WAS IST RECHTS UND WAS IST LINKS ? - TEIL 2
Niemand muss sich schämen, weil er sich vorher als Linker gefühlt hat. Das kann er auch weiterhin mit gutem Gewissen tun.
Niemand muss sich schämen, weil er sich vorher als Linker gefühlt hat. Das kann er auch weiterhin mit gutem Gewissen tun.
WHAT IS RIGHT AND WHAT IS LEFT ?
ENGLISH TRANSLATION :
Confusing the definitions of "right" and "left" is intentional. People are supposed to be so confused that they no longer know what left means and what left usually stands for. If you ask someone what a class struggle is (or was...), - people don't know anything about it anymore. What we are witnessing now is a class struggle. We must not forget the original definitions : RIGHT means the power of capital and LEFT means the common self-determination of the rules. The heart of the intellectuals and progressives has always beaten on the left. It's not that it's different now. It's just that the definitions have been deliberately distorted (for the purpose of confusion and manipulation).
The main goal of the left has always been the SELF-DETERMINATION OF ALL the people, not ONLY of big business. In communist Russia, or in the GDR, the people had nothing to say and could determine nothing. So it was a totalitarian system under the label of "left". That was a fraudulent label. Real leftism is democratic and does not allow the formation of powerful cartels and forces that can corrupt whole governments.Can an educated person in 2023 claim that this would be bad and harmful ? If you own a factory, that's fine, but not if you can influence an entire industry. That would be harmful because then you can corrupt the government. And the media too, of course ! Such a "soup" can boil over and that is what we are seeing now.
There can also be honest people on the right, but they don't want to share power with everyone and/or are afraid of the stupidity of the masses. Propaganda, of course, reinforces this fear so that the elites can keep and increase their power. There are scientific studies that say that well-informed citizens make correct and wise decisions. So the well-informed "masses" are not stupid. But we are unfortunately deliberately badly and also extra misinformed.
In the US, the two terms have been successfully mixed and distorted. But both major parties belong to capital. Calling these parties "left" and "right" is a fraud that has been successfully practised for a long time. In truth, both parties are on the right. You can't get elected in the US without a lot of money from influential big business. A "left" that introduces a reign of terror by big business is not a left. The democratic party in USA is not democratic at all.
Therefore, we should FIRST fight against censorship and narrowing the scope of discourse so that people can distinguish facts from propaganda. Only then will the real left and real, democratic self-determination have a chance.
A REAL democrat has always been leftist, but only slanderous propaganda can count a leftist as a "communist." Such propaganda has a long tradition, especially in the USA. As part of the class struggle, this propaganda deliberately stirs up hysterical fears against the left and thus defames left-wing politicians. If now corrupt politicians, who hide their true, anti-democratic faces under the completely wrong label "Left", and want to pull the Great Reset through, then that doesn't mean that the Great Reset is left or comes from the left because the label is wrong. I can't see it any other way than a fairly well organized and pre-planned right versus left class struggle and coup. Any other assertion would, in my opinion, be a falsification of both then and current history. The false label is intended only to cover up and make invisible the processes of class struggle. A left-wing politician who allows himself to be influenced by big business and betrays the interests of his voters and his citizens can only be called left-wing by name. But then he is no longer a leftist because he has changed sides and betrayed the people.
No one has to be ashamed because they felt they were leftists before. He can continue to feel that way with a clear conscience.
ENGLISH TRANSLATION :
Confusing the definitions of "right" and "left" is intentional. People are supposed to be so confused that they no longer know what left means and what left usually stands for. If you ask someone what a class struggle is (or was...), - people don't know anything about it anymore. What we are witnessing now is a class struggle. We must not forget the original definitions : RIGHT means the power of capital and LEFT means the common self-determination of the rules. The heart of the intellectuals and progressives has always beaten on the left. It's not that it's different now. It's just that the definitions have been deliberately distorted (for the purpose of confusion and manipulation).
The main goal of the left has always been the SELF-DETERMINATION OF ALL the people, not ONLY of big business. In communist Russia, or in the GDR, the people had nothing to say and could determine nothing. So it was a totalitarian system under the label of "left". That was a fraudulent label. Real leftism is democratic and does not allow the formation of powerful cartels and forces that can corrupt whole governments.Can an educated person in 2023 claim that this would be bad and harmful ? If you own a factory, that's fine, but not if you can influence an entire industry. That would be harmful because then you can corrupt the government. And the media too, of course ! Such a "soup" can boil over and that is what we are seeing now.
There can also be honest people on the right, but they don't want to share power with everyone and/or are afraid of the stupidity of the masses. Propaganda, of course, reinforces this fear so that the elites can keep and increase their power. There are scientific studies that say that well-informed citizens make correct and wise decisions. So the well-informed "masses" are not stupid. But we are unfortunately deliberately badly and also extra misinformed.
In the US, the two terms have been successfully mixed and distorted. But both major parties belong to capital. Calling these parties "left" and "right" is a fraud that has been successfully practised for a long time. In truth, both parties are on the right. You can't get elected in the US without a lot of money from influential big business. A "left" that introduces a reign of terror by big business is not a left. The democratic party in USA is not democratic at all.
Therefore, we should FIRST fight against censorship and narrowing the scope of discourse so that people can distinguish facts from propaganda. Only then will the real left and real, democratic self-determination have a chance.
A REAL democrat has always been leftist, but only slanderous propaganda can count a leftist as a "communist." Such propaganda has a long tradition, especially in the USA. As part of the class struggle, this propaganda deliberately stirs up hysterical fears against the left and thus defames left-wing politicians. If now corrupt politicians, who hide their true, anti-democratic faces under the completely wrong label "Left", and want to pull the Great Reset through, then that doesn't mean that the Great Reset is left or comes from the left because the label is wrong. I can't see it any other way than a fairly well organized and pre-planned right versus left class struggle and coup. Any other assertion would, in my opinion, be a falsification of both then and current history. The false label is intended only to cover up and make invisible the processes of class struggle. A left-wing politician who allows himself to be influenced by big business and betrays the interests of his voters and his citizens can only be called left-wing by name. But then he is no longer a leftist because he has changed sides and betrayed the people.
No one has to be ashamed because they felt they were leftists before. He can continue to feel that way with a clear conscience.
Forwarded from It's Me
Telegram
Jerm Warfare Battleground
The creator of the PCR test (or calibration) - Christian Drosten - openly states that nobody would have seen any difference were it not for the PCR test. (Kary Mullis invented PCR. Christian calibrated it.)
In other words, there was NO pandemic.
In other words, there was NO pandemic.
DIE-BEZEICHNUNG-IMPFGEGNER
Erst in der Zeit der Plandemie habe ich viel auch über die konventionelle Impfungen gelesen. Ich las auch die wissenschaftlichen Studien und auch Geschichten darüber, wie diese Studien irgendwann verschwanden und jetzt zensiert und unter Verschluss gehalten werden. Deshalb bin ich erst jetzt, seit 2 Jahren ein allgemeiner, echter Impfgegner geworden. Wenn es überhaupt lohnenswerte Impfungen gibt, dann höchstens nur 1 oder 2 verschiedene. Der Rest ist ein Pfusch. Und die Bezeichnung "Impfgegner" diffamiert Menschen nicht wirklich, nur in den Augen des nicht informierten Lesers. Vor 2-3 Jahren hatte ich keine Ahnung und glaubte fast alles.
Die Bezeichnung „Impfgegner“ hat ähnliche, diffamierende Funktion, wie "Verschwörungstheoretiker" und ist für mich zu einer Art Ritterschlag geworden. Es bedeutet, dass jemand viel Zeit für die Recherche aufwendete, BEVOR er beispielsweise Impfentscheidungen für sich und seine Kinder getroffen hat.
Die Gehirnwäsche arbeitet erfolgreich mittels Emotionen, unter anderem oft mittels der Schamgefühle.
Erst in der Zeit der Plandemie habe ich viel auch über die konventionelle Impfungen gelesen. Ich las auch die wissenschaftlichen Studien und auch Geschichten darüber, wie diese Studien irgendwann verschwanden und jetzt zensiert und unter Verschluss gehalten werden. Deshalb bin ich erst jetzt, seit 2 Jahren ein allgemeiner, echter Impfgegner geworden. Wenn es überhaupt lohnenswerte Impfungen gibt, dann höchstens nur 1 oder 2 verschiedene. Der Rest ist ein Pfusch. Und die Bezeichnung "Impfgegner" diffamiert Menschen nicht wirklich, nur in den Augen des nicht informierten Lesers. Vor 2-3 Jahren hatte ich keine Ahnung und glaubte fast alles.
Die Bezeichnung „Impfgegner“ hat ähnliche, diffamierende Funktion, wie "Verschwörungstheoretiker" und ist für mich zu einer Art Ritterschlag geworden. Es bedeutet, dass jemand viel Zeit für die Recherche aufwendete, BEVOR er beispielsweise Impfentscheidungen für sich und seine Kinder getroffen hat.
Die Gehirnwäsche arbeitet erfolgreich mittels Emotionen, unter anderem oft mittels der Schamgefühle.
The term "anti-vax"
It was only during the period of the plandemic that I read a lot about conventional vaccinations. I also read the scientific studies and also stories about how these studies disappeared at some point and are now censored and kept under lock and key. That is why I have only now, since 2 years, become a real opponent of vaccination. If there are any vaccinations worthwhile at all, then at most only 1 or 2 different ones. The rest are a botch. And the label "vaccination opponent" doesn't really defame people, only in the eyes of the uninformed reader. 2-3 years ago I had no idea and believed almost everything.
The term "anti-vax" has a similar, defamatory function, like "conspiracy theorists" and has become a kind of accolade for me. It means that someone spent a lot of time researching BEFORE making vaccination decisions for themselves and their children, for example.
Brainwashing works successfully by means of emotions, often including feelings of shame.
It was only during the period of the plandemic that I read a lot about conventional vaccinations. I also read the scientific studies and also stories about how these studies disappeared at some point and are now censored and kept under lock and key. That is why I have only now, since 2 years, become a real opponent of vaccination. If there are any vaccinations worthwhile at all, then at most only 1 or 2 different ones. The rest are a botch. And the label "vaccination opponent" doesn't really defame people, only in the eyes of the uninformed reader. 2-3 years ago I had no idea and believed almost everything.
The term "anti-vax" has a similar, defamatory function, like "conspiracy theorists" and has become a kind of accolade for me. It means that someone spent a lot of time researching BEFORE making vaccination decisions for themselves and their children, for example.
Brainwashing works successfully by means of emotions, often including feelings of shame.
ÜBERSETZT VON Kate H :
Wir müssen dem Beispiel der Amish folgen und versuchen, ohne Strom oder Gas aus dem Netz zu leben. Ich habe keinen Kühlschrank, Herd, Fernseher oder WLAN. Ein Alkoholkocher zum Kochen, Mehrstoffkocher zum Kochen, Erhitzen und Trocknen von Kleidung, Eimerdusche, Solar- und Öllampen sind gute Ersatzstoffe und angenehm zu benutzen. Fangen Sie auch an, Ihr eigenes Essen anzubauen und hören Sie einfach auf, irgendetwas von den Konzernen zu kaufen. Das ist kein Hexenwerk.
...................................................................................
ORIG.TEXT :
We need to follow the Amish example and start trying to live without electricity or gas from the grid. I don't have a fridge, cooker, TV or Wifi. An alcohol stove for cooking, multi-fuel stoves for cooking, heating and drying clothes, bucket shower, solar and oil lamps are good replacements and enjoyable to use. Start growing your own food too and just stop buying anything from the corporations. It's not rocket science.
Wir müssen dem Beispiel der Amish folgen und versuchen, ohne Strom oder Gas aus dem Netz zu leben. Ich habe keinen Kühlschrank, Herd, Fernseher oder WLAN. Ein Alkoholkocher zum Kochen, Mehrstoffkocher zum Kochen, Erhitzen und Trocknen von Kleidung, Eimerdusche, Solar- und Öllampen sind gute Ersatzstoffe und angenehm zu benutzen. Fangen Sie auch an, Ihr eigenes Essen anzubauen und hören Sie einfach auf, irgendetwas von den Konzernen zu kaufen. Das ist kein Hexenwerk.
...................................................................................
ORIG.TEXT :
We need to follow the Amish example and start trying to live without electricity or gas from the grid. I don't have a fridge, cooker, TV or Wifi. An alcohol stove for cooking, multi-fuel stoves for cooking, heating and drying clothes, bucket shower, solar and oil lamps are good replacements and enjoyable to use. Start growing your own food too and just stop buying anything from the corporations. It's not rocket science.
Forwarded from Robin Monotti
I don’t know about you, but the past three and a bit years has shown me that many things & events aren’t at all as described.
Famously, I’ve asserted that “Every main official narrative point about the virus & countermeasures is a lie”.
Once you get beyond a couple of deliberate lies, I submit that it’s unsafe and rather stupid to accept ANYTHING from official sources as true, unless there’s corroborative evidence supporting it.
I’m not an engineer or architect & I’ve not personally looked at any of the evidence around 9/11. However, I’m not completely thick and now appreciate that the authorities have had substantial motivation to misbehave for a very long time. I’m now inclined to default everything to inside jobs, pending contrary information.
I do recall earlier & separately thinking that the media reporting around the Oklahoma City Federal Building explosion was distinctly odd. In very coarse terms, even the images of the damage to the building didn’t all look consistent with a sizeable truck bomb parked outside. No, you don’t need to be a munitions expert to ask questions.
As the last three years has rolled by, I concluded tentatively that all the main outrages on US soil are inside jobs. I’m willing to place bets that the same will be true of U.K.
Long ago, I reasoned that the 7/7 incident was hardly believable in the light of the absence, before & since, of attacks using similar methodologies.
It’s not feasible to defend against such things. Until recently, no methods existed to constantly surveille very large numbers of people. Though a grisly way to leave this world, I’m ready to believe that, if you were wearing backpack device or a vest device, you absolutely wouldn’t know anything about it. So it takes that little bit less to overcome naturally reluctance to commit an act which will end your own life. How people end their lives by leaping off tall buildings or in front of trains or lorries, I cannot imagine.
The bottom line is that the entire narrative we’ve been told about extremists of one belief system must be wrong, potentially in several ways.
If the official narrative was even close to the truth, I’d predict with a high level of confidence that, at varying scales, incidents such as those outrages says to be religious / political attacks would occur very much more frequently than they do.
How could that be? Are we to believe that a far, far lower percentage of angry youngish people are willing to make the ultimate sacrifice for the cause?
The Oklahoma City Federal Building bombing was so odd that, even as a normie, I remember saying to Joanna that I didn’t believe what I was being told on TV (by contrast, at the time, I hadn’t any thoughts that the downing of the WTC wasn’t roughly as described).
This tragic story is one of several where somebody stumbled upon evidence that upended the official narrative, thereafter digging into the setting much more thoroughly than at first, who ended up dead in unusual circumstances.
Best wishes
Mike
https://corbettreport.substack.com/p/flashback-requiem-for-the-suicided?utm_medium=email
Famously, I’ve asserted that “Every main official narrative point about the virus & countermeasures is a lie”.
Once you get beyond a couple of deliberate lies, I submit that it’s unsafe and rather stupid to accept ANYTHING from official sources as true, unless there’s corroborative evidence supporting it.
I’m not an engineer or architect & I’ve not personally looked at any of the evidence around 9/11. However, I’m not completely thick and now appreciate that the authorities have had substantial motivation to misbehave for a very long time. I’m now inclined to default everything to inside jobs, pending contrary information.
I do recall earlier & separately thinking that the media reporting around the Oklahoma City Federal Building explosion was distinctly odd. In very coarse terms, even the images of the damage to the building didn’t all look consistent with a sizeable truck bomb parked outside. No, you don’t need to be a munitions expert to ask questions.
As the last three years has rolled by, I concluded tentatively that all the main outrages on US soil are inside jobs. I’m willing to place bets that the same will be true of U.K.
Long ago, I reasoned that the 7/7 incident was hardly believable in the light of the absence, before & since, of attacks using similar methodologies.
It’s not feasible to defend against such things. Until recently, no methods existed to constantly surveille very large numbers of people. Though a grisly way to leave this world, I’m ready to believe that, if you were wearing backpack device or a vest device, you absolutely wouldn’t know anything about it. So it takes that little bit less to overcome naturally reluctance to commit an act which will end your own life. How people end their lives by leaping off tall buildings or in front of trains or lorries, I cannot imagine.
The bottom line is that the entire narrative we’ve been told about extremists of one belief system must be wrong, potentially in several ways.
If the official narrative was even close to the truth, I’d predict with a high level of confidence that, at varying scales, incidents such as those outrages says to be religious / political attacks would occur very much more frequently than they do.
How could that be? Are we to believe that a far, far lower percentage of angry youngish people are willing to make the ultimate sacrifice for the cause?
The Oklahoma City Federal Building bombing was so odd that, even as a normie, I remember saying to Joanna that I didn’t believe what I was being told on TV (by contrast, at the time, I hadn’t any thoughts that the downing of the WTC wasn’t roughly as described).
This tragic story is one of several where somebody stumbled upon evidence that upended the official narrative, thereafter digging into the setting much more thoroughly than at first, who ended up dead in unusual circumstances.
Best wishes
Mike
https://corbettreport.substack.com/p/flashback-requiem-for-the-suicided?utm_medium=email
The Corbett Report
FLASHBACK: Requiem for the Suicided: Terrance Yeakey (2010)
Watch now (41 min) | SHOW NOTES AND MP3: https://www.corbettreport.com/yeakey FROM 2010: This week we turn the focus of our open source investigation to Sgt. Terrance Yeakey, one of the first responder heroes at the scene of the OKC bombing who discovered…
Terrasse Yeakey
" Terrance Yeakey (9. November 1965 – 8. Mai 1996) war Sergeant in der Oklahoma City Police Department (OCPD). Er war einer der Ersthelfer am Ort des Bombenanschlags in Oklahoma City und rettete mindestens vier Menschen. Er starb ein Jahr später nach Angaben der Behörden durch Selbstmord mit einem Schuss.
(...)
Tod
Am 8. Mai 1996, drei Tage bevor er die Ehrung erhalten sollte, wurde Yeakey tot auf einem Feld in der Nähe seiner Heimatstadt El Reno aufgefunden . Yeakey starb an einer Schusswunde am Kopf und wurde mit Schnittwunden an Handgelenken, Armen und Hals gefunden. Sein Tod wurde als Selbstmord gewertet . Ein Freund, Offizierskollege Jim Ramsey, spekulierte, dass er möglicherweise von Schuldgefühlen wegen der Bombenrettung getrieben wurde, weil er nicht in der Lage war, mehr Menschen zu retten, und seiner Verzweiflung über ein schwieriges Familienleben – das hatte er kürzlich getan wurde von seiner Ex-Frau daran gehindert, seine beiden kleinen Töchter zu sehen. [2] [6] Obwohl seine Ex-Frau in einem Interview sagte, dass sie glaubte, dass ihr Ex-Mann ermordet worden war und dass sie vor seinem Tod ein gutes Verhältnis hatten, sogar mit möglichen Aussichten auf eine Wiederverheiratung.
Laut CNN „glaubten nicht viele von denen, die Terry Yeakey kannten, dass er sich umgebracht hatte.“ Es wurde kein Abschiedsbrief gefunden, und viele von Yeakeys Familie, Freunden und Kollegen glauben, dass er ermordet wurde, weil er seine eigene unabhängige Untersuchung des Bombenanschlags durchführte.
Seit dem Bombenanschlag wurden mehrere Todesfälle von Überlebenden als Selbstmord gewertet.( ...)."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrance_Yeakey
" Terrance Yeakey (9. November 1965 – 8. Mai 1996) war Sergeant in der Oklahoma City Police Department (OCPD). Er war einer der Ersthelfer am Ort des Bombenanschlags in Oklahoma City und rettete mindestens vier Menschen. Er starb ein Jahr später nach Angaben der Behörden durch Selbstmord mit einem Schuss.
(...)
Tod
Am 8. Mai 1996, drei Tage bevor er die Ehrung erhalten sollte, wurde Yeakey tot auf einem Feld in der Nähe seiner Heimatstadt El Reno aufgefunden . Yeakey starb an einer Schusswunde am Kopf und wurde mit Schnittwunden an Handgelenken, Armen und Hals gefunden. Sein Tod wurde als Selbstmord gewertet . Ein Freund, Offizierskollege Jim Ramsey, spekulierte, dass er möglicherweise von Schuldgefühlen wegen der Bombenrettung getrieben wurde, weil er nicht in der Lage war, mehr Menschen zu retten, und seiner Verzweiflung über ein schwieriges Familienleben – das hatte er kürzlich getan wurde von seiner Ex-Frau daran gehindert, seine beiden kleinen Töchter zu sehen. [2] [6] Obwohl seine Ex-Frau in einem Interview sagte, dass sie glaubte, dass ihr Ex-Mann ermordet worden war und dass sie vor seinem Tod ein gutes Verhältnis hatten, sogar mit möglichen Aussichten auf eine Wiederverheiratung.
Laut CNN „glaubten nicht viele von denen, die Terry Yeakey kannten, dass er sich umgebracht hatte.“ Es wurde kein Abschiedsbrief gefunden, und viele von Yeakeys Familie, Freunden und Kollegen glauben, dass er ermordet wurde, weil er seine eigene unabhängige Untersuchung des Bombenanschlags durchführte.
Seit dem Bombenanschlag wurden mehrere Todesfälle von Überlebenden als Selbstmord gewertet.( ...)."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrance_Yeakey
Wikipedia
Terrance Yeakey
American police officer
Forwarded from Robin Monotti
Ps: you’ll know that James Corbett is regarded officially as a dreadful conspiracy theorist. I’ve been sceptical all my life about a category of people dubbed conspiracy theorists. It’s literally never made any sense to me. The motives ascribed to such people simply aren’t realistic. You don’t make much money from being a conspiracy theorist. The costs on such a person are large, no question (don’t ask me how I know).
In contrast, you can make pots of money being an official liar or a helpful “journalist”. I can see their motives from space.
But for one-off alleged conspiracy theorists, people like me for example, people with absolutely no antecedent behavior that would fit the alleged events, the motives ascribed are just fatuous, obviously nonsense.
Unfortunately, just as I mostly shrugged at the descriptions of random conspiracy theorists for whom the end was shrouded in mystery, I’m guessing that the Asleep will mostly have accepted what they’ve been told about a former Pfizer Vice President & global head of respiratory research, this fool who went into serve some 30 biotechs and to found & lead as CEO my own biotech which, really unusually, went swimmingly and was acquired by Novartis, making investors & others owning shares happy.
With all this as background (code: he’s not an idiot), and the reasonable guess that anyone taking such a stance as I did is going to lose plenty of money & most of their professional allies, what possible motive could I have to make stuff up, for THREE YEARS?
Not about money. I assure you, you lose money like you’ve just bought a modest sized watercraft device.
Not for fame, for mostly what happens is that you get excluded from mainstream media. Also, people who prefer physical objects and practical tasks, really dislike being in the spotlight.
In my case, there was custom suggestions that I might be coming up with creative lies because “Yeadon is a disgruntled, ex-employee”.
This is also palpable nonsense.
I never fell out with my former employer, certainly not at a personal level.
Next, I persuaded Pfizer to become equity investors in my company and they were with us from a year prior to first financing out to the trade sale. A dinner was held to honour the management team. Not disgruntled. The contrary. Pfizer exited its Sandwich, Kent R&D site at a time where I was experienced enough to have a decent chance of pulling it off, young enough to have been super fit and yet far enough advanced in my career that I wasn’t living paycheque to paycheque.
In conclusion, nothing about me tessellates with the narrative used to smear people like me. If you see someone bring smeared by senior people in this way, and with outlandish motives attached to them, I recommend you find a way to learn what they’re talking about.
Cheers,
Mike
Pps: I find this article very supportive evidence of my claims to be able to work things out with just a little higher success rate than my peers. The author is a former Pfizer main board member, and Dr John LaMattina was formerly global head of R&D.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnlamattina/2017/03/15/turning-pfizer-discards-into-novartis-gold-the-story-of-ziarco/
In contrast, you can make pots of money being an official liar or a helpful “journalist”. I can see their motives from space.
But for one-off alleged conspiracy theorists, people like me for example, people with absolutely no antecedent behavior that would fit the alleged events, the motives ascribed are just fatuous, obviously nonsense.
Unfortunately, just as I mostly shrugged at the descriptions of random conspiracy theorists for whom the end was shrouded in mystery, I’m guessing that the Asleep will mostly have accepted what they’ve been told about a former Pfizer Vice President & global head of respiratory research, this fool who went into serve some 30 biotechs and to found & lead as CEO my own biotech which, really unusually, went swimmingly and was acquired by Novartis, making investors & others owning shares happy.
With all this as background (code: he’s not an idiot), and the reasonable guess that anyone taking such a stance as I did is going to lose plenty of money & most of their professional allies, what possible motive could I have to make stuff up, for THREE YEARS?
Not about money. I assure you, you lose money like you’ve just bought a modest sized watercraft device.
Not for fame, for mostly what happens is that you get excluded from mainstream media. Also, people who prefer physical objects and practical tasks, really dislike being in the spotlight.
In my case, there was custom suggestions that I might be coming up with creative lies because “Yeadon is a disgruntled, ex-employee”.
This is also palpable nonsense.
I never fell out with my former employer, certainly not at a personal level.
Next, I persuaded Pfizer to become equity investors in my company and they were with us from a year prior to first financing out to the trade sale. A dinner was held to honour the management team. Not disgruntled. The contrary. Pfizer exited its Sandwich, Kent R&D site at a time where I was experienced enough to have a decent chance of pulling it off, young enough to have been super fit and yet far enough advanced in my career that I wasn’t living paycheque to paycheque.
In conclusion, nothing about me tessellates with the narrative used to smear people like me. If you see someone bring smeared by senior people in this way, and with outlandish motives attached to them, I recommend you find a way to learn what they’re talking about.
Cheers,
Mike
Pps: I find this article very supportive evidence of my claims to be able to work things out with just a little higher success rate than my peers. The author is a former Pfizer main board member, and Dr John LaMattina was formerly global head of R&D.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnlamattina/2017/03/15/turning-pfizer-discards-into-novartis-gold-the-story-of-ziarco/
Forbes
Turning Pfizer Discards Into Novartis Gold: The Story Of Ziarco
Mike was told in the fall of 2010 that Pfizer was closing the Allergy & Respiratory diseases programs and his own role as the CSO of this group was being eliminated. Rather than seek employment elsewhere, Mike had others ideas.
Forwarded from Robin Monotti
https://rumble.com/vvvn6u-the-great-global-warming-swindle-full-documentary-hd.html
I’ve mentioned that the extent of my exploration of fields away from covid has been small, but not zero.
Though this program is more than 10 years old, it addresses all the fundamental claims of the domestic and international terrorists, that earth is going to hell in a handcart & it’s all our fault.
I think this program is well made, in terms of certain aspects of the fraudulent narrative.
We should be our own best critics. I am not a subject matter expert in any aspect of this story. However, it was for a long time one of my professional responsibilities to evaluate a lot of items that came my way. I would always start at the foundations of whatever it was that made it “controversial”.
In that way, I obtained enough knowledge & self-belief by reading my way into those things that were regarded as axioms (hardline assumptions that you’re simply not to question).
The official version of the situation is utterly divorced from the reality.
Have a watch for yourselves.
I will say that the program-makers surely have their own agenda. I don’t automatically accept as gospel whatever those people opposed to inhuman net zero future plans have to say.
If even half of the items in this film are only half as important as they assert, you’d come to the conclusion that there’s no evidence of anything to be concerned about, period.
The best way to abort this evil agenda is to persuade those still in the narrative to look at arguably unrelated things, like “climate change”.
Most people think they know something about this area of life with good reason. It’s been pumped at them for decades. Trouble is, what they’ve been encouraged to absorb is mostly lies.
Best wishes
Mike
I’ve mentioned that the extent of my exploration of fields away from covid has been small, but not zero.
Though this program is more than 10 years old, it addresses all the fundamental claims of the domestic and international terrorists, that earth is going to hell in a handcart & it’s all our fault.
I think this program is well made, in terms of certain aspects of the fraudulent narrative.
We should be our own best critics. I am not a subject matter expert in any aspect of this story. However, it was for a long time one of my professional responsibilities to evaluate a lot of items that came my way. I would always start at the foundations of whatever it was that made it “controversial”.
In that way, I obtained enough knowledge & self-belief by reading my way into those things that were regarded as axioms (hardline assumptions that you’re simply not to question).
The official version of the situation is utterly divorced from the reality.
Have a watch for yourselves.
I will say that the program-makers surely have their own agenda. I don’t automatically accept as gospel whatever those people opposed to inhuman net zero future plans have to say.
If even half of the items in this film are only half as important as they assert, you’d come to the conclusion that there’s no evidence of anything to be concerned about, period.
The best way to abort this evil agenda is to persuade those still in the narrative to look at arguably unrelated things, like “climate change”.
Most people think they know something about this area of life with good reason. It’s been pumped at them for decades. Trouble is, what they’ve been encouraged to absorb is mostly lies.
Best wishes
Mike
Rumble
The Great Global Warming Swindle - Full Documentary HD
„Wir haben Babynahrung, die ein paar Babys tötet, und das gesamte Produkt wird vom Markt genommen.
Und hier [mit dem Covid-19-Impfstoff] werden all diese Todesfälle gemeldet, und niemand unternimmt etwas. Ich war noch nie in meinem Leben so verängstigt.“ – Dr. Pierre Kory
https://twitter.com/vacsafety/status/1634048902465716225?s=12&t=U9RA291Ra8zjoieLBhs2bA
Und hier [mit dem Covid-19-Impfstoff] werden all diese Todesfälle gemeldet, und niemand unternimmt etwas. Ich war noch nie in meinem Leben so verängstigt.“ – Dr. Pierre Kory
https://twitter.com/vacsafety/status/1634048902465716225?s=12&t=U9RA291Ra8zjoieLBhs2bA
Forwarded from FX (I will never DM First or ask for Funds)
This is also a brilliant paper published by William Happer and a couple of other scientists. It exposes the scientific fraud and failings of the “Net Zero”
Agenda and it is very recent.
https://co2coalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/printable-2023-02-23-E-Challenging-Net-Zero-with-Science.pdf
Agenda and it is very recent.
https://co2coalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/printable-2023-02-23-E-Challenging-Net-Zero-with-Science.pdf
DIE VERSCHWÖRUNGSTHEORETIKER WISSENS ES OFT BESSER, WEIL SIE EINIGES HINTERFRAGEN
ÜBERSETZUNG VOM KOMMENTAR VON Claude_1 :
Wie bei Covid 19 scheint der durchschnittliche „Verschwörungstheoretiker“ viel besser informiert zu sein, als das durchschnittliche Mitglied der Gesellschaft. Ich habe 2021 einen „sehr gebildeten“ Freund besucht und das Thema Impfstoffe kam auf, und als ich sagte, ich hätte ihn nicht genommen, geriet er in Panik und wollte, dass ich gehe. Ich fragte ihn, welchen Impfstoff er bekommen habe, und er musste sich bei seiner Frau erkundigen. Es stellte sich heraus, dass es sich um Astra Zeneca handelte, das er für einen traditionellen Impfstoff hielt.
.......................................................................................................................
ORIG.TEXT :
As with covid 19 the average "conspiracy theorist" seems to be much better informed than the average member of society. I visited a "very well educated" friend in 2021 and the issue of vaccines came up and when I said I hadn't taken it he panicked and wanted me to leave. I asked him which vaccine he had got and he had to check with his wife. It turned out to be Astra Zennica which he thought was a traditional type vaccine
ÜBERSETZUNG VOM KOMMENTAR VON Claude_1 :
Wie bei Covid 19 scheint der durchschnittliche „Verschwörungstheoretiker“ viel besser informiert zu sein, als das durchschnittliche Mitglied der Gesellschaft. Ich habe 2021 einen „sehr gebildeten“ Freund besucht und das Thema Impfstoffe kam auf, und als ich sagte, ich hätte ihn nicht genommen, geriet er in Panik und wollte, dass ich gehe. Ich fragte ihn, welchen Impfstoff er bekommen habe, und er musste sich bei seiner Frau erkundigen. Es stellte sich heraus, dass es sich um Astra Zeneca handelte, das er für einen traditionellen Impfstoff hielt.
.......................................................................................................................
ORIG.TEXT :
As with covid 19 the average "conspiracy theorist" seems to be much better informed than the average member of society. I visited a "very well educated" friend in 2021 and the issue of vaccines came up and when I said I hadn't taken it he panicked and wanted me to leave. I asked him which vaccine he had got and he had to check with his wife. It turned out to be Astra Zennica which he thought was a traditional type vaccine
" Ein Leitfaden für bessere Gespräche mit Ihrem Teenager "
Nicht nur mit Ihrem Teenager !
Recht zu behalten scheint oft ( oder meistens? ) wichtiger zu sein, als die Wahrheit. Die Erwachsenen sind auch nicht anders. Klüger scheinbar auch nicht.
https://dailyclout.io/a-guide-to-better-conversations-with-your-teenager/
Nicht nur mit Ihrem Teenager !
Recht zu behalten scheint oft ( oder meistens? ) wichtiger zu sein, als die Wahrheit. Die Erwachsenen sind auch nicht anders. Klüger scheinbar auch nicht.
https://dailyclout.io/a-guide-to-better-conversations-with-your-teenager/
DailyClout
A Guide to Better Conversations with Your Teenager
My teenage daughter and I have very different political viewpoints. Recently, while discussing difficult issues, I’ve realized that the more
Forwarded from DailyClout
From 2005 to 2017, major depression rose by 52% among teenagers.
What’s the explanation? @TheWellnessCompany weighs in.
https://dailyclout.io/anxiety-and-depression-are-on-the-rise-is-social-media-to-blame/
Follow @Daily_Clout
Latest News | Pfizer Documents Book
What’s the explanation? @TheWellnessCompany weighs in.
https://dailyclout.io/anxiety-and-depression-are-on-the-rise-is-social-media-to-blame/
Follow @Daily_Clout
Latest News | Pfizer Documents Book
DailyClout
Anxiety and Depression are On the Rise. Is Social Media to Blame?
From 2005 to 2017, major depression rose by 52% among teenagers. There are many side-effects of heavy social media use which might mediate
DIE KONNOTATION DER BEZEICHNUNG "VERSCHWÖRUNGSTHEORETIKER"
Ich lache jedes mal, wenn mein Gesprächspartner von mir irgendeine Art von rhetorischer Aggression erwartet, wenn er mich (direkt oder indirekt ) zuvor "Verschwörungstheoretiker" genannt hat. Der tiefe Blick in meine Augen und vielleicht noch ein kleines, unauffälliges Lächeln des Triumphes,- so circa sieht das aus... Ich habe die negative Konotation des Begriffes mir nicht zu eigen gemacht. Im Gegenteil, es ist sogar wie ein kleines Kompliment für mich. Nicht jeder hat ausreichend Vorstellungsvermögen. Aber jeder soll sich freuen, dass er etwas hat, was sein Überleben erleichtert. Ich freue mich, Verschwörungstheoretiker zu sein. Diese Eigenschaft würde ich gegen kein Geld dieser Welt tauschen wollen. Es ist nicht ganz kostenfrei, Verschwörungen und Betrügereien aufzudecken. Das kostet viel Zeit ( "Zeit ist Geld"...) und nennt sich "Bildung". Eine teuer erkaufte Bildung !
Und vielleicht gehört auch etwas Glück dazu, feststellen zu dürfen, dass die eigenen Gene ( in den vorherigen Generationen ?) nicht so schrecklich verpfuscht worden sind. HA HA HA !
…..........................................
THE COLOURING OF THE LABEL "CONSPIRACY THEORIST"
I laugh every time my interlocutor expects some kind of rhetorical aggression from me when he has previously (directly or indirectly ) called me a "conspiracy theorist". The deep look in my eyes and maybe a small, inconspicuous smile of triumph, - that's about what it looks like.... I have not adopted the negative connotation of the term. On the contrary, it is even like a small compliment for me. Not everyone has enough imagination. But everyone should be happy that they have something that makes their survival easier. I am happy to be a conspiracy theorist. I wouldn't want to exchange this quality for any money in this world. It is not entirely free to uncover conspiracies and frauds. It costs a lot of time ("time is money"...) and is called "education". A expensive / dearly bought education !
And perhaps it also takes a bit of luck to discover that one's own genes (in previous generations?) have not been so terribly messed up. HA HA HA !
Ich lache jedes mal, wenn mein Gesprächspartner von mir irgendeine Art von rhetorischer Aggression erwartet, wenn er mich (direkt oder indirekt ) zuvor "Verschwörungstheoretiker" genannt hat. Der tiefe Blick in meine Augen und vielleicht noch ein kleines, unauffälliges Lächeln des Triumphes,- so circa sieht das aus... Ich habe die negative Konotation des Begriffes mir nicht zu eigen gemacht. Im Gegenteil, es ist sogar wie ein kleines Kompliment für mich. Nicht jeder hat ausreichend Vorstellungsvermögen. Aber jeder soll sich freuen, dass er etwas hat, was sein Überleben erleichtert. Ich freue mich, Verschwörungstheoretiker zu sein. Diese Eigenschaft würde ich gegen kein Geld dieser Welt tauschen wollen. Es ist nicht ganz kostenfrei, Verschwörungen und Betrügereien aufzudecken. Das kostet viel Zeit ( "Zeit ist Geld"...) und nennt sich "Bildung". Eine teuer erkaufte Bildung !
Und vielleicht gehört auch etwas Glück dazu, feststellen zu dürfen, dass die eigenen Gene ( in den vorherigen Generationen ?) nicht so schrecklich verpfuscht worden sind. HA HA HA !
…..........................................
THE COLOURING OF THE LABEL "CONSPIRACY THEORIST"
I laugh every time my interlocutor expects some kind of rhetorical aggression from me when he has previously (directly or indirectly ) called me a "conspiracy theorist". The deep look in my eyes and maybe a small, inconspicuous smile of triumph, - that's about what it looks like.... I have not adopted the negative connotation of the term. On the contrary, it is even like a small compliment for me. Not everyone has enough imagination. But everyone should be happy that they have something that makes their survival easier. I am happy to be a conspiracy theorist. I wouldn't want to exchange this quality for any money in this world. It is not entirely free to uncover conspiracies and frauds. It costs a lot of time ("time is money"...) and is called "education". A expensive / dearly bought education !
And perhaps it also takes a bit of luck to discover that one's own genes (in previous generations?) have not been so terribly messed up. HA HA HA !
Forwarded from Horizont (YT: _horizont_ )
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Komm mit mir ins FAKTENFINDER-LAND!
#Faktenfinder #SeymourHersh
(Meine anderen Kanäle: YouTube: https://tinyurl.com/1pz8slts | Odysee: https://odysee.com/@_horizont_:b | GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/_horizont_ )
#Faktenfinder #SeymourHersh
(Meine anderen Kanäle: YouTube: https://tinyurl.com/1pz8slts | Odysee: https://odysee.com/@_horizont_:b | GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/_horizont_ )
Forwarded from Anons17 🇩🇪BREAKING NEWS 🇺🇸
_
Und die verantwortlichen Politiker, die sich auch jetzt noch schützend vor Big Pharma stellen, meinen wirklich, man sollte ihnen verzeihen, alles abhaken und einfach zur Tagesordnung übergehen.
Link zum Original-Video: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628975543164055553
@GlobalPatriots 🦅@Anons17
Und die verantwortlichen Politiker, die sich auch jetzt noch schützend vor Big Pharma stellen, meinen wirklich, man sollte ihnen verzeihen, alles abhaken und einfach zur Tagesordnung übergehen.
Link zum Original-Video: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628975543164055553
@GlobalPatriots 🦅@Anons17