People need to be told that censorship is a criminal offence. That alone tells you all the rest. This is the ABC of knowledge. More like the "A". Many people recognized this as early as the 16th century when Martin Luther translated the Bible into German...It only took him eleven weeks. This translation appeared for the first time in 1522. For 501 years we have known that censorship is never used for the benefit of the people.

Where censorship is used, there is a truth hidden and the perpetrator's responsibility for his crime made invisible.

📍Countering the WHO's "Big Catch-up" Global Campaign and Immunization Agenda 2030

Full statement:
https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/news/statements/who-big-catch-up/

On April 24, 2023 the WHO announced “The Big Catch-up”, a global initiative “to vaccinate millions of children and restore immunization progress lost during the pandemic.”

While targets of the campaign include children around the world, the WHO appears to be specifically targeting children in the 20 countries where they claim “three quarters of the children who missed vaccinations in 2021 live.” These nations include:

🇦🇫 Afghanistan
🇦🇴 Angola
🇧🇷 Brazil
🇨🇲 Cameroon
🇹🇩 Chad,
🇰🇵 Democratic People’s Republic of Korea
🇨🇬 Democratic Republic of the Congo
🇪🇹 Ethiopia
🇮🇳 India
🇮🇩 Indonesia
🇳🇬 Nigeria
🇵🇰 Pakistan
🇵🇭 Philippines
🇸🇴 Somalia
🇲🇬 Madagascar
🇲🇽 Mexico
🇲🇿 Mozambique
🇲🇲 Myanmar
🇹🇿 Tanzania
🇻🇳 Vietnam

Additionally, in the context of the United Nations’ notorious Agenda 2030, the WHO is now advertising their own agenda for the same year – “Immunization Agenda 2030: A Global Strategy to Leave No One Behind.” This agenda includes the goal of introducing “500 new vaccines in low and middle income countries.”

The World Council for Health shares the opinion with many experts that the WHO and their partners including the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, and vaccine manufacturers including Pfizer, Moderna, and others are guilty of crimes against humanity and do not warrant our trust or support.

Meanwhile, WCH continues to stress the urgency of exiting the WHO, rejects the WHO’s monopoly power grab over public health, and continues to call for an immediate halt to the Covid-19 injection campaign.

Please read and share our full statement:
https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/news/statements/who-big-catch-up/

Der Käfig

➡️ Abonniere den Kanal, um kein Video zu verpassen! Lade dieses Video runter und teile es mit deinen Freunden und Bekannten. @dawidsnowden

Martin Sonneborn

Der Lacher vorm Kracher 🧨 😂😃

🌞🍷 Lust auf Gute Laune?
👉👉 https://t.me/macklemachtgutelaune
♦️🔹♦️🔹♦️🔹♦️🔹♦️🔹♦️

Mäckle Gruppen und Kanäle
👇👇👇👇👇👇
https://t.me/maeckleschafftwissen

Stefan Homburg
@SHomburg
12h
Biologin @EBodderas über das „Impfauge“ als Indikator für versteckte Thrombosen, Untererfassung von Impfschäden und Korrelation versus Kausalität.

Hinzufügen möchte ich, dass Impfärzte durch Meldungen ans PEI auch Haftungsrisiken eingehen. Wegsehen ist sicherer.

https://nitter.net/SHomburg/status/1657084250531717129#m

Crow versus Human

Are animals more intelligent than ... ?
.......................................................................
Sind Tiere intelligenter, als ... ?

Heat pumps are starting to look like a conspiracy against the public

12 May 2023 - Ross Clark

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/05/12/the-heat-pump-farce-has-finally-been-exposed/

British Gas has just thrown a large spanner into a policy that seems increasingly unworkable, costly and embarrassing for the Government

So, you want to do your bit for the environment, and you took the Government at its word when it told you that ditching your perfectly well-functioning gas boiler for a heat pump is the way to go. But what do you do if you can’t find an engineer prepared to install one of the devices in your home because, in all honesty, they know it wouldn’t actually keep you warm?

British Gas has come out this week and stated what has doubtless been obvious for a long time to some homeowners who did take the plunge: that a standard heat pump runs at water temperatures which are too low to heat many properties. From now on, says the company, it will only agree to install a heat pump if it is convinced that it will succeed in getting the property up to a target temperature on the coldest days. If any of the heat pumps it installs fail this test, it says it will refund the money.

Fair enough, but that will mean millions of homes cannot have a heat pump installed by British Gas. There are eight million homes in Britain which have solid walls and which, as a result, are hard to bring up to required insulation standards at a reasonable cost. If other companies follow British Gas’ example, the Government will have no hope of achieving its target of retro-fitting 600,000 homes a year with a heat pump by the end of this decade. British Gas has just thrown a very large spanner into the Government’s net zero ambitions.

I don’t want to sound negative. I would much rather heat my house with an electric heat pump than its existing, smelly oil-fired boiler, and I would have made the switch years ago if I could be convinced it would keep the property warm. But to judge by the experience of many people, the air-source heat pumps being marketed en masse at the moment simply aren’t up to the job. They are an effective way of raising the temperature in your home when you don’t really need it to be heated, but if you live in an old property, and you have no other form of heating, you are likely to find yourself shivering on the coldest days.

There isn’t a lot of heat to extract from the air when it is minus 10C outside. There is more heat to be found underground, but to tap into that requires a far more expensive and space-consuming ground source heat pump. To spend £10,000 on a heat pump which turns out only to be effective as background heating seems a poor deal when you can buy a gas boiler which will do the whole job for a fifth of the price.

True, experiences vary, as indeed do people’s assessment of the work achieved by their heat pump – one of the biggest enthusiasts for heat pumps that I know also has a great oil-fired Aga in his home. But it seems to me that if heat pumps really are going to heat our homes in future the technology still has some way to develop. It is possible, even now, to buy a heat pump which chucks out water at similar temperatures to a gas boiler – but there is a big price to pay in terms of cost and efficiency. Maybe the technology will improve and costs will fall, but British Gas’ intervention this week should sound a warning to the Government – it is never a good idea to set targets before you are sure that technology is sufficiently advanced to allow them to be met.

Ross Clark is author of Not Zero: How an Irrational Target Will Impoverish You, Help China (and Won’t Even Save the Planet)

This screen was returned from ChatGTP about me.
I’m surprised that it’s not wholly aligned to The Narrative.
As an aside, I’ve read that for factual information, ChatGTP has a cut off date in late 2021 iirc. Key point is it’s not accessing sources created in real time.
Best wishes
Mike

describe the career of Dr Mike Yeadon and his work at Pfizer and other in pharmacology

Dr. Mike Yeadon is a British pharmacologist who has had a long and distinguished career in the pharmaceutical industry. He graduated with a degree in biochemistry from the University of Surrey in 1981, and later received a PhD in pharmacology from the University of Surrey in 1988.
After completing his PhD, Dr. Yeadon joined Pfizer, one of the world's largest pharmaceutical companies, where he worked for over 16 years in a variety of roles, including as Vice President and Chief Scientist for Allergy and Respiratory Research. During his time at Pfizer, Dr. Yeadon was involved in the development of several drugs, including antihistamines and treatments for respiratory conditions such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
After leaving Pfizer in 2011, Dr. Yeadon founded his own biotech consulting company, called Yeadon Consulting. He also continued to be active in the field of pharmacology, publishing scientific papers and presenting at conferences on topics such as drug discovery, pharmacokinetics, and the regulation of pharmaceuticals.
Dr. Yeadon has been a vocal critic of some of the measures taken in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, including lockdowns and the use of vaccines. He has argued that the virus is not as dangerous as it has been portrayed, and that many of the measures being taken are unnecessary or even harmful. He has also expressed concerns about the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines, and has called for more transparency and scrutiny in their development and approval.
It is worth noting that Dr. Yeadon's views on COVID-19 and vaccines are not widely accepted by the scientific and medical communities, and his statements have been criticized as inaccurate or misleading by some experts. However, he remains a respected figure in the field of pharmacology and drug development, and his contributions to the industry over the course of his career have been significant.

I then asked it what you suggested and it said it couldnt really do all that research, but then spat out. 

Dr. Yeadon has been critical of the measures taken in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, including lockdowns and the use of vaccines. He has argued that the virus is not as dangerous as it has been portrayed and that many of the measures being taken are unnecessary or even harmful.
Some of the key points he has made include:
• The fatality rate for COVID-19 is relatively low, particularly among younger people, and the risk of serious illness is overstated.
• Lockdowns and other restrictions are ineffective at controlling the spread of the virus and cause more harm than good, particularly in terms of economic and social impacts.
• The COVID-19 vaccines are not safe and have not been adequately tested. He has also expressed concerns about the long-term effects of the vaccines and the potential for adverse reactions.
• The use of vaccine passports and other forms of vaccine coercion is unethical and should not be allowed.

ÜBERSETZUNG :

Dieser Bildschirm wurde von ChatGTP über mich zurückgegeben.
Ich bin überrascht, dass es nicht ganz auf The Narrative ausgerichtet ist.
Nebenbei bemerkt habe ich gelesen, dass ChatGTP zur sachlichen Information einen Stichtag Ende 2021 hat. Der entscheidende Punkt ist, dass nicht auf in Echtzeit erstellte Quellen zugegriffen wird.
Besten Wünsche
Mike

Beschreiben Sie die Karriere von Dr. Mike Yeadon und seine Arbeit bei Pfizer und anderen in der Pharmakologie

Dr. Mike Yeadon ist ein britischer Pharmakologe, der auf eine lange und herausragende Karriere in der Pharmaindustrie zurückblicken kann. Er schloss 1981 sein Studium der Biochemie an der University of Surrey ab und promovierte 1988 in Pharmakologie an der University of Surrey.
Nach Abschluss seiner Doktorarbeit wechselte Dr. Yeadon zu Pfizer, einem der weltweit größten Pharmaunternehmen, wo er über 16 Jahre lang in verschiedenen Funktionen arbeitete, unter anderem als Vizepräsident und Chefwissenschaftler für Allergie- und Atemwegsforschung. Während seiner Zeit bei Pfizer war Dr. Yeadon an der Entwicklung mehrerer Medikamente beteiligt, darunter Antihistaminika und Behandlungen für Atemwegserkrankungen wie Asthma und chronisch obstruktive Lungenerkrankung (COPD).
Nachdem er Pfizer im Jahr 2011 verlassen hatte, gründete Dr. Yeadon sein eigenes Biotech-Beratungsunternehmen namens Yeadon Consulting. Er war auch weiterhin auf dem Gebiet der Pharmakologie aktiv, veröffentlichte wissenschaftliche Arbeiten und hielt Vorträge auf Konferenzen zu Themen wie Arzneimittelentwicklung, Pharmakokinetik und Regulierung von Arzneimitteln.
Dr. Yeadon war ein lautstarker Kritiker einiger Maßnahmen, die als Reaktion auf die COVID-19-Pandemie ergriffen wurden, darunter Lockdowns und der Einsatz von Impfstoffen. Er argumentierte, dass das Virus nicht so gefährlich sei, wie es dargestellt werde, und dass viele der ergriffenen Maßnahmen unnötig oder sogar schädlich seien. Er äußerte außerdem Bedenken hinsichtlich der Sicherheit und Wirksamkeit der COVID-19-Impfstoffe und forderte mehr Transparenz und Kontrolle bei deren Entwicklung und Zulassung.
Es ist erwähnenswert, dass Dr. Yeadons Ansichten zu COVID-19 und Impfstoffen von der wissenschaftlichen und medizinischen Gemeinschaft nicht allgemein akzeptiert werden und seine Aussagen von einigen Experten als ungenau oder irreführend kritisiert wurden. Er bleibt jedoch eine angesehene Persönlichkeit auf dem Gebiet der Pharmakologie und Arzneimittelentwicklung und seine Beiträge zur Branche im Laufe seiner Karriere waren bedeutend.

Ich habe es dann gefragt, was Sie vorgeschlagen haben, und es sagte, es könne nicht wirklich all diese Recherchen durchführen, spuckte dann aber aus.

Dr. Yeadon äußerte sich kritisch zu den Maßnahmen, die als Reaktion auf die COVID-19-Pandemie ergriffen wurden, darunter Lockdowns und der Einsatz von Impfstoffen. Er argumentierte, dass das Virus nicht so gefährlich sei, wie es dargestellt werde, und dass viele der ergriffenen Maßnahmen unnötig oder sogar schädlich seien.
Zu den wichtigsten Punkten, die er angesprochen hat, gehören:
• Die Sterblichkeitsrate durch COVID-19 ist relativ niedrig, insbesondere bei jüngeren Menschen, und das Risiko einer schweren Erkrankung wird überbewertet.
• Lockdowns und andere Beschränkungen sind bei der Eindämmung der Ausbreitung des Virus unwirksam und verursachen mehr Schaden als Nutzen, insbesondere im Hinblick auf die wirtschaftlichen und sozialen Auswirkungen.
• Die COVID-19-Impfstoffe sind nicht sicher und wurden nicht ausreichend getestet. Er äußerte auch Bedenken hinsichtlich der langfristigen Auswirkungen der Impfstoffe und der Möglichkeit unerwünschter Reaktionen.
• Der Einsatz von Impfpässen und anderen Formen des Impfzwangs ist unethisch und sollte nicht erlaubt sein.

KOMMENTAR :

............wird ergänzt.....................

Ioannidis

"Why Most Published Research Findings Are False"

ÜBERSETZT :
„Warum die meisten veröffentlichten Forschungsergebnisse falsch sind“

https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124

Courageous and highly informed - a top doctor speaks out on the destruction of medical ethics and complicity of the #medicalprofession.
Tragic but true.

#COVID19 #MedicalEthics

Covid: The destruction of medical ethics and trust in the medical profession - The Conservative Woman
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/covid-the-destruction-of-medical-ethics-and-trust-in-the-medical-profession/

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. details how the NSA was in charge of Operation Warspeed's COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, the history of the United States bioweapons program, and why Anthony Fauci is the highest-paid government official in history:

"The weird thing about the pandemic was this constant involvement by the CIA, the intelligence agencies, and the military. When Operation Warp Speed made its presentation to the FDA committee called VRBPAC. When Warp Speed turned over the organizational charts that were classified at the time, it shocked everybody because it wasn't HHS, CDC, NIH, FDA, or a public health agency. It was the NSA, a spy agency that was at the top and led Operation Warp Speed.

The vaccines were developed not by Moderna and Pfizer. They were developed by NIH, their own the patents are owned 50% by NIH. Nor were they manufactured by Pfizer, or by Moderna. They were manufactured by military contractors, and basically, Pfizer and Moderna were paid to put their stamps on those vaccines as if they came from the pharmaceutical industry. This was a military project from the beginning.

One of the things I uncovered in my book is 20 different simulations on coronavirus and pandemics. That started in 2001. The first one was right before the anthrax attacks and the CIA sponsored them all. The last one was Event 201 which was in October 2019. And one of the participants was Avril Haines, the former Deputy Director of the CIA, who has been managing coverups her whole life. She did the Guantanamo Bay and others. She is now the Director of National Intelligence which makes her the highest ranking officer at the NSA which managed the pandemic."

https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1657175672660566016

@KanekoaTheGreat

ZWEI KOMMENTARE DAZU :

von mir :
Demnach soll es sich bei den vom Robert F. Kennedy Jr. erwähnten US-Organisationen um nichts anderes, als um BIOTERRORISTEN handeln !
Das sollen Sie sich erst an der Zunge zergehen lassen...!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
von "MB" :
Übersetztung : Warum verwenden die Menschen immer noch die Wörter „Pandemie“ und „Impfstoff“ ? Es gab keine Pandemie und es gibt keinen Impfstoff. Wählen Sie Ihre Worte mit Bedacht. ( Original : https://t.me/robinmg/28027?comment=1205504 )


ÜBERSETZUNG :

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. beschreibt ausführlich, wie die NSA für die COVID-19-mRNA-Impfstoffe der Operation Warspeed verantwortlich war, die Geschichte des US-amerikanischen Biowaffenprogramms und warum Anthony Fauci der bestbezahlte Regierungsbeamte der Geschichte ist:

„Das Seltsame an der Pandemie war diese ständige Beteiligung der CIA, der Geheimdienste und des Militärs. Als die Operation Warp Speed dem FDA-Komitee namens VRBPAC vorgestellt wurde. Als Warp Speed die Organigramme übergab, die bei der FDA klassifiziert waren Gleichzeitig schockierte es alle, denn es war nicht HHS, CDC, NIH, FDA oder eine öffentliche Gesundheitsbehörde, sondern die NSA, eine Spionageagentur, die an der Spitze stand und die Operation Warp Speed leitete.

Die Impfstoffe wurden nicht von Moderna und Pfizer entwickelt. Sie wurden vom NIH entwickelt, ihre eigenen Patente liegen zu 50 % im Besitz des NIH. Sie wurden auch nicht von Pfizer oder Moderna hergestellt. Sie wurden von militärischen Auftragnehmern hergestellt, und im Grunde wurden Pfizer und Moderna dafür bezahlt, diesen Impfstoffen ihren Stempel aufzudrücken, als kämen sie von der Pharmaindustrie. Dies war von Anfang an ein militärisches Projekt.

In meinem Buch habe ich unter anderem 20 verschiedene Simulationen zu Coronaviren und Pandemien entdeckt. Das begann im Jahr 2001. Der erste fand direkt vor den Anthrax-Anschlägen statt und die CIA hat sie alle gesponsert. Die letzte Veranstaltung war Event 201 im Oktober 2019. Und eine der Teilnehmerinnen war Avril Haines, die ehemalige stellvertretende Direktorin der CIA, die sich ihr ganzes Leben lang mit Vertuschungen beschäftigt hat. Sie war in Guantanamo Bay und anderen. Sie ist jetzt Direktorin des Nationalen Geheimdienstes und damit die ranghöchste Beamtin der NSA, die die Pandemie bewältigt hat.“

https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1657175672660566016

@KanekoaTheGreat

Durch das Schüren von Chaos und Gesetzlosigkeit haben die Globalisten eine Falle gestellt, die die Menschheit dazu verleiten wird, biometrische digitale IDs zu akzeptieren !

https://uncutnews.ch/durch-das-schueren-von-chaos-und-gesetzlosigkeit-haben-die-globalisten-eine-falle-gestellt-die-die-menschheit-dazu-verleiten-wird-biometrische-digitale-ids-zu-akzeptieren/