2023-06-22 ::: There Was No Pandemic (essay)

There Was No Pandemic

By Denis G. Rancourt, PhD

June 22, 2023

This is radical.

https://denisrancourt.ca/entries.php?id=130&name=2023_06_22_there_was_no_pandemic_essay

Watch Steve Kirsch’s interview with Prof Denis Rancourt. Rancourt is now on record stating there is “no evidence of a virus or proof of contagion”!

https://rumble.com/v4cbk8x-steve-kirsch-interviews-denis-rancourt-february-1-2024.html

Many are slowly waking up to the reality that they were taught to believe a lie.

I know of someone who works in medical claims processing.
ALL ‘long Covid’ claims are from people who are injected.
There is not one from an unjabbed person.

I have to add something to Anguss' statement above :

There were unvaccinated people who claimed to have “long Covid”. If the human eye looks for such cases, then such cases will be found. A whole district will then talk about it. If it later turns out to be a mistake, no one will know about it. That's how fear and general psychosis worked back then. But the wrong tests did the biggest part.

I argue that if most people were aware of a very simple truth, we would not have to be experiencing a false pandemic. Such fraud would not be possible in an enlightened society. It is :

Where there is censorship, we are dealing with fraud and hidden lies.

Censorship never fights against any nonsense. It is there to make the truth invisible. Why do so few people know about this? I'm writing this because of this article, which I forward here :

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/matt-taibbi-supreme-court-justice-ketanji-brown-jackson-first-amendment/

Portugal court ruled in 2020 that PCR tests are TOO UNRELIABLE to confirm COVID-19 – but this ruling is still being ignored

In late 2020, a judge in Portugal condemned the widely used PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test for identifying the presence of the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) in individuals as being up to 97 percent unreliable – but this ruling is still being ignored.

The verdict, delivered on Nov. 11, 2020, followed an appeal against a writ of habeas corpus filed by four German holidaymakers to the Azores against the Azores Regional Health Authority. The health authority had been appealing a ruling from a lower court that favored the tourists, who claimed that they were illegally confined to a hotel without their consent, in compliance with the required 14-day isolation period for new arrivals to the Azores.

The 34-page ruling by the Lisbon Appeal Court reaffirmed the earlier decision of the courts that the four German tourists were "illegally confined" to a hotel in the Azores. The tourists were ordered to stay in the hotel after one of them tested positive for COVID-19 using a PCR test. The other three were labeled as close contacts and therefore were made to quarantine as well.

The appeals court further ruled that only a doctor can "diagnose" someone with a disease and were critical of the fact that the four tourists were never assessed by one. The court was also scathing about the reliability of the PCR test.

The conclusion of their 34-page ruling included the following: “In view of current scientific evidence, this test shows itself to be unable to determine beyond reasonable doubt that such positivity corresponds, in fact, to the infection of a person by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.”

PCR testing far too unreliable to confirm COVID-19

The Portuguese court noted that the two most important reasons for questioning the reliability of COVID-19 tests are that "the test's reliability depends on the number of cycles used" and that "the test's reliability depends on the viral load present."

There is a discrepancy around the world regarding the "cycle threshold" for PCR tests, or the number of amplifications that are performed. Each cycle exponentially increases the amount of viral DNA in the sample.

This number in most American and European labs is 35to 40 cycles, but experts have claimed that even 35 cycles is far too many and that a more reasonable protocol would call for 25 to 30 cycles.

The Portuguese judges cited a study conducted by “some of the leading European and world specialists,” which was published by Oxford Academic. It showed that if someone tested positive for COVID-19 at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher, the chances of that person actually being infected is less than three percent, and that “the probability of… receiving a false positive is 97 percent or higher.”

While the judges in this case admitted that the cycle threshold used in Portuguese labs was unknown, they took this as further proof that the detention of the tourists was unlawful. The implication was that the results could not be trusted.

https://www.brighteon.com/a64f1767-2c57-4bec-98f4-a209b51cecd3

Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia

High Court orders temporary suspension of Telegram's services in Spain | Reuters
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/high-court-orders-temporary-suspension-telegrams-services-spain-2024-03-23/

...
The design of mRNA technology alone is inherently cancer-promoting. Just a few examples :

N1-methylpseudouridylation of mRNA causes +1 ribosomal frameshifting

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06800-3

The title says that pseudouracil, which is used instead of uracil, in contrast to the native mRNA in the modified mRNA of the gene injections, can cause so-called +1 frameshift reading errors in the ribosomes. It's a reading frameshift, one of the most brutal mutations we know. Pseudouracil is used by the manufacturers of the gene injection in exchange for the physiological uracil to significantly increase the shelf life of the mRNA in the cell (usually 10-12 hours), days, weeks, months - no one knows for sure. Incidentally, this is a serious mistake in the approval process; one of the basic principles of pharmacokinetics is to characterize the duration of effectiveness. Well, this pseudouracil is not physiological and, according to the Nature article, causes RNA reading errors. To do this, you have to understand protein biosynthesis in detail.

For those of you outraged by field interrogation methods, I would advise not committing acts of terror and killing innocents.

The only reason you’re seeing this image is because Putin wants you to see it.

This is a deterrent to future terrorists. Your humanity is forfeit.

Did you all notice the lack in public outrage over the attack in Moscow, juxtaposed to past acts of terror?

The masses already forgot they changed their profile pictures to French flags in 2015 after the 11/13 attacks.

It confirms the sheep are only outraged when instructed.

So the New York Times admit the Deep State is real… but that it’s actually a good thing!

Someone might want to inform the Ukrainian flag-wavers and blue-haired whales in my comments, because they have been assuring me for YEARS that the Deep State is “not real”.

2016: “There is no crisis at the border!”

2024: “Okay maybe there is a crisis at the border… BUT IT’S TRUMP’S FAULT!”

2016: “The Deep State is a far-right QAnon conspiracy theory!”

2024: “Okay maybe the Deep State is real… BUT IT’S ACTUALLY A GOOD THING!”

2016: “Epstein island is not real and human-trafficking/pedophilia is a conspiracy theory!”

2024: “Okay maybe Epstein island and human-trafficking/pedophilia is real… BUT IT’S TRUMP’S FAULT!”

2016: “The media is not fake news! That’s a far-right conspiracy theory!”

2024: “Okay maybe we lied about some stuff… BUT WE DID IT TO STOP TRUMP!”

I could do this forever.

The FDA has agreed to take down social media posts and online materials cautioning against the use of ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19, following a lawsuit filed by three doctors in 2022.

Badlands Media

https://odysee.com/@TheGreaterReset:4/Jason-Christoff-tgr5:f

Well, this is very interesting! I was aware of mind control in the context of rock & pop music and the activities of the Tavistock (U.K.) & the Stanford Research Institute (USA).

I had guessed that TV was an important means of mind control, but only after I’d stopped watching it completely (late spring 2020).

I didn’t know quite how powerful this technique is, how it’s victims are in general completely unaware of what is being done to them & that this extends to all media formats.

I encourage you to watch this and share it with your circle.

Best wishes
Mike

Gm

https://rumble.com/v4kc73l-dr-mike-yeadon.html

An oral presentation given recently to the International group, “Doctors4CovidEthics”.

Approximately 4min to 42min is my description of more or less what I tried to communicate in my letter to the Metropolitan Police.
1. My background & credentials to comment.
2. The alleged pandemic.
3. The multiple, independent modes of toxicity, built-in to the so-called vaccines.

I challenge anyone, by the end, to not think, as I do, that the motivation for the injections was to injure, kill & reduce fertility in survivors.

Please do share. New listeners won’t want to hear this. I understand that. However, it is only by gaining an understanding of what has been done to us can we hope to resist further attacks.

Best wishes and thanks,
Mike