Queue for brain
197 subscribers
4.03K photos
3.43K videos
44 files
11K links
My Substack : suavek1.substack.com
Download Telegram
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
Anyone who ever thought Reiner’s trial was about money should revisit that opinion in the light of this legal opinion.

The authorities plan to convict him of something (anything) criminal because that will permit them to retain him in prison, potentially indefinitely.

Best wishes
Mike
BRIEF REPORT on the TRIAL against the German CITIZENS' LAWYER Dr. Reiner Fuellmich. The witnesses confirm his statements.

Car and other mishaps

Today StA John was present without the support of the chief prosecutor. Justus Hoffmann and Viviane Fischer were not present.
Defense lawyer Dr. Miseré was delayed due to a car breakdown. Tobias Weissenborn was questioned again in detail on today's trial day. He answered the questions put to him in the same detailed and extremely confident manner as during the last interrogation. There were additions, namely he was explicitly asked about his perception regarding the class action and the client terminations. Clients had terminated their mandates at the time due to the data leak and transferred their matters, or powers of attorney, to Reiner Füllmich. This means that he was instructed to reclaim the client's money. Marcel Templin no longer had any legal right to act as the representative of the community of interests in this respect, as this was also the formal legal responsibility of Reiner Füllmich.
Weissenborn gave his testimony meticulously and in detail, enriched with expert legal explanations.
According to Weissenborn, Templin's actions were legally questionable.
They should have filed a complaint and informed the bar association, he continued.
Füllmich had always relied on communication or the settlement route, i.e. ultimately on an amicable agreement. He was under an illusion; he wanted to avoid trouble or declaratory actions.
Regarding the loans, Weissenborn said that they could of course be utilized, as they all had sole power of representation.
Weissenborn confirmed Reiner Füllmich's statements and was a witness for the defense.

Finally, the chairman read out the preliminary legal assessment of the case, which can only be regarded as devastating.

PART 2 of the SHORT REPORT from the trial day in the proceedings against civil rights activist Dr. Reiner Füllmich (May 3): THE TRICKY COURT - after it became clear that the loan agreements between Füllmich and the company actually existed and that he was authorized to conclude these agreements, the court changes its prosecution strategy. It says: these were not loan agreements after all.... The goal: a CONDEMNATION AT ANY PRICE.

Everyone present in the courtroom seemed shocked, the remarks almost brutal.
As if everything was now being tried to construct what the witness statements did not provide.

The loan agreements were interpreted as sham loan agreements that primarily constituted fiduciary asset management. The chamber thus considered it proven that Füllmich had acted unlawfully.

The audience was confronted with a completely original interpretation of the law. Antonia Fischer and Justus Hoffmann, as co-partners, should always have been informed. In addition, collusion between Reiner Füllmich and Viviane Fischer was no longer assumed.
In plain language, this means that Viviane Fischer would now be completely exonerated. (Note: this is still a preliminary legal assessment).

She would not be seen by the chamber as someone who had done something wrong.
Attorney Dr. Miseré filed a motion to suspend the main hearing, as the defense has a completely different legal opinion. A transcript of this will follow later with the consent of the defense.

Attorney Miseré also stated that he assumed that the proceedings were politicized, which could be interpreted from the fact that Reiner Füllmich was illegally brought from Mexico to Germany.

Despite the exonerating witnesses, who gave detailed, expert and credible testimony, the chamber made this preliminary legal assessment.

In addition, further dates beyond 15.05.2024 until July were scheduled in the event that the defense wishes to submit further motions for evidence - witnesses.
The chamber made it clear that it was no longer necessary to hear further witnesses - supplement: that no further witnesses would be heard ex officio.

@wearegreeekja
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
A 12 minute video from Dr Reiner Fuellmich, dated April 29th 2024.

In addition to the heavily redacted documents from Germany’s Robert Koch Institute, analogous to the CDC in USA, proving that RKI was leant on my figures in government to prepare reports designed to terrorise their population, we have ample evidence of fakery from every quarter. You may have noticed a new Substack article under the bye line of “John Dee’s Almanac”, analysing almost 2 million visits to U.K. A&E (USA equivalent of ER). It is eminently clear that there was not only no hint of a pandemic, which I no longer believe are even possible, but activity greatly reduced in spring 2020.

The only thing that happened was lying. Triggered by the fraudulent declaration of a pandemic by WHO, prearranged changes to medical practice was made widely and internationally, from above the level of nation. These changes predictably led to a large pulse of mostly avoidable deaths, none of which had anything to do with a fictitious “virus”. Deliberate misuse of a clinical diagnostic test exploited the propensity of PCR to make copies of pieces of genetic sequence had previously been got up to represent a non pathogen. This knowing misuse created all the “covid cases” & “covid deaths”.

In addition to smashing the economy of large numbers of especially countries comprising “The West”, those same populations were coerced or even mandated to receive intentionally harmful material’s masquerading as “vaccines”.

This completes just one cycle & you what havoc has been created already.

It’s almost certainly going to be done again, with some variations no doubt. We are facing deliberate extinguishing of liberal democracy everywhere. If we permit even it’s philosophical underpinnings I doubt it’ll ever return.

Best wishes
Mike
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
It’s becoming harder and harder to be a successful conspiracy theorist these days. I’ve almost run out of such “theories” because they keep being confirmed to be accurate.

Best wishes
Mike
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
I hereby declare as in the statement below in speech marks that I do not give permission to Telegram or it’s affiliates & partners to use my words and photographs.

Best wishes
Mike
FROM DR. MIKE YEADON :
..........................................................
Due to the new telegram rule where they can use/share your photos and information, which can be used in court cases and litigation against you. Everything you've ever sent becomes public as of today. Even messages that have been deleted. It costs nothing for a simple copy and paste, better safe than sorry:

“I do not give telegram or any entities associated with telegram permission to use my pictures, information, messages or posts, both past and future. With this statement, I give notice to telegram it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, or take any other action against me based on this profile and/ or its contents. The content of this profile (and of this forum/channel/group) is private and confidential information. The violation of privacy can be punished by law (UCC 1-308- 11
308-103 and the Rome Statute. TELEGRAM DOES NOT HAVE MY PERMISSION TO SHARE PHOTOS OR MESSAGES.”

NOTE: Telegram is now a public entity. All members must send a note like this. If you do not publish a statement at least once it will be tacitly allowing the use of your photos, as well as the information contained in chats.

https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannelChat/60831
👍1
I hereby declare as in the statement below in speech marks that I do not give permission to Telegram or it’s affiliates & partners to use my words and photographs.

Due to the new telegram rule where they can use/share your photos and information, which can be used in court cases and litigation against you. Everything you've ever sent becomes public as of today. Even messages that have been deleted. It costs nothing for a simple copy and paste, better safe than sorry:

“I do not give telegram or any entities associated with telegram permission to use my pictures, information, messages or posts, both past and future. With this statement, I give notice to telegram it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, or take any other action against me based on this profile and/ or its contents. The content of this profile (and of this forum/channel/group) is private and confidential information. The violation of privacy can be punished by law (UCC 1-308- 11
308-103 and the Rome Statute. TELEGRAM DOES NOT HAVE MY PERMISSION TO SHARE PHOTOS OR MESSAGES.”

NOTE: Telegram is now a public entity. All members must send a note like this. If you do not publish a statement at least once it will be tacitly allowing the use of your photos, as well as the information contained in chats.

Best wishes,

— Suavek / Telegram channel : Queue for brain
...
I have expanded this article on my Substack :

TOXIC BY DESIGN : Statement by Pfizer`s former Vice President Dr. Mike Yeadon. With video. ( A greatly expanded/updated article ). :

https://suavek1.substack.com/p/statement-by-pfizers-former-vice

If you already know the article, please scroll down within the article until you find this new article :

Dr. Mike Yeadon: Anything with mRNA written on it is designed to be harmful

By Rhoda Wilson on May 8, 2024

( The picture published above is the identifying mark of the newly article ).
...
Dr. Peter and Ginger Breggin
Apr 29, 2024.

Desmet and Malone strike again: No one’s killing us; we’re a suicidal society


I don't know why it is like that, but I've always been of the same opinion as Prof. Breggin. I criticized Mattias Desmet about two years ago for the same reason when he first presented his theory of mass education. I found that Desmet applied the wrong emphasis to the topic of "responsibility" by placing too much blame/responsibility on the victims. When I wrote about it back then, I upset a good friend of Desmet, namely Robin Monotti. Now, after 2 years, I find it a bit funny that Prof. Breggin has the same opinion, because I have always had the same opinion as him. So nothing has changed.

I think that this dispute, as two completely different perspectives, could go down in history.

Have fun while reading,

- Suavek

https://gingerbreggin.substack.com/p/desmet-and-malone-strike-again-no
Here is the article from Mattias Desmet, which Prof. Breggin sharply criticized.

https://words.mattiasdesmet.org/p/suicidal-society
...
Deaths piling up! Do the global predators really want to kill us ?

Involuntary “euthanasia” (murder) has become one of the numerous strategies for crushing and killing us.


Dr. Peter and Ginger Breggin
May 08, 2024

https://gingerbreggin.substack.com/p/deaths-piling-up-do-the-global-predators
...
"Coffee and a Mike" episode #747 with Nick Hudson | Collapse of government and more

https://rumble.com/v4douvr-coffee-and-a-mike-episode-747-with-nick-hudson-collapse-of-government-and-m.html

Nick's Substack (I'm sure great articles will be posted here later) :

https://nickhudson.substack.com/

Nick Hudson is Chairman of PANDA : www.pandata.org , and of course also a subscriber to my Telegram channel . Thank you Nick and best regards,
— Suavek


The articles from the PANDA organization are actually top notch. Warmly recommended :

https://pandauncut.substack.com/
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
I don’t know if you’re aware of a letter written to President Biden from the 49 Republican senators in relation to WHO’s pandemic treaty and modified International Health Regulations. While this may be nothing more than window dressing, it is at least a public document.
Anyone reading it will learn that the additional powers that WHO would acquire are frightening in their scope and in the minds of those senators, unacceptable. Obviously we agree. It’s been pointed out however that our governments did not require some international treaty to deprive us of our freedoms in 2020.
Best wishes
Mike
👏1
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
https://open.substack.com/pub/pharmafiles/p/mark-your-calendars-get-ready-for

I lifted the letter from the US senators to the POTUS from this Substack article, which deserves your attention even more.

May 31st 2024 marks a protest & rally in Japan against the WHO nonsense.

Best wishes
Mike
👏2
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
https://open.substack.com/pub/drtesslawrie/p/the-notice-of-liability-delivered

I’m sharing this again because of an interesting discussion point below the article. One person could join the dots but observed that crimes against humanity required intent.

I provided some compelling evidence of intent, not even the half of it.

Please use it. I can reach only you, dear readers.

It’s due to extraordinary censorship. I literally cannot reach new people unless you help me do so, very actively, through your own efforts. If that isn’t of interest, I should desist for futility.

Best wishes
Mike
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
https://open.substack.com/pub/anitabaxasmd/p/shocking-treatment-of-reiner-fullmich

Dr Fuellmich is alleged to have committed a “white collar crime”, though he hasn’t received any proceeds of the alleged crime. Paradoxically, it’s in the hands of his accusers.

Regardless of the facts of this matter, does the process (which is part of the punishment) and steps taken feel appropriate & proportionate?

They don’t, do they.

He’s a POLITICAL PRISONER.

Best wishes
Mike
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
https://open.substack.com/pub/interestofjustice/p/i-learned-how-not-to-do-it-says-who

It is asserted here by the Chairperson of the body charged with getting agreement between WHO member states who are to be party to the latest draft of a treaty or amended regulations (it doesn’t matter terribly much which for the purposes of this short piece) that they’re not yet closing in on a text that can be voted through. Herding cats would be an easier task by the sound of it. This is encouraging at very least because it reveals I think that there’s still a limit to the powers of the perpetrators. I do recognize this might all be a distraction to put you off objecting.

Best wishes
Mike