...
Prof. Denis Rancourt :

The numbers paint a picture of an unimaginable crime against humanity

Source : https://suavek1.substack.com/p/dr-mike-yeadon-and-prof-denis-rancourt

https://correlation-canada.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/2024-04-25-Comment-on-Fisman-et-al-2024.pdf

This is a paper that strains me, because it is based on mathematical equations, algebraic in nature. I was a rare kind of school student in relation to maths, doing well at ordinary level exams, taken aged 16y, scoring a grade A. Two years later, I took the advanced level exams & I’d regressed, scoring so badly that I got no grade at all at that level. I don’t know if I was being trolled, but I was awarded another pass at ordinary level! So I’ve got two qualifications in mathematics, but only because I was so poor at it.

This is an example of how easy it is to mislead. With two qualifications in maths, I should walk this paper, no?

Anyway, this paper from Professor Denis Rancourt & Joseph Hickey demonstrates that papers by Fisman and colleagues is formally wrong and is furthermore dangerous.

My take is that Fisman et al have invented a term which has no meaning in the real world, yet purports to be a useful new term in epidemiology.

The new term is a “bullshit” activity, looking superficially useful but it’s a real mantrap of deceit.

The effect of this new term is, astonishingly, to compute that the more effective a vaccine is & the higher the % of the population who is injected and the LESS the vaccinated & unvaccinated mingle with each other, the GREATER the “risk” (of infection) unvaccinated represent to the vaccinated.

Setting aside the reality that there’s been no pandemic, that covid is entirely fictional and that in prior years, no one has demonstrated that someone sick with an acute respiratory illness can transmit their symptoms to others, the appropriate response would be derision.

This isn’t a mistake. It is intended to provide those who “own the science” & purport to be “your single source of truth” to have a bullshit rationale to coerce the unvaccinated to get jabbed. That’s what the paper dismantled by Rancourt and Hickey is for.

Don’t let them get away with it.

Best wishes
Mike

https://youtu.be/CmvwyuV7Uvk

This is depressing. It’s apparently a truthful documentary, telling you about how the authorities conspired to prevent honest doctors using their expert judgement to prescribe “early treatments” that might save lives in people suffering from “covid”. I fell for all this BS myself.

THERE WAS NO PANDEMIC. No new illness. Nothing changed anywhere in all causes mortality in the run up to the fraudulent declaration by WHO of “a pandemic”.

All these “early treatment” promoting doctors are frauds and they’re aiding and abetting the perpetrators, to convince you there was some new disease risk going around. There wasn’t. Therefore it’s illogical to focus on early treatment.

I must say, it was a genius move by the perpetrators and obviously pre-planned. Don’t hero worship the proponents of hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin and the like, because they’re not your friends. They’re helping the perpetrators.

By reinforcing the notion of “early treatment” of a non-existent disease, they’ll have helped reinforce the propaganda that there was a pandemic and that there might be other pandemics.

There won’t be. Pandemics are not real. They’re yet another hobgoblin, designed to frighten you into giving up more of your dwindling freedoms and ultimately all of your medical autonomy, because we know how this ends: everyone facing a needle containing toxic substances masquerading as “vaccines”. They’re not vaccines. There was nothing to vaccinate you against. There won’t be anything to vaccinate you, to protect you, against. Yet my expertise in “structure based drug design” rightly alerted me early to the dark realisation that these gene-based injections were designed intentionally to injure, kill and reduce fertility in survivors.

Best wishes
Mike

In relation to Dr. Yeadon's post published above :

I am one of those people who understood early on that there is no such thing as a “Covid” disease. However, I assumed that the ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine would help against serious respiratory illnesses. I have never promoted these medications, but I have also never spoken negatively about them. However, I criticized the fact that they were suddenly banned in 2020, leaving early treatment for seasonal flu untreated, which in some cases could lead to bacterial pneumonia and sometimes death. Dr. Yeadon's post makes sense, of course. If I were to state my own position on this, I would say it this way. Anyone who recommends the above-mentioned medications and affirms the existence of Covid is sowing fear of non-existent health risks and playing into the hands of the perpetrators. However, I don't know what could be wrong with offering such medications for targeted use against the diseases that these medications can work well against. My question is : Don't these medications work against the flu? In particular, I mean the early treatment of older, vulnerable groups. I would be grateful if someone could answer this question for me. My enlightenment work now also needs enlightenment to avoid future mistakes. Should the ivermectin be reduced again to a horse paste? What are these medications not effective against? And what about the antibiotics ? I thank you for that in advance.

Kind regards !
- Suavek

ENGLISH :
Here is the image translation of the above screenshot in German. The text here is very meaningful and understandable to me.Only the text under the screenshot confuses me a bit. I don't know why the GENERAL recommendation of these medications with regard to diseases other than "Covid" should also be objectionable.
................................
GERMAN :
Hier ist die Bildübersetzung des oberen Screenshots auf Deutsch. Der Text hier ist für mich sehr sinnvoll und verständlich. Nur der Text unter dem Screenshot verwirrt mich etwas. Ich weiß nicht, warum die ALLGEMEINE Empfehlung dieser Medikamente im Bezug auf andere Erkrankungen, als "Covid" ebenfalls verwerflich sein sollte.

I’ve added a note on Dr Ian Brighthope’s Substack which contains the video.
I think Ian is straight & put out the link to the video with good conscience.
Best wishes
Mike

Here is the image translation of the above screenshot in German.
....................................................................................................................
Hier ist die Bildübersetzung des oberen Screenshots auf Deutsch.

https://open.substack.com/pub/collapselife/p/three-diseases-you-need-to-panic

This is absolutely terrifying.

Snigger.

Best wishes
Mike

https://brownstone.org/articles/illusions-in-vaccine-effectiveness/

I have one main criticism of this article and the embedded paper it refers to & that’s that I don’t recognise “covid” as a valid cause of death.

Nevertheless, I think it’s instructive to read how the fakery of apparent covid vaccine effectiveness has been accomplished.

I believe Carl Heneghan has put a wrecking ball through such claims in the past, as well (as have others).

What is particularly interesting is that the same fraud has been confirmed in other countries and also extends to “flu vaccines”.

I’ve never felt at risk from flu & so always declined the “free injections” offered in autumn. Of course, I am confident in recommending that you & your children always pass on these ineffective & potentially dangerous injections. Flu isn’t something you can prevent with an injection.

Best wishes
Mike

The rule of 72 we use in finance for back of the envelope math suggests cancer mortality at this sustained CAGR implies the number of cancer deaths will double in 10 years.

Let’s all pray this CAGR does not accelerate.

EDWARD DOWD

Cancer Mortality continues to be elevated, featuring a novel CAGR.

Not 'skyrocketing' - don't use that term. Rhetoric specialists shift the focus to that word and distract from the critical path issue, as would a stage magician.

"Cancer exhibits a 6.7% elevation in excess mortality, along with a novel 2.7% growth rate."

This is extraordinary... because of the nature of cancer.

@EthicalSkeptic

Israel is being completely isolated on the game board.

The longer they choose to draw out their side of the conflict, the more alienated they become in the region.

This is yet another soft Devolution proof, with Donald Trump conveniently out of the public seat of power in the West, as the Uniparty War Hawks converge on the Biden Admin, pressuring the pretender to go to war against Iran and all its proxies despite the utter surety of the resultant World War that would break out.

The Russians took center stage throughout 2022-23, and now the Saudis have stepped up to the plate to exert asymmetric power projection to forward the side of peace with the US Military Industrial Complex temporarily hamstrung by the Devolution operation.

It's almost like the Sovereign Alliance has always been real, that Devolution is a worldwide plan rather than US-only, and that the Actuals are transforming the world for the better while the Narratives catastrophically damage the Deep State Establishment.

https://badlandsmedia.tv/saudis-reveal-plan-b-excluding-israel-from-us-deal/

Source :
An interesting, recommendable channel : https://t.me/KnewsQues/19533

Remember all the horror and panic over the double cicada brood apocalypse of 2024? I woke up this morning in the mountains of East Tennessee and realized, no cicadas. Zero. We usually have at least some cicada noise.

So I grabbed this map. See the brown area? That is one of the 2024 brood areas. The light blue is the other 2024 brood area. The other colors are other years.

There in hardly any overlap in brown and blue, meaning very few places will get a double shot of cicada madness. And East Tennessee won’t get it at all.

The narratives leading up to this had me thinking I was going to be spending a month this spring wearing my shooting ear protection and sweeping up suicide bugs.

As it turns out, it was a fear narrative built on half truths and exaggeration. They even lie about bugs.

https://t.me/KnewsQues/19534

I’ve been very sceptical of “shedding”, based on simple toxicological principles.
I don’t believe it can happen unless
1. The injected material is itself amplified or
2. Some people are several orders of magnitude more sensitive to toxic effects.
Pierre is flat wrong about the “pandemic” and anyone pushing “early treatment” for non existent diseases ought to stop, given this actively assists the perpetrators in preparing the public mind to be assaulted again by fear provoking propaganda and lies, like they did in 2020.
Best wishes
Mike

S H E D D I N G - risk for the "unvaccinated"?

Dr. Pierre Kory describes shedding and its consequences. Shedding involves the transfer of exosomes from "vaccinated" to "unvaccinated" people. There were no studies on shedding prior to the conditional approval of the injections. The gene therapy known as "Covid-19 vaccination" is - as civil rights activist Dr. Reiner Füllmich and numerous scientists determined two years ago - the greatest crime in human history. New pathogenic and fatal effects of mRNA therapy are emerging every day. Heart attacks, turbo cancer, infertility, thromboses, strokes, infant mortality - the indicators of pathogenic effects are increasing rapidly. There is no end in sight. Now "unvaccinated" people are also affected.

https://truth613.substack.com/p/roundupglyphosate-the-poison-sprayed

On the precautionary principle, plus much evidence of potential for harm from glyphosate, I’d recommend you read this. I’m unable to put in enough time to decide which observations are most concerning, but there is more than adequate evidence to suggest you take active steps to limit routine exposure via foodstuffs especially to your children and prior to having any children you may be blessed with.
Best wishes
Mike

Another great post from this channel :

https://t.me/BonfireBeach/7943

Rumi told us that the wound is the place where the light can enter.
Khalil Gibran told us that out of suffering emerges the strongest souls, that the most massive characters are seared with scars.
Marcus Aurelius told us that the impediment to action advances action, that what stands in the way becomes the way.
Napoleon Hill told us that every adversity, every failure, and every heartache carries with it the seeds of an equal or greater benefit.
Elisabeth Kübler-Ross told us that the most beautiful people we have known are those “who have known defeat, known suffering, known struggle, known loss, and have found their way out of the depths.

These writers have an appreciation, a sensitivity, and an understanding of life that fills them with compassion, gentleness, and a deep loving concern.”
That “beautiful people do not just happen.”

When Joseph Campbell outlined the hero’s journey for us, the premise was that at the moment of the deepest and most unmoving difficulty, the protagonist recognized that it was they who must change. That which seemed to derail the path was the pinnacle moment at which the true path was actually revealed.

In each case, the epiphany is that the presence of the challenge is the initiator. If we are lucky, our lives will continue to grow as we are presented with new paths, and various obstacles among them. To heal is not to arrive at a place where we are absolved of that difficulty, but where we no longer interpret the presence of it as our finality, our ending. Rather, we come to see it is as yet another beginning in support of the continual unfolding of all we will one day know ourselves to be.

In a world where most of us die before we are dead, where most of us hyper-fixate on what we cannot control and leave to ruins everything that we can, where most of us fear our humanness and our vulnerability — I hope you find the courage to try. I hope you will come to see that just maybe, beneath the journey you fear to take is the life you had been waiting for, all along.

~ Brianna Wiest

@beautyandwisdom

Another great post from this channel :

https://t.me/BonfireBeach/7943

"Our university is taking our tuition money without our consent and investing it in companies that contribute to the suffering of Palestinians."

A student at the University of Toronto in Canada explains why they are protesting.

One of the comments under the video :

Our Australian Prime Minister recently demanded that he speak at a rally because, as he put it, " I am the Prime Minister and I run this country". This is a profound example of how the politicians have forgotten that they are not elected to rule us but to SERVE us. After all, we not only elect them in good faith but pay their wages and their ridiculously large superannuation payouts. I have also heard our politicians call themselves the "political class." I thought we were living in a classless society. Silly me. This is the attitude that allows them to separate themselves from the general population, in fact to insulate themselves from the general population. Even the title minister has its roots in the concept of ministering to others, not ruling. How we change this I have no idea, but it is the change that needs to happen.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=be9zcujZK4o