Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
https://youtu.be/um-DJfWmBnA
This is funny. The leader of the Dream Team official perpetrator-appointed crusader against tyranny.
Best wishes
Mike
This is funny. The leader of the Dream Team official perpetrator-appointed crusader against tyranny.
Best wishes
Mike
YouTube
GOLIATH SLAYER B WEINSTEIN TAKES ON THE DEEP STATE LIVE!
SubscribeStar: https://www.subscribestar.com/alistair-williams
PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/alistairwilliams316
MERCH STORE https://www.godsavethestream17.com/
TELEGRAM - https://t.me/alistairwilliams
lOCALS! - https://alistairwilliams.locals.com/
PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/alistairwilliams316
MERCH STORE https://www.godsavethestream17.com/
TELEGRAM - https://t.me/alistairwilliams
lOCALS! - https://alistairwilliams.locals.com/
Forwarded from Suavek
The Overton Window and Stupidity
As far as the measures taken at that time are concerned. Simply talking about the disproportionate nature of the measures taken at the time is misleading. Compared to what danger should these measures have been proportionate or disproportionate? Against nothing? Here many are simply moving within the Overton window, which was determined by the perpetrators and which is ridiculously small. The whole health threat was 100% made up back then. Therefore, any conversation about the proportionality of the measures taken at that time is an insult to human intellect.
Through the constant repetition of the lie, we seem to lose sight of what is obvious and obvious. This is probably the most common type of idiocy. Weinstein's bandanas intentionally encourage us to make this exact mistake : He wants to turn us into idiots. The script probably came from a CIA psychologist.
As far as the measures taken at that time are concerned. Simply talking about the disproportionate nature of the measures taken at the time is misleading. Compared to what danger should these measures have been proportionate or disproportionate? Against nothing? Here many are simply moving within the Overton window, which was determined by the perpetrators and which is ridiculously small. The whole health threat was 100% made up back then. Therefore, any conversation about the proportionality of the measures taken at that time is an insult to human intellect.
Through the constant repetition of the lie, we seem to lose sight of what is obvious and obvious. This is probably the most common type of idiocy. Weinstein's bandanas intentionally encourage us to make this exact mistake : He wants to turn us into idiots. The script probably came from a CIA psychologist.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Rowan Atkinson, actor ("Mr. Bean") and electrical/electronics engineer, on freedom of expression.
90 minutes of standing ovation, please.
90 minutes of standing ovation, please.
...
Simpsonwood Scandal: How an ‘Absolutely Catastrophic’ Autism Link Was Covered Up by Health Authorities
“Simpsonwood was effectively a highly-secret meeting between representatives of federal agencies and vaccine experts to cover up the fact that they had discovered a highly-significant link between exposure to thimerosal in the hepatitis b vaccine and autism,” shared Andrew Wakefield.
“And they did do a vaxed/unvaxed study, a comparison of those who received a thimerosal-containing vaccine versus those who did not. And there was a sevenfold [7.6] increased risk of autism in those who received the vaccine,” he relayed.
“And what they did then was to fudge the data — to take out the comparison unvaccinated group and to present the data as saying that there is no link between thimerosal and autism,” Wakefield attested.
“But then they went on, obviously, to remove it slowly — recommendations ... And it was all done not to protect the children. This is the key point. It was done to protect the reputations and the credibility of the vaccine regulators.”
Hear more from Andrew Wakefield on #CHDTV:
https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/the-simpsonwood-scandal-with-dr-andrew-wakefield/
Simpsonwood Scandal: How an ‘Absolutely Catastrophic’ Autism Link Was Covered Up by Health Authorities
“Simpsonwood was effectively a highly-secret meeting between representatives of federal agencies and vaccine experts to cover up the fact that they had discovered a highly-significant link between exposure to thimerosal in the hepatitis b vaccine and autism,” shared Andrew Wakefield.
“And they did do a vaxed/unvaxed study, a comparison of those who received a thimerosal-containing vaccine versus those who did not. And there was a sevenfold [7.6] increased risk of autism in those who received the vaccine,” he relayed.
“And what they did then was to fudge the data — to take out the comparison unvaccinated group and to present the data as saying that there is no link between thimerosal and autism,” Wakefield attested.
“But then they went on, obviously, to remove it slowly — recommendations ... And it was all done not to protect the children. This is the key point. It was done to protect the reputations and the credibility of the vaccine regulators.”
Hear more from Andrew Wakefield on #CHDTV:
https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/the-simpsonwood-scandal-with-dr-andrew-wakefield/
💯1
Andrew Wakefield Confronts Twitter “Fact-check” Smears and the Infamous Lancet Paper
The Lancet alleged Andrew Wakefield’s 1998 paper concluded MMR vaccines cause autism.
“So not only did I not say that, but we said actually quite the opposite,” responded Wakefield. The paper stated, “This does not prove an association.”
“Things have changed,” he stated, “because I now do believe sincerely that [the] MMR vaccine causes autism. Why? Because ... the CDC, to their credit, tested that hypothesis [autism-vaccine link], and then, having found that it was exactly right in their study, they covered it up, destroyed the documents,” Wakefield detailed.
“And 14 years later, William Thompson [senior CDC scientist] came forward, confessed that he could no longer live with this knowledge, and admitted to the fraud.”
Hear more from Andrew Wakefield on the episode that garnered a lot of attention on #CHDTV:
https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/the-simpsonwood-scandal-with-dr-andrew-wakefield/
The Lancet alleged Andrew Wakefield’s 1998 paper concluded MMR vaccines cause autism.
“So not only did I not say that, but we said actually quite the opposite,” responded Wakefield. The paper stated, “This does not prove an association.”
“Things have changed,” he stated, “because I now do believe sincerely that [the] MMR vaccine causes autism. Why? Because ... the CDC, to their credit, tested that hypothesis [autism-vaccine link], and then, having found that it was exactly right in their study, they covered it up, destroyed the documents,” Wakefield detailed.
“And 14 years later, William Thompson [senior CDC scientist] came forward, confessed that he could no longer live with this knowledge, and admitted to the fraud.”
Hear more from Andrew Wakefield on the episode that garnered a lot of attention on #CHDTV:
https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/the-simpsonwood-scandal-with-dr-andrew-wakefield/
live.childrenshealthdefense.org
The Simpsonwood Scandal With Dr. Andrew Wakefield
Joined by Dr. Andrew Wakefield, Michael Kane walks viewers through a straightforward explanation of aspects of vaccination that threaten individual health an...
...
The censorship of vaccine damage
"Truth in Science: the Right to Know and the Freedom to Decide"—3rd International Public Conference on Vaccination
By Nataliya V. Schetchikova, PhD, Staff Writer
(Reprinted from the February 2003 issue of the Journal of the American Chiropractic Association)
A censored website / Please just ignore the Google warning and click on :
http://www.whale.to/a/aca.html
Join 👉 https://t.me/QueueForBrain/13889
The censorship of vaccine damage
"Truth in Science: the Right to Know and the Freedom to Decide"—3rd International Public Conference on Vaccination
By Nataliya V. Schetchikova, PhD, Staff Writer
(Reprinted from the February 2003 issue of the Journal of the American Chiropractic Association)
A censored website / Please just ignore the Google warning and click on :
http://www.whale.to/a/aca.html
Join 👉 https://t.me/QueueForBrain/13889
The so-called “monitoring” involves the evaluation of statistics carried out in-house, the mathematical principles of which were invented by the pharmaceutical industry itself. One example of many: The difference between reported and actual vaccine damage. The benefit-risk ratio is calculated on such an extremely mathematically incorrect basis. This is what they call “surveillance.” If the calculation principle is fundamentally wrong, then the result can never be correct. Added to this is the fact that the supposedly independent external controls are actually self-control/self-monitoring.
This would be true even if you monitor vaccine damage for 100 years. The result will always be the same.
This would be true even if you monitor vaccine damage for 100 years. The result will always be the same.
Dr. Mike Yeadon writes two related messages on Telegram on February 8th, 2024 about the toxicity mechanisms of pseudo-“vaccinations”:
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannelChat/36463
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannelChat/36464
Please see below 👇🏿
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannelChat/36463
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannelChat/36464
Please see below 👇🏿
Telegram
Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel in Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel Chat
Dear all,
You may have seen videos I’ve recorded where I’ve outlined some of the to-me obviously intentional harms built into the alleged vaccines.
I’ve been on tiresome, dozens of people commenting email threads. These are the bane of my current existence…
You may have seen videos I’ve recorded where I’ve outlined some of the to-me obviously intentional harms built into the alleged vaccines.
I’ve been on tiresome, dozens of people commenting email threads. These are the bane of my current existence…
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
Dear all,
You may have seen videos I’ve recorded where I’ve outlined some of the to-me obviously intentional harms built into the alleged vaccines.
I’ve been on tiresome, dozens of people commenting email threads. These are the bane of my current existence because they’re not email lists from which you can ask to be removed. No, they’re reply to all fests. And they never stop. I get sometimes dozens of emails daily. I learn to delete them, lest I be tempted to reply, perpetuating the torture.
Today, one person questioned whether the harms were really deliberate. After slapping my forehead, I typed this. You may find it useful in case anyone accuses you of perpetuating misinformation or conspiracy theory.
Best wishes
Mike
Dear all,
I have a different yet complimentary point, and I have made it before. Somehow, it has not landed.
I am a card carrying trained mechanistic toxicologist (as well as a biochemist, at least, that’s what my degree certificate says).
More relevantly, I have over 30 years experience leading new drug design teams across the disciplines.
Over the life of the pharmaceutical industry, we have collectively learned a great deal what kind of chemical and biochemical structures confer what kinds of safety and toxicity risks. We still miss things, especially when they’re not understood and all we have is harms leading to abandonment of research projects or even withdrawal of launched products. Sometimes, board level executives still don’t withdraw harmful products if they think there’s some slight or arguable uncertainty & if they think they can get away with it. Thalidomide for example was sold in Spain deep into the 1970s, 15 years after it was unequivocally known to be a teratogen in humans. Merck didn’t withdraw their COX2 inhibitor until it was so obvious that they were more or less going to get caught. Other times, companies behaved well.
Equally, we have learned what kinds of design features confer good or poor absorption, low or high plasma protein binding, fast or slow oxidative or conjugative metabolic clearance of drugs via which pathways (hepatic to stool, renal to urine, etc). Drug disposition is perhaps the best understood to the extent there are AI systems which a century of medicinal chemistry & drug metabolism data has fed.
Toxicology is much less well understood by the industry broadly, but students of the specialist field almost all of the well understood mechanisms of toxicity. Things like aspirin, paracetamol, paraquat, rotenone, masked anilines, certain free radical generators, planar polyaromatic hydrocarbons, etc etc. I’ve forgotten so many.
One classic example was dioxin release at Seveso, Italy, which resulted in widespread harms from halogenated biphenyls, which injure us via the aryl hydrocarbon receptor, a nuclear factor controlling expression or repression of numerous genes. The underlying biology is extremely complex and I don’t believe we can claim to understand it. We’re not even sure what the endogenous ligands are.
In one project in industry in which I was lead biologist, I noticed two chemistry colleagues had developed unusual facial rashes. I always pored over chemical structures, and noticed a plausible similarity between part of the new molecules that were being made & tested for this program and those industrial pollutants involved in the Italian accident. Sure enough, they had chloracne and it became a major incident, which we solved, killing the project (obviously) and teaching the industry worldwide to avoid close-in analogues.
So when I looked at the purported vaccines, I detected at least three distinct mechanisms of toxicity. I assure you, not one of those features would have remained in molecules in the research teams armoury after the first project meeting. It wouldn’t need to be me leading it. Any of my senior staff would see the very obvious safety risks. My peers in industry would also know of them. I’ve talked about them in interviews, pieces to camera and affidavits.
You may have seen videos I’ve recorded where I’ve outlined some of the to-me obviously intentional harms built into the alleged vaccines.
I’ve been on tiresome, dozens of people commenting email threads. These are the bane of my current existence because they’re not email lists from which you can ask to be removed. No, they’re reply to all fests. And they never stop. I get sometimes dozens of emails daily. I learn to delete them, lest I be tempted to reply, perpetuating the torture.
Today, one person questioned whether the harms were really deliberate. After slapping my forehead, I typed this. You may find it useful in case anyone accuses you of perpetuating misinformation or conspiracy theory.
Best wishes
Mike
Dear all,
I have a different yet complimentary point, and I have made it before. Somehow, it has not landed.
I am a card carrying trained mechanistic toxicologist (as well as a biochemist, at least, that’s what my degree certificate says).
More relevantly, I have over 30 years experience leading new drug design teams across the disciplines.
Over the life of the pharmaceutical industry, we have collectively learned a great deal what kind of chemical and biochemical structures confer what kinds of safety and toxicity risks. We still miss things, especially when they’re not understood and all we have is harms leading to abandonment of research projects or even withdrawal of launched products. Sometimes, board level executives still don’t withdraw harmful products if they think there’s some slight or arguable uncertainty & if they think they can get away with it. Thalidomide for example was sold in Spain deep into the 1970s, 15 years after it was unequivocally known to be a teratogen in humans. Merck didn’t withdraw their COX2 inhibitor until it was so obvious that they were more or less going to get caught. Other times, companies behaved well.
Equally, we have learned what kinds of design features confer good or poor absorption, low or high plasma protein binding, fast or slow oxidative or conjugative metabolic clearance of drugs via which pathways (hepatic to stool, renal to urine, etc). Drug disposition is perhaps the best understood to the extent there are AI systems which a century of medicinal chemistry & drug metabolism data has fed.
Toxicology is much less well understood by the industry broadly, but students of the specialist field almost all of the well understood mechanisms of toxicity. Things like aspirin, paracetamol, paraquat, rotenone, masked anilines, certain free radical generators, planar polyaromatic hydrocarbons, etc etc. I’ve forgotten so many.
One classic example was dioxin release at Seveso, Italy, which resulted in widespread harms from halogenated biphenyls, which injure us via the aryl hydrocarbon receptor, a nuclear factor controlling expression or repression of numerous genes. The underlying biology is extremely complex and I don’t believe we can claim to understand it. We’re not even sure what the endogenous ligands are.
In one project in industry in which I was lead biologist, I noticed two chemistry colleagues had developed unusual facial rashes. I always pored over chemical structures, and noticed a plausible similarity between part of the new molecules that were being made & tested for this program and those industrial pollutants involved in the Italian accident. Sure enough, they had chloracne and it became a major incident, which we solved, killing the project (obviously) and teaching the industry worldwide to avoid close-in analogues.
So when I looked at the purported vaccines, I detected at least three distinct mechanisms of toxicity. I assure you, not one of those features would have remained in molecules in the research teams armoury after the first project meeting. It wouldn’t need to be me leading it. Any of my senior staff would see the very obvious safety risks. My peers in industry would also know of them. I’ve talked about them in interviews, pieces to camera and affidavits.
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
No one has tapped me on the shoulder to explain why I’ve got it all wrong. Several very clever people have independently said overlapping things, such as Professor Sucharit Bakdhi.
Others with great expertise in intracellular signalling and molecular biology quickly spotted at least two other, clearly designed-in, obviously intentional, mechanisms of toxicity (to do with nuclear localisation signals).
That makes at least five, independent, starkly obvious, in-the-structure harms. Based on at least some of these, I and doctor in Germany, Wolfgang Wodarg, wrote an open letter to the European Medicines Agency, prior to any such product being granted an Emergency Use Authorization. We listed several concerns for the kinds of harms we expected and feared would follow from mass administration to the population. In response to this letter, the media fell upon us both, we were smeared by our national broadcasters and pushed off numerous online platforms. Within weeks of commencement of mass rollouts, all but one of our concerns were starkly obvious. The last one had to do with reproductive toxicity, which duly rolled in a year later.
If you choose to disregard this testimony, I don’t know what to say.
Best wishes
Mike
Others with great expertise in intracellular signalling and molecular biology quickly spotted at least two other, clearly designed-in, obviously intentional, mechanisms of toxicity (to do with nuclear localisation signals).
That makes at least five, independent, starkly obvious, in-the-structure harms. Based on at least some of these, I and doctor in Germany, Wolfgang Wodarg, wrote an open letter to the European Medicines Agency, prior to any such product being granted an Emergency Use Authorization. We listed several concerns for the kinds of harms we expected and feared would follow from mass administration to the population. In response to this letter, the media fell upon us both, we were smeared by our national broadcasters and pushed off numerous online platforms. Within weeks of commencement of mass rollouts, all but one of our concerns were starkly obvious. The last one had to do with reproductive toxicity, which duly rolled in a year later.
If you choose to disregard this testimony, I don’t know what to say.
Best wishes
Mike
Forwarded from ZEITGEIST
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
"nie wieder" war bereits und ihr wart Teil von "schon wieder" und fast alle machten mit 😐
https://t.me/geistderzeit
https://t.me/geistderzeit
Forwarded from Hermann Ploppa
Was tun sich diese ganzen Parteigründungen so schwer? So viel Einfallslosigkeit ist kaum zu verstehen. Ich würde eine Partei aufmachen, die den sofortigen Austritt aus der NATO, und EU fordert und den baldigst möglichen Eintritt in den BRICS-Block, damit wir eurasische Zukunftsoptionen sichern und den Regierungschefs der Dritten Welt wieder gerade und mit gutem Gewissen in die Augen schauen können. Die deutschen Souveränitätsrechte, die an die EU ohne demokratische Legitimation abgegeben wurden, gehen an uns zurück. Große Konzerne und Finanzhäuser werden hier in Deutschland besteuert, und zwar mindestens auf dem Niveau der Besteuerung des Mittelstands. Die regionale Wirtschaft wird wieder massiv gestärkt. Ich weiß noch mehr. Aber warum bin ich der Einzige, der in diesen Zielen einen Sinn sieht?
An automatic translation of the above message from Hermann Ploppa:
................................................ .................................
Why are all these party formations so difficult? It's hard to understand so much lack of imagination. I would open a party that calls for an immediate exit from NATO and the EU and entry into the BRICS bloc as soon as possible so that we can secure Eurasian future options and once again look the leaders of the Third World straight in the eye and with a clear conscience . The German sovereign rights, which were handed over to the EU without democratic legitimacy, will be returned to us. Large corporations and financial institutions are taxed here in Germany, at least at the level of the taxation of medium-sized businesses. The regional economy will be massively strengthened again. I know even more. But why am I the only one who sees meaning in these goals?
................................................ .................................
Why are all these party formations so difficult? It's hard to understand so much lack of imagination. I would open a party that calls for an immediate exit from NATO and the EU and entry into the BRICS bloc as soon as possible so that we can secure Eurasian future options and once again look the leaders of the Third World straight in the eye and with a clear conscience . The German sovereign rights, which were handed over to the EU without democratic legitimacy, will be returned to us. Large corporations and financial institutions are taxed here in Germany, at least at the level of the taxation of medium-sized businesses. The regional economy will be massively strengthened again. I know even more. But why am I the only one who sees meaning in these goals?
Forwarded from Gas axe
(5) GMO Animals? European Medicines Agency (EMA) Pushes Plasmid DNA Vaccines for Veterinary Use
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/gmo-animals-european-medicines-agency
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/gmo-animals-european-medicines-agency
Substack
GMO Animals? European Medicines Agency (EMA) Pushes Plasmid DNA Vaccines for Veterinary Use
What could possibly go wrong?
😢2
...
Here you can read how Putin makes fun of alleged climate change.
NUKE BOMBSHELL! Tucker Carlson’s Exclusive Interview With President Vladimir Putin In Moscow
– Full Transcript Released
https://bestnewshere.com/nuke-bombshell-tucker-carlsons-exclusive-interview-with-president-vladimir-putin-in-moscow-full-transcript-released/
Join 👉 https://t.me/QueueForBrain/13901
Here you can read how Putin makes fun of alleged climate change.
NUKE BOMBSHELL! Tucker Carlson’s Exclusive Interview With President Vladimir Putin In Moscow
– Full Transcript Released
https://bestnewshere.com/nuke-bombshell-tucker-carlsons-exclusive-interview-with-president-vladimir-putin-in-moscow-full-transcript-released/
Join 👉 https://t.me/QueueForBrain/13901
BestNewsHere
NUKE BOMBSHELL! Tucker Carlson’s Exclusive Interview With President Vladimir Putin In Moscow – Full Transcript Released
Share this post:Share on X (Twitter)Share on FacebookShare on RedditShare on TelegramShare on LinkedIn“In a stunning turn of events, renowned journalist Tucker Carlson has embarked on a mission of historic proportions. With the fate of Ukraine and the world…
Forwarded from Prof.Dr.Stefan Hockertz Original Wissenschaft
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
FEHLGEBURTEN seit 2021 bis jetzt ‼️
"Frühe Fehlgeburten (unter der 12. Schwangerschaftswoche) unterliegen – im Gegensatz zu Totgeburten – nicht der standesamtlichen Meldepflicht. Daher
können weder konkrete Angaben zur Anzahl von Fehlgeburten noch zu ihrem Verhältnis zur Anzahl aller Geburten gemacht werden. Es liegen darüber hinaus auch keine Daten vor, wie viele
Betroffene in welcher Schwangerschaftswoche ihr Kind verloren haben."
"Was ich nicht sehe existiert nicht 🙈"
AUFARBEITUNG JETZT ‼️‼️‼️
https://t.me/hebammejassy2
"Frühe Fehlgeburten (unter der 12. Schwangerschaftswoche) unterliegen – im Gegensatz zu Totgeburten – nicht der standesamtlichen Meldepflicht. Daher
können weder konkrete Angaben zur Anzahl von Fehlgeburten noch zu ihrem Verhältnis zur Anzahl aller Geburten gemacht werden. Es liegen darüber hinaus auch keine Daten vor, wie viele
Betroffene in welcher Schwangerschaftswoche ihr Kind verloren haben."
"Was ich nicht sehe existiert nicht 🙈"
AUFARBEITUNG JETZT ‼️‼️‼️
https://t.me/hebammejassy2