Beabsichtigte Folgen: mRNA-Impfstoffe wurden entwickelt, um schwere Krankheiten zu verursachen und gegen Antikörper resistent zu sein.

Laut den Erfindern ist der S-2P -Zwei-Prolin-Trimer-Spike anders und pathogener als der (S)-Wildtyp-Spike, der vom SARS-CoV-2-Virus produziert wird.

Vielleicht kann man logischerweise schlussfolgern, dass die FDA die mRNA-Impfstoffe von Pfizer zugelassen hat , weil die mRNA-Injektionen eine „robuste Immunantwort“ hervorriefen. Die FDA hatte jedoch keine Beweise dafür, dass die „robuste Immunantwort“ einen klinischen Nutzen bei der Verringerung des Risikos einer SAR-CoV-2-Infektion, einer schweren Erkrankung, eines Krankenhausaufenthalts oder des Todes bietet.

https://karenkingston.substack.com/p/intended-consequences-mrna-vaccines

MEIN KOMMENTAR DAZU : MIKE YEADON HAT RECHT, DIE ABSICHT IST VORHANDEN. DER BEWEIS : DIE SPIKE PROTEINE DER "IMPFUNG" SIND ANDERS UND BEI WEITEM GEFÄHRLICHER, ALS DIE ORIG. SPIKE PROTEINE VOM VIRUS. UND : DAS WAR KEIN IRRTUM, WEIL DAS WISSEN VON DIESEM UNTERSCHIED WAR EINFACH. DIE DESIGNER DER "IMPFUNGEN" WUSSTEN ES !

ii) https://hillmd.substack.com/p/spike-proteins-choice-by-competing

BETRIFFT DIE OBERE NACHRICHT :

DR. MIKE YEADON :

Die Wahl des Spike-Proteins in voller Länge durch konkurrierende Unternehmen als einziges Covid-Impfstoffziel enthüllt den Einsatz von Biowaffen

Es könnte keinen schlimmeren Antigen-Pick geben: giftig, schnell mutierend, um der Impfimmunität zu entgehen, und mit menschenähnlichen Proteinsequenzen, um eine Autoimmunität zu provozieren, sagt der Ex-Chef von Pfizer

https://hillmd.substack.com/p/spike-proteins-choice-by-competing

DAZU NOCH EINE ETWAS ÄLTERE ARBEIT VOM ENDE 2022 ÜBER DAS OBIGE THEMA :

Fünfzig verräterische Anzeichen dafür, dass Covid eine Biowaffenoperation ist

https://hillmd.substack.com/p/in-a-covid-bioweapon-operation-strange?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=web

Klasse Zusammenschnitt von #BehindTheMatrix

https://twitter.com/behindthematrix/status/1649001933347209217

Katastrophen Karlchen komentierte auf Twitter:

"Leider noch ein Video das verboten werden sollte. Hätte ich gewusst wie mächtig die Pharmaindustrie ist, hätte ich dies damals so nicht gesagt. #Aufarbeitung #LetzteGeneration #Waermepumpe" ( https://twitter.com/Karl_Laulerbach/status/1649124900081106955 )

👉Unterstützen Sie uns ! 👈
➡️ www.kulturstudio.tv

In dieser Folge von ICIC spricht Dr. Reiner Fuellmich mit Dr. Bodo Schiffmann, HNO-Mediziner, Widerständler, Aufklärer und Aktivist der ersten Stunde. Sie beleuchten die vergangenen drei Jahre Corona-Plandemie, politische Gehversuche und was bis dato aus einem "Grippe-Virus" globalgesellschaftlich geworden ist. Wohin entwickelt sich diese Gemengelage, die viele Menschen mittlerweile dazu gebracht hat, neben tiefgreifenden Erkenntnisgewinnen auch ihre Lebenssituationen gravierend zu verändern. Dieses tiefgründige Gespräch zwischen zwei bekannten Gesichtern des aktiven Widerstandes lässt persönliche Einblicke zu, um auch den Menschen und seine Motivationen hinter dem öffentlichen Bild kennenzulernen.

https://rumble.com/c/c-2316350
https://video.icic-net.com/c/deutsch

www.icic.law

Vax= deadly illnesses

Hitler hat selbst keinen einzigen Menschen getötet ; es waren diejenigen, die seine Worte und die Worte seines Propagandasystems kritiklos angenommen haben und die Befehle ausführten.

Andrew has been expelled from the Conservative party for stating COVID jabs were "causing serious harms", adding that the vaccine programme was "the biggest crime against humanity since the Holocaust".

He is entirely correct and in this tweet he was retweeting a cardiologists paper from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem... yet he has been branded anti-Semitic despite support from the Jewish community including doctors and scientists.

Andrew has said 'I have been a vocal critic of the vaccine rollout and the party have been sure to make an example of me.

I am grateful for my newfound freedom and will continue to fight for justice for all those harmed, injured and bereaved due to governmental incompetence.'

I stand with Andrew Bridgen.

@FionaRoseDiamond

Das größte Verbrechen gegen die Menschheit“ in unserer Geschichte: Naomi Wolfs 11 Enthüllungen aus den Pfizer-Impfstoff-Dokumenten

Es handelt sich also um Monster, und man kann nicht umhin, daraus zu schließen, dass sie darauf abzielen, die menschliche Fortpflanzung zu stören“, so der Autor über die Hersteller des COVID-Impfstoffs: „Es handelt sich um eine Biowaffe, und… wir werden angegriffen.

„Ich sage es nicht leichtfertig, aber es ist Massenmord“ : Nebenwirkungen in Pfizer-Dokumenten weitaus schwerwiegender als CDC und Ärzte den Patienten sagten.

https://uncutnews.ch/das-grosste-verbrechen-gegen-die-menschheit-in-unserer-geschichte-naomi-wolfs-11-enthullungen-aus-den-pfizer-impfstoff-dokumenten/

Bestandsaufnahme #13 | Mit Kayvan Soufi-Siavash und Anselm Lenz

• Zensoren versus Seymour Hersh.
• Robert Habeck steht jetzt auf Atomstrom und Müllverbrennung.
• Schwarze Bürgerrechtler und Südafrikas ANC versus US-Kriegsregime

Siehe auch Apolut.net und demokratischerwiderstand.de.

Bestandsaufnahme! Die Medienschaffenden Kayvan Soufi-Siavash und Anselm Lenz treffen sich wöchentlich zur Bestandsaufnahme. Verlinkt wird das Privatformat im befreundeten Presseportal Apolut.net, ein Auszug wird in der Wochenzeitung Demokratischer Widerstand abgedruckt (demokratischerwiderstand.de).


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Ym3O_DzJrw&t=3025s

Cont/

On her recommendation & because I believe it too, I’ve recently begun saying so explicitly during interviews.
I feel uncomfortable saying things like this because they’re not science based. Nevertheless I feel this so strongly that I need to say it. Please look inside yourself and be open to a higher power, one that is good and truthful. If you feel anything along these lines, that there’s more to this existence than momentary distractions and amusements, that there is a reason why you feel stronger when you tell the truth, that lies weaken you to the point that you don’t understand why you’re even here, then please nurture that feeling, be open to it and behave well.
Consider regularly reading parts of the most important religious tracts you possess & think about what these ancient books have to tell us.
If enough of us align ourselves with the right way to be in the world, orientate ourselves to the light, we will drive the darkness away.
Best wishes
Mike

Hier unten erfolgt die interessante Stellungnahme eines Lesers :

Mike, don't feel uncomfortable about such words. In fact they *are* science-based, but based in a higher science than most people yet know. What is the nature of one's feelings and indeed even more so one's thoughts? I don't believe thinking has a fundamentally material nature. Experience of thinking is not something that can be explained (I believe) by material, quantitative science BUT it can be understood in a meaningful way by a qualitative, spiritual science - which does not contradict but complements the material view. Through thinking man can know himself and his limits or lack thereof. Freedom is real though unavoidably it wouldn't be freedom if it didn't allow error - mistakes genuine and the deliberate 'mistakes' of evil. Perhaps the 'stuff' of our thoughts is the same stuff that is of God or a spiritual world generally. I believe that the conventional 'scientific' view of the world (matter, only physical bodies and any experiences of feeling & thinking just some psychological abstraction, an epi-phenomenological delusion) is in fact an inversion of the reality. There is no Kantian (unknowable) thing-in-itself; reality consists of being or beings-in-themselves and their relations and what we call the material world is built upon this, not the other way round. Current science treats the whole world including living bodies as if they were dead mechanical machines but the reality is that all is (in a sense) 'alive' but our conventional thinking cannot yet grasp it as it really is. However there is spiritual evolution and with it our consciousness is changing and increasingly more people will come to this understanding that the foundation, the ground of reality consists of spirit. But no such thing as a free lunch, there are forces that want to retard our free development and nip in the bud these new green offshoots of spiritual perception/conception before they can take hold and make their plans more difficult. I think this underlies the battle currently raging. It is a battle for our freedom which is the same as for our future. Freedom is intrinsic to being Human with a capital 'H' and not simply being super-intelligent animals. The Spirit is responsible for inspiring the world religions, ancient writings of wisdom and so forth but the religious institutions have mostly become corrupted and will fall away which is as it should be because increasingly we must find a free and conscious relation to the spiritual. My two pence worth.

Gesundheitsminister Levine blockierte die Veröffentlichung eines Bundesberichts, der bestätigt, dass Fluorid in US-Leitungswasser den IQ von Kindern senkt

MEIN KOMMENTAR : Ist die Absenkung des IQ im eigenen Volk ein Herrschaftsinstrument ? Schon vor Jahren gewöhnte ich mich an den Gedanken, dass wir mit weniger Zufällen zu tun haben, als man es auf den ersten Blick sehen und begreifen kann.

https://hillmd.substack.com/p/health-secretary-levine-blocked-public

Die folgende 3 Teile einer Nachricht vom Dr.Mike Yeadon erläutet die Bradford Hill - Kriterien, die zeigen, ob die Kausalität in einer Korrelation enthalten ist. Wichtig, um die Impfschäden zu erkennen.

A very good article from an author who took the trouble to attend the public meetings that U.K. medicines regulator MHRA holds on a cyclical basis. This time she submitted a question & it was called to be asked & answered at the most recent meeting. See article for details.
It’s abundantly clear that the adverse effects being reported post c19 injections are causal, not casual.
Best wishes
Mike


Causality:
My second piece of information throws light on Causality, regarding which the MHRA, especially in response to FoI requests, continually states:
An adverse drug reaction or a fatal outcome does not mean that the vaccine was the cause of SAEs [serious adverse effects] or death.
The WHO accepts the Bradford-Hill Criteria as confirmation of causation if at least five of the criteria are met. These vaccines meet all the criteria. This is confirmed in the presentation Understanding 'Vaccine' Causation by Dr Jessica Rose, Dr Peter McCullough and others.
Dr Rose explains that the WHO uses a ten-criterion list, the Bradford Hill criteria, to prove causality. She goes through all ten criteria and provides evidence accordingly.

https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/taking-on-the-mhra-part-1

It’s very commonly said by bad actors & by people ignorant about causation analysis that “Correlation does not equal causation”, as if that means “You can disregard MHRA Yellow Card and FDA VAERS reports”.
That’s not at all what the saying means.
It means precisely what it says, that you shouldn’t AUTOMATICALLY assume causation just because there are reports of harms after exposure to these injections.
But you shouldn’t AUTOMATICALLY disregard the possibility of causation, either.
There’s a matching but more or less never used phrase:
“Where there is causation, there will be correlation”.
So what these enormous numbers of reports of injuries and deaths post c19 injections demand is done, by way of follow up, is to explore how strong is the evidence of causation.
There are widely accepted methods for conducting such an analysis, in the form of the Bradford Hill criteria.
These are accepted by WHO as well as by the medicines regulators.
Cont/

If just five of the ten Bradford Hill criteria are met, causality is accepted.

Here’s the kicker. ALL TEN (10) of the Bradford Hill causality criteria are met for the c19 injections in relation to the adverse effects reports.

It’s DEFINITELY causation. Without question, these injections CAUSE the majority of the injuries experienced & occasionally reported.

It’s acknowledged in peer reviewed journal articles that only a small minority, between 1-10%, of adverse events experienced after taking a prescribed medication are reported. This is for a variety of reasons. Often the person doesn’t link the events so they never consider reporting it. Other times they do suspect causation but someone else, such as their family doctor, dismisses such a claim and they give up. Many people believe that side effects only occur soon after exposure to a toxic substance occurs. While it’s true that some kinds of toxicity occur shortly after exposure (such as acute allergic reactions) others, by their nature, can take weeks, months or even years to manifest themselves (such as heart damage, autoimmunity, cancer etc).

Please take a look at the article, both to understand how dreadfully badly served we are currently by MHRA and especially to at least scan these causality criteria. They’re well thought through but they’re not high science. Anyone with reasonable linguistic abilities will be able to follow the examples given.

In closing, the author points out that MHRA knows perfectly well that the gene-based injections have caused tremendous harms, and if they claim not to know this, they will have had to not look at their own data. It’s that blatant.

Of course, they’re not telling the public, because they’ve been captured by those I call the perpetrators. They might be complying with strict orders or they might be enthusiastic supporters of what’s going on.

Please onboard enough information to be able to inform others of the risks & to push back on the lazy “Correlation is not causation” trope.

Best wishes and thanks!
Mike