Here is a response to my written question to the Health Secretary about whether the Department of Health and Social Care is aware that the General Medical Council (GMC), which regulates doctors, receives grant funding from the World Economic Forum.
As you can see they do not answer the question. They are saying they have no responsibility or control over the GMC, but do not deny that the World Economic Forum, via funding incentives, might. No wonder so many brave medical professionals who raise concerns about the experimental Covid 19 treatments face harassment and suspension.

https://t.me/ABridgen

...
UTOPIA | Omeleto

A man lives in a society where citizens police each other with their phones.


UTOPIA is used with permission from Kosta Nikas. Learn more at / utopiaflick .


Jack has just come back to his homeland of Australia after over a decade away in paradise. But after being met at the airport by his brother Frank, Jack discovers that the country has radically changed. Citizens report and fine one another for various civil infractions, using their mobile phones to record and upload offenses to a government app.

Jack is in disbelief as he arrives at Frank's home with his wife Margaret, and he can't even believe that swearing is fined and alcohol is banned. There are cameras everywhere, and the only safe place in people's homes is the bathroom. Unable to adapt or accept the changes, Jack attempts to leave the country -- a much harder feat to accomplish than he thought.

Written and directed by Kosta Nikas, this sci-fi short may be named after an ideal paradise of balance and peace, but its title is deeply satirical in how the film portrays the absurdity of the new surveillance state. It constructs a fascinating world that seems only a few steps removed from our phone-saturated society, telling its cautionary tale in an ironically jaunty way.

The writing takes time in its world-building, which is often one of the pleasures of the sci-fi genre. The narrative action at the beginning catalogs the myriad ways that control and order are exerted over people, and there's dour, wry humor embedded in how Frank escorts his increasingly skeptical brother through this brave new world. The bright sunniness of the cinematography and the percolating, cheerful musical score that peppers itself throughout the film also add touches of stylish buoyancy to what is an increasingly dark story.

The aesthetic approach offers a counterpoint to the often horrifying reality shown on screen, in which citizens are incentivized to document one another's offenses through their omnipresent phones. Jack is a stand-in for the audience, looking increasingly askance at how even the most intimate recesses of everyday life can't escape the pitiless lens of a camera and the desperate people wielding them.

It takes some time for the dramatic conflict to emerge, but the world-building is fascinating enough to carry interest through, and is substantial and detailed enough to power an entire series or feature. By the time Jack finally decides that he must escape, the building blocks of the world and story have been carefully laid into place, forming a chain of obstacles that make it harder for him to leave. He seems trapped indefinitely, but then he gets an unexpected chance -- though one that comes at considerable cost.

That cost, however, doesn't seem so bad by the time we conclude UTOPIA, which we realize is anything but. Its sense of horror derives not from perversity or violence, but from how the world that the film constructs is only a few clicks from our current reality.

Practically everyone has a smartphone, and the devices are deeply integrated with almost all aspects of our lives, from banking to romance to communication to entertainment. At many levels, we're still reckoning with how mobile technology is transforming our lives and our relationships. A population armed with phones -- and imbued with increasingly knee-jerk punitiveness towards fellow humans -- seems ludicrous, but with deeper reflection, viewers realize those pieces are already in place in other aspects of our culture. Are human beings so weak that they could be weaponized to do a government's surveillance for them? UTOPIA imagines that day isn't as far as one would think.

Published on March 12, 2021

https://youtu.be/vJYaXy5mmA8

The perpetrators who gave us the fake pandemic and want to present a false reality as truth in many other areas have set up a lot of false Telegram channels. The news can correspond 100% to the real broadcaster for a long time, until at some point the perpetrators feel the need to manipulate society through their fake channel. If one day the visibility of a real one is limited by censorship, this will be less noticed if, for example, four fake channels remain in operation. The real channels can often only be determined with the help of someone you trust. Here is an example. This channel is one of the most important and, among many similar-sounding channels, is the only one that is real, including the associated links :

Wide Awake Media - Official Channel
https://t.me/realwideawakemedia
https://wide-awake-media.com/
https://twitter.com/wideawake_media

An example. There was a pro-Russian Telegram channel. At least that's what I thought. Suddenly I saw that one day the channel was publishing NATO propaganda and trying to ridicule Putin. This is also the goal of fake channels. With their help, the alternative opinions are rendered ineffective. Telegram does not seem to respond to the notices and requests to delete the wrong channels. We live in a lawless area.
All the best !
— Suavek

https://youtu.be/YE4kS7S3Crs

A generous portion of Sheep Farm matrix busting clips.

Best wishes
Mike

...
Image: Amazon's spending on lobbying in Brussels.

Ernst Wolff
@wolff_ernst

The coming EU parliamentary elections serve only one goal : to conceal the fact that Brussels policy is not determined by the EU Parliament, but by 15,000 - 25,000 lobbyists, particularly from the IT, defense and financial sectors.

Source : https://twitter.com/wolff_ernst/status/1785991540378153370

...
This study tested infection with a virus that doesn't exist. Can it be surprising that the attempted infection fails ?

NEWS
01 May 2024

Oh yes, laughter is allowed.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-01284-1

...
Ancient Political Advice for Today’s Rulers

" ( ... ) Politicians would probably scoff at this — a fellow who lived more than 2,000 years ago teach us ‘modern’ politicians how to do our job? Come on! Actually, this is precisely what I mean. Consider this. Plato’s Republic did not fall from thin air. When his teacher, Socrates, was found guilty of misleading the youth of the city (that is, for teaching them how to think for themselves) by an Athenian court, he was condemned to death. For Plato this was a clear sign that justice did not prevail in Athens. (...)."

https://brownstone.org/articles/ancient-political-advice-for-todays-rulers/

https://open.substack.com/pub/sanityunleashed/p/my-view-on-the-who-pandemic-treaty

I agree with Jonathan here.

Our governments didn’t need legal instruments to smash up our lives in 2020. They won’t need them next time.

If we don’t get to a place where people stop automatically doing what they’re told, however absurd, dangerous or unreasonable the instructions are, WHO won’t need any new powers.

All that said, the WHO pandemic treaty is as necessary as a Sugarplum Fairy treaty. And much more dangerous. So are amendments to the International Health Regulations.

In both cases, what is required is sufficient knowledge and outrage at what’s being done to us that when we speak, it’s so obviously authentic that those within earshot are compelled to think again.

Best wishes
Mike

...
Prof. Denis Rancourt :

The numbers paint a picture of an unimaginable crime against humanity

Source : https://suavek1.substack.com/p/dr-mike-yeadon-and-prof-denis-rancourt

https://correlation-canada.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/2024-04-25-Comment-on-Fisman-et-al-2024.pdf

This is a paper that strains me, because it is based on mathematical equations, algebraic in nature. I was a rare kind of school student in relation to maths, doing well at ordinary level exams, taken aged 16y, scoring a grade A. Two years later, I took the advanced level exams & I’d regressed, scoring so badly that I got no grade at all at that level. I don’t know if I was being trolled, but I was awarded another pass at ordinary level! So I’ve got two qualifications in mathematics, but only because I was so poor at it.

This is an example of how easy it is to mislead. With two qualifications in maths, I should walk this paper, no?

Anyway, this paper from Professor Denis Rancourt & Joseph Hickey demonstrates that papers by Fisman and colleagues is formally wrong and is furthermore dangerous.

My take is that Fisman et al have invented a term which has no meaning in the real world, yet purports to be a useful new term in epidemiology.

The new term is a “bullshit” activity, looking superficially useful but it’s a real mantrap of deceit.

The effect of this new term is, astonishingly, to compute that the more effective a vaccine is & the higher the % of the population who is injected and the LESS the vaccinated & unvaccinated mingle with each other, the GREATER the “risk” (of infection) unvaccinated represent to the vaccinated.

Setting aside the reality that there’s been no pandemic, that covid is entirely fictional and that in prior years, no one has demonstrated that someone sick with an acute respiratory illness can transmit their symptoms to others, the appropriate response would be derision.

This isn’t a mistake. It is intended to provide those who “own the science” & purport to be “your single source of truth” to have a bullshit rationale to coerce the unvaccinated to get jabbed. That’s what the paper dismantled by Rancourt and Hickey is for.

Don’t let them get away with it.

Best wishes
Mike

https://youtu.be/CmvwyuV7Uvk

This is depressing. It’s apparently a truthful documentary, telling you about how the authorities conspired to prevent honest doctors using their expert judgement to prescribe “early treatments” that might save lives in people suffering from “covid”. I fell for all this BS myself.

THERE WAS NO PANDEMIC. No new illness. Nothing changed anywhere in all causes mortality in the run up to the fraudulent declaration by WHO of “a pandemic”.

All these “early treatment” promoting doctors are frauds and they’re aiding and abetting the perpetrators, to convince you there was some new disease risk going around. There wasn’t. Therefore it’s illogical to focus on early treatment.

I must say, it was a genius move by the perpetrators and obviously pre-planned. Don’t hero worship the proponents of hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin and the like, because they’re not your friends. They’re helping the perpetrators.

By reinforcing the notion of “early treatment” of a non-existent disease, they’ll have helped reinforce the propaganda that there was a pandemic and that there might be other pandemics.

There won’t be. Pandemics are not real. They’re yet another hobgoblin, designed to frighten you into giving up more of your dwindling freedoms and ultimately all of your medical autonomy, because we know how this ends: everyone facing a needle containing toxic substances masquerading as “vaccines”. They’re not vaccines. There was nothing to vaccinate you against. There won’t be anything to vaccinate you, to protect you, against. Yet my expertise in “structure based drug design” rightly alerted me early to the dark realisation that these gene-based injections were designed intentionally to injure, kill and reduce fertility in survivors.

Best wishes
Mike

In relation to Dr. Yeadon's post published above :

I am one of those people who understood early on that there is no such thing as a “Covid” disease. However, I assumed that the ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine would help against serious respiratory illnesses. I have never promoted these medications, but I have also never spoken negatively about them. However, I criticized the fact that they were suddenly banned in 2020, leaving early treatment for seasonal flu untreated, which in some cases could lead to bacterial pneumonia and sometimes death. Dr. Yeadon's post makes sense, of course. If I were to state my own position on this, I would say it this way. Anyone who recommends the above-mentioned medications and affirms the existence of Covid is sowing fear of non-existent health risks and playing into the hands of the perpetrators. However, I don't know what could be wrong with offering such medications for targeted use against the diseases that these medications can work well against. My question is : Don't these medications work against the flu? In particular, I mean the early treatment of older, vulnerable groups. I would be grateful if someone could answer this question for me. My enlightenment work now also needs enlightenment to avoid future mistakes. Should the ivermectin be reduced again to a horse paste? What are these medications not effective against? And what about the antibiotics ? I thank you for that in advance.

Kind regards !
- Suavek

ENGLISH :
Here is the image translation of the above screenshot in German. The text here is very meaningful and understandable to me.Only the text under the screenshot confuses me a bit. I don't know why the GENERAL recommendation of these medications with regard to diseases other than "Covid" should also be objectionable.
................................
GERMAN :
Hier ist die Bildübersetzung des oberen Screenshots auf Deutsch. Der Text hier ist für mich sehr sinnvoll und verständlich. Nur der Text unter dem Screenshot verwirrt mich etwas. Ich weiß nicht, warum die ALLGEMEINE Empfehlung dieser Medikamente im Bezug auf andere Erkrankungen, als "Covid" ebenfalls verwerflich sein sollte.

I’ve added a note on Dr Ian Brighthope’s Substack which contains the video.
I think Ian is straight & put out the link to the video with good conscience.
Best wishes
Mike

Here is the image translation of the above screenshot in German.
....................................................................................................................
Hier ist die Bildübersetzung des oberen Screenshots auf Deutsch.

https://open.substack.com/pub/collapselife/p/three-diseases-you-need-to-panic

This is absolutely terrifying.

Snigger.

Best wishes
Mike

https://brownstone.org/articles/illusions-in-vaccine-effectiveness/

I have one main criticism of this article and the embedded paper it refers to & that’s that I don’t recognise “covid” as a valid cause of death.

Nevertheless, I think it’s instructive to read how the fakery of apparent covid vaccine effectiveness has been accomplished.

I believe Carl Heneghan has put a wrecking ball through such claims in the past, as well (as have others).

What is particularly interesting is that the same fraud has been confirmed in other countries and also extends to “flu vaccines”.

I’ve never felt at risk from flu & so always declined the “free injections” offered in autumn. Of course, I am confident in recommending that you & your children always pass on these ineffective & potentially dangerous injections. Flu isn’t something you can prevent with an injection.

Best wishes
Mike

The rule of 72 we use in finance for back of the envelope math suggests cancer mortality at this sustained CAGR implies the number of cancer deaths will double in 10 years.

Let’s all pray this CAGR does not accelerate.

EDWARD DOWD

Cancer Mortality continues to be elevated, featuring a novel CAGR.

Not 'skyrocketing' - don't use that term. Rhetoric specialists shift the focus to that word and distract from the critical path issue, as would a stage magician.

"Cancer exhibits a 6.7% elevation in excess mortality, along with a novel 2.7% growth rate."

This is extraordinary... because of the nature of cancer.

@EthicalSkeptic