Counterfeit Continuity in Our Fourth Estate Wasteland
You really cannot scorn these loathsome, lying, false witness, reprobate “journalists” enough.
TriTorch
Nov 12, 2024
https://tritorch.substack.com/p/counterfeit-continuity-in-our-fourth
You really cannot scorn these loathsome, lying, false witness, reprobate “journalists” enough.
TriTorch
Nov 12, 2024
https://tritorch.substack.com/p/counterfeit-continuity-in-our-fourth
Substack
Counterfeit Continuity in Our Fourth Estate Wasteland
You really cannot scorn these loathsome, lying, false witness, reprobate “journalists” enough.
"The Matrix" Is Not What You Think—Here’s Why It Matters
How Your Perception of Reality Has Been Engineered—And What You Can Do About It
Erik Wikström
Mar 12, 2025
" ( ... )
Have you ever noticed how certain topics instantly transform reasonable, intelligent people into rabid fucking defenders of "obvious truth"? How questioning certain narratives—even with well-sourced information—can get you labeled as crazy, dangerous, or a "conspiracy theorist"?
That visceral reaction isn't defending facts. It's defending consensus reality.
Consensus reality is the unwritten agreement about what is real, what is possible, what is reasonable to discuss, and what must never be questioned. It's not just about specific facts but about the boundaries of acceptable thought itself.
Many of us hold nearly identical views on fundamental questions about how our world works, despite having experienced almost none of these things firsthand.
This isn't natural. It's constructed.
( ... )."
Full article :
https://erikwikstrom.substack.com/p/the-matrix-is-not-what-you-thinkheres
How Your Perception of Reality Has Been Engineered—And What You Can Do About It
Erik Wikström
Mar 12, 2025
" ( ... )
Have you ever noticed how certain topics instantly transform reasonable, intelligent people into rabid fucking defenders of "obvious truth"? How questioning certain narratives—even with well-sourced information—can get you labeled as crazy, dangerous, or a "conspiracy theorist"?
That visceral reaction isn't defending facts. It's defending consensus reality.
Consensus reality is the unwritten agreement about what is real, what is possible, what is reasonable to discuss, and what must never be questioned. It's not just about specific facts but about the boundaries of acceptable thought itself.
Many of us hold nearly identical views on fundamental questions about how our world works, despite having experienced almost none of these things firsthand.
This isn't natural. It's constructed.
( ... )."
Full article :
https://erikwikstrom.substack.com/p/the-matrix-is-not-what-you-thinkheres
Substack
"The Matrix" Is Not What You Think - Here’s Why It Matters
How Your Perception of Reality Has Been Engineered - And What You Can Do About It
TOXIC BY DESIGN - PART 21 :
The unintentional stun grenade by the Slovak government commissioner Dr. Peter Kotlár.
Even the most valuable solution to a crime can unintentionally push other important aspects of the case into the background. A small correction of the current news from Slovakia.
Suavek
Mar 14, 2025
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/toxic-by-design-part-21-the-unintentional
The unintentional stun grenade by the Slovak government commissioner Dr. Peter Kotlár.
Even the most valuable solution to a crime can unintentionally push other important aspects of the case into the background. A small correction of the current news from Slovakia.
Suavek
Mar 14, 2025
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/toxic-by-design-part-21-the-unintentional
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
https://sanityunleashed.substack.com/p/novelty-and-immunity-why-were-we
So close that it hurts to read it.
See my opinion in the comment. Surely this is no longer controversial among those looking at all this with great suspicion?
Best wishes
Mike
So close that it hurts to read it.
See my opinion in the comment. Surely this is no longer controversial among those looking at all this with great suspicion?
Best wishes
Mike
A comment under the article by Jessica Hockett and Jonathan Engler linked above.
Dr Mike Yeadon, March 16, 2025
Source : https://sanityunleashed.substack.com/p/novelty-and-immunity-why-were-we/comment/100959579
There was never an anything but lies and murder in order to introduce intentionally harmful substances into most people in the world.
None of the “tests” require there to be an anything in any clinical sample in order to produce “positive results”, either.
Other than lies, the only elements that “leaked” into the population were the fake tests and fake “vaccines”.
That’s why none of the Useless Eliters altered anything about their lives. Because they knew there wasn’t ever an anything, too.
I expect they’ll do it again.
You see, a major error we’ve committed, and I’m part of it, is to think it’s medical or scientific problem. It isn’t. It’s a crime with science-y and medical-y sounding characteristics.
What’s been needed from the start is non scientific & non medical pure investigators of crime. Occasionally taking inputs from some of us.
Scientists & medics mostly lack the wider investigative skills needed to expose this worldwide deception for more to see it for what it is. A ruthless coup d’etat of the entire world.
Dr Mike Yeadon, March 16, 2025
Source : https://sanityunleashed.substack.com/p/novelty-and-immunity-why-were-we/comment/100959579
There was never an anything but lies and murder in order to introduce intentionally harmful substances into most people in the world.
None of the “tests” require there to be an anything in any clinical sample in order to produce “positive results”, either.
Other than lies, the only elements that “leaked” into the population were the fake tests and fake “vaccines”.
That’s why none of the Useless Eliters altered anything about their lives. Because they knew there wasn’t ever an anything, too.
I expect they’ll do it again.
You see, a major error we’ve committed, and I’m part of it, is to think it’s medical or scientific problem. It isn’t. It’s a crime with science-y and medical-y sounding characteristics.
What’s been needed from the start is non scientific & non medical pure investigators of crime. Occasionally taking inputs from some of us.
Scientists & medics mostly lack the wider investigative skills needed to expose this worldwide deception for more to see it for what it is. A ruthless coup d’etat of the entire world.
Jonathan’s Substack
Dr Mike Yeadon on Jonathan’s Substack
There was never an anything but lies and murder in order to introduce intentionally harmful substances into most people in the world.
None of the “tests” require there to be an anything in any clinical sample in order to produce “positive results”, either.…
None of the “tests” require there to be an anything in any clinical sample in order to produce “positive results”, either.…
Why do many people believe in "Covid" myth ? - PART 3 :
Marcel Barz refuted the alleged statistical evidence for “Covid” as early as 2023.
Refuting the alleged "Covid" death toll.
Suavek
Mar 19, 2025
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/why-do-many-people-believe-in-covid-e7b
Marcel Barz refuted the alleged statistical evidence for “Covid” as early as 2023.
Refuting the alleged "Covid" death toll.
Suavek
Mar 19, 2025
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/why-do-many-people-believe-in-covid-e7b
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
https://open.substack.com/pub/bailiwicknews/p/on-the-absence-of-legal-and-scientific
This brief exchange between Jessica Hockett and Katherine Watt exposes starkly how the legal but unlawful powers are obtained & maintained, that deprived you of your rights.
There being no definition of a “public health emergency”, no right to challenge or even to understand the evidentiary basis for declaring such a PHE is what makes it so very dangerous.
All these powers remain in force because the new HHS Secretary, RFK Jr, has not apparently looked at it so he might still pretend that he doesn’t know that the PHE is just a story with absolutely nothing to back it up. He’s been written to by Sasha Latypova to fully brief him.
Best wishes
Mike
This brief exchange between Jessica Hockett and Katherine Watt exposes starkly how the legal but unlawful powers are obtained & maintained, that deprived you of your rights.
There being no definition of a “public health emergency”, no right to challenge or even to understand the evidentiary basis for declaring such a PHE is what makes it so very dangerous.
All these powers remain in force because the new HHS Secretary, RFK Jr, has not apparently looked at it so he might still pretend that he doesn’t know that the PHE is just a story with absolutely nothing to back it up. He’s been written to by Sasha Latypova to fully brief him.
Best wishes
Mike
The Arguments for “NO VIRUS” - PART 15.
Dr. Mike Yeadon : There really is no scientific evidence for the existence of any virus.
"Initially, it seemed an absurd notion, because of the horrifying implications."
Suavek
Mar 22, 2025
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/the-arguments-for-no-virus-part-14-9f0
Dr. Mike Yeadon : There really is no scientific evidence for the existence of any virus.
"Initially, it seemed an absurd notion, because of the horrifying implications."
Suavek
Mar 22, 2025
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/the-arguments-for-no-virus-part-14-9f0
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
https://open.substack.com/pub/suavek1/p/the-arguments-for-no-virus-part-14-9f0
Dear Suavek has ably grouped together my rants about the fake discipline called “virology” with other providing more details of the absence of scientific evidence for the existence of “viruses”.
Enjoy & maybe delve into any of the claimed “pillars” of pretend evidence yourself?
It’s very obvious once you decide to look.
Best wishes
Mike
Dear Suavek has ably grouped together my rants about the fake discipline called “virology” with other providing more details of the absence of scientific evidence for the existence of “viruses”.
Enjoy & maybe delve into any of the claimed “pillars” of pretend evidence yourself?
It’s very obvious once you decide to look.
Best wishes
Mike
Substack
The Arguments for “NO VIRUS” - PART 15. Dr. Mike Yeadon : There really is no scientific evidence for the existence of any virus.
"Initially, it seemed an absurd notion, because of the horrifying implications."
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
https://interestofjustice.substack.com/p/statement-by-whitehouse-ousted-cdc/comment/100892334
Putting out a slightly extended version of a comment made in recent days.
I do think this might be the mother lode of evidence that will persuade far more people than by going at them with evidence of myriad scientific frauds.
This, as my dear wife constantly reminds me, if because going onto full transmit mode had only a slight chance of being persuasive, a precondition being that the listener is highly receptive, because they’ve come to the conclusion that they’re not being told the truth.
She coaches me to recognise that asking good questions of the listener or correspondent has a much better chance of opening things up in the mind of the other person.
If they get a question that they regard as legitimate and they do not have an answer that sits well with everything else, if at all, they will not be able to properly rest until they’ve an answer to the question.
I’d be very interested to hear if anybody tries it & gets either an answer or just pensive silence, while they process it.
As I’ve said before, why is it that if you even question let alone criticise a vaccine, even if you’re not a medical doctor or life scientist, but a member of any regulated profession, the ceiling falls in on you if you won’t stop asking questions.
I don’t think this is true of any other domain, about which you can less riskily ask questions or overtly disagree with the official position.
Go near vaccines and you are going to be in career limiting trouble pdq. So, WHY is that??
I address the question in the post to which I share a link.
Best wishes
Mike
Putting out a slightly extended version of a comment made in recent days.
I do think this might be the mother lode of evidence that will persuade far more people than by going at them with evidence of myriad scientific frauds.
This, as my dear wife constantly reminds me, if because going onto full transmit mode had only a slight chance of being persuasive, a precondition being that the listener is highly receptive, because they’ve come to the conclusion that they’re not being told the truth.
She coaches me to recognise that asking good questions of the listener or correspondent has a much better chance of opening things up in the mind of the other person.
If they get a question that they regard as legitimate and they do not have an answer that sits well with everything else, if at all, they will not be able to properly rest until they’ve an answer to the question.
I’d be very interested to hear if anybody tries it & gets either an answer or just pensive silence, while they process it.
As I’ve said before, why is it that if you even question let alone criticise a vaccine, even if you’re not a medical doctor or life scientist, but a member of any regulated profession, the ceiling falls in on you if you won’t stop asking questions.
I don’t think this is true of any other domain, about which you can less riskily ask questions or overtly disagree with the official position.
Go near vaccines and you are going to be in career limiting trouble pdq. So, WHY is that??
I address the question in the post to which I share a link.
Best wishes
Mike
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
https://ncvalues.org/happel/
I’ve just been made aware by lawyer colleagues in the US, some of whom I worked with briefly when we were in Florida.
The decision made by the Supreme Court of North Carolina appears to run head-on, into the Federal law as described in the PREP Act (pandemic response and emergency preparedness Act) and overridden PREP.
Katherine Watt has researched the antecedents of the PREP Act as well as the 2005 Act itself.
In brief, the claim is that “For the greater good”, citizens rights are made secondary, in the event that a “Public Health Emergency” (PHE) is in force, as declared by the President or the Health & Human Services division of the Federal Government.
Anything that the HHS Sec had authorised for deployment into the face of the alleged emergency is deemed “a covered countermeasure”.
Anyone operating under a declared PHE is required to use “covered countermeasures”. The PREP Act holds that, providing you used covered countermeasures & there was a PHE in force, invoking the PREP Act provides full legal immunity to legal action against you.
It’s important to know that, regardless of what fictional scenarios were used in the US Congress in order to have it voted into law, a PHE has no legal definition, nor do covered countermeasures.
To paint an absurd example in order to show how malign this all is, consider the example of a handgun, which fires intentionally curative “projectiles” in its magazine. A duly qualified operator, working within an ongoing PHE and having been told that the “therapy gun” was deemed to be a covered countermeasure, could shoot you in the face and not be subject to prosecution.
In the case under examination here, a 14 year old schoolchild was forcibly injected with a “covid19” “vaccine”, against his wishes and against the express wishes of his mother.
Various institutions got sued & despite an earlier apparent legal victory handed down to the defendants in a lower level court, after at least two appeals, the Supreme Court overrode their legal immunity from prosecution (I think).
I understand nothing specific about US law, but this decision is seemingly much more powerful than the judgement of lower courts. For example, I don’t see how the Supreme Court Of The United States (SCOTUS) could easily declare their state subsidiaries judgements incorrect.
While that might well be possible (which is why SCOTUS judgements can be so far reaching), I don’t think such a case or challenge could so easily be kept out of the public domain.
Best wishes
Mike
I’ve just been made aware by lawyer colleagues in the US, some of whom I worked with briefly when we were in Florida.
The decision made by the Supreme Court of North Carolina appears to run head-on, into the Federal law as described in the PREP Act (pandemic response and emergency preparedness Act) and overridden PREP.
Katherine Watt has researched the antecedents of the PREP Act as well as the 2005 Act itself.
In brief, the claim is that “For the greater good”, citizens rights are made secondary, in the event that a “Public Health Emergency” (PHE) is in force, as declared by the President or the Health & Human Services division of the Federal Government.
Anything that the HHS Sec had authorised for deployment into the face of the alleged emergency is deemed “a covered countermeasure”.
Anyone operating under a declared PHE is required to use “covered countermeasures”. The PREP Act holds that, providing you used covered countermeasures & there was a PHE in force, invoking the PREP Act provides full legal immunity to legal action against you.
It’s important to know that, regardless of what fictional scenarios were used in the US Congress in order to have it voted into law, a PHE has no legal definition, nor do covered countermeasures.
To paint an absurd example in order to show how malign this all is, consider the example of a handgun, which fires intentionally curative “projectiles” in its magazine. A duly qualified operator, working within an ongoing PHE and having been told that the “therapy gun” was deemed to be a covered countermeasure, could shoot you in the face and not be subject to prosecution.
In the case under examination here, a 14 year old schoolchild was forcibly injected with a “covid19” “vaccine”, against his wishes and against the express wishes of his mother.
Various institutions got sued & despite an earlier apparent legal victory handed down to the defendants in a lower level court, after at least two appeals, the Supreme Court overrode their legal immunity from prosecution (I think).
I understand nothing specific about US law, but this decision is seemingly much more powerful than the judgement of lower courts. For example, I don’t see how the Supreme Court Of The United States (SCOTUS) could easily declare their state subsidiaries judgements incorrect.
While that might well be possible (which is why SCOTUS judgements can be so far reaching), I don’t think such a case or challenge could so easily be kept out of the public domain.
Best wishes
Mike
nc values
Happel Opinion
The North Carolina Supreme Court has just issued a landmark ruling in Happel v. Guilford County Schools, affirming that parents have a fundamental right to control the upbringing of their children under Article 1, Section 19 of the state constitution
The Arguments for “NO VIRUS” - PART 16.
Katherine Watt: Illusion that 'something is spreading'. Ben/US Mortality-Substack: The alleged 'SARS-CoV-2' genome is a random construct. Afterword: Dr. Yeadon.
And, for new subscribers and beginners : Simple basics of the Freedom of Information Act and the recommendation of Christine Massey's articles.
Suavek
Mar 24, 2025
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/the-arguments-for-no-virus-part-16
Katherine Watt: Illusion that 'something is spreading'. Ben/US Mortality-Substack: The alleged 'SARS-CoV-2' genome is a random construct. Afterword: Dr. Yeadon.
And, for new subscribers and beginners : Simple basics of the Freedom of Information Act and the recommendation of Christine Massey's articles.
Suavek
Mar 24, 2025
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/the-arguments-for-no-virus-part-16
The paid preachers of the completely fabricated "pandemic" admit the truth only piecemeal. Dr. Leana Wen, a CNN medical analyst, is one example. The SARS-CoV-2 lie continues to be perpetuated. Whoever owns the media determines what the "truth" is.
Dr. Leana Wen Admits Some COVID 'Conspiracy Theories' Were Actually True
by Tyler Durden
Tuesday, Mar 18, 2025
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/dr-leana-wen-admits-some-covid-conspiracy-theories-were-actually-true
Dr. Leana Wen Admits Some COVID 'Conspiracy Theories' Were Actually True
by Tyler Durden
Tuesday, Mar 18, 2025
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/dr-leana-wen-admits-some-covid-conspiracy-theories-were-actually-true
"MANY wicked things came our way with the WHO’s pandemic declaration, including lies, democide, propaganda, coercion, force, and fear.
None was a novel spreading coronavirus."
"Something wicked this way comes"
Still asking: Was SARS-CoV-2 a spreading viral threat?
Jessica Hockett
Mar 24, 2025
https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/something-wicked-this-way-comes
None was a novel spreading coronavirus."
"Something wicked this way comes"
Still asking: Was SARS-CoV-2 a spreading viral threat?
Jessica Hockett
Mar 24, 2025
https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/something-wicked-this-way-comes
Woodhouse76
"Something wicked this way comes"
Still asking: Was SARS-CoV-2 a spreading viral threat?