of variation in lethality meant that what was being administered from a “hot batch” wasn’t at all the same thing as when administering an injection from a batch which, according to VAERS, was close to benign.

That phase I’ve termed “calibration”. However erratic in formal pharmaceutical terms these products are, wholly unapprovable, the makers are able to vary, at will, the kill rates of their products.

Never, ever permit yourself to be injected with these things. Fight to the death instead if necessary.

Best wishes
Mike

Are US flu death figures more PR than science?

CDC's model calculated an average annual 36 155 deaths from influenza associated underlying respiratory and circulatory causes (JAMA 2003;289: 179-86). Less than a quarter of these (8097) were described as flu or flu associated underlying pneumonia deaths. Thus the much publicised figure of 36 000 is not an estimate of yearly flu deaths, as widely reported in both the lay and scientific press, but an estimate—generated by a model—of flu-associated death.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1309667/

...
Another top scientist is welcomed into the "No Virus" club: Prof. Denis Rancourt.

https://denisrancourt.substack.com/p/germ-theory-critical-excess

...
The Betrayal Blindness - PART 1.

The statements of Dr. Mike Yeadon, Suzanne O'Keeffe, and John Botica.

Sense of self shatters after betrayal. Unprocessed betrayal, according to Charlie Health, can take a mental health toll akin to trauma.

Suavek
Nov 01, 2024

https://suavek1.substack.com/p/the-betrayal-blindness-part-1-the

...
The illusion of regulation of medical products - PART 8.

Katherine Watt : The Legalized Deception.

Sasha Latypova : Every “vaccine” and “immunization” shot is dangerous and deleterious.

"I have rarely read something so informative and powerful. Please share it."
- Dr. Mike Yeadon.

Suavek
Nov 01, 2024

https://suavek1.substack.com/p/the-illusion-of-regulation-of-medical-680

...
The UK's "Alzheimer's Society" is still pushing masking, regular covid testing, isolation and covid injections of the frail elderly with dementia.

It's a cult - and our institutions are all complicit in maintaining it.

Jonathan Engler
Oct 31, 2024

" ( ... )

Reading this makes me physically sick.

It is bad enough that those without knowledge of what caring for the frail involves put forward policies which degrade and dehumanise.

However, when a charity with intimate knowledge of a condition which makes the need for human contact even more vital does it, having observed first hand the harm caused thereby over the past few years, the mind boggles.

The “if you want physical contact - such as holding hands”….what kind of evil heartless bureaucrat would suggest that this is not something everyone wants?

( ... )

Full article :

https://sanityunleashed.substack.com/p/the-uks-alzheimers-society-is-still

https://open.substack.com/pub/truthsummit/p/complete-account-reiner-trial-day-36-nov-1

The latest update on Reiner Fuellmich’s “trial”, which is taking on its medieval meaning, rather than that of the usual judicial process.

A couple of posts as screenshots below.

Best wishes
Mike