...
Breaking: Outgoing HHS Scy extends Covid PREP Act liability shield to the end of 2029!

As expected. The crime cartel needs its protections, desperately.

Sasha Latypova

Dec 10, 2024

https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/breaking-outgoing-hhs-scy-extends

Doc Malik
Dec 11, 2024
Doc Malik Honest Health

As far as I know, I am the only doctor out of some 300000 registered medical doctors in the UK who voluntarily returned his license to the GMC.

I am proud of this statistic.

I want nothing to do with a broken system and a profession that, on the whole, failed patients and the public during the plandemic and forgot medical ethics and the importance of informed consent and bodily autonomy.

And a regulatory body that is corrupt at its core.

I lost my registration and license but retained my integrity and moral values.

And I've never been happier.

I do not comply and I do not consent.

Source : https://substack.com/@docmalik/note/c-81023350

His Substack : Doc Malik Honest Health ( https://docmalik.substack.com/ )

Not everything in this article fits the current situation, where our best friends didn't believe us when we warned them about the "Covid" psyop. But the main point, namely the reason why 70% of citizens believed the government in 2021/2021, is right at the beginning of this article.

Best wishes,
Suavek

An Insight Into the Concept of Normalcy Bias in Psychology

In psychology, there is a concept known as normalcy bias, which explains why most people underestimate the threat associated with natural disasters like hurricanes and floods, and why people are plagued by inaction during a crisis.

Normalcy bias is also known as normality bias, incredulity response, analysis paralysis, and most interesting of all, the ostrich effect.

Mount Vesuvius erupted in 79 AD, burying the Roman city of Pompeii and its 16,000 inhabitants, in what is considered as one of the worst natural disasters ever. In hindsight, had people evacuated the city, instead of watching the volcano erupt for hours until it was too late, the situation would have been different. The Pompeii tragedy is just one example of disastrous events resulting from people’s inaction.

( ... )

https://psychologenie.com/insight-into-concept-of-normalcy-bias-in-psychology

DANGERS OF CELLPHONES
.. and Microwave Ovens

☎️ 5G or Not 5G? ☎️

Recently, I came across a report that claimed to test 5G technology, but it used a frequency of just 2.45 GHz, the same as your home Wi-Fi and microwave oven!

The study tested 5G in a controlled environment on rats with extremely low power, which doesn’t reflect the real-world conditions we face.

To understand the differences between various frequencies, it’s important to recognize their unique physical properties.

Lower frequencies, like those used by CB radios, can travel farther, penetrate objects more easily, and are safe. On the other hand, higher frequencies—such as the millimeter waves used in 5G require far more infrastructure. This includes base stations and boosters placed every few hundred yards to maintain coverage. These higher frequencies function more like high-power Wi-Fi than traditional mobile networks. 🛜

The relationship between frequency and wavelength can be understood with the simple formula:
Wavelength = Speed of Light ÷ Frequency

•CB Radio (27 MHz)
Wavelength = 300,000,000 ÷ 27,000,000 = 11.1 meters

•Mobile Phones (700 MHz)
Wavelength = 300,000,000 ÷ 700,000,000 = 0.43 meters (42.9 cm)

•Wi-Fi (2.45 GHz):
Wavelength = 300,000,000 ÷ 2,450,000,000 = 0.12 meters (12.2 cm)

•5G Millimeter Waves (24 GHz and higher):
Wavelength = 300,000,000 ÷ 24,000,000,000 = 0.0125 meters (1.25 cm)

As frequency increases, wavelength decreases, which leads to smaller antennas:
5G antennas are extremely small and highly directional, with a tiny wavelength of just 1.25 cm - similar to laser-guided military systems.

Personal Observations: Is 5G Really Active?

In my opinion, true “5G” technology is not yet active or available in my area of Worcestershire, despite what some phones may show on the signal bar. Many friends and followers on social media have reported a significant drop in mobile signals since COVID, with data speeds slowing to the point of being nearly unusable in certain areas.

After testing with tri-field meters, acoustic meters, and frequency counters, I’ve only detected 2G, 3G, 4G, and 2.45 GHz signals—nothing higher. Even when testing older “5G monopoles” and newer small cells, I’ve found no frequencies above these. However, the highest power output I detected on any so-called 5G monopole was in the small cells in Shrewsbury Park. These small cells are mounted on lamp posts or stand on their own and are less than 8 feet tall, pumping high amounts of radiation just above head height. These are apparently installed to help businesses take card payments during events in the park.

What About True 5G?

True 5G technology uses millimeter-wave frequencies above 24 GHz, offering high data speeds. However, these frequencies face several challenges: shorter ranges, and the need for a dense network of base stations and boosters. As a result, true 5G networks are still in the early stages of deployment, especially in rural areas like mine.

The Rat Study: What Was Found?

A study conducted by Tomsk State University in Russia examined the effects of RF-EMF exposure at 2.4 GHz (the frequency of Wi-Fi) from a simulated 5G base station on male Wistar rats. The experiment tested three age groups: juvenile, adult, and presenile. The rats were exposed to low-power 2.4 GHz radiation for five weeks.

Several interesting changes were observed in the rats:
• They started eating, drinking, and excreting twice as much.
• Their behavior became more easily manipulated, with increased sensitivity to the exposure.
• Blood changes were noted, including altered blood oxygen levels.
• Colon cancer developed in the rats following prolonged exposure.

These results suggest that even at low levels of 2.4 GHz, significant physiological changes can occur, particularly affecting the rats’ digestive systems and mental health.

You can read more about the study in this PDF: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-60862-5

#5G

Source


SMART METER DANGERS

...
A small graphic representation that kills. Worldwide manipulation of statistical graphic representation. Which psychopathic clowns do this ?

Can one do evil without being evil ?

Suavek
Dec 12, 2024

https://suavek1.substack.com/p/a-small-graphic-representation-that

Rethinking Burnout: Lessons from Adam Grant's Think Again
Instead of finding new ways to cope with impossible standards, let's ask why we bought into them in the first place.

Jana
Nov 13, 2024

https://coffeebreaknewsletter.substack.com/p/rethinking-burnout-lessons-from-adam

UK HAS A PROBLEM: Excess deaths are up a staggering 22% among 1 to 14-year-olds.

Notably, this trend didn’t start until “the magic juice started to be issued to children later in 2021.”

2020: 9 percent fewer deaths than expected
2021: 7 percent fewer deaths than expected
2022: 16 percent MORE deaths than expected
2023: 22 percent MORE deaths than expected

Furthermore, “Figures from the Office for National Statistics show about 10% more deaths (across all age groups) than expected since April this year.”

UK health officials believe “circulatory diseases and diabetes are ... behind the increase.”

EDWARD DOWD

The ultimate dystopia. Is everything already over?

"The majority of people do not even know when they act maliciously and why they actually do it."

A guest article by Werner Roth

Suavek
Dec 13, 2024

https://suavek1.substack.com/p/the-ultimate-dystopia-is-everything

This is beyond HUGE. There are tears of joy, not just in Australia but across the world.

The criminal malfeasants from our government health bureaucracy have been destroyed in Queensland Supreme Court.

Here’s what Dr. William Bay said after the court handed down its decision,

"I think the vaccines are shit mate, they’re absolute shit, they are killers. They destroy people’s DNA - and i’m telling you this Australia and the world as a registered doctor.

This is coming from a registered Australian medical professional; the mRNA vaccines are poisonous. They are bad for you, they are not good for you. They are harming your children they are harming you.

Everything you’ve heard has been there to deceive you. I have been vindicated in court today. To let you know the people of Australia that you have been lied to by the medical regulator.

The medical regulator APHRA has lied to you.

Justice Bradley in Supreme Court has today declared me 100% correct …. WE HAVE WON”

https://open.substack.com/pub/delingpole/p/bovaer-is-bullshit

Funny and accurate. This is a field James has researched extensively.

Best wishes
Mike

Adult Vaccines Reconsidered
Are They Unavoidably Unsafe?

Egerton Y. Davis, MD
Guest Editor - McGill University, MD, Professor of Medicine, Johns Hopkins and Oxford University

Dec 02, 2024

Sasha Latypova wrote about this article in a note :

"Nobody needs vaccines. They are all poisons. At best they do nothing. Please share with your loved ones !"

https://realhealthflash.substack.com/p/adult-vaccines-reconsidered

https://open.substack.com/pub/biologyphenom/p/newscottish-covid-19-inquiry16-dec

This is harrowing and cruel. The behaviour of those under strict instructions beggars belief and resulted in much suffering and premature deaths.

There’s no reason at all to think that it’s not representative of what happened rather widely.

Best wishes
Mike

An article worth translating :

PRIMO VACCINO A MRNA AUTO-AMPLIFICANTE VERSO L'APPROVAZIONE IN EUROPA

Il veleno si chiama Kostaive ed ha ricevuto un parere favorevole da parte del Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP), e se sarà favorevole anche la decisione della commissione europea, sarà definitivamente approvato.

1) L'ENNESIMA FRODE

Loro stessi nello studio principale di questo nuovo veleno sostengono che i veleni Pfizer e Moderna non servono a nulla perché hanno un'efficacia del 50%, perciò hanno proposto di potenziare l'efficacia dei veleni aggiungendo anche una replicasi proveniente dal virus venezuelano dell'encefalite equina, e hanno condotto insieme il trial di fase 1, di fase 2 e due trial di fase 3.
Dopo 92 giorni hanno somministrato il veleno anche a coloro che erano nel gruppo del placebo, quindi ciò renderà impossibile una valutazione delle reazioni avverse, che sono state studiate solo per una settimana dopo ciascuna dose: le persone dovevano compilare dei diari per una settimana dove indicavano la presenza di sintomi tra quelli proposti.
Per quanto riguarda l'efficacia, questo nuovo veleno raggiunge solo il 56% (48.7–63.3) e supera di poco l'ipotesi nulla di un'efficacia del 30%, quindi è anch'esso inutile come i precedenti.
Non previene neanche il decesso, perché il limite inferiore dell'intervallo di confidenza è negativo (86.5% (−7.4–98)).
Nella valutazione delle ospedalizzazioni hanno assunto che l'efficacia vaccinale verso la malattia grave sia indipendente da quella verso la malattia lieve. Ciò significa confrontare gli ospedalizzati con la popolazione sana, invece di, come sarebbe giusto, confrontarla con quella dei soli contagiati. Interpretare i dati in questo modo porta a risultati senza senso: è impossibile che un vaccino non abbia efficacia contro la malattia lieve e al contempo esibisca un'efficacia del 95.3% (80.5–98.9) contro quella grave.

2) IMMORTAL TIME BIAS

Il motivo per cui questo studio è spazzatura è però insito nel disegno sperimentale e si tratta di una fallacia così grave che merita di essere discussa separatamente. Lo studio prevede di effettuare in modo parallelo, ma parzialmente sequenziale, i vari trial.
Come si può notare dalla figura 1, il tempo di reclutamento che va dall'inizio dello studio, cioè quello della fase 1, fino all'inizio della fase 3b è lunghissimo, infatti la fase di screening inizia solo 10 giorni prima della fase della prima somministrazione. Durante il periodo tra reclutamento e screening, se piuttosto lungo, i partecipanti sani e meno esposti al rischio vengono selezionati e sovrarappresentati perché chi contrae l'infezione durante la fase di reclutamento viene poi eliminato dallo studio durante la fase di screening, in questo caso sono stati eliminati anche i partecipanti con parenti che hanno avuto una reazione anafilattica a qualsiasi vaccino, non rendendo il campione rappresentativo della popolazione generale.
Siccome dovrebbero eliminarli anche dal gruppo di controllo, il bias dovrebbe risolversi. Ma non è così, perché l'unico modo per eliminarlo è inserire nella regressione di Cox il tempo del trattamento come covariata usando i dati di tutti i partecipanti, senza escludere quelli che hanno avuto l'infezione prima del trattamento, cosa che nello studio non è stata fatta, perché come covariate hanno messo solo l'età del partecipante e la regione di somministrazione.

CONCLUSIONI

Questo schifo è già stato approvato in Giappone, che in questo caso ha fatto da cavia. La differenza con i precedenti veleni Pfizer è che l'mRNA contenuto in questi prodotti è destinato a replicarsi per un periodo di tempo indeterminato. In questo post ho già spiegato i rischi associati alla presenza del replicone, ed il principale è che il replicone si può unire ad un'infezione già presente ed aggravarla.
Lo studio che sta portando all'approvazione del veleno è stato condotto e finanziato dalla stessa casa farmaceutica che vuole farlo approvare, Arcturus Therapeutics, i cui advisors hanno legami sia con l'OMS che Bill Gates.

(fonte: Der Einzige - Il fronte intellettuale)

https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/new-york-city-spring-2020-an-unsubstantiated

One of the best ways to support an author is to share their articles. Jessica Hockett's articles are among the best in the world because they are very informative, logically easy to follow, and convincing. Please spread the word about your articles by sharing them so that the "Covid" lie is understood.

All the best,

Suavek

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

New York City Spring 2020: An Unsubstantiated Mass Casualty Event That Appears Fraudulent & Staged

Narrative of an ongoing investigation

https://substack.com/@jessicahockett

Dec 16, 2024

https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/new-york-city-spring-2020-an-unsubstantiated

“( … )

The idea of a respiratory virus striking a location out of nowhere and killing tens of thousands of people while leaving nearby areas unscathed offends common sense. Why Milan but https://x.com/digregjf/status/1698775435553980416?

If latitude/longitude or density matter, how did Berlin and Tokyo and Sydney see no real increase in spring 2020 deaths, while Madrid, London, and Manaus, Brazil saw jumps of https://x.com/Wood_House76/status/1784947778197627292?

Modes or speed of travel can’t possibly explain https://x.com/MartinNeil9/status/1683227268502388736 where the positive tests for the putative pathogen were most prevalent. No epidemiological model accounts for the wildly https://x.com/Wood_House76/status/1683218182436208640 in U.S. cities connected by thousands of flights every day. Yet coronavirus attacking New Orleans while evading Houston and Atlanta and Orlando is precisely what we are supposed to believe happened — and could happen again in the https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/next-pandemicno-pandemic

( … )

Full article :

https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/new-york-city-spring-2020-an-unsubstantiated

There is no scientific definition of vaccine in US biological product law.
Katherine Watt
Dec 13, 2024

https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/there-is-no-scientific-definition

Prof. Denis Rancourt also recommended this article. There are good reasons for this.

https://followthesilence.substack.com/p/profiles-in-courage-the-covid-era

Someone recently asked me about vaccinating her child. My answer is below.
Sharing in case of use to anyone else.
It’s not a complete answer, but may be helpful taken with other information.

Best wishes
Mike


Dear xxxx,

Until 2020, like an idiot, fully programmed by propaganda, I would have unhesitatingly have recommended that children receive all recommended vaccines. I had not done my research. I trusted the government and doctors. 

I spent my career in pharmaceutical R&D, though I had no connections to the vaccines division, fortunately for them as well as me.

Since 2020, I have realised that the entire field of virology is, believe it or not, fraudulent. Illnesses attributed to a wide range of scary sounding viruses are real. Measles exist. Mumps exists. Rubella exists. 

Here’s the key thing, though. None of them are caused by submicroscopic, infectious particles called “viruses”. There’s no scientific evidence for their existence. 

Consider this. When you have a headache, perhaps a migraine, do you ask yourself “Where did I catch this headache from?” If you’re unlucky enough to have chest pain on mild exertion, can you imagine questioning “From whom did I catch this dose of angina?”

If a family member saw you in distress, suffering a migraine or chest pain, do you think they would be fearful that they might catch a headache or angina from you?

You wouldn’t in either case, because you understand that these very real illnesses, these health conditions, are not infectious in nature.

Your family member would comfort you and not be fearful, for they understand that these real conditions are not contagious.

It follows that nobody has tried to kid you that you need an injected vaccine to protect you from migraines or angina, or to protect others from you, for the same reasons. You don’t “catch” these diseases & you cannot transmit them to others. They arise out of disordered equilibrium inside us, which mostly our bodies fix unaided. 

Now to the unbelievable truth. Exactly the same things apply to measles, mumps and rubella. They’re real, but you don’t “catch” them from others. You can’t give them to others.

It follows that the very idea of a “vaccine”, a mysterious mixture of substances, injected into your child’s body, takes on a horribly malign feel to it.

If these Illnesses are not caused by <insert name of fictional virus> then how even theoretically could an injection prevent them?

The answer is that they cannot & do not protect your child from anything.

Why has this field of lies been sustained & indeed grown?

I’ve done a great deal of research and digging into the dubious history of those we're told are heroic and clever scientists. We find they’re all associated with the antecedents of the supranational elites currently running the covid19 scam, dangerous so-called vaccines and lots of other awful things (eg climate change lies, overpopulation lies).

There’s absolutely no possible benefit to be had by allowing your child to be injected with vaccines. At a low frequency, children are harmed by them. I do not assert that all alleged vaccines are designed to kill people. I do say this about the alleged covid19 injections and I’m the best qualified person speaking out to make this judgement. I think the main reason for the decades of lying & injecting people was to entrain them to do exactly what they were told in the faked pandemic (& there were probably other reasons like profiting). 

You may not believe what I’ve written. That’s your choice and privilege. I’m not wrong about several, really central events of the last five years, like the uselessness of PCR based diagnostics, masking and of course the “vaccines”. If I’m wrong about certain details, the one thing I want you to decide is this. “Is Dr Mike Yeadon wrong in some detail? Or is he lying?”

My commitment to everyone is that while I may be wrong from time to time, I’m not lying. Nobody is paying me to say certain things. The above is my truthful opinion.

Please don’t allow your children to be injected with useless, unnecessary and potentially harmful substances. There is no possible benefit to them. 

Finally, and perhaps rudely. Please do not allow any thoughts you might have about what other people may think about the decisions you make about your health and that of your children.

Though not a friend, the person I recommend the most for educational evidence underwriting what I’ve said is Dr Sam Bailey of New Zealand.

Best wishes 
Mike 

Dr Mike Yeadon 

Ps: it is not the case that “everyone in the NHS must know all this, too”. Some do, but I think they’re the minority.