I’m currently not able to respond to this poor logic. I’ve applied to join the group solely to try to put them right. Though it’s embarrassingly weak logic.

1. I’ve never said people were not sick in 2020, or at any other time. If they think I have, I invite them to cite where I’ve done that.

2. I say again, you can be sick in, say, 2020 & it not be “covid”. There are no signs & symptoms that even it’s proponents agree are pathognomic for so called covid19. It’s classified as an “influenza-like illness”.

3. We even now do not know the cause of ILIs. Even those who believe in influenza viruses do not have an explanation for the assumed causative agent in the majority of such cases.

4. Transmission of symptoms from person to person in people with ILIs and common colds, both acute (rapid onset) respiratory illnesses, does not occur. I realise this runs counter to everything we’ve been told. But that’s what the extensive, published evidence is telling us. Thus, we need to recalibrate our understanding of what’s going on.

5. People do not experience ILIs very often. Perhaps a small handful through the entire life of an individual. This means it’s certain that quite a proportion of people experiencing an ILI will deem it their most severe case they’ve ever had. This is to be expected if you think it through. It cannot therefore be cited as evidence either that there’s a new pathogen or that there’s been a pandemic.

6. This is why there’s a subject called epidemiology. If there was a pandemic, we’d see it in the all causes mortality. It’s missing. Before a pandemic could be called, medical events must have preceded it. These events didn’t happen. All causes mortality did not increase until after WHO fraudulently called a pandemic. Simultaneously with that announcement, by prior arrangements, many governments ensured that medical treatment of sick people changed in important ways. In any previous time, if you were to review those changes, in hospitals, care homes & the community, you’d predict that avoidable deaths would increase. And they did. This, coupled with the meaningless PCR-based clinical diagnostic “test”, provided the deaths expected in a “pandemic”.

7. Of course I support early treatment of illnesses. If HCQ, IVM & corticosteroids have utility in certain illnesses, I defend physicians right to use their judgements. That is entirely different from individuals who have worked very hard for “early treatment of covid19”. Pushing early treatment at this juncture, knowing there wasn’t a new illness let alone a pandemic is achieving what the perpetrators want. The public convinced there was a fearful pandemic and afraid there’ll be another.

8. Please note that my opinions about what has gone on & is undoubtedly continuing are rightly & heavily coloured by my assessment about the purported “vaccines”. I spent my professional life in teams designing new potential treatments. My training included rare exposure to mechanistic toxicology. So when I tell you that there are multiple, independent & obvious mechanisms of toxicity built into all of these gene based injections, there is no escaping the conclusion that the “Useless Eliters” intended prospectively to harm many people. Now ask yourself if they had an incentive to try to fool you.

Best wishes
Mike

https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/1204

If the comments attributed here to Mike Yeadon are true then he is firmly in the "there is no SARS-COV-2 virus" camp - which means that all of you who had symptomatic COVID (symptoms of a viral illness with a positive COVID test - for which the same test was negative when you didn't have symptoms) were imagining it.

The people taking this approach, whilst correctly implying that fear of more viruses should not drive the population to accept and fund more DURC (a moratorium on virology research is needed) , are also de facto suggesting that the minority of people who are at risk of post-viral pneumonia should not be treated with preventative therapy (because viruses don't exist therefore the disease cannot exist).

Most of the people behind this idea don't understand that treating the elderly and frail at risk of post-viral pneumonia is essential to prevent a high risk of mortality in those groups.

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/dr-yeadon-comments-on-epidemic-of

https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/1205

Myocarditis in children

This is programming at a new level!!

How many of you had heard the medical term “myocarditis” before experimental mRNA injections?

Answer: Not much. There are now advertisements on television warning of this heart disease in children.

...
"Oh! What a Lovely War"

What events led up to World War I? In this episode of CTTM's Tragedy & Hope Bookclub, Jared and Melissa discuss Chapter 5, "World War I, 1914-1918". How was propaganada used? What was the Balfour Declaration? Trench warfare and submarines. A loss of life that most people couldn't fathom.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/uyedBZoYa8kN/?t=0

...
Dr. Mike Yeadon : “Covid” was a scam. Conventional early treatment of vulnerable groups for seasonal illnesses makes sense.

Mike Yeadon,- the man who can see the pattern and talk about it. Can you do that too ?

https://suavek1.substack.com/p/dr-mike-yeadon-covid-was-a-scam-conventional

...
A comment I found in Mike Yeadon's chat.

I thought, maybe someone wants to say something nice to these desperate people (probably a married couple?)? I think we all know this problem. Here the couple seems somewhat isolated. For someone who always liked people and enjoyed spending time in larger company, it would have to be terrible...
.......................................................................................................................
The comment begins here :
........................................................

We're in Aix en Provence & the same thing is happening here !!!!
Everyone (or at least the majority of people) seem either to be oblivious and/or to prefer to associate the phenomena to 'Climate change'..?!!?!!
P L E A S E, someone/anyone who's 'AWAKE' help me to find a way to get through them (with what's really going on...) - getting really fed-up with being treated as a 'weirdo' just because I know what's really going on...

Source : https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannelChat/59638

‘It’s apparently a truthful documentary, telling you about how the authorities conspired to prevent honest doctors from using their expert judgment to prescribe “early treatments” that might save lives in people suffering from “covid”.
I fell for all this BS myself.
THERE WAS NO PANDEMIC. No new illness.’

👆With Mike’s words in mind I viewed the film Epidemic of Fraud.
To pilfer a quote ‘Isn't the best bit of truth always woven in with a lie? I clipped this tainted kernel

Bill Gates: "For every disease that we don't have vaccines, we will try mRNA".

"We just need to mess around. There's a lot of lipid nanoparticles, and some are very self assembling."

"We'll be able to build factories worldwide that can make $2 vaccines with even less lead time than we've had to have here during this pandemic."

Source

For more content like this, subscribe to @RealWideAwakeMedia

And visit: https://wide-awake-media.com

Twitter | Rumble | Gettr | Truth Social

...
“You’re Dealing With A SCAM!” Nick Hudson On WHO Pandemic Treaty - Stay Free #358 - Russell Brand - May 3rd 2024

On the show today, we have Nick Hudson, who is an investor, actuary and chairman of Panda. Panda is an organisation set up in response to the totalitarian response to the purported threat of Covid. You can find out more at https://pandata.org
& substack at https://pandauncut.substack.com
We spoke about….Decentralization vs Centralization, Awakening, Censorship & Propaganda.

https://odysee.com/@SubversionDiversion:8/Youre-Dealing-With-a-Scam-Nick-Hudson-on-WHO-Pandemic-Treaty-Stay-Free-358-Russell-Brand:d

The German Working Group for COVID Vaccine Analysis Report

If you want the genomic sequencing you need to look at McKernan et al

That was part 1.
👇🏿

PART 2

" (... )
SUMMARY OF PRELIMINARY FINDINGS
Page 7
Overview
1. Comparative observations using dark-field microscopy of the blood of both subjects who were
vaccinated with the COVID-19 vaccines and subjects who were not: Over the course of many years,
well over 10,000 structured blood analyses have been carried out. In the context of COVID-19 vaccinations,
48 vaccinated patients were examined. Without exception, all of these patients showed peculiarities that
could not be observed in a single case in unvaccinated subjects. In addition, the blood of the vaccinated
subjects regularly displays phenomena that have similarities with pathogenic, and often highly pathogenic,
clinical presentations. These observations have also been recognised by other observers or therapists
working with dark field microscopy and were, in fact, the main reason for establishing this working group
to investigate the question: What is the truth about gene-based vaccines?
2. Metallic particles in COVID-19 vaccines: Investigation of metallic contaminants in vector- and mRNA-
based COVID-19 vaccines - Preliminary results - (Vials of COVID-19 vaccines from BioNTech/Pfizer,
Moderna and Astra Zeneca) are investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and corresponding
energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) to identify possible contaminants. Metallic particles have been
found.
3. Preliminary results of standard analyses of Covid vaccines: Increase in the number of side effects due
to more stable nanolipids, crystallisation effects due to decomposition of the nanolipids (e.g., cholesterol),
metallic impurities in the ppm range, unspecified impurities due to calcium and aluminium. Methods: SEM-
EDS, mass spectroscopy (MS).
4. Antimony in Moderna: Naturally occurring antimony is highly toxic; antimony was detected in the Moderna
vaccine during an inorganic analysis of the vaccines. Moderna and BioNTech/Pfizer vaccines were
analysed, using an inductively coupled plasma (ICP) analyser, the results of all 41 investigated elements,
except antimony, are below the respective detection limit (DL), DL results from the sample quantity, high DL,
due to low sample quantity.
( ... )."

"We are in an information war."

Unelected globalist technocrat Melissa Fleming, head of the UN's Department of Global Communications: "Mis- and disinformation... is threatening not just our people, our operations, but also the issues and the causes that we're working on."

Make no mistake: When these self-appointed technocrats talk about "misinformation", "disinformation" and "hate speech", what they're really referring to is any information that exposes or undermines the various totalitarian agendas of unelected globalist bodies like the United Nations.

Source : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Chu3T6CTaV4

There are two related articles from Dr. Yeadon. I'm writing this because the first sentences in the first post seem a bit unclear if you don't know the second post yet :

I remember after that clip, saying to my wife, like Del Boy, “I’ve only gone & bloody done it now”.
I was sure then & I’m much more sure now.
Unfortunately.
Wish I was wrong.

Methods have been established.
Fear using faked pandemics.
Coerced vaccination.
Mandatory digital ID. They’ll find reasons why “you must have one”. No. You don’t need one. THEY need you to have it, so they can control everything you do. Once digital ID is normalised, you’ll need to use it for absolutely everything.
Validity of that digital ID will be set to hinge on being up to date with WHO recommended “vaccines”.
They’ll be mRNA based preparations, which are all, axiomatically injurious.
Participation in life will lead inexorably to your death.
Refusal to participate will mean near total exclusion from life.

https://x.com/P_McCulloughMD/status/1495250298947973120

An old Tweet, thanks to Dr McCullough.

I do wish he’d stop pushing supplements and talking of pandemics.

Best wishes
Mike

This post is from a man we met when we lived in Florida in 2022. I still receive his regular reports and market commentary. He & his wife are just the nicest people we’ve ever met and we miss them. They met when they were teenagers, at church. Still together approaching 70. He was once a jeweller and was robbed at gunpoint in his workshop. He told me he’d sent up a prayer and a resolution. He got to act on his resolution, becoming not only armed, but so highly competent he now trains police in firearms use. If I had to characterise the couple, I’d say they were why I’d been drawn to the southern USA. With more like them, we wouldn’t be in this mess.

Best wishes
Mike

Are you ready for this?

 If you ever wondered just how badly our nation has been handled, it is IMPERATIVE that you watch this 1.3 minute clip. 

Jared Bernstein is literally the Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers, the main agency advising Biden on economic policy. Listen to him reply to a very simple question...

https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1786049431478939649/pu/vid/avc1/640x360/aeGhMl9mu7IYA4sr.mp4?tag=12

Are ya gettin this? Can you believe this guy? He can't explain it, because it would expose how fake everything is. Speaking of fake, did you see the jobs report and the Services PMI Friday morning? Better works of fiction are never to be found.

Let's start with the jobs. The big "bugaboo" for the fed, according to Powell is that the labor market is still really tight and that's adding inflation. So, the wink and the nod was given to the BLS, to produce numbers that are much more "fed friendly."

Boy, did they deliver. 

So the headline jobs number was that we gained 175K jobs, Much lower than anticipated. Now, first off let me chat about that for a minute. The fed's job is to lie to us. It's all a show. On one hand they have to make you believe things are better than they are, but not make it look so good that you question them about it.

The BLS's "birth/death" model added 363K jobs in April. Whoa! So Bob, if the headline says we gained 175K jobs, but the fake, made up, phantom jobs from the B/D added 363,000 to that "official" number, didn't we really LOSE like 188,000 jobs? YES we did.

But, the BLS can't put out the real jobs number, because if the news stations started broadcasting that in April we LOST 188K jobs on top of the actual loses in Jan-March, it would look VERY bad for Biden and the Fed. Don't forget one of their so called "mandates" is Maximum sustainable employment. Well it wouldn't look too damn maximum sustainable if you're puking up 200K jobs in a month. So, they lie about it. All of it.

Look at the unemployment rate. The market got all warm and fuzzy because it "rose" to 3.9%, again very favorable for a fed rate cut. But the real number is over 16%. They can't broadcast that, everyone would know the economy is in trouble. So they toss out a number that satisfies the fed and the market, and make it look better for the fed and Biden.

It's all lies. All of it.

Which brings us to the services PM. First up, what is it? Well, it's The Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) and it is an index of the prevailing direction of economic trends in the manufacturing and service sectors. It consists of a diffusion index that summarizes whether market conditions are expanding, staying the same, or contracting as viewed by purchasing managers. The purpose of the PMI is to provide information about current and future business conditions to company decision-makers, analysts, and investors.

Well when that report hit, and it was weaker than expected, once again the market simply adored it. But should they have? In their view, it suggests slowing of the economy and thus again...rate cut friendly. But there's an issue.

 ISM Services, like manufacturing, came in weaker than all the (57) forecasts that form the Bloomberg consensus forecast. The composite fell from 51.4 to 49.4, its lowest level since the end of 2022.

Business activity witnessed the most significant drop -- to its lowest point since May 2020 -- while the employment component also exhibited weakness. So yeah, that sounds pretty ugly and gloomy, and would make for a good argument for a rate cut.

But wait a second... Isn't Powell's first agenda to stomp out inflation? Didn't he say we might have to have "higher for longer" to see if things are heading to his vaunted 2% target? Indeed he did, many times. Well there's a fly in that ointment, because while business activity slowed, Conversely, prices paid rebounded to their January levels, increasing from 53.4 to 59.2. Oh and that's just what they tell us. What's the real number? 65? More lies.

Whoa! Yeah Mr. Market, it would be best to just parade that slowing headline number around, because a jump that big in prices paid, is about as inflationary as it gets and is absolutely not Fed friendly.

We are definitely in the first stages of stagflation folks.

Now, people ask me all the time... doesn't the market know all the numbers are made up lies? If the jobs numbers are really that bad, and the inflation numbers are really that bad, why would the market ignore that, and run with the made up BS numbers?

They have no choice. Ever since the 80's they've had to come up with ways to hide the fact that our dollar was going to crap, inflation was eating our wages, and our manufacturing base was in the toilet. NO president wants to be the guy in charge of that, so the wink and nod was sent out to the bean counters, to come up with "new and improved ways" of measuring activity and inflation. Wall Street wasn't going to be the party pooper and expose the baloney, because 1) it would crater the market and 2) they'd have the intelligence agencies up their butt.

For instance, let's take inflation. In the early 80's if the prices in the CPI example list went higher, it was reported pretty honestly. But there were times when it was pretty ugly, and again, no administration wants ugly economic reports on their watch. So they dreamed up "hedonic"measurements. What's that? A way to hide inflation.

Let's say a gadget you want to buy is 1000 dollars. But by the time you actually buy it, the price has gone up to 1100. The reporting manager to the CPI might tell them that actually the price went down. 

WHAT?? Yep, they'll say it's a newer, improved model, with more features and benefits. So while the price in dollars went up, the value to the user went up more, therefore the overall reported number would be....the price fell. I'm not making this up folks, I'll give you an example from their own website:

This is for men's shirts. Here all shirts are either short sleeve or long sleeve and either cotton/poly or 100% cotton. After doing the statistical processing BLS might estimate that v1 = 0.15 and v2 = 0.25. This indicates that a long sleeve shirt is 15 percent more valuable than a short sleeve one and that a 100% cotton shirt is 25 percent more valuable than a cotton/poly blend shirt.

If the BLS data collector is forced to replace a short-sleeve cotton/poly shirt in the CPI sample with a long sleeve 100% cotton shirt, the CPI would adjust the price of the old item by the features in the new item, leading to a price adjustment of about 49 percent (e0.15+0.25).

If the price of the original shirt had been $20 and that of the replacement shirt $30, rather than using a $10 increase in price for that sample observation, the CPI would adjust the original shirt for sleeves and cotton content resulting in a price estimate of $29.84 (20*e0.15+0.25). This adjustment attributes most of the price difference between the shirts to the change in characteristics and an increase of only $0.16 is shown.

Ya get that? Shirt went up 10 bucks, they report it up 16 cents. Anyone still think inflation is 3%???? Well they do it with everything, along with "substitution" equations. If steak for example gets too high, they'll simply remove steak and substitute ground beef for the equation.

It's all a game, a big fat lie and yes, Wall Street is well aware of it and plays right along.

Just understand that our system is wrecked. The fraud has gone on so long, it's so broken, it cannot be fixed. They just have to keep pushing the lies and borrowing from the future to keep the wheels on. One day, the axle will snap. Oh and it won't be pretty.  

https://open.substack.com/pub/suavek1/p/dr-mike-yeadon-covid-was-a-scam-conventional

The same request as the last Substack by Suavek (to whom thanks!!).

Please use, comment and perhaps consider subscribing.

I think he has assembled in one place evidence & arguments that add up, if not to compelling proof of global malfeasance, to strong rationale to no longer trust the authorities.

Best wishes
Mike

I would like to thank Dr. Mike Yeadon for supporting my Substack. I really appreciate his words. I feel very honored that, despite his busy schedule, he still came up with the idea of writing a few warm words for me.

I wonder why the accumulated evidence of a global crime against humanity cannot also be considered evidence of global malfeasance ?

In this regard, I linked the study by Prof Denis Rancourt and also posted countless statements from Dr Yeadon. My entire Substack was created for this purpose, to document global crime.

Is there perhaps a misunderstanding here that I have no idea about because I don't speak English? Maybe someone can please shed some light on this strange darkness? The English word "malfeasance" means exactly the same thing in German as "wrongdoing" ( in German : "Fehlverhalten" ).

I thank you in advance ! Best wishes,
-Suavek