Mit stellen sich dann immer diverse Fragen. Vor allem, wenn alles so unklar ist. Ruhe in Frieden, kleiner Mann🥺

https://www.bild.de/video/clip/leute/letzte-aufnahmen-von-baby-rio-dieses-abschieds-video-zerreisst-das-herz-82239754.bild.html

Using foreign genetic code to trick body into producing foreign proteins that express on the cell surface triggers auto-immune attack and organ damage. Disastrous idea by BARDA and DARPA contractors sold to our government officials--should be halted. #courageousdiscourse https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/the-game-exploit-fda-expedited-programs-the-public-in-bid-to-repurpose-bundle-increasingly-ineffective-covid-19-vaccine-with-flu-vaccine-to-monet-3e4d3501

ÜBERSETZUNG :

Die Verwendung eines fremden genetischen Codes, um den Körper dazu zu bringen, fremde Proteine zu produzieren, die auf der Zelloberfläche exprimiert werden, löst einen Autoimmunangriff und Organschäden aus. Katastrophale Idee von BARDA- und DARPA-Auftragnehmern, die an unsere Regierungsbeamten verkauft wurde – sollte gestoppt werden. #courageousdiscourse https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/the-game-exploit-fda-expedited-programs-the-public-in-bid-to-repurpose-bundle-increasingly-ineffektive-covid-19-vaccine- mit-grippeimpfstoff-zu-monet-3e4d3501

To this day, the Infectious Disease Society of America and the NIH Guidelines do not advise prehospital use of corticosteroids in C19 illness. Conversely oral and or nebulized steroids have always been in FLCCC and McCullough Protocols. See autopsy data. https://open.substack.com/pub/petermcculloughmd/p/steroids-too-little-too-late-in-covid?r=14jb45&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

ÜBERSETZUNG :

Bis heute raten die Infectious Disease Society of America und die NIH-Richtlinien nicht zur präklinischen Anwendung von Kortikosteroiden bei C19-Erkrankungen. Umgekehrt waren orale und/oder vernebelte Steroide immer in den FLCCC- und McCullough-Protokollen enthalten. Siehe Autopsiedaten. https://open.substack.com/pub/petermcculloughmd/p/steroids-too-little-too-late-in-covid?r=14jb45&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

ÜBERSETZUNG :

Dr. Jesse Lopez mit aktuellen Studien und medizinischen Informationen, die dem widersprechen, was Fauci, Big Govt und andere sagen.

Of those found dead at home within 20 days of taking it, 71% of autopsies found fatal conditions caused by them including myocarditis, blood clots, and neurological injury. #courageousdiscourse https://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/336961-2022-12-13-german-study-of-autopsies-of-people-found-dead-at-home.htm

ÜBERSETZUNG :

Von denjenigen, die innerhalb von 20 Tagen nach der Einnahme zu Hause tot aufgefunden wurden, fanden 71 % der Autopsien tödliche Zustände, die von ihnen verursacht wurden, darunter Myokarditis, Blutgerinnsel und neurologische Verletzungen. #courageousdiscourse https://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/336961-2022-12-13-german-study-of-autopsies-of-people-found-dead-at-home.htm

Es wird die Nachricht verbreitet, dass, wenn er zu Hause tot aufgefunden wird und es keine Erklärung gibt, die Autopsie wahrscheinlich zeigen wird, dass die Todesursache auf die Aufnahme der Genspritze zurückzuführen ist.
.....................................................................
Message getting out that when found dead at home and there is no explanation then autopsy will probably show the cause of death was due to taking it in the arm.

#courageousdiscourse

Die idiotischen Energiespartipps der Experten

Da wurde doch ernsthaft vorgeschlagen, einige Teelichter unter einen umgekehrten Blumentopf zu platzieren, um ein Zimmer behaglich zu temperieren. Dazu sollten zwei Faktoren beleuchtet werden. Zum einen bringt man mit brennenden Kerzen das Stickoxid-Niveau in diesem Raum ganz schnell auf Werte, die das Zulässige auf den Straßen leicht um das Zehnfache übersteigen. Es gibt aber keine Grenzwerte für Stickoxide in Wohnräumen...

https://uncutnews.ch/die-idiotischen-energiespartipps-der-experten/

🇬🇧Arrest at poison centre, Manchester, 26th Nov.

They arrested one living man for speaking the truth, who was acting peacefully in a public place. No one had entered the poison centre.
https://twitter.com/Sgtnewsnetwork/status/1603024650375958530?s=20&t=5p0HKch0zMm3Q1-W7LrGxw

Immer mehr Nebenwirkungen - Fauci eiskalt: »Was ist denn das Problem mit den Impfungen?«

https://report24.news/immer-mehr-nebenwirkungen-fauci-eiskalt-was-ist-denn-das-problem-mit-den-impfungen/?feed_id=25663

Berichte über Triage in Wien: »Patienten liegen am Gang zum Sterben«

https://www.focus.de/gesundheit/news/lage-in-kliniken-spitzt-sich-zu-berichte-ueber-triage-in-wien-patienten-liegen-am-gang-zum-sterben_id_180457301.html

Reichsbürger-Razzia: Nun soll ein AfD-Verbot vorbereitet werden

https://jungefreiheit.de/politik/deutschland/2022/afd-verbot-vorbereitet/

Angeblich gibt es nur noch 83 freie Kinder-Betten auf Intensivstationen. Fehlalarm! In Wirklichkeit sind es 700. Wie es zu der fatalen Ente kam, die die Politik zur Forderung trieb, wieder Masken zu tragen.

https://jungefreiheit.de/politik/deutschland/2022/luege-kinder-intensivbetten/

Wie Merkel die Medien steuerte

Merkel und ihr damaliger Regierungssprecher Steffen Seibert hatten jeweils am Tag vor wichtigen Bund-Länder-Konferenzen zur Festlegung von Corona-Einschränkungen eine Gruppe von Journalisten zusammengerufenen. Dieser wurde klar gemacht, daß strenge Lockdown-Maßnahmen nötig seien. Durch die regierungstreuen Berichte sollte nicht nur die Bevölkerung manipuliert, sondern auch Druck auf noch schwankende Ministerpräsidenten ausgeübt werden. Letztlich stimmten immer alle Länderchefs zu, und die Medien diffamierten die Kritiker der Maßnahmen.

https://jungefreiheit.de/politik/deutschland/2022/merkel-medien-corona/

Letter to amend and send to your mp, doctors, local councillors.....NHS staff - this is in relation to mp Andrew bridgens speech 13.12.22
💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥

Letter 11 – Andrew Bridgen Parliamentary Speech 13.12.22

This is letter you can send to your MP following the speech in Parliament on 13th December 2022 by Andrew Bridgen MP. Please note that if you did not write to your MP following the publication of Dr. Aseem Malhotra’s papers on 26th September 2022, then you will need to amend your email slightly. It is always better to personalise your letters to suit your circumstances anyway.

Please remove this and the preceding two paragraphs before sending and remember to let us know of any replies you receive – northeast@ukcitizen2021.org.

Dear [insert name of MP],

A few months ago, I wrote to you raising questions about the accuracy of the government and NHS mantra, “safe and effective’, with regard to the Covid-19 “vaccine”. I attached a copy of the peer-reviewed paper, by Dr. Aseem Malhotra, “Curing the pandemic of misinformation on Covid-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine - Part 1 and Part 2”, which was published on 26th September 2022.

On Tuesday 13th December 2022, three months after Dr. Malhotra’s research was published, Andrew Bridgen MP for North West Leicestershire, in a debate in the House of Commons entitled “Vaccines: Potential Harms”, drew attention to the said paper and stated, “interestingly, there has so far not been a single rebuttal of Dr. Malhotra’s findings in the scientific literature despite their widespread circulation and the fact that they made international news.”

In his speech, Andrew Bridgen reminded us that this peer-reviewed research had concluded that the administration of the Covid-19 “vaccine” should be halted as a direct consequence of real world data indicating significant harms associated with the “vaccine” and little ongoing benefit. He also reminded us that Dr. Malhotra described the BioNTech-Pfizer “vaccine” as “perhaps the greatest miscarriage of medical science, attack on democracy, damage to population health, and erosion of trust in medicine that we will witness in our lifetime”.

Why have you not acknowledged these facts? Is it because of what Andrew Bridgen refers to as the psychological phenomena of “wilful blindness”? I urge you to watch the debate here (it starts at around 19:04:00):
https://parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/d0cc6561-6ab9-46ea-8d6d-f07ac0cf136d?agenda=True

And here is the transcript of that debate:
Vaccines: Potential Harms - Hansard - UK Parliament

Andrew Bridgen provided numerous references to key evidence to substantiate his claim that the Covid-19 “vaccine” is neither “safe” nor “effective”. Maria Caulfield MP, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, strongly disagreed about the content of Andrew Bridgen’s speech, but failed to provide any evidence in support of her position that, to the contrary, the Covid-19 “vaccines” are “safe and effective”. I would therefore be grateful if you could provide the evidence of the following:

PART 2 : SEE DOWN

PART 2

1. the evidence to support Maria Caulfield’s claim that it is the Covid-19 “vaccine” which has allowed the country to “open-up” again;

2. the evidence to support her claim “that all the vaccines used in the UK are safe” and “have some of the highest safety standards in the world”;

3. evidence of the placebo used in the trials for the Covid-19 “vaccine”;

4. evidence that random controlled trials were utilised in the trials for the Covid-19 “vaccine”;

5. evidence that the trials at 4 above were double blinded;

6. evidence of the “robust standards of effectiveness, safety and quality” as mentioned by Maria Caulfield in her rebuttal of Andrew Bridgen’s position;

7. evidence of the “extensive data” that Maria Caulfield claims illustrates the “vaccine is safe and highly effective in reducing deaths”;

8. evidence showing that the adverse events reported to the Yellow Card reporting system have been investigated by the MHRA as Maria Caulfield claims;

9. evidence to support the decision to leave the Covid-19 “vaccine” on the market contrary to action taken in the past with respect to safety signals for other vaccines all of which had significantly less adverse events reported than the Covid-19 “vaccine”;

10. evidence to support the claim (which Marie Caulfield would like put on record) “that the Covid-19 vaccines have saved tens of thousands of lives and prevented hundreds of thousands of people from being hospitalised”; and

11. evidence of the risk/benefit analysis conducted by the government in relation to the Covid-19 policies.
I have repeatedly reminded you of the Nolan Principles, but I feel the need to do so once again. You will, of course, be aware that The Ministerial Code requires Ministers to uphold the seven principles of public life: selflessness, integrity, objectivity, accountability, openness, honesty and leadership!

Clause 1.3 c of The Ministerial Code provides:

“It is of paramount importance that Ministers give accurate and truthful information to Parliament, correcting any inadvertent error at the earliest opportunity. Ministers who knowingly mislead Parliament will be expected to offer their resignation to the Prime Minister.”

Do you believe Maria Caulfield has upheld The Ministerial Code with respect to her position on the Covid-19 “vaccines”? If so, how?

Do you believe you have upheld the Ministerial Code in your interaction with me with respect to the Covid-19 “vaccine”? If so, how?

If Maria Caulfield is correct, then Dr. Malhotra, along with numerous other eminent scientists and doctors across the world, is wrong, as are the thousands of people (no doubt some of whom are your constituents) who have reported adverse events to the Yellow Card reporting system. Is their harm just coincidental? I would welcome your thoughts on this.

I shall leave you with this study to ponder (maybe you should forward it to Maria Caulfield for her consideration too), “Covid-19 vaccine boosters for young adults: a risk benefit assessment and ethical analysis of mandate policies at universities”. (https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/early/2022/12/05/jme-2022-108449.full.pdf)

Finally, I once again remind you of the inalienable right of bodily autonomy.

I look forward to receiving your thoughts and the evidence requested above.

Yours sincerely,

[Your name and address]