https://youtu.be/qaSGHabq1RU

This fellow is alert to some of the dangers of losing access to cash & especially if it’s formally abolished.

I repeat my assertion that there are no legitimate grounds ever to abolish cash. Any government seeking to do so is criminal and must be resisted by any means necessary.

Best wishes
Mike

We do not want it, we did not request it. I think what would be very beneficial is if everyone on here research banking and how money is created. See Prof Richard Werner explain it on YT or Rumble. Some people are going to be shocked. Also, research your sovereignty and your standing lawfully as opposed to a legal person/corporate fiction. Once you understand the deception you can move forward. It's ALL a giant CON game.

Gleich live aus London...

Streams von Paul:

Youtube
https://www.youtube.com/@DauerwelleDemoReport

Dlive
https://dlive.tv/paulsshop.de

Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/lisaymea.hirsch

Stream von Songül:
https://x.com/SonguelSunny

Streams von Chris:

Twitter: twitter.com/KlartextRM
Dlive: cutt.ly/KwBnMLWU
Instagram: instagram.com/klartextrm/
Telegram: t.me/klartext_rheinmain

Für mehr Berichte folgen auf...
t.me/dauerwelleDemoReport

...
Groundbreaking Global Study on 99 Million Vaccinated People Reveals Increases in Neurological, Blood, and Heart Conditions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccines

COVID-19 vaccines and adverse events of special interest: A multinational Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) cohort study of 99 million vaccinated individuals

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24001270?via%3Dihub

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/02/groundbreaking-global-study-99-million-vaccinated-people-reveals/

...
The title should actually be : "Research made easy" !

Research : Online access to suspected side effects reports. Also important for veterinary medicine and “Covid” bioweapons.

EudraVigilance - European database of suspected adverse drug reaction reports.

The most important data seems to be somewhat hidden on this website. This is how the idea for this article was born: the time-consuming search should be simplified.

https://suavek1.substack.com/p/researching-online-access-to-suspected

Join 👉 https://t.me/QueueForBrain

...
The covid booster cancer time bomb

By Professor Angus Dalgleish

"I HAVE previously reported on my concern about the rise in stable cancer relapses that I have witnessed in my melanoma clinic.

None of these patients of mine presented with the classic prodrome of relapse that I had always noticed previously, such as severe depression due to bereavement, divorce or bankruptcy. Indeed the only thing I found they had in common was to have had a recent booster mRNA covid vaccine. I phoned around my colleagues not only in the UK but also in Australia to check their experience. In no case did they deny such a link. Indeed, they were equally alarmed at the association between booster vaccines and relapse that they too were witnessing, as well an increase in new cancers, particularly in those below 50 years old. In addition to melanoma these colleagues were also very concerned about a sudden big increase in young patients with colorectal cancer.(...)."

https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/the-covid-booster-cancer-time-bomb/

@DocAhmadMalik admits - "I was late to the party" - not a shame for a busy orthopedic surgeon with a young family.
Since attending the party, he gives it his all, thus lost job and income.
Please consider supporting Ahmad by subscribing to his substack.

Join 👉 https://t.me/QueueForBrain

...
Prof. Norman Fenton`s evidence of the "pandemic" scam and his selected works on exposing fraudulent scientific studies.

Where are the numbers ?

https://suavek1.substack.com/p/prof-norman-fenton-the-evidence-of

Join 👉 https://t.me/QueueForBrain/14050

In my last post, I mentioned that “public health emergency” laws have been subverted over decades to be where we now are.
Within a few emails, I noticed this from Katherine Watt, paralegal, who as far as I know, is the world’s leading authority on the subject (the exception of course is senior government lawyers who presumably drew up some of the more recent changes).
Some people hear the outline and baulk. They refuse to believe it, and of course, if they really don’t believe it, they mostly won’t review the evidence.
It’s quite convoluted but it ends with the Alice In Wonderland situation where a senior government official, a lawyer, has the responsibility for deciding whether or not to authorise, for massed human use, a treatment incorporating novel technology which is intrinsically injurious, while declining to look at what many believe is clinical trials data (but isn’t, check the article).

Stepwise alterations to private property laws have been changed in analogous ways, and each step looks pretty inconsequential here, too.

There is an old saying that “Ignorance is bliss”. Whatever else you think about a circumstance where you’re under attack, I doubt you can stand this up.

I think the perpetrators are counting on few people even being vaguely aware of these two sets of law changes.

After all, Katherine Watt’s opening remarks are sobering. However, I have to point out that, like doctors, lawyers everywhere are members of a regulated profession.

The particular point of this article is to contrast the lash-up that is the floppiness of the emergency use authorization of dangerous products with the precision you’ll be required to meet if ever you were to attempt to make a claim for injury by such a product.

Best wishes
Mike

The message above from Mike Yeadon forwarded here is very important. That's why I'm posting a translation of the picture above in German right below. Then I copy a few important comments :

Quelle : https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/699

In meinem letzten Beitrag habe ich erwähnt, dass die Gesetze zum „Notstand im Bereich der öffentlichen Gesundheit“ über Jahrzehnte hinweg untergraben wurden, um zu dem zu gelangen, was wir jetzt sind.
Innerhalb weniger E-Mails bemerkte ich dies von Katherine Watt, Rechtsanwaltsfachangestellte, die meines Wissens die weltweit führende Autorität auf diesem Gebiet ist (mit Ausnahme natürlich hochrangiger Regierungsanwälte, die vermutlich einige der neueren Änderungen ausgearbeitet haben).
Manche Leute hören die Umrisse und scheuen sich. Sie weigern sich, es zu glauben, und wenn sie es wirklich nicht glauben, werden sie die Beweise natürlich größtenteils nicht überprüfen.
Es ist ziemlich verworren, aber es endet mit der Situation von Alice im Wunderland, in der ein hochrangiger Regierungsbeamter, ein Anwalt, die Verantwortung dafür trägt, zu entscheiden, ob er eine Behandlung mit neuartiger Technologie, die an sich schädlich ist, für den Massengebrauch beim Menschen genehmigen soll oder nicht, obwohl er dies ablehnt Schauen Sie sich an, was viele für Daten aus klinischen Studien halten (was aber nicht der Fall ist, lesen Sie den Artikel).

Schrittweise Änderungen im Privateigentumsrecht wurden in analoger Weise geändert, und auch hier sieht jeder Schritt ziemlich belanglos aus.

Es gibt ein altes Sprichwort: „Unwissenheit ist Glückseligkeit“. Was auch immer Sie sonst noch über die Situation denken, in der Sie angegriffen werden, ich bezweifle, dass Sie dem standhalten können.

Ich denke, die Täter rechnen damit, dass nur wenige Menschen sich dieser beiden Gesetzesänderungen auch nur annähernd bewusst sind.

Immerhin sind die Eröffnungsreden von Katherine Watt ernüchternd. Allerdings muss ich darauf hinweisen, dass Rechtsanwälte überall wie Ärzte einem reglementierten Beruf angehören.

Der besondere Sinn dieses Artikels besteht darin, die Unzulänglichkeit der Notfallgenehmigung für gefährliche Produkte mit der Präzision zu vergleichen, die Sie einhalten müssen, wenn Sie jemals versuchen sollten, einen Schadensersatzanspruch wegen einer Verletzung durch ein solches Produkt geltend zu machen Produkt.

Beste Wünsche
Mike

Quelle : https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/699

My car in for Mot ,chatted to retired & Magistrate he retired from the later 7 years ago.. in just 5 mins I red pilled him, mentioning Chef Police Officers didt respond to being served twice with a mountain of concerns & evidence over 2 years ago & Police told to ignore public, Justice system obviously broken, as someone who used to teach in a prison I see more Criminals in so called Government & Media & all our main vital services. I threw into the Mix Shares in companies , this poor man chocked back & said he couldn’t disagree, I then said time to speak to everyone you know as we are being totally gaslighted.

https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannelChat/40044

The difference in the US is that we have the US Constitution and each state has their own State Constitution.

In each, the People are the masters of their servants (three branches of government) and in all these express written trusts it is the People who authorize the limited powers of their servants. The confiscation of property, removal of coin, and forced jabs are all unconstitutional. The People have inalienable rights granted by God that cannot be infringed by government or other people.

The Constitution is the supreme law of the land (Common / Fundamental Law) and no statute, ordinance, case law, etc., can go against this.

Now, this does not mean that lawyers, judges, and legislatures do not create / uphold / argue for laws that do go against the Constitution. Just the opposite. They do it all the time.

Forced jabs, digital currency, illegal confiscation of property - or children - (without due process and trial by jury in a Court of Record) in the US only occurs when people don’t know (1) the Bible, (2) their Rights, and (3) the Constitution.

No other nation has such a powerful tool to be wielded by its People against a tyrannical government.

I’m not sure how, other than by honorable God-fearing officials leading to protect the People in Europe, or by revolt of the People, this will change.

The farmers are at the revolt stage, so it will be interesting to see how that is resolved. If the farmers are successful, then that’s the example for the people. Hopefully nom-violent.

And if that happens, the People should demand every nation and each province / state in each nation creates a Constitution based on what we have in the US. Including 2nd Amendment right to bear arms … it’s much easier for a despotic and tyrannical government to control an unarmed population.

https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannelChat/40050

i hope we're aware of the likelihood that the farmers' mass protests are financed & organized by those with the power & resources to do so. the proof will be in the results. if the results are increased public hardship, aggravated divisions between us & rejection of public institutions & government, call it mission accomplished.
eyes open always. invest in no heroes but you. this way we thrive & we win.

https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannelChat/40061

https://truthforhealthfoundation.substack.com/p/the-great-taking-you-really-own-nothing

I probably shared this a week ago, but it’s so centrally important to the main claim associated with The Great Reset (that “You will own nothing…”) that I thought it worth posting it here again.

If you don’t own much today anyway, you might think this doesn’t apply to you. I understand why that reaction could be commonplace. What those with no scope to resist will face (if & when the perpetrators trigger the next & very much larger global financial crisis) is loss of freedom.

Several of us, independently, expect (at some point) abolition of cash and seizure of all assets held by a custodian (such as a bank deposit taker, a building society mortgage provider, an online execution-only broker holding a SIPP (pension), a life insurance company responsible for paying a final salary pension on behalf of a former employer, possibly even a car dealer or car finance house.

It seems to some people completely ridiculous and implausible. Those with such a reaction tend not to bother listening to the evidence.

So were the decade by decade changes to public health emergency laws, the changes that made the unlawful, legal on paper, so that billions of people ended up rolling up their sleeves to receive an intentionally harmful injection.

Ahem. It seems to some people that this, too, is completely ridiculous and implausible. Those with such a reaction tend not to bother listening to the evidence and may well get jabbed again.

Anyway, if you’ve already seen this, apologies. Is there anyone who might give it is a listen?

Best wishes
Mike

https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannelChat/40022

'Spikeopathy' does not explain the 'novel' symptoms associated with COVID-19
An investigation into competing alternative explanations
Martin Neil, Jonathan Engler and Jessica Hockett
21.12.2023

" (...)
We reviewed the medical literature and found that most of the papers on covid-19 CT findings actually suggest findings indistinguishable from those associated with influenza or bacterial pneumonia; it appears to be very difficult (or impossible) to reliably differentiate between influenza and bacterial pneumonia and covid-19 on CT scans.

We also reviewed the medical literature to look for supporting evidence relating for ‘happy hypoxia’ and ‘dry lung’ in covid-19 patients. We did not find any compelling evidence reported linking happy hypoxia to covid-19. Neither did the literature confirm that dry lung was strongly diagnostic of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Likewise, many of the papers and reviews we reviewed made no mention of diarrhoea, loss of taste and smell and micro clotting or other ‘blood issues’.

Thus, we do not think that these symptoms can be explained by a single over-arching cause, that of a novel spikeopathy mechanism associated with SARS-CoV-2. We therefore believe that prior to the “‘pandemic’” many/most covid-19 cases would have been diagnosed as ‘ordinary’ influenza and bacterial pneumonia cases, as this is the most likely mechanism that explains the evidence reported in the medical literature.

None of the symptoms attributed to SARS-CoV-2 need be explainable by spikeopthy, except for those cases where blood problems, happy hypoxia and dry lung and diarrhoea were observed, either more frequently or severely. But even here there are alternate explanations.
(...)."

https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com/p/a-closer-look-at-spikeopathy-as-the

https://open.substack.com/pub/pharmafiles/p/kaboom-renowned-neurologist-and-thai

The novelty isn’t that experts have spoken out about multiple mechanisms of toxicity but that this has been, apparently, shown on a main TV channel in Thailand.
Given the degree of control over main media through the last four plus years, I’m not inclined to interpret this as anything but deliberate. Why & why now, I do not know.

Best wishes
Mike