Queue for brain
197 subscribers
4.03K photos
3.43K videos
44 files
11K links
My Substack : suavek1.substack.com
Download Telegram
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
https://open.substack.com/pub/sashalatypova/p/how-to-fake-pandemics-part-2-i-do

Another fine piece from Sasha Latypova.

May I direct your attention to the comments?

There’s a very long comment from one gentleman about the PCR tests.

I’ve taken the liberty for the first time of writing a long comment myself on a topic I’ve never seen discussed: the methods used to claim to detect viral proteins and antibodies to said viral proteins in samples from humans.

I outline how such methods could be developed. Its been a considerable period since I last did work like this, but unlike PCR, which didn’t exist, at least as a routine analytical approach for PhD students when I was doing my own PhD research, I did develop & use immunoassays to measure things including circulating antibodies to things, so I know how easily they can be subverted (usually by accident of course!).

I believe that these test methods could easily have been subverted. My assumption is that they have been, just as the PCR based tests were. Why would they not be?

So a claim that “there must have been a spreading virus because viral proteins were detected at such and such a date & location” or “there must have been a contagious new virus because antibodies to parts of the virus have been extremely widely reported” are both nonsense until the methods used to detect the things claimed have been pored over and shown unequivocally to be correctly set up & beyond reproach.

Anyone believe that latter scenario is likely? Or might we again detect the hidden hand of deception?

Best wishes
Mike
...
My comment on Sasha Latypova's article, linked in the message:
This is work whose importance cannot be overstated. Please don't miss out on reading it.
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
https://off-guardian.org/2024/02/02/uks-online-safety-act-officially-grants-msm-permission-to-publish-lies/

Apparently, credentialed media organisations & individuals and exempted from this new law. Astonishing. You can deduce who they really want to shut up.

I doubt they’d bother to imprison me for my factually correct opinions which are nevertheless classifiable as “malinformation” or otherwise defined as an offence in this “Online SAFETY Act” (its always for your safety, isn’t it?). But they might charge me, fine me and threaten me. I’m not sure it would make any difference at this point.

Best wishes
Mike
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
Sent to me via American colleagues.
A most odd note.
I can’t recall ever seeing anything like it.
You decide if it’s significant.
The use of the word curfew wouldn’t immediately spring to mind, I suggest, as a reason a renal dialysis patient might not be able to get in for their life-maintaining procedure.
Not unless the author knew something was afoot. Then it definitely would occur to you.
Best wishes
Mike
"For your safety"
Forwarded from Lawyers of Light
I'm not quite sure why the SA judgement of August last year is doing the rounds again. We did post about it on the channel last October, and the meaning of it. You can find the post here

So again to clarify:

The judgment was handed down in the Pretoria High Court on 17 August 2023

The National Department of Health were compelled to provide access to the COVID-19 vaccine procurement contracts

In para 5.5 of the Pfizer contract it states, "Purchaser further acknowledges that the long-term effects and efficacy of the vaccine are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the vaccine that are not currently known."

"The Purchaser" was the government

All statements of 'safe and effective' by the government were a fabrication and deliberate misinformation giving the disclaimer in the contracts

Likely all governments throughout the world signed similar contracts, with similar disclaimers. Therefore all statements of 'safe and effective' by all governments were a fabrication and deliberate misinformation.

The contract can be downloaded from here https://healthjusticeinitiative.org.za/pandemic-transparency/#contracts
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Mittlerweile sind das schon Meldungen wie aus einem Horrorfilm…
In den Impfstoffen sind nicht nur DNA-Verunreinigungen, was an sich schon schlimm genug ist, jetzt hat man auch noch „Spinnenseidenproteine“ gefunden, die Lähmungen bis Wahnsinn auslösen können!‼️

Fremd DNA in Impfstoffen
Biologie Professorin Dr. hum. biol.
Ulrike Kämmerer klärt auf...


In diese sogenannte "Impfung", wurde eine Antibiotikaresestenz eingebaut, dass wussten ja schon die meisten von uns....
Doch jetzt haltet euch fest, es sind jetzt auch Spinnenseidenproteine gefunden worden, das ist das Protein, welches die Spinnen brauchen, um ihre Netze zu weben...
Es entstehen im menschlichen Körper, Amyloidplaques,
dieses lähmt und die Geimpften dieser Chargen, bekommen Alzheimer und werden im schlimmsten Fall "verrückt" (ähnlichkeit zu BSE) , wegen diesem Zeug...

Aber seht und hört selbst
..etwas kompliziert, aber nach einer Zeit geht es.. 🙈

👉Hier das ganze Video

Danke für die Zusendung 😊😉

TEILEN

https://t.me/Klartext2021Gemeinsam
VIDEO IN GERMAN / Adjustable subtitles

Omega-3 against dementia / Prof. Dr. med. Clemens von Schacky

Omega - 3 containing foods :

Fish: haddock, tuna, mackerel, salmon, trout, sardine.
Cooking oils: rapeseed oil, hemp oil, linseed oil,
walnut oil, perilla oil, chia oil.
Vegetables: Brussels sprouts, spinach, beans, avocado.
Nuts and seeds: chia seeds, flax seeds, walnuts, almonds.
Soy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBwnp_5xviY

Attention: The balanced omega-6 to omega-3 ratio is important :

https://gesundheitsvergleich-deutschland.de/blogs/kaufratgeber/omega3
👍1
Forwarded from Andrew Bridgen
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Food is a necessity, and food security is one of the hottest topics at the moment, with food price inflation running at 10%.

I urged the Government to have a debate on UK farmers, food security, and food production.

https://t.me/ABridgen
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
BOMBSHELL: Scientist Confirms “Fluoride Lobby” Has Infiltrated the WHO

Dr. Philippe Grandjean: "The WHO asked me to help them develop what they called an environmental health criteria document on fluoride. So I drafted that document that reviewed the sources of fluoride in the environment, including drinking water, the animal data, and the epidemiology. [...] And they inserted changes in my draft indicating that fluoride could perhaps be toxic, but only at immense concentrations. I protested and said that in accordance with the scientific documentation, it would be wrong to insert the word immense."

"And so WHO published a document, without my name because I'd asked to have my name stricken, but then they inserted some other colleague's name as the author of the draft, which is, of course, erroneous. But that was what WHO felt was necessary in order to protect the interests of water fluoridation."


Full video: https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/dr-philipe-grandjean-fluoride/
Please remember that The Atlantic is in the hands of the establishment. The facts are never presented truthfully here. Nevertheless, this article seems interesting.

Meet the New Luddites

PART -1

Activists are organizing to combat generative AI and other technologies—and reclaiming a misunderstood label in the process.
By Brian Merchant

https://archive.is/NKElR#selection-667.0-683.14

Join 👉 https://t.me/QueueForBrain
...
Meet the New Luddites

PART - 2


https://archive.is/NKElR#selection-667.0-683.14

Activists are organizing to combat generative AI and other technologies—and reclaiming a misunderstood label in the process.

In 2023, the biggest story in tech was the rise of OpenAI and Silicon Valley’s embrace of generative AI. This year, the technology may grow only further entrenched: OpenAI is attempting to make its flagship product, ChatGPT, a stickier part of daily life with the launch of a new app store, and the company has inked deals with institutions such as Axel Springer and Arizona State University to broaden its reach. But in contrast to many previous tech trends, this story includes a grassroots movement amassing to resist the change. Many of those who have joined proudly embrace the mantle of Luddite. Yes, the industry continues on its march, collecting huge investments to rapidly accelerate the development of this controversial technology. But the events of the past several months have demonstrated that, on some key fronts, the Luddites are winning.

The first Luddites were artisans and cloth workers in England who, at the onset of the Industrial Revolution, protested the way factory owners used machinery to undercut their status and wages. Contrary to popular belief, they did not dislike technology; most were skilled technicians.

At the time, some entrepreneurs had started to deploy automated machines that unskilled workers—many of them children—could use to churn out cheap, low-quality goods. And while the price of garments fell and the industrial economy boomed, hundreds of thousands of working people fell into poverty. When petitioning Parliament and appealing to the industrialists for minimum wages and basic protections failed, many organized under the banner of a Robin Hood–like figure, Ned Ludd, and took up hammers to smash the industrialists’ machines. They became the Luddites.

The government mobilized what was then the largest-ever domestic military occupation of England to crush the uprising—the Luddites had won the approval of the working class, and were celebrated in popular songs and poems—and then passed a law that made machine-breaking a capital offense. They painted Luddites as “deluded” and backward. Ever since, Luddite has been a derogatory word—shorthand for one who blindly hates or doesn’t understand technology.

That’s starting to change.

One way to consider the Luddites, new and old, is as a movement seeking to widen the scope of who gets to participate in technological development. To more radically democratize the creation of technologies, in a manner that Silicon Valley pays only lip service to. And if the Luddites continue apace, encouraging more of us to participate, to become Luddites too—to not merely be consumers or users of technology, but shapers—they might not even need the hammers.


Follow 👉 https://t.me/QueueForBrain
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Tourist shocked by what he sees in Paris.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Former Pharma insider tells Tucker Carlson that the true goal of pharma ads on TV is not to sell drugs but to BUY OFF the news media.

PART 1


The interview presents us with a false picture of reality. It acts as if the pharmaceutical industry wants to take power over our countries. I am convinced that this industry merely serves as a battering ram for the US military-financial complex.

Join 👉 https://t.me/QueueForBrain