https://www.infowars.com/posts/top-economist-martin-armstrongs-computer-warns-2024-will-probably-be-our-last-election/

If you choose to watch this, you’ll have to make up your own mind about Martin Armstrong. I have him on the same side as me, though I don’t know him personally. Someone I know & trust does, however. It’s in part on that basis that I share this recent interview.

Best wishes
Mike

...
Lawyer Reiner Fuellmich

Lawyer Reiner Fuellmich is receiving extremely harsh and atypical treatment from German officials while being held in German prison on criminal charges. German law enforcement is making an example of Fuellmich, apparently to deter others from speaking out to the world, as he did, about the abhorrent crimes against humanity that occurred during the COVID crisis worldwide. Fuellmich is being held indefinitely in solitary confinement to send a clear message to all who dare to expose the truth and exercise their right to free speech.

Another activist, Johanna Findeisen, has been in pre-trial detention since May 2023. According to credible sources, Findeisen has been tortured and subjected to physically invasive examinations. These unlawful behaviors remind the world about the similar persecution of whistleblower journalist Julian Assange who exposed secrets about illicit government activities.

The undersigned members of the international scientific, legal and advocacy communities condemn these inhumane acts, which cannot but remind the world of Germany's dark history in the World War II era.

( ... )

Full article :

https://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/862/845/312/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

https://interestofjustice.substack.com/p/undercover-pfizers-principal-scientist

I’m in touch with Justin Leslie. He seemed genuine to me. He wasn’t asking anything of me or selling anything.

His courage ought to be infectious. Whistleblowing is still a thing.

Though neither he nor the person he videoed was senior, there’s more than enough evidence to be convinced that whatever was going on, it wasn’t a legitimate attempt to make a “vaccine”.

Best wishes
Mike

https://substack.com/@sashalatypova/note/c-68515109

Nested within this post from Sasha Latypova, you’ll find a recent analysis of the legal situation in the early 20th century in the USA.
Apparently, “vaccine” has never been defined in law, which is nuts.
You cannot hope to regulate that which is ephemeral.

Best wishes
Mike

https://x.com/BTCryptoMedium/status/1833826204610080895

I share it because James Corbett is awesome and dry, while dealing well with complex and upsetting situations.

Five minutes is just short enough to make it plausible that a normie refuses to watch it on grounds that “they don’t have the time to waste on stupid conspiracy theories”.

Best wishes
Mike

She’s saying no more nor less than I’ve been warning is going to happen, for coming up on four years.
The difference is she’s not linked the connection between “vaccination status” and mass murder, yet. She will, as soon as she twigs that the injuries & deaths following injection were planned and wholly intentional, occurring by design.
That was one of my earliest insights. Once that informed, experienced insight is had, noting nobody has ever even attempted to rebut it, I have my answer to why I’ve experienced unusually severe censorship. You do, too, don’t you?

Best wishes
Mike

https://pandata.org/germany-creating-capacity-to-produce-over-one-billion-mrna-vaccine-doses-per-year/

Old news now, from July 2024, but in case doubt creeps in about the intentions of the perpetrators to commit harm on an international scale, please read this short piece.

Best wishes
Mike

So overt yet unreported that the perpetrators don’t even feel the need to hide it.
A borderless world means many things, one of which is the end of democracy.
Democracy, or federalism with a written constitution, requires borders, a way to restrict who is in a defined area.
How else can a group decide what’s allowed, what it’s prohibited?
“Globalists” regard such borders and differences as inefficiencies, barriers to having what they want to happen.
Lacking any conscience, such people don’t need a set of rules observed by themselves and their neighbours.
They go where they like, they “do what thou wilt is the whole of the law” (Crowley satanic philosophy).

UN Conference for the Future – 22 and 23 September 2024. Complete, Borderless Digital Control

In less than two weeks, the United Nations will present during a special session – 22 and 23 September — of their 2024 UN annual meeting in New York, the World of The Future. It is a fully digitized world. For the UN AG meeting, a “package” of global digitization was prepared by the governments of Germany and Namibia. Of course, with the “help” of Big Tech and Big Finance.

Read here: https://www.globalresearch.ca/un-conference-future-complete-borderless-digital-control/5867564

https://mft.nhs.uk/covid-19-vaccine-vlogs/

If you’ve a strong stomach, listen to these very short videos from people who are propping up the 91-divoc injections.

They’re all horrible, but the one by Dr Theresa Kelly is particularly awful. She looks completely haunted, too, though this may be wholly my imagination. She looks away from the camera when delivering the worst lies.

Best wishes
Mike

You will probably be aware that some years ago, solicitor Lois Bayliss wrote to many schools and GP surgeries, warning them about the potential for harms to recipients of the then novel injections, allegedly called vaccines.

She has endured a multi year quasi judicial process which concluded recently with a judgement against her & substantial costs were awarded against her, too. The odd thing is that her communications were not judged as malicious, which I understood was the original basis for the case made against her.

I had offered an affidavit as evidence to underwrite her actions to warn innocents about potential/ expected harms. There were other witnesses, too.

You’ll see the authorities decided that she wasn’t to be permitted to have such evidence enter the official record. They paradoxically claimed this ruling didn’t prejudice her ability to defend herself. A real looking glass world.

Below are a couple of relevant reports & a Go Fund Me campaign link. Please consider a contribution, no matter how small. Though her fine was small, she has to pay their costs of £30,000 (reduced from £60,000).

Best wishes and thanks
Mike

https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/vaccine-campaign-solicitor-denied-chance-to-call-experts-at-sdt/5120650.article

https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/solicitor-fined-2500-over-covid-vaccine-letters-to-schools/5120766.article

https://www.gofundme.com/f/lois-bayliss-solicitor-defence-fund

Bill Gates Wants AI-Based Real-Time Censorship for Vaccine “Misinformation”

Microsoft founder Bill Gates continues with his crusade, as part of the mission of the Gates Foundation, to not only proliferate the use of vaccines but find new justifications to in effect, force them onto those skeptical or unwilling.

One of the methods Gates has clearly identified as helpful in achieving this goal is hitching his “vaccine wagon” to the massive, ongoing scaremongering campaign and narrative around “misinformation” and “AI.”

Gates spoke for CNBC to reveal he may be a vaccine absolutist – but not a free-speech one. He also didn’t sound convinced that America’s Constitution and its speech protections are the right way to go when he brought up the need for “boundaries” allowing some new “rules.”

Gates’ argument incorporates all the main talking points against free speech: misinformation, incorrect information (aka, fake news), violence, and online harassment. And, he sneaked in vaccines in there, while making a case for “rules” in the US as well.

“We should have free speech, but if you’re inciting violence, if you’re causing people not to take vaccines, where are those boundaries that even the US should have rules? And then if you have rules, what is it?” Gates is quoted as saying.

He was evasive on who the authority to introduce that might be, but he clearly wants censorship and wants it to act swiftly. “Is there some AI that encodes those rules because you have billions of activity and if you catch it a day later, the harm is done,” he said.

Source: https://reclaimthenet.org/bill-gates-wants-ai-based-real-time-censorship-for-vaccine-misinformation

I’m following Sasha’s (Latypova) and Katherine’s (Watt) recent delving into the history of “vaccination” and of the use of proteins in them.
I was of course well aware of what are termed collectively “hypersensitivity reactions” to foreign substances large enough to be recognized by our bodies as foreign or non-self. There were five separate classes of hypersensitivity reaction, for example, Type I is acute anaphylaxis, Type IV is Delayed Type Hypersensitivity etc. They’re distinct, because they use different biochemical pathways and different components of the immune system to set up & trigger the reactions.
I confess I hadn’t focussed on the possibility that, centuries ago, that injections might “sensitise” the population in ways that could compromise their general health without causing such obvious adverse reactions in most people that they’d make the connection.
I’m not certain that this is what’s happening, or is the primary thing that’s happening, and that it’s the main objective of mock vaccination (there’s nothing to vaccinate against….that’s all PsyOp stuff).
But it might be. It’s consistent with most of the observations with which I’m familiar, which doesn’t include what I used to think of as “traditional vaccines” (I now see them as last generation chronic toxins).
The ultra wealthy and royalty are known for disregarding the jab schedules, aren’t they? And some as well don’t participate in “Rockefeller pharmaceuticals”. You no longer need to wonder why this might be.

For my own part, since 2020, I’ve been steadfast in warning people that it’s hideously dangerous to allow anyone to inject you with genetic material capable of causing your body to manufacture a non-self protein. It doesn’t matter what is encoded, provided it’s non-self and large enough (ie immunogenicity enough) for your body to determine that it’s been invaded. In the case of the 91-divoc jabs, my additional concern arose because the injected material will travel all around the body and cause a wide variety of cells and tissues to mark themselves as foreign. That triggers lethal, autoimmune attack on every cell complying with the genetic instructions.

There’s a different concern here. If you’re injected with foreign proteins (or substances different from your own & large enough for your body to mind) you will set up a hypersensitivity condition. A repeat injection, 2-3 weeks later, will precipitate one or more of these hypersensitivity reactions.

The awful realisation is that injecting you with foreign proteins is incredibly non-natural and is very dangerous. There’s no safe way to do it & no healthy rationale to do it.

What Sasha is positing is the hypothesis that this alone, when it involves priming you to hypersensitivity reactions to all sorts of foreign, yet commonplace proteins and other large molecules, puts your body in a state of perpetual warfare with its otherwise natural & healthy environment.

When you eat a foodstuff, normally, very little to no intact macromolecules get into your circulation. Your body defends your interior, does not allow direct absorption from the gastrointestinal tract of intact large molecules such as proteins. Instead, it chops them up into tiny pieces whereupon they’re absorbed as nutrients. But once you’ve a hypersensitive gut, I expect you’ll be more likely to permit microscopic but real amounts of swallowed material to get absorbed. Now you’re really in trouble, with chronic illness & you may be unaware of what’s happened to you.

A key quote below.

Best wishes
Mike

https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/on-vaccination-as-intentional-induction

<<They're definitely trying to attack the pregnant women and children. I just republished my older article where I showed that it was definitely concerted attack. The pregnant women were specifically identified in contracts with DOD...for these mRNA vaccines, they're mentioning "We have 4 million pregnant women in the United States." And actually it's much less now after they've injected everyone. I think the latest number was 3 million, something..They really reduced the rate of pregnancy with this. But at the time they were writing contracts they said "four million pregnant women,"...as a target...
Why are you writing a contract for ...completely new technology, nothing has been done with it...before clinical trials and you're already targeting it to pregnant women? I was shocked at the time. Then I knew it was part of the plan.>>

Coming Soon: Denis Rancourt at "An Injection of Truth 2.0", Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Here is the summary of my planned presentation
Denis Rancourt
and CORRELATION

Sep 14, 2024

Since early 2020, Dr. Denis Rancourt and his collaborators have studied all-cause mortality by time (day, week, month, year) in hundreds of local and national jurisdictions. They have published some 30 scientific reports related to the Covid period (https://correlation-canada.org/research/) (https://ocla.ca/covid/). Dr. Rancourt was the first (2 June 2020: “All‑cause mortality during COVID-19: No plague and a likely signature of mass homicide by government response”) to prove that the so-called March-May 2020 “1st wave” of presumed COVID-19 deaths could not be due to a spreading viral respiratory disease but instead coincided with the 11 March 2020 political announcement of a pandemic, aggressive government measures, and deadly hospital treatment protocols.

Dr. Rancourt and collaborators went on to establish many results worldwide:

proven absence of spread (not a viral pandemic ― no evidence for a virulent new spreading pathogen)

highly heterogeneous excess mortality rates across jurisdictions

strong associations of excess mortality to lockdowns and political measures, in otherwise identical neighboring states

strong correlations of excess mortality to age, poverty and disability

striking impact on young adults, especially males, associated with economic hardship, including in Alberta, Canada

worldwide temporal associations between rapid vaccine booster rollouts and peaks in excess all‑cause mortality, exponential with age

global excess mortality in the Covid period (2020-2022): 31 million

global excess mortality associated with the vaccine rollouts: 17 million (to date)

persistent excess all-cause mortality into 2023 in many highly-vaccinated Western countries, including Canada

rigorous debunking of false scientific claims that the vaccines and measures “saved millions of lives” (or any lives), in Canada and in the world

rigorous dismantling of the Fisman et al.’s claims that the unvaccinated disproportionately harm the vaccinated

theoretical epidemiological proof that isolation and segregation are the most harmful policies for seniors during pandemic circumstances

Whereas respiratory conditions are associated with the excess deaths (are present at death), Rancourt and collaborators conclude that the said respiratory conditions were not induced by a pandemic-causing virus, and were generally bacterial and fungal while not being treated as such (antibiotics and established treatment protocols were universally denied).

Rancourt and collaborators distinguish proximal or apparent causes of death and actual or “primary” causes of death. They argue that the primary causes of all excess all-cause mortality during the Covid period were:

Biological (including psychological) stress from mandates such as lockdowns and associated socio-economic structural changes

Medical interventions other than vaccines, such as mechanical ventilators and drugs (including denial of treatment with antibiotics)

COVID-19 vaccine injection rollouts, including repeated rollouts on the same populations

Now if that is mortality… imagine the magnitude of associated disability, trauma, chronic ailments, and pain…

Full article :

https://denisrancourt.substack.com/p/coming-soon-denis-rancourt-at-an

...
TOXIC BY DESIGN - PART 7 : The most censored statement in earth history.

And : Dr. Mike Yeadon, Katherine Watt and Sasha Latypova : "Vaccinations" and hypersensitivity reactions to foreign substances.

The recommendation of the "vaccination" without safety data was a mass murder.

Suavek
Sep 16, 2024

https://suavek1.substack.com/p/toxic-by-design-part-7-the-most-censored

...
Prof. Denis Rancourt : The summary of his planned presentation. Everything was a lie: the health threat, the alleged "pandemic", "SARS-CoV-2 virus" and "Covid".

This was murder. Not a single life was saved by the criminal "vaccination" orgy.

Suavek
Sep 16, 2024