Queue for brain
197 subscribers
4.03K photos
3.43K videos
44 files
11K links
My Substack : suavek1.substack.com
Download Telegram
THE TRIAL AGAINST SUCHARIT BHAKDI :

[ An explanation from Suavek : I assume that the lawyer Lausen mentioned here just happens to have the same name as the well-known source of these Telegram messages, the data analyst Tom Lausen ]

After the judge concluded his assessment of the non-punishability of Bhakdi's statements, most of the mainstream press quietly left the room.

The fact checker Rohwedder, I think from the daily news fact checkers, is still there, otherwise only the up-and-coming media are still there.

I will report whether these mediums might come back after all.

Source : Tom Lausen Telegram channel :
https://t.me/TomLausen/192
..........................................................
continuation

Judge Grundmann still assumes that there is no criminal liability, and senior public prosecutor Füssinger also says something in a quiet contribution,

Defense attorney Lausen massively reprimands the absolutely incomplete clarification and yet the indictment.

Now the chief public prosecutor, Füssinger, tries another trick, she speaks to Prof. Bhakdi, although the defense has clearly stated that he will not comment. Defense attorney Lausen reprimands the behavior in the strongest possible terms, the senior public prosecutor lets go and now apparently wants to introduce short follow-up investigations into the distribution of the video with Kai Stuht.

Source : Tom Lausen Telegram channel :
https://t.me/TomLausen/196
Forwarded from Suavek
THE TRIAL AGAINST SUCHARIT BHAKDI :

2:05 p.m.

Public prosecutor Füssinger submits an application for evidence, she wants to summon an investigating commissioner who can tell how often the video has been watched and distributed.

Source : https://t.me/TomLausen/197
Forwarded from Suavek
THE TRIAL AGAINST SUCHARIT BHAKDI :
14:10

The defense Tobias Weissenborn and Martin Schwab reject the application, Judge Grundmann does not invite the commissioner, but reads out parts of the file for the sake of form, which introduce the number of views of the video into the procedure. So how often was the video called and where? Facebook, Peertube, kai-stuht.de etc. Chief Public Prosecutor Füssinger is satisfied and looks at the clock

Source :
https://t.me/TomLausen/198
Forwarded from Suavek
THE TRIAL AGAINST SUCHARIT BHAKDI :
...............................................................................

Since there are still requests for bias, the proceedings cannot be completed in this way. The judge asks the defense to advise whether they should be withdrawn or whether they should be decided within an interruption of 2 hours.

Source : https://t.me/TomLausen/199
.................................................. ..........
2:30 p.m
Martin Schwab withdraws the bias claims for the defense.

Another break, resumed at 3:30 p.m

Source : https://t.me/TomLausen/200
.................................................. ..........
Reason for the interruption: Chief Public Prosecutor Füssinger needs 60 minutes to prepare the plea.

Source : https://t.me/TomLausen/201
Forwarded from Suavek
THE TRIAL AGAINST SUCHARIT BHAKDI :

Oh, the lawyer from Sucharit Bhakdi and the source of the news, the data analyst Tom Lausen are brothers ! Both are called Lausen ! On the right sits Tom, from whom the last news comes. He uncovered a lot of fraud with the statistical data of those injured by "vaccination" in Germany ( our friend Fabian Spieker too ! ). The following message from Tom Lausen reads / translation :

The Lausen brothers have a short lunch break at the district court in Plön
Forwarded from Suavek
THE TRIAL AGAINST SUCHARIT BHAKDI

15:40
Start of the pleadings, which I don't think will reveal any more surprises.

Chief prosecutor Füssinger starts:
She cares about dangerous language, inner peace and about the people who are affected by dangerous language.

Supposedly it was surprising to them that the court expressed its legal opinion early on. Nevertheless, she hopes that she will still be heard.

She is pointing out that Kai Stuht and Prof. Bhakdi planned this thing that way on purpose...

She tries to interpret every sentence against Prof Bhakdi.

So far she's basically repeating her indictment.

She still thinks it was hate speech. With small supplementary interpretation tricks, she simply invents words in my opinion.

She probably needs some more time.

Source : Tom Lausen : https://t.me/TomLausen/203
Forwarded from Suavek
THE TRIAL AGAINST SUCHARIT BHAKDI

The senior public prosecutor also continues to assume that the public peace will be disturbed.

Now she is lecturing on the federal emergency brake and FFP 2 masks on the bus. I don't know what that's supposed to mean.

I'm sorry, I can't document the lecture in detail at the moment.

She stands by her allegations.

She demands the following penalty:

Allegations number 1:
150 daily rates
Accusation number 2:
70 daily rates

Altogether 180 daily rates of 90 euros each
(=16,200 euros)

Source: Source : https://t.me/TomLausen/204
Forwarded from Suavek
THE TRIAL AGAINST SUCHARIT BHAKDI

The defense wants to talk first

Source : https://t.me/TomLausen/205
Forwarded from Suavek
THE TRIAL AGAINST SUCHARIT BHAKDI

Tom Lausen really liked Martin Schwab's plea. He writes briefly :

"Martin Schwab
G R A N D I O S !!!!!!"

Source : https://t.me/TomLausen/207
Live aus dem Gerichtssaal – Bhakdis Prozess

Jetzt wird es absurd!

"Die Oberstaatsanwältin unterstellt Bhakdi und Stuht, die Äußerungen vorab gemeinsam geplant zu haben, um sie in dieser Form zu verbreiten“, so Chefredakteur Florian Machl.
Die Oberstaatsanwältin unterstellt weiterhin, den öffentlichen Frieden stören zu wollen. Was ihr Vortrag zur Bundesnotbremse und FFP 2 Maske im Bus soll, bleibt unklar. Es scheint ein hilfloser Versuch zu sein, sich doch noch Gehör zu verschaffen.

"Beides hat mit dem gegenständlichen Verfahren nichts zu tun. Das erweckt den Eindruck einstudierter, bestellter Glaubensbekenntnisse." (Florian Machl, Report24)

Sie hält verzweifelt an den Inhalten ihrer Anklageschrift fest und fordert folgendes Strafmaß:

180 Tagessätze je 90 Euro, damit wäre Prof. Dr. Bhakdi vorbestraft.

https://t.me/MWGFD_Kanal

Neue Fälle @Prozessbeobachter - Diskussion @Gerichtsbarkeit

Termin mitteilen
@Terminverteiler_Bot
Forwarded from Suavek
THE TRIAL AGAINST SUCHARIT BHAKDI

Interruption for the verdict until 5:45 p.m

Source : https://t.me/TomLausen/210
Forwarded from Suavek
THE TRIAL AGAINST SUCHARIT BHAKDI

ACKNOWLEDGMENT !
ACKNOWLEDGMENT !
ACKNOWLEDGMENT !

Latest news : Sucharit Bhakdi acquitted !

https://t.me/TomLausen/211
Forwarded from Suavek
THE TRIAL AGAINST SUCHARIT BHAKDI

A review :

In his pleading, the lawyer Tobias Weissenborn accused the chief public prosecutor of not having watched the video with Sucharit Bhakdi completely / to the end. At least that's what I understood from the message from Tom Lausen. Here it is in the original :

https://t.me/TomLausen/208
Forwarded from Taylor Hudak
Sucharit Bhakdi found not guilty.
Forwarded from Taylor Hudak
Prosecutor Silke Fussinger completed her final argument. For the first charge she asked for 90 Euros paid daily for 150 days and for the second charge, she asked for 90 Euros paid daily for 70 days. She summed it up and came to 90 Euros paid daily for 180 days. We are now on a 10 minute break. The defense will deliver its final arguments when court reconvenes.