https://open.substack.com/pub/suavek1/p/the-rki-protocols-part-4-as-dr-mike

For avoidance of doubt. I’m more than aware that, AFTER the WHO fraudulently called a “pandemic, changes in medical management of many conditions were imposed internationally. The details vary substantially from country to country.
In U.K. for example, hospitals were much more likely to sedate, intubate and mechanically ventilate patients than previously. Further treatments such as remdesivir led predictably to many deaths.
In care homes, the scandalous misuse of sedatives and strong painkillers caused many vulnerable residents to stop breathing, a predictable consequence of administering these drugs (eg midazolam and morphine).
In the community, people with incipient or developing pneumonia were disregarded and not prescribed the “better safe than sorry” medication, a short course of oral antibiotics. Many died avoidable deaths from pneumonia induced respiratory failure.
Many of these unfortunate people were “tested” using a known-invalid diagnostic method, based on PCR.
Dying after a positive test result meant they were classified as “Covid deaths”. There is no such new, unique and clearly delineated illness. Yet, there’s your “pandemic”, if you’re expecting to see the evidence that way.
I do not believe “pandemics of severe, acute respiratory syndromes” are plausible, let alone possible. All claims for historical pandemics of this variety are faked, exaggerated and outright lied about.
Even in ordinary times, people fall ill & die. No one is saying anything different, least of all me.
But I am resolute that pandemics of severe, acute respiratory illnesses cannot happen & have never happened.
Please don’t fight me, fight the liars who intend to steal the freedoms of you and your family.
For some reason, many people have got to the point that they accept we’ve been lied to about almost every major narrative point in relation to the “pandemic”, yet insist there was a novel illness, and impliedly a new pathogen.
Perhaps there were local episodes of poisoning. While I personally have not seen evidence of such things, it’s not completely absurd in that those who set up these military grade psychological operations against their own people have indicated that this can be used to initiate fake pandemics.
Best wishes
Mike

https://open.substack.com/pub/woodhouse/p/difficulties-obtaining-raw-data-for

Jessica Hockett can’t obtain raw data for publicly funded studies. There aren’t many explanations for behaviour like this, none of them legitimate.

Best wishes
Mike

https://open.substack.com/pub/johnsullivan/p/what-is-government-for

I’m pessimistic about politics in practise because all those in & around Westminster, just to select U.K. for example, are compromised or worse.
Nothing will change because those in charge of the law books already have sufficient control that democratic forces are inadequate to force any change.
Saying all that, there can be no impetus to change anything while most of the citizenry is asleep to what has happened.
The first part of this article leaves the objective reader with no uncertainty about the degree of corruption everywhere across “The West”.

Best wishes
Mike

...
British mp that pushed the vax just had hands and feet amputated

LawyerLisa
May 27, 2024

Do you want to show this to your doctor or representative / local politician ?

https://lawyerlisa.substack.com/p/british-mp-that-pushed-the-vax-just

https://interestofjustice.substack.com/p/nuremberg-hearing-costa-rica-update

Let’s hope we can deliver written and oral testimony to a properly constituted court, ideally one with a jury and a live TV feed.

Then I woke up.

Still, we will present whenever we can, but I expect no dice from such a court. Go on, surprise me.

One major barrier is likely to be funding. Would you help if I was to set up some kind of mechanism to enable it?

Everyone is working pro bono except a professional court lawyer. They’re going to need paying.

Best wishes
Mike

Best wishes
Mike

...
“If the doctors did not inform citizens about the lack of effect, lack of immunity and side effects, then the corona vaccination became a serious physical injury. That means we actually have to put all the vaccinating doctors behind bars! And the politicians anyway,”

— says Prof. Andreas Sönnichsen.

An article in German :

https://report24.news/prof-soennichsen-schwere-koerperverletzung-wir-muessten-alle-impf-aerzte-hinter-gitter-bringen/

Join : 👉 https://t.me/QueueForBrain/15220

IT'S TOTALLY CONTROLLED"

Watch as British politician Andrew Bridgen reveal that the mainstream media is controlled and he EXPOSE how Bill Gates operate.

Did you know that Bill has donated millions to the BBC?

SHARE - The TRUTH is coming out

https://t.me/ABridgen

Never forget the fraudulent way in which "Covid deaths" were recorded.

Deborah Birx: "If someone dies WITH Covid-19, we are counting that as a Covid-19 death."

Anthony Fauci: "I can't imagine if someone comes in WITH Coronavirus, goes to an ICU, and they have an underlying heart condition and they die, they're gonna say cause of death heart attack. I cannot see that happening."

In other words, anybody who "tested positive" with a fraudulent PCR test and then died of ANY CAUSE WHATSOEVER, was recorded as a "Covid death".

Hit by a bus, but recently "tested positive" for "Covid" using a fraudulent, 97% unreliable PCR test? Covid death.

Shot in the head, but recently "tested positive" for "Covid" using a fraudulent, 97% unreliable PCR test? Covid death.

Committed suicide, but recently "tested positive" for "Covid" using a fraudulent PCR test? Covid death.

Can you imagine how high the number would be if the same methodology was used to record vaccine deaths?

Why did all the excess mortality start after the "pandemic" was over, from 2021 onwards?

And why was there less excess mortality in 2020, during a "deadly pandemic", than the previous five years?

Zero “Covid” / Null “Covid” / Zéro « Covid » / Ноль «Ковида» / Zero „Covida” / Cero “Covid” /Nula "Covid" / 零“新冠病 / ゼロ「コロナ」

https://suavek1.substack.com/p/dr-mike-yeadon-please-stop-referring

...
NOBEL PRIZE IN PHYSICS 2022 JOHN CLAUSER DEBUNKS THE "CLIMATE CRISIS"

Nobel Laureate John Clauser's Speech at the Competitive Enterprise Insti...
https://youtube.com/watch?v=fcnSXNb6qLw&feature=shared

https://open.substack.com/pub/francesleader/p/there-is-no-virus-there-is-no-lab

Here, Frances Leader details an hypothesis that widespread use of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) in the form of 5G has been used to render large numbers of people unwell.

I recently posted about my hopelessly inadequate knowledge of EMR, in case you ever wondered why I don’t post here about this area.

I am going to read this Substack article carefully. If you’ve time, I recommend you to do the same.

Best wishes
Mike

https://x.com/MarkAttwood/status/1795137301544116301

I know the surgeon, Ian McDermott. It’s great to have additional people speaking plainly.

Best wishes
Mike

“They did intend to at least seriously injure or kill her [Princess Diana]…she was about to go into campaigning on behalf of the Palestinians.”

Former MI5 officer Annie Machon on the alleged conspiracy to have the future Queen of England killed.

Dr. Cartland interviews pilot on his knowledge of chemtrails.

...
Gov Caught Manipulating Temperature Data to Push Global Warming & Climate Change

Weather Channel Founder explains exactly how the US government is intentionally manipulating data to fuel Climate Change hysteria for Agenda 2030 and Agenda 2050

Agent131711
May 29, 2024

https://substack.com/home/post/p-144404020?source=queue

https://x.com/Beck_Sall/status/1796072334928773475

This thread details offences by Merck revealed in court in relation to the mumps component of their MMR vaccine.

Apparently, since their clinical trials results were devastating, they simply hid them & substituted them with made-up numbers.

But trust the science.

Best wishes
Mike

...
Dr. Mike Yeadon about reproductive damage - Part 2

NO STOP ? = INTENTION !

https://suavek1.substack.com/p/dr-mike-yeadon-about-reproductive-f0e

Below is the musings by email of a friend who has, independently of my own meanderings, become very concerned about a new relationship between the state and the citizen, being based upon our spending, which is increasingly digital & could, at the drop of that, become solely digital.
Their concern is that this enables a “social credit scoring system” which could (I believe obviously would) become crushingly fascist.
Others have told me that, while their (& my) concern is valid, the system architecture implied to make this work at very high speed and accuracy just isn’t there yet. I am unqualified to opine on such an opinion. I do note that satellite navigation in cars works apparently extremely well despite there often being tens of thousands of vehicles densely occupying a relatively small space geographically, giving instant, timely and accurate information both vocally and on high resolution screens, and which copes without any impression of effort if, at any moment, the driver modifies their destination or misses an instruction.
The rate of processing to reach a simpler (yes/no) decision on a financial transaction seems very much greater in relation to satnav guidance than required to control spending, especially if the digital control of spending is initially biased to allowing your transactions.
In other words, I’m not at all comfortable relying on “it’s won’t work, so don’t worry about it”.
The perpetrators don’t need it to work perfectly in order to secure tremendous hold on people, especially if the people believe that the control system does work. The belief that it works would, it seems to me, to be quite sufficient to render most people highly compliant with whatever they’re told is “correct behaviour”.
In any case, though I share my friends concern, I’ve been shouting warnings for years that, undemocratic intrusion aside, it wouldn’t take nearly so much technological effort to get people to believe their digital spending rights depend upon having received the latest, WHO-recommended injections.
I’ll end this post here and drop their email musings in as a reply.
Best wishes
Mike

Money, the root of all evil. 

We now know who the enemy is and what they want to do next. 

Quite obviously programmable Central Bank Digital Currencies
pegged to your unique digital ID are the lever to censor your spending. 

Checkouts, payment terminals, carparking, anywhere you swipe your 
phone, credit card to pay digitally will be enabled with the central bank software
and cash will not be available.

Indeed, in many instances, cash already banned.

So, with a digital only payment system you have no options if your transaction is declined. 
If the payment machine does not accept your digital payment, you have no means to challenge it. 

The new CBDC systems, being piloted or rolled out by every central bank
in every country all at the same time is no co-incidence. 

The EU saying 'yes the CBDC is programable but we will not use that
functionality', who believes a word of that? 

Obviously CBDC is a talking point in the USA election with both
sides of the uniparty stating their stance for and against CBDC. But this is
not about the USA, this is world government, world finance, to ultimately give
the central banks control over your spending habits, enabling them the technology
to censor your spending based on hundreds of parameters.

Yes hundreds. 

Censored spending based on carbon usage, taxation payments, fines, credit
and ultimately a social credit score. CBDC offers the central bank an immediate
social credit scoring system which can handicap your own spending ability. 

What will that do to society? 
It will instantly make people more compliant, more robotic for fear their wallet may
be 'shadow banned', censored, or locked. This is ideal for the globalists to have ultimate
control. 

Back in 2020 the UN/WHO would have loved to have this sort of banking technology, geo-fencing people into their 5 mile radius from home is simple if their money won't function out of their local
jurisdiction. 

We need politicians in places of power ensuring that this level of money censorship is not
enacted on tax paying civilians. I still have hope that some countries have the control over
their governments and it is not entirely run by the industrial military complex, the corporate
fascist realms of big tech, pharma, blackrock et al, manipulating the government decision making
process in all regions to enable this level of control.

We live in a technologic age now. 
We cannot stop that, even with money. 
The lowest common denominator of the herd mentality is steering the technology addiction, the laws and ultimately our future. 

The obvious changes to digital money, which are rampantly upon us now, need firm laws in place to stave off communism and allow free market capitalism to thrive. If there are not bulletproof laws in democratic constitutions, akin to the first amendment, then the public is going to fall victim to this seismic shift in monetary policy. If the central banks and governments can install CBDC, with levers of censorship control via the programmability, then we will be living in a communist regime. 

How do we stop that happening? 
Will there be democratic pockets of resistance around the world? 
CBDC free countries, where cash is still in circulation? 

What about Bitcoin?
Will there be two digital payment gateways, one for centralised digital currencies owned and controlled by governments and the other de-centralised digital payment gateways that offer peer-to-peer transactions with no 3rd, 4th and 5th parties taking a clip on every transaction? 

These are relevant questions. 
We can see where the governments and central planners are wanting to go with this. 
Given we know their end-game, surely now is a time to install legislation that prevents this from becoming a digital prison, where people are fearful of saying what they think (and feel) because of the concern their wallet will stop working. 
People are already fearful enough, scared to post their true beliefs online, or voice them in the public square for fear of being de-platformed or cancelled by the ever-toxic social media landscape.....

this fear is driven from freedom of speech, but what we are discussing above is freedom of spend, the ability of the governments to censor your spending habits. 

https://suavek1.substack.com/p/dr-mike-yeadon-about-reproductive-f0e

A collection of stories and posts with a related theme: fertility & malign efforts to reduce it in humans.

My thanks as always to Suavek for its creation.

Best wishes
Mike